سابِق|تال

Advances and challenges in the validation of remote sensing albedo products

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    College of Earth and Environment Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

  • Email：wuxd@lzu.edu.cn
  • Introduction：吴小丹，1987年，女，副教授，研究方向为遥感数据产品真实性检验。E-mail：wuxd@lzu.edu.cn
Xiaodan WU1,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

  • Email：xiaoqing@radi.ac.cn
  • Introduction：肖青，1971年，男，研究员，研究方向为定量遥感、遥感试验。E-mail：xiaoqing@radi.ac.cn
Qing XIAO23*,  
  • Affiliation：

    Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Jianguang WEN23,  
  • Affiliation：

    Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Dongqin YOU23

ملخص

Validation of satellite-derived albedo products is an essential precursor to scientific research and subsequent environmental monitoring. Unlike the simple comparison between two datasets, validation involves determining the ground truth at pixel scale that exists independently. The reliability of validation results depends on the accurate treatment of ground-based measurements, upscaling, and assessment methods. This study analyzed the current state and development trends of validation technique specifically for remote sensing of albedo products. Ground-based measurements are the primary source of truth value at pixel scale to validate remote sensing products. The balance between the comprehensiveness and strictness of a validation can be achieved by selecting either the extensively distributed but sparse networks or small-scale but dense networks depending on each specific goal. However, ground measurements cannot provide sufficient information for the acquisition of truth value at pixel scale due to their limited spatial scales. Moreover, this finding was especially true for heterogeneous surfaces. Therefore, an upscaling technique should be explored to minimize errors due to the large spatial-scale difference between ground measurements and satellite product pixels. High-resolution imageries can provide spatial distribution characteristics of surface albedo within a coarse pixel, and these imageries can address the severity of the upscaling problem. Apart from these factors, the quality index, the effect of solar zenith angle, and the choice of albedo can all affect the quality of validation. The sparse networks can ensure the comprehensiveness of the validation but ignore the scale problems embodied in the validation. The dense networks can address the scale problem but cannot support the validation on a global scale. With regard to upscaling issues, the combination of ground measurements and high-resolution imageries can provide ideal upscaling results. However, differences remained among different methods. The traditional multi-scale validation strategy suffered from critical uncertainties caused by high-resolution albedo maps’errors, geometric mismatches, and calibration model errors. Recently, the upscaling method based on the idea of trend surface has attracted the attention of scholars whose interest is the validation field. This method compensates the errors of high-resolution maps and calibration model, thus improving the quality of upscaling results. The quality index of satellite albedo products should be considered in validation. Otherwise, wrong results may be obtained. Moreover, ground measurements with solar zenith angle exceeding 75° should be discarded. Great achievements have been obtained with regard to ground measurements, upscaling, and assessing methods in the past few years. Nevertheless, the accuracy of validation results remained hindered by several problems, which had not been seriously considered. This study provided an overview of existing validation activity, including ground-based data acquisition and processing, upscaling method for calculating the reference at pixel scale, and assessment method. Furthermore, their key challenges were also presented.

