سابِق|تال

Fine mapping of PM2.5 based on measurements from geostationary satellites and grid monitoring stations

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

  • Email：fandonghao21@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • Introduction：范东浩，研究方向为大气遥感。E-mail： fandonghao21@mails.ucas.ac.cn
FAN Donghao12,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China

  • Email：qinkai@cumt.edu.cn
  • Introduction：秦凯，研究方向为大气环境遥感、遥感大数据与机器学习。E-mail：qinkai@cumt.edu.cn
QIN Kai1*,  
  • Affiliation：

    Xuzhou Environmental Monitoring Center, Jiangsu Province, Xuzhou 221002, China

DU Juan3,  
  • Affiliation：

    School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China

HE Qin1,  
  • Affiliation：

    School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

XIN Shiji12,  
  • Affiliation：

    School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

LIU Dingyi12

ملخص

The dense gridded air quality monitoring sites established by local governments in China have laid the foundation for fine-tuned monitoring of urban air quality. However, whether it can help improve the capabilities of satellite-based surface PM2.5 concentration estimation and mapping remain to be tested. To this end, we conducted a case study with Xuzhou as an example.In order to describe the spatial distribution of PM2.5 in detail at urban scale , this study used the PM2.5 concentration data from 172 grid monitoring stations in Xuzhou, the apparent reflectance and aerosol optical thickness data from the Himawari-8/AHI and COMS/GOCI, meteorological data from ERA5 and other auxiliary data to carry out fine mapping study of PM2.5 concentration on the 0.005° spatial resolution grid. The machine learning and geostatistical algorithms of eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest (RF) and Geographically and Temporally Weight Regression (GTWR) are applied, and a variety of characteristic parameter combinations (listed in the body of the paper) were selected for comparative analysis.Compared with other two prediction models, the XGBoost model performed the best, in terms of model accuracy and degree of overfitting, with high correlation coefficient (0.90) and low root mean squard error (11.65 μg/m3). Meanwhile, the best parameter combination includes satellite data from Himawari-8 as well as GOCI and meteorological data from ERA5. These retrieved results were then compared with the measurements obtained from the national grid monitoring stations. For peer comparison, in addition, the TAP (Tracking Air Pollution in China) dataset of Tsinghua University and the CHAP (China High AirPollutants) dataset of the University of Maryland are also involved in this comparison, in the aspect of daily mean value and capacity of fine mapping of PM2.5 in Xuzhou. Besides, these two datasets use the data from national grid monitoring stations as the validation data..The following conclusions can be drawn:(1) Due to its higher temporal resolution, geostationary satellite measurements can better fit hourly urban grid monitoring station data in model prediction, and is more suitable for urban PM2.5 fine mapping than polar orbit satellite;(2) The estimation results based on urban grid monitoring stations and satellite measurements can make up for the lack of sparse national control stations to a certain extent, better reflect the difference of PM2.5 concentration distribution between different regions within a city, and better serve the accurate control of air pollution.

مفهوم

remote sensing;PM2.5;grid site;fine drawing;Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD);apparent reflectance

