سابِق|تال

Mangrove species classification with combination of WorldView-2 and Zhuhai-1 satellite images

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Silviculture, Protection and Utilization, Guangdong Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou 510520, China

  • Email：gaochangjun015@163.com
  • Introduction：高常军，研究方向为滨海湿地生态过程及生态遥感。E-mail：gaochangjun015@163.com
GAO Changjun1,  
  • Affiliation：

    MNR Key Laboratory for Geo-Environmental Monitoring of Great Bay Area, Shenzhen 518060, China

JIANG Xiapeng2,  
  • Affiliation：

    MNR Key Laboratory for Geo-Environmental Monitoring of Great Bay Area, Shenzhen 518060, China

    College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China

ZHEN Jianing23,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    MNR Key Laboratory for Geo-Environmental Monitoring of Great Bay Area, Shenzhen 518060, China

    College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China

  • Email：wang_2015@szu.edu.cn
  • Introduction：王俊杰，研究方向为红树林生态遥感的理论与应用。E-mail：wang_2015@szu.edu.cn
WANG Junjie23*,  
  • Affiliation：

    MNR Key Laboratory for Geo-Environmental Monitoring of Great Bay Area, Shenzhen 518060, China

WU Guofeng2

ملخص

Remotely sensed classification of mangrove species is affected by image resolution, spectral information, classification strategy, and image feature selection methods. The present studies of mangrove species classification using remote sensing mostly focus on comparison of classification accuracy, and few of them discuss the spatial pattern of species distribution and the corresponding influencing factors. The combination of high-resolution and hyperspectral satellite images in species classification of mangrove forest has received less attention. With WorldView-2 and Zhuhai-1 images in Gaoqiao mangrove Reserve, this study aims to compare the effects of different feature selection methods (XGBoost, eXtreme gradient boosting; ERT, extremely randomized trees; SPA, successive projections algorithm) and different image resolutions (the WorldView-2 image with a resolution of 0.5 m was resampled to 1, 2, 4, 8, and 10 m) on the classification accuracy of mangrove species based on random forest classification model and to explore the spatial pattern of mangrove distribution and the corresponding influencing factors based on the coupling of WorldView-2 and Zhuhai-1 images.With each spatial resolution of WorldView-2 image, 248 features were extracted, including 52 spectral features (eight spectral bands, 38 vegetation indices, three principal component bands, and three tasseled cap transformation bands) and 196 texture features (seven windows of 3×3, 5×5, 7×7, 9×9, 11×11, and 15×15; for each window, 28 texture features were extracted). With Zhuhai-1 hyperspectral image, 117 spectral features (32 original spectral bands, 32 first derivative bands, 47 vegetation indices, three principal component bands, and three tasseled cap transformation bands) were extracted.Results showed that XGBoost was superior to ERT and SPA, which had great advantage in image feature selection. Among the six types of WorldView-2 image resolution, the 2 m resolution was optimal for species classification, and the red edge band (705—745 nm) played an important role in species classification. The coupling of WorldView-2 and Zhuhai-1 images (resolution: 2 m, overall accuracy: 88.98%, kappa coefficient: 0.846) had better performance than using single WorldView resolution: 2 m, overall accuracy: 83.47%, kappa coefficient: 0.768 and Zhuhai-1 image (resolution: 10 m, overall accuracy: 78.50%, kappa coefficient: 0.703). The classification map based on the coupled image features illustrated that the area of Aegiceras corniculatum accounted for the largest proportion (33.77 % ), followed by Bruguiera gymnorrhiza (30.44%), Avicennia marina (26.96%), Bruguiera gymnorrhiza (6.08%), Sonneratia apetala (2.72%), and Kandelia candel (0.02%). Moreover, to some extent, forest gap, surface elevation, and offshore distance greatly affected the spatial distribution pattern of mangrove species.This study demonstrated that the combination of WorldView-2 and Zhuhai-1 image had great potential in accurate mapping mangrove species at the landscape and regional scales, thereby facilitating biodiversity protection and scientific management of forest ecosystem and providing technical and data support for retrieval of ecosystem parameters (e.g., carbon storage, net primary production, and leaf area index) and health evaluation of mangrove forests. Future research will focus on the fusion of WorldView-2 and Zhuhai-1 image to simultaneously achieve high spatial resolution and hyperspectral bands and the inclusion of canopy height and leaf trait information (e.g., chlorophyll and water content) to the classification model.