مفهوم

validation;heterogeneous surfaces;scale effect;albedo

References

  1. 1.
    Albrecht B and Cox S K. 1977. Procedures for improving pyrgeometer performance. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 16: 188–197
  2. 2.
    Box J E. 1997. Polar Day Effective Cloud Opacity in the Arctic from Measured and Modeled Solar Radiation Fluxes. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado
  3. 3.
    Cescatti A, Marcolla B, Santhana Vannan S K, Pan J Y, Román M O, Yang X Y, Ciais P, Cook R B, Law B E, Matteucci G, Migliavacca M, Moors E, Richardson A D, Seufert G and Schaaf C B. 2012. Intercomparison of MODIS albedo retrievals and in situ measurements across the global FLUXNET network. Remote Sensing of Environment, 121: 323–334
  4. 4.
    Crow W T, Berg A A, Cosh M H, Loew A, Mohanty B P, Panciera R, de Rosnay P, Ryu D and Walker J P. 2012. Upscaling sparse ground-based soil moisture observations for the validation of coarse-resolution satellite soil moisture products. Reviews of Geophysics, 50(2): RG2002
  5. 5.
    De Gruijter J, Brus D J, Bierkens M F P and Knotters M. 2006. Sampling for Natural Resource Monitoring. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag[DOI: 10.1007/3-540-33161-1]
  6. 6.
    Dickinson R E. 1995. Land processes in climate models. Remote Sensing of Environment, 51(1): 27–38
  7. 7.
    Gardner A S and Sharp M J. 2010. A review of snow and ice albedo and the development of a new physically based broadband albedo parameterization. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 115(F1): F01009
  8. 8.
    Gascoin S, Guðmundsson S, Aðalgeirsdóttir G, Pálsson F, Schmidt L, Berthier E and Björnsson H. 2017. Evaluation of MODIS albedo product over ice caps in iceland and impact of volcanic eruptions on their albedo. Remote Sensing, 9(5): 399
  9. 9.
    Ge Y, Liang Y Z, Wang J H, Zhao Q Y and Liu S M. 2015. Upscaling sensible heat fluxes with area-to-area regression kriging. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 12(3): 656–660
  10. 10.
    Goovaerts P. 1997. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  11. 11.
    Henderson-Sellers A and Wilson M F. 1983. Surface albedo data for climatic modeling. Reviews of Geophysics, 21(8): 1743–1778
  12. 12.
    Huang D, Yang W Z, Tan B, Rautiainen M, Zhang P, Hu J N, Shabanov N V, Linder S, Knyazikhin Y and Myneni R B. 2006. The importance of measurement errors for deriving accurate reference leaf area index maps for validation of moderate-resolution satellite LAI products. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(7): 1866–1871
  13. 13.
    Hufkens K, Bogaert J, Dong Q H, Lu L, Huang C L, Ma M G, Che T, Li X, Veroustraete F and Ceulemans R. 2008. Impacts and uncertainties of upscaling of remote-sensing data validation for a semi-arid woodland. Journal of Arid Environments, 72(8): 1490–1505
  14. 14.
    Jackson T J, Cosh M H, Bindlish R, Starks P J, Bosch D D, Seyfried M, Goodrich D C, Moran M S and Du J Y. 2010. Validation of advanced microwave scanning radiometer soil moisture products. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48(12): 4256–4272
  15. 15.
    Jiao Z T, Wang J D, Xie L O, Zhang H, Yan G J, He L M and Li X W. 2005. Initial validation of MODIS albedo product by using field measurements and airborne multiangular remote sensing observations. Journal of Remote Sensing, 9(1): 64–72 (
  16. 16.
    Jin Y F, Schaaf C B, Woodcock C E, Gao F, Li X W, Strahler A H, Lucht W and Liang S L. 2003. Consistency of MODIS surface bidirectional reflectance distribution function and albedo retrievals: 2. Validation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108: 4159
  17. 17.
    Justice C, Belward A, Morisette J, Lewis P, Privette J and Baret F. 2000. Developments in the ‘validation’ of satellite sensor products for the study of the land surface. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(17): 3383–3390
  18. 18.
    Justice C O, Townshend J R G, Vermote E F, Masuoka E, Wolfe R E, Saleous N, Roy D P and Morisette J T. 2002. An overview of MODIS land data processing and product status. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1/2): 3–15
