Hyperspectral image de-noising and classification with small training samples

  • role: First author第一作者
  • Affiliation:

    College of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China

  • Email:cuibinge@qq.com
  • Introduction:崔宾阁(1979— ),男,副教授,研究方向为高光谱遥感的理论和应用。E-mail:cuibinge@qq.com
CUI Binge,  
  • Affiliation:

    College of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China

MA Xiudan,  
  • Affiliation:

    College of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China

XIE Xiaoyun

ملخص

The fine-grained classification of hyperspectral image with small training samples is a major challenge for all kinds of classifiers. The signal-to-noise ratio of hyperspectral image is usually difficult to improve, and the magnitude of noise has a direct impact on classification results. Thus, noise reduction is one of the most important pretreatment measures for hyperspectral image classification. Employing the strong relevance between adjacent bands of hyperspectral images and the relevance between adjacent pixels in the space, a novel hyperspectral image classification method based on multi-level denoising and filtering is proposed. One two-phase Sparse and Low Rank Matrix Decomposition (SLRMD) method is introduced to remove the noise with high energy. At the first phase, the hyperspectral image is segmented, and each patch will use the SLRMD method to perform noise reduction based on the spectral correlation between the pixels within the same patch. At the second phase, the pixels of all patches will be merged together for noise reduction based on the spectral correlation of the adjacent bands of the hyperspectral image. Secondly, then principal component analysis (PCA) is introduced to remove the noise with low energy. Thirdly, Support Vector Machine (SVM) is used to classify the de-noised and dimension reduced hyperspectral dataset. Finally, guided filter is introduced to remove the " salt and pepper noise” in the classification map. We use the Indian Pines hyperspectral dataset as an example to verify the noise reduction effect of sparse and low rank matrix decomposition methods. The effect of image noise reduction is very obvious, and the bands after noise reduction show very strong correlation. The pixel spectrum of the original image contains a lot of noise information, especially in the first few bands and the last few bands, whereas the pixel spectrum of the low rank image becomes very smooth. The Spectral and Spatial De-Correlation (SSDC) and Local Variance Estimation (LVE) methods were used to evaluate the change of image quality before and after noise reduction. The signal-to-noise ratio of hyperspectral images is significantly improved after low rank matrix decomposition, especially at both ends of the spectral range. Two hyperspectral images, i.e., Indian Pines and University of Pavia, and some related classification methods are used for comparative experiments.The results show that the classification accuracy of our method is 25.85% and 13.2% higher than that of the SVM method, and 6.04% and 5.79% higher than the best method respectively. The two-phase SLRMD method proposed in this paper has better strong noise removal effect than the conventional SLRMD method, and it is more helpful to improve the classification accuracy of hyperspectral image. Moreover, SLRMD, principal component analysis and guided filtering, these three noise reduction and dimension reduction methods are highly complementary, so they should be used together to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of hyperspectral image and make the classification results more natural and smooth.

مفهوم

hyperspectral image classification;feature extraction;small training samples;sparse and low rank;matrix decomposition

References

  1. 1.
    Beck A and Teboulle M. 2009. A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 2(1): 183–202
  2. 2.
    He K M, Sun J and Tang X O. 2010. Guided image filtering//Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Computer Vision. Heraklion, Crete: Springer: 1–14
  3. 3.
    Hughes G. 1968. On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 14(1): 55–63
  4. 4.
    Kang X D, Li S T and Benediktsson J A. 2014a. Spectral-spatial hyperspectral image classification with edge-preserving filtering. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(5): 2666–2677
  5. 5.
    Kang X D, Li S T and Benediktsson J A. 2014b. Feature extraction of hyperspectral images with image fusion and recursive filtering. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(6): 3742–3752
  6. 6.
    Lin Z C, Chen M M and Ma Y. 2009. The Augmented Lagrange Multiplier Method for Exact Recovery of Corrupted Low-Rank Matrices. Technical Report UILU-ENG-09-2215. arXiv: 1009.5055 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.10.010]
  7. 7.
    Liu X F, Bourennane S and Fossati C. 2012. Nonwhite noise reduction in hyperspectral images. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 9(3): 368–372
  8. 8.
    Lu X Q, Wang Y L and Yuan Y. 2013. Graph-regularized low-rank representation for destriping of hyperspectral images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51(7): 4009–4018
  9. 9.
    Tong Q X, Zhang B, Zheng L F. 2006. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing - Principle, Technology and Application. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1–2
  10. 10.
    Wright J, Ganesh A, Rao S and Ma Y. 2009. Robust principal component analysis: exact recovery of corrupted low-rank matrices via convex optimization//Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Vancouver, British Columbia: DBLP: 1–9
  11. 11.
    Xu Y, Wu Z B and Wei Z H. 2015. Spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral image based on low-rank decomposition. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 8(6): 2370–2380
  12. 12.
    Yuan Q Q, Zhang L P and Shen H F. 2012. Hyperspectral image denoising employing a spectral-spatial adaptive total variation model. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(10): 3660–3677
  13. 13.
    Zhang B and Gao L Y. 2011. Hyperspectral Image Classification and Target Detection. Beijing: Science Press: 52–55
  14. 14.
    Zhang H Y, He W, Zhang L P, Shen H F and Yuan Q Q. 2014. Hyperspectral image restoration using low-rank matrix recovery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(8): 4729–4743
  15. 15.
    Zhao Y Q and Yang J X. 2015. Hyperspectral image denoising via sparse representation and low-rank constraint. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(1): 296–308
  16. 16.
    Zou M Y. 2001. Deconvolution and Signal Recovery. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press: 185–189

قراءة النص الكامل

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website