مفهوم

remote sensing;mangrove;WorldView-2 image;Zhuhai-1 image;Species classification;XGBoost;Extremely randomized trees;Successive projections algorithm

References

  1. 1.
    Araújo M C U, Saldanha T C B, Galvão R K H, Yoneyama T, Chame H C and Visani V. 2001. The successive projections algorithm for variable selection in spectroscopic multicomponent analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 57(2): 65-73
  2. 2.
    Cao J J, Leng W C, Liu K, Liu L, He Z and Zhu Y H. 2018a. Object-based mangrove species classification using unmanned aerial vehicle hyperspectral images and digital surface models. Remote Sensing, 10(1): 89
  3. 3.
    Cao J J, Liu K, Liu L, Zhu Y H, Li J and He Z. 2018b. Identifying mangrove species using field close-range snapshot hyperspectral imaging and machine-learning techniques. Remote Sensing, 10(12): 2047
  4. 4.
    Chen T Q and Guestrin C. 2016. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system//Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. San Francisco: ACM: 785-794
  5. 5.
    George R, Padalia H, Sinha S K and Kumar A S. 2019. Evaluating sensitivity of hyperspectral indices for estimating mangrove chlorophyll in Middle Andaman Island, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191(S3): 785
  6. 6.
    Geurts P, Ernst D and Wehenkel L. 2006. Extremely randomized trees. Machine Learning, 63(1): 3-42
  7. 7.
    Heenkenda M K, Joyce K E, Maier S W and Bartolo R. 2014. Mangrove species identification: comparing worldview-2 with aerial photographs. Remote Sensing, 6(7): 6064-6088
  8. 8.
    Hu L J, Xu N, Liang J, Li Z C, Chen L Z and Zhao F. 2020. Advancing the mapping of mangrove forests at national-scale using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 time-series data with google Earth engine: a case study in China. Remote Sensing, 12(19): 3120
  9. 9.
    Huang J J, Liu S Q and Han W D. 2012. The analysis of mangrove inside zone gap feature in Gaoqiao, Leizhou peninsula. Forest Resources Management, (5): 46-50
  10. 10.
    Jia M M, Wang Z M, Zhang Y Z, Mao D H and Wang C. 2018. Monitoring loss and recovery of mangrove forests during 42 years: the achievements of mangrove conservation in China. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 73: 535-545
  11. 11.
    Jia M M, Zhang Y Z, Wang Z M, Song K S and Ren C Y. 2014. Mapping the distribution of mangrove species in the Core Zone of Mai Po Marshes Nature Reserve, Hong Kong, using hyperspectral data and high-resolution data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 33: 226-231
  12. 12.
    Jiang Y F, Zhang L, Yan M, Qi J G, Fu T M, Fan S X and Chen B W. 2021. High-resolution mangrove forests classification with machine learning using worldview and UAV hyperspectral data. Remote Sensing, 13(8): 1529
  13. 13.
    Kahaer Y, Tashpolat N, Shi Q D and Liu S H. 2020. Possibility of Zhuhai-1 hyperspectral imagery for monitoring salinized soil moisture content using fractional order differentially optimized spectral indices. Water, 12(12): 3360
  14. 14.
    Kamal M, Phinn S and Johansen K. 2014. Characterizing the spatial structure of mangrove features for optimizing image-based mangrove mapping. Remote Sensing, 6(2): 984-1006
  15. 15.
    Kamal M, Phinn S and Johansen K. 2015. Object-based approach for multi-scale mangrove composition mapping using multi-resolution image datasets. Remote Sensing, 7(4): 4753-4783
  16. 16.
    Kumar T, Mandal A, Dutta D, Nagaraja R and Dadhwal V K. 2019. Discrimination and classification of mangrove forests using EO-1 Hyperion data: a case study of Indian Sundarbans. Geocarto International, 34(4): 415-442
  17. 17.
    Leong R C, Friess D A, Crase B, Lee W K and Webb E L. 2018. High-resolution pattern of mangrove species distribution is controlled by surface elevation. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 202: 185-192
  18. 18.
    Li H Y, Jia M M, Zhang R, Ren Y X and Wen X. 2019a. Incorporating the plant phenological trajectory into mangrove species mapping with dense time series Sentinel-2 imagery and the Google Earth Engine platform. Remote Sensing, 11(21): 2479
  19. 19.
    Li Q S, Wong F K K and Fung T. 2019b. Classification of mangrove species using combined wordview-3 and LiDAR data in Mai Po nature reserve, Hong Kong. Remote Sensing, 11(18): 2114
  20. 20.
    Li Y Q, Zuo X Q and Li H Z. 2020. Study on the separability measurement of mangrove population based on random forest——a case study of Shenzhen bay. Journal of Shaanxi University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 36(2): 64-70, 92
  21. 21.
    Lu Y P, Xu W H, Zhang Z M, Zhang L, Xie S L, Zhang J J, Fan X Y and Ouyang Z Y. Gap analysis of mangrove ecosystem conservation in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(2): 684-691
  22. 22.
    Ma C L, Ai B, Zhao J, Xu X P and Huang W. 2019. Change detection of mangrove forests in coastal Guangdong during the past three decades based on remote sensing data. Remote Sensing, 11(8): 921