  19. 19.
    Kang J, Jin R and Li X. 2015. Regression kriging-based upscaling of soil moisture measurements from a wireless sensor network and multiresource remote sensing information over heterogeneous cropland. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 12(1): 92–96
  20. 20.
    Li X, Ma M G, Wang J, Liu Q, Che T, Hu Z Y, Xiao Q, Liu Q H, Su P X, Chu R Z, Jin R, Wang W Z and Ran Y H. 2008. Simultaneous remote sensing and ground-based experiment in the Heihe River Basin: scientific objectives and experiment design. Advances in Earth Science, 23(9): 897–914 (
  21. 21.
    Liang S L, Fang H L, Chen M Z, Shuey C J, Walthall C, Daughtry C, Morisette J, Schaaf C and Strahler A. 2002. Validating MODIS land surface reflectance and albedo products: methods and preliminary results. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1/2): 149–162
  22. 22.
    Lin X W, Wen J G, Liu Q H, Xiao Q, You D Q, Wu S B, Hao D L and Wu X D. 2018. A multi-scale validation strategy for albedo products over rugged terrain and preliminary application in Heihe River Basin, China. Remote Sensing, 10(2): 156
  23. 23.
    Liu J C, Schaaf C, Strahler A, Jiao Z T, Shuai Y M, Zhang Q, Roman M, Augustine J A and Dutton E G. 2009. Validation of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) albedo retrieval algorithm: dependence of albedo on solar zenith angle. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 114(D1): D01106
  24. 24.
    Liu N F, Liu Q, Wang L Z, Liang S L, Wen J G, Qu Y and Liu S H. 2013a. A statistics-based temporal filter algorithm to map spatiotemporally continuous shortwave albedo from MODIS data. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(6): 2121–2129
  25. 25.
    Liu Q, Wang L Z, Qu Y, Liu N F, Liu S H, Tang H R and Liang S L. 2013b. Preliminary evaluation of the long-term GLASS albedo product. International Journal of Digital Earth, 6: 69–95
  26. 26.
    Lucht W. 1998. Expected retrieval accuracies of bidirectional reflectance and albedo from EOS-MODIS and MISR angular sampling. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103(D8): 8763–8778
  27. 27.
    Lucht W, Schaaf C B and Strahler A H. 2000. An algorithm for the retrieval of albedo from space using semiempirical BRDF models. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38(2): 977–998
  28. 28.
    Mulder V L, de Bruin S and Schaepman M E. 2013. Representing major soil variability at regional scale by constrained Latin Hypercube Sampling of remote sensing data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 21: 301–310
  29. 29.
    Peng J J, Liu Q, Wen J G, Liu Q H, Tang Y, Wang L Z, Dou B C, You D Q, Sun C K, Zhao X J, Feng Y B and Shi J. 2015. Multi-scale validation strategy for satellite albedo products and its uncertainty analysis. Science China Earth Sciences, 58(4): 573–588
  30. 30.
    Pirazzini R. 2004. Surface albedo measurements over Antarctic sites in summer. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 109: D20118
  31. 31.
    Qu Y, Liu Q, Liang S L, Wang L Z, Liu N F and Liu S H. 2014. Direct-estimation algorithm for mapping daily land-surface broadband albedo from MODIS data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(2): 907–919
  32. 32.
    Román M O, Gatebe C K, Shuai Y M, Wang Z S, Gao F, Masek J G, He T, Liang S L and Schaaf C B. 2013. Use of in situ and airborne multiangle data to assess MODIS- and Landsat-based estimates of directional reflectance and albedo. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51(3): 1393–1404
  33. 33.
    Román M O, Schaaf C B, Lewis P, Gao F, Anderson G P, Privette J L, Strahler A H, Woodcock C E and Barnsley M. 2010. Assessing the coupling between surface albedo derived from MODIS and the fraction of diffuse skylight over spatially-characterized landscapes. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(4): 738–760
  34. 34.