References

  1. 1.
    Bai K X, Chang N B, Zhou J Y, Gao W and Guo J P. 2019a. Diagnosing atmospheric stability effects on the modeling accuracy of PM2.5/AOD relationship in eastern China using radiosonde data. Environmental Pollution, 251: 380-389
  2. 2.
    Bai K X, Li K, Chang N B and Gao W. 2019b. Advancing the prediction accuracy of satellite-based PM2.5 concentration mapping: a perspective of data mining through in situ PM2.5 measurements. Environmental Pollution, 254: 113047
  3. 3.
    Bessho K, Date K, Hayashi M, Ikeda A, Imai T, Inoue H, Kumagai Y, Miyakawa T, Murata H, Ohno T, Okuyama A, Oyama R, Sasaki Y, Shimazu Y, Shimoji K, Sumida Y, Suzuki M, Taniguchi H, Tsuchiyama H, Uesawa D, Yokota H and Yoshida R. 2016. An introduction to himawari-8/9— japan's new-generation geostationary meteorological satellites. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 94(2): 151-183
  4. 4.
    Cameron M A, Jacobson M Z, Barrett S R H, Bian H, Chen C C, Eastham S D, Gettelman A, Khodayari A, Liang Q, Selkirk H B, Unger N, Wuebbles D J and Yue X. 2017. An intercomparative study of the effects of aircraft emissions on surface air quality. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 122(15): 8325-8344
  5. 5.
    Cao J J, Xu H M, Xu Q, Chen B H and Kan H D. 2012. Fine particulate matter constituents and cardiopulmonary mortality in a heavily polluted Chinese city. Environmental Health Perspectives 120(3): 373-378
  6. 6.
    Chen T Q and Guestrin C. 2016. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system//Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. San Francisco: ACM: 785-794
  7. 7.
    Chen X F, De Leeuw G, Arola A, Liu S M, Liu Y, Li Z Q and Zhang K N. 2020. Joint retrieval of the aerosol fine mode fraction and optical depth using MODIS spectral reflectance over northern and eastern China: artificial neural network method. Remote Sensing of Environment, 249: 112006
  8. 8.
    Choi M, Kim J, Lee J, Kim M, Park Y J, Jeong U, Kim W, Hong H, Holben B, Eck T F, Song C H, Lim J H and Song C K. 2016. GOCI yonsei aerosol retrieval (YAER) algorithm and validation during the DRAGON-NE Asia 2012 campaign. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 9: 1377-1398
  9. 9.
    Fan W Z, Qin K, Cui Y L, Li D and Bilal M. 2021. Estimation of hourly ground-level PM2.5 concentration based on himawari-8 apparent reflectance. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 59(1): 76-85
  10. 10.
    Fan W Z, Qin K, Han X, Zou J H and Li Y F. 2018. Aerosol distribution characteristics in Xuzhou based on mobile lidar observation. China Environmental Science, 38(8): 2857-2864
  11. 11.
    Gong P, Wang J, Yu L, Zhao Y C, Zhao Y Y, Liang L, Niu Z G, Huang X M, Fu H H, Liu S, Li C C, Li X Y, Fu W, Liu C X, Xu Y, Wang X Y, Cheng Q, Hu L Y, Yao W B, Zhang H, Zhu P, Zhao Z Y, Zhang H Y, Zheng Y M, Ji L Y, Zhang Y W, Chen H, Yan A, Guo J H, Yu L, Wang L, Liu X J, Shi T T, Zhu M H, Chen Y L, Yang G W, Tang P, Xu B, Giri C, Clinton N, Zhu Z L, Chen J and Chen J. 2013. Finer resolution observation and monitoring of global land cover: first mapping results with Landsat TM and ETM+ data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(7): 2607-2654
  12. 12.
    Guo J P, Wu Y T, Zhang X Y and Li X W. 2013. Estimation of PM2.5 over Eastern China from MODIS aerosol optical depth using the back propagation neural network. Environmental Science, 34(3): 817-825
  13. 13.
    Guo J P, Xue Y, Cao C X, Zhang H, Guang J, Zhang X Y and Li X W. 2009. A synergic algorithm for retrieval of aerosol optical depth over land. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 26(5): 973-983
  14. 14.
    Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P, Hirahara S, Horányi A, Muñoz-sabater J, Nicolas J, Peubey C, Radu R, Schepers D, Simmons A, Soci C, Abdalla S, Abellan X, Balsamo G, Bechtold P, Biavati G, Bidlot J, Bonavita M, Chiara G, Dahlgren P, Dee D, Diamantakis M, Dragani R, Flemming J, Forbes R, Fuentes M, Geer A, Haimberger L, Healy S, Hogan R J, Hólm E, Janisková M, Keeley S, Laloyaux P, Lopez P, Lupu C, Radnoti G, Rosnay P, Rozum I, Vamborg F, Villaume S and Thépaut J N. 2020. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 146(730): 1999-2049
  15. 15.
    Hsu N C, Tsay S C, King M D and Herman J R. 2004. Aerosol properties over bright-reflecting source regions. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(3): 557-569
