سابِق|تال

Wetland mapping of Donting Lake Basin based on time-series MODIS data and object-oriented method

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    School of Geosciences and Info-physic, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

  • Email：251zhangmeng@sina.com
  • Introduction：张猛(1987—　)，男，博士研究生，研究方向为环境遥感。E-mail：251zhangmeng@sina.com
ZHANG Meng,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    School of Geosciences and Info-physic, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

  • Email：ynzeng@mail.csu.edu.cn
  • Introduction：曾永年(1959—　)，男，教授，研究方向为遥感与地理信息系统及其环境变化。E-mail：ynzeng@mail.csu.edu.cn
ZENG Yongnian*,  
  • Affiliation：

    School of Geosciences and Info-physic, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

ZHU Yongsen

ملخص

The mapping of large-scale wetlands involves time-series coarse spatial resolution remote sensing data and pixel-based methods, such as the decision tree and threshold techniques. However, few studies use low spatial-resolution images(such as moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS)) and object-oriented methods to extract information from large-area wetlands. Although spatial resolution has some disadvantages, the coarse spatial resolution image has high time resolution, considerable spectral information, and low cost. Therefore, the high temporal characteristics of coarse image and object-oriented method can be used to extract wetland information over a large area, such as basins and continents. In this study, the object-oriented method and time-series MODIS Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) data are utilized to map the wetland of the Dongting Lake Basin. The time-series MODIS EVI images are smoothed using the double logistic function fitting method of TIMESAT software package, which is based on MATLAB. Meanwhile, the phenology indices are calculated from the time-series MODIS EVI data. Subsequently, the best combination of images and optimal segmentation scale are determined with the JBh distance and Johnson index. Wetland mapping is then verified using a random tree classifier based on the segmented images. In addition, validation data are derived from the visual interpretation of Landsat 8 images, Google Earth, and land-use data. To verify the classification effect of the object-oriented classification method on coarse spatial resolution images, the pixel-based method is also utilized to classify the best combination of images and is then compared with the upper method. The phenology of various ground cover types is obviously different, which indicates that they can be used to distinguish different land types, especially vegetation types. Given the image combination of the critical periods (DOY113, DOY145, DOY173, DOY193, DOY241, and DOY289) of vegetation growth and phenology (start of season and length of season), we can determine theJBh(9.143) and JM distances to meet research needs. An optimal segmentation scale parameter (15 pixels of MODIS) is obtained using the Johnson index. Based on object-oriented classification method, the overall accuracy and Kappa coefficient of the random tree classifier are 78.84% and 0.71 respectively. Compared with the object-oriented method, a pixel-based classification method with random tree classifier achieves a lower overall accuracy and Kappa coefficient of 73.05% and 0.67, respectively. In traditional pixel-based analysis, the surrounding pixels contribute a substantial proportion of signals. The object-oriented method analysis utilizes objects instead of pixels, which effectively reduces signals from surrounding pixels by integrating neighborhood information. The object-oriented classification method also reduces the " saltand pepper” effect of mapping heterogeneous landscapes and enhances the accuracy of the analysis. However, large pixels of water still exist, thus causing existing mutual fault points (368 and 228). A total of 237 and 316 pixels of sedge and reed are classified to water and 113 and 128 pixels are classified to mudflat. However, 683 and 502 pixels of paddy are misclassified into dry land and forest. We also obtained higher user accuracy for the whole wetland through the object-oriented classification technique than pixel-based classification method. Both the user and producer accuracies improved to approximately 4.56% and 6.21%, respectively. The user and producer accuracy of wetland categories were approximately 74.75%—88.03% and 78.68%—84.36%, respectively, based on the object-oriented method, which considerably increased compared with pixel-based method except for the user accuracy of the sedge wetland. On the one hand, this finding can be attributed to strong heterogeneity and mixed pixels. On the other hand, the influence of human activity, disturbance, crop prices, and national policy caused an increasingly broken patch of sedge field, thus causing misclassification. The combination of time-series MODIS EVI data and object-oriented method effectively extract wetland information on a watershed scale. It provides a new method and technique for wetland mapping on a large scale, even in a continental range.