    Román M O, Schaaf C B, Woodcock C E, Strahler A H, Yang X Y, Braswell R H, Curtis P S, Davis K J, Dragoni D, Goulden M L, Gu L H, Hollinger D Y, Kolb T E, Meyers T P, Munger J W, Privette J L, Richardson A W, Wilson T B and Wofsy S C. 2009. The MODIS (Collection V005) BRDF/albedo product: assessment of spatial representativeness over forested landscapes. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(11): 2476–2498
  35. 35.
    Salomon J G, Schaaf C B, Strahler A H, Gao F and Jin Y F. 2006. Validation of the MODIS bidirectional reflectance distribution function and albedo retrievals using combined observations from the Aqua and Terra platforms. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(6): 1555–1565
  36. 36.
    Schaaf C B, Gao F, Strahler A H, Lucht W, Li X W, Tsang T, Strugnell N C, Zhang X Y, Jin Y F, Muller J P, Lewis P, Barnsley M, Hobson P, Disney M, Roberts G, Dunderdale M, Doll C, d'Entremont R P, Hu B X, Liang S L, Privette J L and Roy D. 2002. First operational BRDF, albedo nadir reflectance products from MODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1/2): 135–148
  37. 37.
    Schaaf C, Liu Y, Li Z, Sun Q S, Erb A, Shuai Y M and Wang Z S. 2016. Evaluation of MODIS/VIIRS/Landsat-8 Albedo Products over BSRN Sites.
  38. 38.
    Schaaf C B, Wang Z S and Strahler A H. 2011. Commentary on Wang and Zender-MODIS snow albedo bias at high solar zenith angles relative to theory and to in situ observations in Greenland. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(5): 1296–1300
  39. 39.
    Sellers P J, Meeson B W, Hall F G, Asrar G, Murphy R E, Schiffer R A, Bretherton F P, Dickinson R E, Ellingson R G, Field C B, Huemmrich K F, Justice C O, Melack J M, Roulet N T, Schimel D S and Try P D. 1995. Remote sensing of the land surface for studies of global change: models- algorithms- experiments. Remote Sensing of Environment, 51(1): 3–26
  40. 40.
    Stroeve J, Box J E, Gao F, Liang S L, Nolin A and Schaaf C. 2005. Accuracy assessment of the MODIS 16-day albedo product for snow: comparisons with Greenland in situ measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment, 94(1): 46–60
  41. 41.
    Stroeve J, Box J E, Wang Z S, Schaaf C and Barrett A. 2013. Re-evaluation of MODIS MCD43 Greenland albedo accuracy and trends. Remote Sensing of Environment, 138: 199–214
  42. 42.
    Sütterlin M, Schaaf C B, Stöckli R, Sun Q, Hüsler F, Neuhaus C and Wunderle S. 2015. Albedo and reflectance anisotropy retrieval from AVHRR operated onboard NOAA and MetOp satellites: algorithm performance and accuracy assessment for Europe. Remote Sensing of Environment, 168: 163–176
  43. 43.
    Susaki J, Yasuoka Y, Kajiwara K, Honda Y and Hara K. 2007. Validation of MODIS albedo products of paddy fields in Japan. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45(1): 206–217
  44. 44.
    Wang D D, Liang S L, He T and Yu Y Y. 2013. Direct estimation of land surface albedo from VIIRS data: algorithm improvement and preliminary validation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118(22): 12577–12586[DOI: 10.1002/2013JD020417]
  45. 45.
    Wang J F, Christakos G and Hu M G. 2009. Modeling spatial means of surfaces with stratified nonhomogeneity. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 47(12): 4167–4174
  46. 46.
    Wang J H. 2014. Space-Time Geostatistical Model-based Monitoring Network Optimization and Space-Time Interpolation. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  47. 47.
    Wang J H, Ge Y, Heuvelink G B M and Zhou C H. 2015. Upscaling in situ soil moisture observations to pixel averages with spatio-temporal geostatistics. Remote Sensing, 7(9): 11372–11388
  48. 48.
    Wang K C and Liang S L. 2009. Evaluation of ASTER and MODIS land surface temperature and emissivity products using long-term surface longwave radiation observations at SURFRAD sites. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(7): 1556–1565
  49. 49.
    Wang K C, Liang S L, Schaaf C L and Strahler A H. 2010. Evaluation of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer land surface visible and shortwave albedo products at FLUXNET sites. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115(D17): D17107
