سابِق|تال

Enhanced multi-temporal cloud detection algorithm for optical remote sensing images

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Land Use, Ministry of Natural Resources, China Land Surveying and Planning Institute, Beijing 100035, China

    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

  • Email：chenxd@radi.ac.cn
  • Introduction：陈曦东，1994年生，男，博士研究生，研究方向为全球地表覆盖定量监测遥感。E-mail：chenxd@radi.ac.cn
Xidong CHEN12,  
  • Affiliation：

    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

    Institute of Remote Sensing Science and Digital Earth, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Xiao ZHANG23,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    Institute of Remote Sensing Science and Digital Earth, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

  • Email：liuly@radi.ac.cn
  • Introduction：刘良云，1975年生，男，研究员，研究方向为植被定量遥感。E-mail：liuly@radi.ac.cn
Liangyun LIU3*,  
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Land Use, Ministry of Natural Resources, China Land Surveying and Planning Institute, Beijing 100035, China

Xiaofan WANG1

ملخص

Remote sensing images have been a crucial data source for land cover mapping and other applications. However, optical remote sensing images are frequently contaminated with clouds. Clouds have caused several limitations in remote sensing applications through optical satellite. Although several approaches have been conducted for cloud detection, they still fail to distinguish bright surfaces, snow, and clouds, especially for seasonally snow-covered images. Therefore, we aim to develop a fast and universal cloud detection method, which can accurately detect clouds in complex areas. Considering that many sensors do not have a thermal infrared band, we only use the visible, near infrared, and short-wave infrared bands to detect clouds. The proposed method is expected to be used for a variety of satellite data. In this study, a multi-temporal cloud detection method was proposed for optical images. Given that snow and clouds have a big difference in short-wave infrared bands, we first developed an Enhanced Cloud Index (ECI) based on the spectral properties of the bands to distinguish them. Then, we proposed an Enhanced Multi-Temporal Cloud Detection (EMTCD) algorithm based on the ECI index and multi-temporal images to extract cloudy pixels. Finally, we tested and compared the algorithm with three classical cloud detection algorithms, namely, Function of mask (Fmask), Cloud Cover Assessment (CCA), and Multi-Temporal Cloud Detection (MTCD) algorithms, to verify the accuracy of the proposed algorithm. Landsat-8 images were used as the data source in this study. Given that many operational cloud detection methods had failed in complex areas, we selected four Landsat-8 OLI scenes in two test areas with typical seasonal snow cover and complicated land covers as our test data. The images were all obtained from 2015. The test areas were the northeast and southwest of China. Test results indicated that the ECI index can effectively distinguish snow and clouds. The ECI index of snow was higher than that of clouds. The EMTCD method performed well in cloud detection, which had the best cloud detection result with an overall accuracy of 93.2% compared with that of 81.85%, 66.14%, and 86.3% for the classic Fmask, MTCD, and CCA cloud detection methods, respectively. The ECI index is effective in distinguishing clouds and snow. The EMTCD algorithm can provide a good performance in cloud detection without using the thermal infrared band, even for seasonally snow-covered regions with complicated high brightness ground surface, which is always challenging for traditional cloud detection algorithms. However, the method is developed based on multiple images. Compared with single temporal methods, the proposed method still has some limitations.

