سابِق|تال

Production and validation of FY-3C VIRR total precipitable water products

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Radiometric Calibration and Validation for Environment Satellites, National Satellite Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China

  • Email：hujy@cma.gov.cn
  • Introduction：胡菊旸(1987—　)，女，硕士研究生，研究方向为红外定量遥感的理论和应用。E-mail：hujy@cma.gov.cn
Juyang HU1,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Radiometric Calibration and Validation for Environment Satellites, National Satellite Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China

  • Email：tangsh@cma.gov.cn
  • Introduction：唐世浩(1971—　)，男，研究员，研究方向为卫星遥感相关理论和应用。E-mail：tangsh@cma.gov.cn
Shihao TANG1*,  
  • Affiliation：

    Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, China

Hailei LIU2,  
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Radiometric Calibration and Validation for Environment Satellites, National Satellite Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China

Jing ZHENG1

ملخص

Total Precipitable Water (TPW) products, which are derived from satellite FY-3C Visible and Infrared Radiometer (VIRR) infrared split-window information, have been officially put into operation. High-quality FY-3C TPWs could be used in many fields, such as weather analysis, climate study, and atmospheric correction in land surface remote sensing. The retrieval method of TPW products has only been introduced briefly, and product assessments have yet to be conducted. Thus, we compared the product accuracies and stabilities of MODIS Terra infrared TPWs and radiosonde TPWs. The global distribution of FY-3C VIRR TPW was evaluated and compared with that of MODIS Terra monthly infrared TPW in March 2015. In addition, we selected two months (March to April 2015) of radiosonde TPWs to calculate FY-3C TPW errors and analyze the features of global errors, errors changed with water vapor, error day–night distributions, and error space distributions. At the same time, the same accuracy analyses for MODIS Terra daily TPWs were conducted by comparing them with the same radiosonde TPWs. The results can be used as reference for FY-3C TPW accuracy evaluations. Moreover, monthly RMSEs of FY-3C TPWs from January 2015 to July 2016, as well as monthly RMSEs of MODIS TPWs, were calculated by comparing with radiosonde data. The variations of two time series RMSEs were compared to assess FY-3C TPW stabilities relative to MODIS TPWs. FY-3C VIRR TPW is generally consistent with MODIS monthly TPW in space distribution. The differences between the two TPWs are smaller than 30° S to the south pole and 30° N to the north pole and relatively larger between 30° S and 30° N. The verifications of VIRR TPW, which were conducted by comparing with two-month radiosonde data, show that the bias, RMSE, and correlation coefficient are –0.16 mm, 5.36 mm, and 0.85, respectively, which are slightly better than the errors of MODIS TPWs, except in dry atmosphere (TPW<10 mm). Analyses of errors changed with water vapor indicate that the relative errors of VIRR TPWs are less than 20% when water vapor is more than 30 mm, which is much higher in dry atmosphere. In addition, in dry (TPW<10 mm) and wet (TPW>55 mm) atmospheres, the relative errors of VIRR TPWs are smaller than those of MODIS TPWs, whereas the differences between the two TPWs are small when TPWs are between 30 mm and 50 mm. The performances of VIRR and MODIS TPWs are better at night than at daytime. Moreover, the qualities of VIRR TPW are better than those of MODIS TPWs at daytime but slightly worse at night. Biases of VIRR TPWs mostly sit at ±2 mm. RMSEs are small in middle- and high-latitude areas and large in lower-latitude areas. Furthermore, most biases and RMSEs of VIRR TPWs in the maps are better than those of MODIS TPWs but worse near the coastlines. The mean and standard deviation of 19 VIRR TPW monthly RMSEs are 5.63 and 0.54 mm, whereas those of MODIS TPWs are 6.19 and 1.33 mm, respectively. These data indicate that the qualities of VIRR TPWs are more stable than those of MODIS TPWs. Given their good agreement with radiosonde data and higher precision than MODIS TPWs, FY-3C VIRR TPW products have good accuracies. In addition, FY-3C VIRR TPWs have better stability than MODIS TPWs. With high precision and stable qualities, FY-3C VIRR TPW products have wide application capabilities.

مفهوم

FY-3C/VIRR;infrared split window;total precipitable water;radiosonde;MODIS infrared water vapor product