مفهوم

time series data;MODIS EVI data;object-oriented method;Random tree;wetland;Dongting Lake Basin

References

  1. 1.
    Chopra R, Verma V K and Sharma P K. 2001. Mapping, monitoring and conservation of Harike wetland ecosystem, Punjab, India, through remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(1): 89–98
  2. 2.
    Corcoran J M, Knight J F and Gallant A L. 2013. Influence of multi-source and multi-temporal remotely sensed and ancillary data on the accuracy of random forest classification of wetlands in northern Minnesota. Remote Sensing, 5(7): 3212–3238
  3. 3.
    Dronova I, Peng G and Wang L. 2011. Object-based analysis and change detection of major wetland cover types and their classification uncertainty during the low water period at Poyang Lake, China. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(12): 3220–3236
  4. 4.
    Dronova I, Gong P, Clinton N E, Wang L, Fu W, Qi S H and Liu Y. 2012. Landscape analysis of wetland plant functional types: the effects of image segmentation scale, vegetation classes and classification methods. Remote Sensing of Environment, 127: 357–369
  5. 5.
    Ghioca-Robrecht D M, Johnston C A and Tulbure M G. 2008. Assessing the use of multiseason QuickBird imagery for mapping invasive species in a Lake Erie coastal Marsh. Wetlands, 28(4): 1028–1039
  6. 6.
    Gong Z N, Lin C, Zhao W J and Cui T X. 2014. Canopy water content estimation for typical emerged plant community using WorldView-2 imagery: a case study in Wild Duck Lake wetland, Beijing. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter, 33(5): 533–545
  7. 7.
    Han X X, Chen X L and Feng L. 2015. Four decades of winter wetland changes in Poyang Lake based on Landsat observations between 1973 and 2013. Remote Sensing of Environment, 156: 426–437
  8. 8.
    Hao P Y, Wang L, Niu Z, Aablikim A, Huang N, Xu S G and Chen F. 2014. The potential of time series merged from Landsat-5 TM and HJ-1 CCD for crop classification: a case study for Bole and Manas counties in Xinjiang, China. Remote Sensing, 6(8): 7610–7631
  9. 9.
    Johnson B and Xie Z X. 2011. Unsupervised image segmentation evaluation and refinement using a multi-scale approach. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66(4): 473–483
  10. 10.
    Jönsson P and Eklundh L. 2004. TIMESAT-a program for analyzing time-series of satellite sensor data. Computers and Geosciences, 30(8): 833–845
  11. 11.
    Kang J, Hou X H, Niu Z, Gao S and Jia K. 2014. Decision tree classification based on fitted phenology parameters from remotely sensed vegetation data. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 30(9): 148–156
  12. 12.
    Kayastha N, Thomas V, Galbraith J and Banskota A. 2012. Monitoring wetland change using inter-annual Landsat time-series data. Wetlands, 32(6): 1149–1162
  13. 13.
    Klemas V. 2013. Remote sensing of emergent and submerged wetlands: an overview. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(18): 6286–6320
  14. 14.
    Laba M, Blair B, Downs R, Monger B, Philpot W, Smith S, Sullivan P and Baveye P C. 2010. Use of textural measurements to map invasive wetland plants in the Hudson River National Estuarine Research Reserve with IKONOS satellite imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(4): 876–886
  15. 15.
    Landmann T, Schramm M, Colditz R R, Dietz A and Dech S. 2010. Wide area wetland mapping in semi-arid Africa using 250-Meter MODIS metrics and topographic variables. Remote Sensing, 2(7): 1751–1766
  16. 16.
    Lane C R, Liu H X, Autrey B C, Anenkhonov O A, Chepinoga V V and Wu Q S. 2014. Improved wetland classification using eight-band high resolution satellite imagery and a hybrid approach. Remote Sensing, 6(12): 12187–12216
  17. 17.
    Lei X, Yang B, Jiang W G, Yang Y P, Kuenzer C and Chen Q. 2012. Vegetation pattern changes and their influencing factors in the East Dongting Lake wetland. Geographical Research, 31(3): 461–470
  18. 18.
    Li X Y, Qin D H, Xiao C D and Chen R. 2011. Progress regarding climate change during recent years. Chinese Science Bulletin, 56(36): 3029–3040
  19. 19.
    Long Y H, Qin J X, He X G and Yang Z. 2015. Wavelet multi-resolution analysis of vegetation dynamic change in Dongting Lake Basin. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70(9): 1491–1502
  20. 20.
    Lv M Z, Sheng L X and Zhang L. 2013. A review on carbon fluxes for typical wetlands in different climates of China. Wetland Science, 11(1): 114–120