  23. 23.
    Majdar R S and Ghassemian H. 2017. A probabilistic SVM approach for hyperspectral image classification using spectral and texture features. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 38(15): 4265-4284
  24. 24.
    Mallinis G, Koutsias N, Tsakiri-Strati M and Karteris M. 2008. Object-based classification using Quickbird imagery for delineating forest vegetation polygons in a Mediterranean test site. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 63(2): 237-250
  25. 25.
    Peng L H, Liu K, Cao J J, Zhu Y H, Li F S and Liu L. 2020. Combining GF-2 and RapidEye satellite data for mapping mangrove species using ensemble machine-learning methods. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 41(3): 813-838
  26. 26.
    Pham T D, Yokoya N, Bui D T, Yoshino K and Friess D A. 2019. Remote sensing approaches for monitoring mangrove species, structure, and biomass: opportunities and challenges. Remote Sensing, 11(3): 230
  27. 27.
    Tian J Y, Wang L, Li X J, Gong H L, Shi C, Zhong R F and Liu X M. 2017. Comparison of UAV and WorldView-2 imagery for mapping leaf area index of mangrove forest. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 61: 22-31
  28. 28.
    Toosi N B, Soffianian A R, Fakheran S, Pourmanafi S, Ginzler C and Waser L T. 2019. Comparing different classification algorithms for monitoring mangrove cover changes in southern Iran. Global Ecology and Conservation, 19: e00662
  29. 29.
    Valderrama-Landeros L, Flores-de-Santiago F, Kovacs J M and Flores-Verdugo F. 2018. An assessment of commonly employed satellite-based remote sensors for mapping mangrove species in Mexico using an NDVI-based classification scheme. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190(1): 23
  30. 30.
    Wan L M, Lin Y Y, Zhang H S, Wang F, Liu M F and Lin H. 2020. GF-5 hyperspectral data for species mapping of mangrove in Mai Po, Hong Kong. Remote Sensing, 12(4): 656
  31. 31.
    Wang D Z, Wan B, Qiu P H, Su Y J, Guo Q H, Wang R, Sun F and Wu X C. 2018a. Evaluating the performance of sentinel-2, landsat 8 and pléiades-1 in mapping mangrove extent and species. Remote Sensing, 10(9): 1468
  32. 32.
    Wang D Z, Wan B, Qiu P H, Su Y J, Guo Q H and Wu X C. 2018b. Artificial mangrove species mapping using pléiades-1: an evaluation of pixel-based and object-based classifications with selected machine learning algorithms. Remote Sensing, 10(2): 294
  33. 33.
    Wang J J, Xu Y and Wu G F. 2020a. The integration of species information and soil properties for hyperspectral estimation of leaf biochemical parameters in mangrove forest. Ecological Indicators, 115: 106467
  34. 34.
    Wang W Q, Fu H F, Lee S Y, Fan H Q and Wang M. 2020b. Can strict protection stop the decline of mangrove ecosystems in China? From rapid destruction to rampant degradation. Forests, 11(1): 55
  35. 35.
    Wang X, Li H W, Qiu Z J, Yang H, Zhou G Y and Liao B W. 2009. Research on the difference of the structural feature of artificial sonneratia apetala-S. Caseolaris community and its affecting factor. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 37(27): 13312-13316
  36. 36.
    Watt A S. 1947. Pattern and process in the plant community. Journal of Ecology, 35(1/2): 1-22
  37. 37.
    Xu Y, Wang J J, Xia A Q, Zhang K Y, Dong X Y, Wu K P and Wu G F. 2019. Continuous wavelet analysis of leaf reflectance improves classification accuracy of mangrove species. Remote Sensing, 11(3): 254
  38. 38.
    Xu Y, Zhen J N, Jiang X P and Wang J J. 2021. Mangrove species classification with UAV-based remote sensing data and XGBoost. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 25(3): 737-752
  39. 39.
    Zhang H S, Wang T, Liu M F, Jia M M, Lin H, Chu L M and Devlin A T. 2018. Potential of combining optical and dual polarimetric SAR data for improving mangrove species discrimination using rotation forest. Remote Sensing, 10(3): 467
  40. 40.
    Zhang X W, Zhang J C, Chen W Y, Liu W, Zhang Z J, Fan J W, Xiao C J and Wang R. 2021a. Semi-automated extraction of surface water based on ZhuHai-1 hyperspectral satellite images. Remote Sensing Letters, 12(8): 750-756
  41. 41.
    Zhang Y Y, Yang J and Du L. 2021b. Analyzing the effects of hyperspectral ZhuHai-1 band combinations on LAI estimation based on the PROSAIL model. Sensors, 21(5): 1869
  42. 42.
    Zhen J N, Jiang X P, Xu Y, Miao J, Zhao D M, Wang J J, Wang J Z and Wu G F. 2021. Mapping leaf chlorophyll content of mangrove forests with Sentinel-2 images of four periods. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation Geoinformation, 102: 102387
  43. 43.
    Zheng Y, Lin Y Q, Zhou J, Gan W X, Lin G X, Xu F H and Lin G H. 2019. Mangrove inter-species classification based on ZY-3 image in Leizhou Peninsula, Guangdong Province. Remote Sensing For Land & Resources, 31(3): 201-208

قراءة النص الكامل

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website