References

  1. 1.
    Bennartz R and Fischer J. 2001. Retrieval of columnar water vapour over land from backscattered solar radiation using the Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer. Remote Sensing of Environment, 78(3): 274–283
  2. 2.
    Chen S H, Zhao Z, Haase J S, Chen A D and Vandenberghe F. 2008. A study of the characteristics and assimilation of retrieved MODIS total precipitable water data in severe weather simulations. Monthly Weather Review, 136(9): 3608–3628
  3. 3.
    Dong C H, Yang J, Yang Z D, Lu N M, Shi J M, Zhang P, Liu Y J, Cai B and Zhang W J. 2009. An overview of a new Chinese weather satellite FY-3A. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 90(10): 1531–1544
  4. 4.
    Du J Y, Kimball J S and Jones L A. 2015. Satellite microwave retrieval of total precipitable water vapor and surface air temperature over land from AMSR2. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(5): 2520–2531
  5. 5.
    Guan C G, Chen Q Y, Tong H and Wang H. 2008. Experiments and evaluations of global medium range forecast system of T639L60. Meteorological Monthly, 34(6): 11–16 (
  6. 6.
    Guillory A R, Jedlovec G J and Fuelberg H E. 1993. A technique for deriving column-integrated water content using VAS split-window data. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 32(7): 1226–1241
  7. 7.
    Haines S L, Jedlovec G J and Suggs R L. 2004. The GOES Product Generation System. NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Tech. Memo., NASA/TM-2004-213286, Huntsville, Alabama: NASA: 64
  8. 8.
    Held I M and Soden B J. 2000. Water vapor feedback and global warming. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25: 441–475
  9. 9.
    Jedlovec G J. 1987. Determination of atmospheric moisture structure from high resolution MAMS radiance data. Madison: The University of Wisconsin
  10. 10.
    Kaufman Y J and Gao B C. 1992. Remote sensing of water vapor in the near IR from Eos/MODIS. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 30(5): 871–884
  11. 11.
    Kwon E H, Li J, Li J L, Sohn B J and Weisz E. 2012. Use of total precipitable water classification of a priori error and quality control in atmospheric temperature and water vapor sounding retrieval. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 29(2): 263–273
  12. 12.
    Lee Y K, Li Z L, Li J and Schmit T J. 2014. Evaluation of the GOES-R ABI LAP retrieval algorithm using the GOES-13 sounder. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 31(1): 3–19
  13. 13.
    Li J, Wolf W W, Menzel W P, Zhang W J, Huang H L and Achtor T H. 2000. Global soundings of the atmosphere from ATOVS measurements: the algorithm and validation. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 39(8): 1248–1268
  14. 14.
    Liu J M, Liang H, Sun Z A and Zhou X J. 2006. Validation of the moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer precipitable water vapor product using measurements from GPS on the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111(D14): D14103
  15. 15.
    Liu Y C, Chen S H and Chien F C. 2011. Impact of MODIS and AIRS total precipitable water on modifying the vertical shear and Hurricane Emily simulations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 116(D2): D02126
  16. 16.
    Ningombam S S, Jade S, Shrungeshwara T S and Song H J. 2016. Validation of water vapor retrieval from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectro-radiometer (MODIS) in near infrared channels using GPS data over IAO-Hanle, in the trans-Himalayan region. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 137: 76–85
  17. 17.
    Schmit T J, Feltz W F, Menzel W P, Jung J, Noel A P, Heil J N, Nelson J P and Wade G S. 2002. Validation and use of GOES sounder moisture information. Weather and Forecasting, 17(1): 139–154
  18. 18.
    Schulz J, Schluessel P and Grassl H. 1993. Water vapour in the atmospheric boundary layer over oceans from SSM/I measurements. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 14(15): 2773–2789
  19. 19.
    Seemann S W, Li J, Menzel W P and Gumley L E. 2003. Operational retrieval of atmospheric temperature, moisture, and ozone from MODIS infrared radiances. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 42(8): 1072–1091
  20. 20.
    Shi C X and Xie Z H. 2005. Operational method of total precipitable water retrieved from satellite multi-channels’ infrared data. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 24(4): 304–308 (
  21. 21.
    Sobrino J A, Raissouni N, Simarro J, Nerry F and Petitcolin F. 1999. Atmospheric water vapor content over land surfaces derived from the AVHRR data: application to the Iberian Peninsula. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37(3): 1425–1434
  22. 22.
    Suggs R J, Jedlovec G J and Guillory A R. 1998. Retrieval of geophysical parameters from GOES: evaluation of a split-window technique. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 37(10): 1205–1227
  23. 23.
    Trenberth K E, Fasullo J and Smith L. 2005. Trends and variability in column-integrated atmospheric water vapor. Climate Dynamics, 24(7/8): 741–758
  24. 24.
    Wagner T, Beirle S, Grzegorski M and Platt U. 2006. Global trends (1996-2003) of total column precipitable water observed by Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) on ERS-2 and their relation to near-surface temperature. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111(D12): D12102
  25. 25.
    Xu H L, Xu N and Hu X Q. 2014. Inter-calibration of infrared bands of FY-3C MERSI and VIRR using hyperspectral sensor CrIS and IASI//Proceedings of SPIE 9264, Earth Observing Missions and Sensors: development, Implementation, and Characterization. Beijing, China: SPIE, 9264: 92640B [DOI: 10.1117/12.2069581]
  26. 26.
    Xu N, Chen L, Hu X Q, Zhang L Y and Zhang P. 2014. Assessment and correction of on-orbit radiometric calibration for FY-3 VIRR thermal infrared channels. Remote Sensing, 6(4): 2884–2897
  27. 27.
    Yang H and Yang Z D. 2006. A modified land surface temperature split window retrieval algorithm and its applications over China. Journal of Remote Sensing, 10(4): 600–607 (
  28. 28.
    Zheng J, Shi C X, Lu Q F and Xie Z H. 2010. Evaluation of total precipitable water over East Asia from FY-3A/VIRR infrared radiances. Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters, 3(2): 93–99

قراءة النص الكامل

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website