سابِق|تال

Research on the effects of delay and Doppler intervals on GNSS-R DDM simulation

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

    Beijing Key Laboratory of Space Environment Exploration, Beijing 100190, China

  • Email：xiajunming10@126.com
  • Introduction：夏俊明，1986年生，男，副研究员，研究方向为GNSS-R的理论和应用。E-mail：xiajunming10@126.com
Junming XIA12,  
  • Affiliation：

    Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200030, China

    Key laboratory of Planetary Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200030, China

Xuerui WU34,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

    Beijing Key Laboratory of Space Environment Exploration, Beijing 100190, China

    School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

  • Email：bjbwh@163.com
  • Introduction：白伟华，1982年生，男，研究员，研究方向为GNSS遥感技术。E-mail：bjbwh@163.com
Weihua BAI125*,  
  • Affiliation：

    National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

    Beijing Key Laboratory of Space Environment Exploration, Beijing 100190, China

    School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Yueqiang SUN125,  
  • Affiliation：

    National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

    Beijing Key Laboratory of Space Environment Exploration, Beijing 100190, China

    School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Liming LUO125,  
  • Affiliation：

    National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

    Beijing Key Laboratory of Space Environment Exploration, Beijing 100190, China

Qifei DU12,  
  • Affiliation：

    National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

    Beijing Key Laboratory of Space Environment Exploration, Beijing 100190, China

Xianyi WANG12,  
  • Affiliation：

    National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

    Beijing Key Laboratory of Space Environment Exploration, Beijing 100190, China

Congliang LIU12,  
  • Affiliation：

    National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

    Beijing Key Laboratory of Space Environment Exploration, Beijing 100190, China

Xiangguang MENG12,  
  • Affiliation：

    National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

    Beijing Key Laboratory of Space Environment Exploration, Beijing 100190, China

Danyang ZHAO12,  
  • Affiliation：

    College of Meteorology and Oceanology, National University of Defense Technology, Nanjing 211101, China

Yingqiang WANG6

ملخص

Global Navigation Satellite System Reflectometry (GNSS-R) uses GNSS signals reflected by the Earth’s surface to detect the Earth surface parameters, including sea surface wind field, sea surface height, soil moisture, sea ice range, and snow depth. GNSS-R is a new Earth remote sensing technology, and it has been a research focus in recent years. Delay-Doppler Mapping (DDM) is a significant GNSS-R observation for retrieving geophysical parameters. The reliability of GNSS-R DDM simulation results directly affects GNSS-R theoretical research and satellite mission engineering parametric design. In this thesis, the effects of delay and Doppler intervals on a simulated DDM is investigated, and the suitable parameters for both intervals is determined to generate a reliable DDM simulation result. GREEPS, which was a GNSS-R simulator based on Z-V models and was developed by the National Space Science Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, is currently used to simulate DDM waveforms with different delay and Doppler intervals. To evaluate the accuracy of the simulated DDM waveforms, the 1D delay mapping with 0 Hz Doppler and the peak’s signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and position of the simulated DDM are compared with theoretical ones. The results shows that the smaller the delay and Doppler intervals are, the higher the correlation coefficient of the simulated DDM waveform and the theoretical waveform will be. When the delay interval is less than 1/16 GPS L1 C/A code chips, the correlation coefficient of the simulated DDM waveform and the theoretical waveform is greater than 0.99. The relative deviation of the peak SNR of the simulated DDM waveform is approximately 0.1% when the delay interval is set to be 1/16 GPS L1 C/A code chips. However, the relative deviation of the peak position of the simulated DDM waveform is extremely high. Even if the delay interval is set to be 1/64 GPS L1 C/A code chips, the relative deviation of the peak position of the simulated DDM is just 2.3%. When the Doppler interval is less than 200 Hz, the correlation coefficient of the simulated DDM waveform and the theoretical waveform is close to 1. When the Doppler interval is less than 50 Hz, the relative deviation of the peak SNR and the peak position is less than 0.1%. It is can be concluded that the smaller the delay and Doppler intervals are, the higher the coincidence degree of the simulated DDM and the theoretical DDM will be. When the delay interval and the Doppler interval are set to be 1/16 GPS L1 C/A code chips and 50 Hz, respectively, the simulated waveforms and the theoretical waveforms highly coincide with one another. The correlation coefficient is more than 0.99, and the relative deviation of the peak SNR of DDM is less than 0.1%. The effect of the delay interval on the peak’s position of DDM is greater than that of the Doppler interval. The relative deviation of the position of the peak SNR is greater than 2% even if the delay interval is set to 1/64 GPS L1 C/A code chips.