  50. 50.
    Wang K C, Liu J M, Zhou X J, Sparrow M, Ma M, Sun Z and Jiang W H. 2004. Validation of the MODIS global land surface albedo product using ground measurements in a semidesert region on the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Geophysical Research, 109: D05107
  51. 51.
    Wang X W and Zender C S. 2010. MODIS snow albedo bias at high solar zenith angles relative to theory and to in situ observations in Greenland. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(3): 563–575
  52. 52.
    Wang Y T, Xie D H and Li X W. 2014. Universal scaling methodology in remote sensing science by constructing geographic trend surface. Journal of Remote Sensing, 18(6): 1139–1146 (
  53. 53.
    Wang Z S, Schaaf C B, Chopping M J, Strahler A H, Wang J D, Román M O, Rocha A V, Woodcock C E and Shuai Y M. 2012. Evaluation of Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) snow albedo product (MCD43A) over tundra. Remote Sensing of Environment, 117: 264–280
  54. 54.
    Wang Z S, Schaaf C B, Strahler A H, Chopping M J, Román M O, Shuai Y M, Woodcock C E, Hollinger D Y and Fitzjarrald D R. 2014. Evaluation of MODIS albedo product (MCD43A) over grassland, agriculture and forest surface types during dormant and snow-covered periods. Remote Sensing of Environment, 140: 60–77
  55. 55.
    Warren S G, Brandt R E and Hinton P O. 1998. Effect of surface roughness on bidirectional reflectance of Antarctic snow. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103(E11): 25789–25807
  56. 56.
    Wen J G, Dou B C, You D Q, Tang Y, Xiao Q, Liu Q and Liu Q H. 2017. Forward a small-timescale BRDF/Albedo by multisensor combined BRDF inversion model. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(2): 683–697
  57. 57.
    Wen J G, Liu Q H, Liu Q, Xiao Q and Li X W. 2009. Parametrized BRDF for atmospheric and topographic correction and albedo estimation in Jiangxi rugged terrain, China. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(11): 2875–2896
  58. 58.
    Wu X D, Wen J G, Xiao Q, Liu Q, Peng J J, Dou B C, Li X H, You D Q, Tang Y and Liu Q H. 2016. Coarse scale in situ albedo observations over heterogeneous snow-free land surfaces and validation strategy: a case of MODIS albedo products preliminary validation over northern China. Remote Sensing of Environment, 184: 25–39
  59. 59.
    Wu X D, Wen J G, Xiao Q, You D Q, Liu Q and Lin X W. 2018. Forward a spatio-temporal trend surface for long-term ground-measured albedo upscaling over heterogeneous land surface. International Journal of Digital Earth, 11(5): 470–484
  60. 60.
    Wu X D, Wen J G, Xiao Q, Yu Y Y, You D Q and Hueni A. 2017b. Assessment of NPP VIIRS albedo over heterogeneous crop land in northern China. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 122(24): 13138–13154
  61. 61.
    Wu X D, Xiao Q, Wen J G, Liu Q, Peng J J and Li X W. 2014. Advances in uncertainty analysis for the validation of remote sensing products: take leaf area index for example. Journal of Remote Sensing, 18(5): 1011–1023 (
  62. 62.
    Wu X D, Xiao Q, Wen J G, Liu Q, You D Q, Dou B C, Tang Y and Li X W. 2015. Optimal nodes selectiveness from WSN to fit field scale albedo observation and validation in long time series in the foci experiment areas, Heihe. Remote Sensing, 7(11): 14757–14780
  63. 63.
    Wu X D, Xiao Q, Wen J G, Liu Q, You D Q, Dou B C and Yong T. 2017a. Upscaling in situ albedo for validation of coarse scale albedo product over heterogeneous surfaces. International Journal of Digital Earth, 10(6): 604–622
  64. 64.
    Zhang J L, Li X H, Yang R J, Liu Q, Zhao L and Dou B C. 2017. An extended kriging method to interpolate near-surface soil moisture data measured by wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 17(6): 1390
  65. 65.
    Zhang R H, Tian J, Li Z L, Su H B, Chen S H and Tang X Z. 2010. Principles and methods for the validation of quantitative remote sensing products. Science China Earth Sciences, 53(5): 741–751

قراءة النص الكامل

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website