  21. 21.
    Mou X J, Liu X T, Yan B X and Cui B S. 2015. Classification system of coastal wetlands in China. Wetland Sicence, 13(1): 19–26
  22. 22.
    Peerbhay K, Mutanga O, Lottering R and Ismail R. 2016. Mapping Solanum mauritianum plant invasions using WorldView-2 imagery and unsupervised random forests. Remote Sensing of Environment, 182: 39–48
  23. 23.
    Pengra B W, Johnston C A and Loveland T R. 2007. Mapping an invasive plant, Phragmites australis, in coastal wetlands using the EO-1 Hyperion hyperspectral sensor. Remote Sensing of Environment, 108(1): 74–81
  24. 24.
    Poulin B, Davranche A and Lefebvre G. 2010. Ecological assessment of Phragmites australis wetlands using multi-season SPOT-5 scenes. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(7): 1602–1609
  25. 25.
    Reschke J and Hüttich C. 2014. Continuous field mapping of Mediterranean wetlands using sub-pixel spectral signatures and multi-temporal Landsat data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 28: 220–229
  26. 26.
    Reschke J and Hüttich C. 2014. Continuous field mapping of Mediterranean wetlands using sub-pixel spectral signatures and multi-temporal Landsat data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 28: 220–229
  27. 27.
    Shi K, Zhang Y L, Zhu G W, Liu X H, Zhou Y Q, Xu H, Qin B Q, Liu G and Li Y M. 2015. Long-term remote monitoring of total suspended matter concentration in Lake Taihu using 250 m MODIS-Aqua data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 164: 43–56
  28. 28.
    Sun P J, Zhang J S, Pan Y Z, Xie D F and Yuan Z M Q. 2016. Temporal-spatial-fusion model for area extraction of paddy rice using multi-temporal remote sensing images. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(2): 328–343
  29. 29.
    Szantoi Z, Escobedo F, Abd-Elrahman A, Smith S and Pearlstine L. 2013. Analyzing fine-scale wetland composition using high resolution imagery and texture features. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 23: 204–212
  30. 30.
    Tian B, Zhou Y X, Thom R M, Diefenderfer H L and Yuan Q. 2015. Detecting wetland changes in Shanghai, China using FORMOSAT and Landsat TM imagery. Journal of Hydrology, 529: 1–10
  31. 31.
    Van Niel T G, Mcvicar T R and Datt B. 2005. On the relationship between training sample size and data dimensionality: Monte Carlo analysis of broadband multi-temporal classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, 98(4): 468–480
  32. 32.
    Wang L, Dronova I, Gong P, Yang W B, Li Y R and Liu Q. 2012. A new time series vegetation-water index of phenological-hydrological trait across species and functional types for Poyang Lake wetland ecosystem. Remote Sensing of Environment, 125: 49–63
  33. 33.
    Wu J S, Liu J Z, Huang X L, Peng J and Li H J. 2012. Automatic identification of irrigation and drainage system in land reclamation area based on object-oriented classification. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 28(8): 25–31
  34. 34.
    Xie D F, Zhang J S, Pan Y Z, Sun P J and Yuan Z M Q. 2015. Fusion of MODIS and Landsat 8 images to generate high spatial-temporal resolution data for mapping autumn crop distribution. Journal of Remote Sensing, 19(5): 791–805
  35. 35.
    Yang Y Z, Chang Y, Hu Y M, Liu M and Li Y H. 2011. Application of small remote sensing satellite constellations for environmental hazards in wetland landscape mapping: taking Liaohe delta, Liaoning province of northeast China as a case. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 22(6): 1552–1558
  36. 36.
    Zhang M and Zeng Y N. 2015. Mapping paddy fields of Dongting Lake area by fusing Landsat and MODIS data. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 31(13): 178–185
  37. 37.
    Zhang S W, Yan F Q, Yu L X, Bu K, Yang J C and Chang L P. 2013. Application of remote sensing technology to wetland research. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 33(11): 1406–1412
  38. 38.
    Zheng Y M, Niu Z G, Gong P, Dai Y J and Shangguan W. 2013. Preliminary estimation of the organic carbon pool in China’s wetlands. Chinese Science Bulletin, 58(6): 662–670
  39. 39.
    Zhou B H, Yin J, Jin B S and Zhu L. 2014. Degradation of Wuchang Lake wetland and its causes during 1980-2010. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(11): 1697–1706

قراءة النص الكامل

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website