مفهوم

GNSS-R;delay-Doppler mapping;delay interval;Doppler interval;GREEPS

References

  1. 1.
    Addabbo P, Giangregorio G, Galdi C and Di Bisceglie M. 2017. Simulation of TechDemoSat-1 delay-Doppler maps for GPS ocean reflectometry. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 10(9): 4256–4268
  2. 2.
    Bai W H, Xia J M, Zhao D Y, Sun Y Q, Meng X G, Liu C L, Du Q F, Wang X Y, Wang D W, Wu D, Wu C J, Liu C and Cai Y R. 2016. GREEPS: an GNSS-R end-to-end performance simulator//2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Beijing: IEEE: 4831–4834
  3. 3.
    Cardellach E. 2002. Sea surface determination using GNSS reflected signals. Barcelona: Polytechnical University of Catalonia: 37–38
  4. 4.
    Clarizia M P, Gommenginger C P, Gleason S T, Srokosz M A, Galdi C and Di Bisceglie M. 2009. Analysis of GNSS-R delay-Doppler maps from the UK-DMC satellite over the ocean. Geophysical Research Letters, 36(2): L02068
  5. 5.
    Elfouhaily T, Chapron B, Katsaros K and Vandemark D. 1997. A unified directional spectrum for long and short wind-driven waves. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102(C7): 15781–15796
  6. 6.
    Foti G, Gommenginger C, Jales P, Unwin M, Shaw A, Robertson C and Roselló J. 2015. Spaceborne GNSS reflectometry for ocean winds: first results from the UK TechDemoSat-1 mission. Geophysical Research Letter, 42(13): 5435–5441
  7. 7.
    Gleason S, Hodgart S, Sun Y P, Gommenginger C, Mackin S, Adjrad M and Unwin M. 2005. Detection and Processing of bistatically reflected GPS signals from low Earth orbit for the purpose of ocean remote sensing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(6): 1229–1241
  8. 8.
    Marchan-Hernandez J F, Camps A, Rodriguez-Alvarez N, Valencia E, Bosch-Lluis X and Ramos-Perez I. 2009. An efficient algorithm to the simulation of delay–Doppler maps of reflected global navigation satellite system signals. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 47(8): 2733–2740
  9. 9.
    Morris M and Ruf C S. 2017. Determining tropical cyclone surface wind speed structure and intensity with the CYGNSS satellite Constellation. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 56(7): 1847–1865
  10. 10.
    O’Brien A and Johnson T J. 2017. Comparing the CYGNSS simulator forward scattering model with TDS-1 and CYGNSS on-orbit DDMS//2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Fort Worth, TX, USA: IEEE: 2657–2658
  11. 11.
    Park H, Camps A, Pascual D, Kang Y J, Onrubia R, Querol J and Alonso-Arroyo A. 2017. A generic level 1 simulator for spaceborne GNSS-R Missions and application to GEROS-ISS ocean reflectometry. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 10(10): 4645–4659
  12. 12.
    Pierdicca N, Guerriero L, Giusto R, Brogioni M and Egido V. 2014. SAVERS: a simulator of GNSS Reflections from bare and vegetated soils. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(10): 6542–6554
  13. 13.
    Ruf C, Unwin M, Dickinson J, Rose R, Rose D, Vincent M and Lyons A. 2013. CYGNSS: enabling the future of hurricane prediction. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 1(2): 52–67
  14. 14.
    Saïd F, Katzberg S J and Soisuvarn S. 2017. Retrieving hurricane maximum winds using simulated CYGNSS power-versus-delay waveforms. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 10(8): 3799–3809
  15. 15.
    Soisuvarn S, Jelenak Z, Said F, Chang P S and Egido A. 2016. The GNSS reflectometry response to the ocean surface winds and waves. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 9(10): 4678–4699
  16. 16.
    Sun Y Q, Liu C L, Du Q F, Wang X Y, Bai W H, Kirchengast G, Xia J M, Meng X G, Wang D W, Cai Y R, Zhao D Y, Wu C J, Li W and Liu C. 2017. Global navigation satellite system occultation sounder II (GNOS II)//2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Fort Worth, TX, USA: IEEE: 1189–1192
  17. 17.
    Warnock A M, Ruf C S and Morris M. 2017. Storm surge prediction with CYGNSS winds//2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Fort Worth, TX, USA: IEEE: 2975–2978
  18. 18.
    Zavorotny V U, Gleason S, Cardellach E and Camps A. 2014. Tutorial on remote sensing using GNSS bistatic radar of opportunity. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 2(4): 8–45
  19. 19.
    Zavorotny V U and Voronovich A G. 2000. Scattering of GPS signals from the ocean with wind remote sensing application. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38(2): 951–964

قراءة النص الكامل

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website