مفهوم

cloud detection;Enhanced Cloud Index;multi-temporal;Landsat-8;multi-spectral

References

  1. 1.
    Ackerman S A, Strabala K I, Menzel W P, Frey R A, Moeller C C and Gumley L E. 1998. Discriminating clear sky from clouds with MODIS. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 103(D24): 32141–32157
  2. 2.
    Braaten J D, Cohen W B and Yang Z Q. 2015. Automated cloud and cloud shadow identification in Landsat MSS imagery for temperate ecosystems. Remote Sensing of Environment, 169: 128–138
  3. 3.
    Candra D S, Phinn S and Scarth P. 2016. Cloud and cloud shadow masking using multi-temporal cloud masking algorithm in tropical environmental. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLI-B2: 95–100 [DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B2-95-2016]
  4. 4.
    Chander G, Markham B L and Helder D L. 2009. Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(5): 893–903
  5. 5.
    Chen S L, Chen X H, Chen J, Jia P F, Cao X and Liu C Y. 2016. An iterative haze optimized transformation for automatic cloud/haze detection of landsat imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(5): 2682–2694
  6. 6.
    Goodwin N R, Collett L J, Denham R J, Flood N and Tindall D. 2013. Cloud and cloud shadow screening across Queensland, Australia: an automated method for Landsat TM/ETM+time series. Remote Sensing of Environment, 134: 50–65
  7. 7.
    Hagolle O, Huc M, Pascual D V and Dedieu G. 2010. A multi-temporal method for cloud detection, applied to FORMOSAT-2, VENμS, LANDSAT and SENTINEL-2 images. RemoteSensing of Environment, 114(8): 1747–1755
  8. 8.
    Hagolle O, Huc M, Pascual D V and Dedieu G. 2015. A multi-temporal and multi-spectral method to estimate aerosol optical thickness over land, for the atmospheric correction of formosat-2, landsat, VENμS and sentinel-2 images. Remote Sensing, 7(3): 2668–2691
  9. 9.
    Hall D K, Riggs G A and Salomonson V V. 1995. Development of methods for mapping global snow cover using moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 54(2): 127–140
  10. 10.
    Hu Y, Liu L Y, Liu L L, Peng D L, Jiao Q J and Zhang H. 2014. A landsat-5 atmospheric correction based on MODIS atmosphere products and 6S model. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 7(5): 1609–1615
  11. 11.
    Irish R R. 2000. Landsat 7 automatic cloud cover assessment//Proceedings of SPIE Volume 4049, Algorithms for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery. Orlando, FL: SPIE: 348–355 [DOI: 10.1117/12.410358]
  12. 12.
    Irish R R, Barker J L, Goward S N and Arvidson T. 2006. Characterization of the landsat-7 ETM+automated cloud-cover assessment (ACCA) algorithm. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 72(10): 1179–1188
  13. 13.
    Jin S M, Homer C, Yang L M, Xian G, Fry J, Danielson P and Townsend P A. 2013. Automated cloud and shadow detection and filling using two-date Landsat imagery in the USA. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(5): 1540–1560
  14. 14.
    Ju J C and Roy D P. 2008. The availability of cloud-free Landsat ETM+data over the conterminous United States and globally. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(3): 1196–1211
  15. 15.
    Kennedy R, Cohen W B, Schroeder T A. 2007. Trajectory-based change detection for automated characterization of forest disturbance dynamics. Remote Sensing of Environment, 110(3): 370–386
  16. 16.
    Lavanant L, Marguinaud P, Harang L, Lelay J, Sonia P and Philippe S. 2007. Operational cloud masking for the O&SISAF global METOP SST production. Proceedings of the Joint 2007 EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Conference and the 15th Satellite Meteorology and Oceanography Conference of the American Meteorological Society. Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  17. 17.
    Lee D S, Storey J C, Choate M J and Hayes R W. 2004. Four years of Landsat-7 on-orbit geometric calibration and performance. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(12): 2786–2795
  18. 18.
    Li Z W, Shen H F, Li H F, Xia G S, Gamba P and Zhang L P. 2017. Multi-feature combined cloud and cloud shadow detection in gaofen-1 wide field of view imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 191: 342–358
  19. 19.
    Mei L L, Vountas M, Gómez-Chova L, Rozanov V, Jäger M, Lotz W, Burrows J P and Hollmann R. 2017. A cloud masking algorithm for the xbaer aerosol retrieval using meris data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 197: 141–160
  20. 20.
    Rouse Jr J W, Haas R H, Schell J A and Deering D W. 1974. Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with erts//Proceedings of the 3rd Earth Resources Technology Satellite-1 Symposium-Volume I: Technical Presentations. Washington: NASA Special Publication: 309–317
  21. 21.
    Roy D P, Ju J C, Kline K, Scaramuzza P L, Kovalskyy V, Hansen M, Loveland T R, Vermote E and Zhang C S. 2010. Web-enabled Landsat Data (WELD): landsat ETM+ composited mosaics of the conterminous United States. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(1): 35–49
  22. 22.
    Saunders R W and Kriebel K T. 1998. An improved method for detecting clear sky and cloudy radiances from AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 9(1): 123–150
  23. 23.
    USGS. 2016a. Landsat 8 OLI and TIRS calibration notices[EB/OL]. [2018-02-06].
  24. 24.
    USGS. 2016b. Landsat 8 (L8) data users handbook[EB/OL].
  25. 25.
    Vermote E, Justice C, Claverie M and Frabch B. 2016. Preliminary analysis of the performance of the Landsat 8/OLI land surface reflectance product. Remote Sensing of Environment, 185: 46–56
  26. 26.
    Woodcock C E and Strahler A H. 1987. The factor of scale in remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 21(3): 311–332
  27. 27.
    Zhang Y, Guindon B and Cihlar J. 2002. An image transform to characterize and compensate for spatial variations in thin cloud contamination of Landsat images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 82(2-3): 173–187
  28. 28.
    Zhang Y C, Rossow W B, Lacis A A, Oinas V and Mishchenko M I. 2004. Calculation of radiative fluxes from the surface to top of atmosphere based on ISCCP and other global data sets: refinements of the radiative transfer model and the input data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 109(D19): D19105
  29. 29.
    Zhu Z, Wang S X and Woodcock C E. 2015. Improvement and expansion of the Fmask algorithm: cloud, cloud shadow, and snow detection for Landsats 4-7, 8, and Sentinel 2 images. Remote Sensing and Environment, 159: 269–277
  30. 30.
    Zhu Z and Woodcock C E. 2012. Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 118: 83–94
  31. 31.
    Zhu Z and Woodcock C E. 2014. Automated cloud, cloud shadow, and snow detection in multitemporal Landsat data: an algorithm designed specifically for monitoring land cover change. Remote Sensing of Environment, 152: 217–234

قراءة النص الكامل

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website