  16. 16.
    Hu Z Y. 2009. Spatial analysis of MODIS aerosol optical depth, PM2.5, and chronic coronary heart disease. International Journal of Health Geographics, 8: 27
  17. 17.
    Huang B, Wu B and Barry M. 2010. Geographically and temporally weighted regression for modeling spatio-temporal variation in house prices. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(3): 383-401
  18. 18.
    Koelemeijer R B A, Homan C D and Matthijsen J. 2006. Comparison of spatial and temporal variations of aerosol optical thickness and particulate matter over Europe. Atmospheric Environment, 40(27): 5304-5315
  19. 19.
    Li R, Cui L L, Fu H B, Meng Y, Li J L and Guo J P. 2020. Estimating high-resolution PM1 concentration from Himawari-8 combining extreme gradient boosting-geographically and temporally weighted regression (XGBoost-GTWR). Atmospheric Environment, 229: 117434
  20. 20.
    Lloyd C T, Chamberlain H, Kerr D, Yetman G, Pistolesi L, Stevens F R, Gaughan A E, Nieves J J, Hornby G, Macmanus K, Sinha P, Bondarenko M, Sorichetta A and Tatem A J. 2019. Global spatio-temporally harmonised datasets for producing high-resolution gridded population distribution datasets. Big Earth Data, 3(2): 108-139
  21. 21.
    Ordieres J B, Vergara E P, Capuz R S and Salazar R E. 2005. Neural network prediction model for fine particulate matter (PM2.5) on the US–Mexico border in El Paso (Texas) and Ciudad Juárez (Chihuahua). Environmental Modelling & Software, 20(5): 547-559
  22. 22.
    Pan J X, Yan P Z, Sun F, Li Y T, Liu B X, Wang Z S and Dong R. 2019. Application of ensemble forecast and linear regression method in improving PM2.5 forecast over Beijing area. Environmental Monitoring in China, 35(2): 43-52
  23. 23.
    Ryu J H, Han H J, Cho S, Park Y J and Ahn Y H. 2012. Overview of geostationary ocean color imager (GOCI) and GOCI data processing system (GDPS). Ocean Science Journal, 47(3): 223-233
  24. 24.
    Saffari A, Daher N, Shafer M M, Schauer J J and Sioutas C. 2014. Global perspective on the oxidative potential of airborne particulate matter: a synthesis of research findings. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(13): 7576-7583
  25. 25.
    Shen H F, Li T W, Yuan Q Q and Zhang L P. 2018. Estimating regional ground-level PM2.5 directly from satellite top-of-atmosphere reflectance using deep belief networks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 123(24): 13875-13886
  26. 26.
    Stevens F R, Gaughan A E, Linard C and Tatem A J. 2015. Disaggregating census data for population mapping using random forests with remotely-sensed and ancillary data. PLoS One, 10(2): e0107042
  27. 27.
    Tang D, Liu D R, Tang Y L, Seyler B C, Deng X F and Zhan Y. 2019. Comparison of GOCI and Himawari-8 aerosol optical depth for deriving full-coverage hourly PM2.5 across the Yangtze River Delta. Atmospheric Environment, 217: 116973
  28. 28.
    Wang J and Christopher S A. 2003. Intercomparison between satellite-derived aerosol optical thickness and PM2.5 mass: Implications for air quality studies. Geophysical Research Letters, 30(21): 2095
  29. 29.
    Wang W, Mao F Y, Du L, Pan Z X, Gong W, andShenghui Fang. 2017. Deriving hourly PM2.5 concentrations from himawari-8 AODs over Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei in China. Remote Sensing, 9(8): 858
  30. 30.
    Wang Y L, Chen H S, Wu Q Z, Chen X S, Wang H, Gbaguidi A, Wang W and Wang Z F. 2018. Three-year, 5 km resolution China PM2.5 simulation: Model performance evaluation. Atmospheric Research, 207: 1-13
  31. 31.
    Wei J, Li Z Q, Lyapustin A, Sun L, Peng Y R, Xue W H, Su T N and Cribb M. 2021. Reconstructing 1-km-resolution high-quality PM2.5 data records from 2000 to 2018 in China: spatiotemporal variations and policy implications. Remote Sensing of Environment, 252: 112136
  32. 32.
    Wu C B, Li K and Bai K X. 2020. Validation and Calibration of CAMS PM2.5 Forecasts Using In Situ PM2.5 Measurements in China and United States. Remote Sensing, 12(22): 3813
  33. 33.
    Wu Y R, Guo J P, Zhang X Y, Tian X, Zhang J H, Wang Y Q, Duan J and Li X W. 2012. Synergy of satellite and ground based observations in estimation of particulate matter in eastern China. Science of The Total Environment, 433: 20-30
  34. 34.
    Xiao Q Y, Geng G N, Cheng J, Liang F C, Li R, Meng X, Xue T, Huang X M, Kan H D, Zhang Q and He K B. 2021. Evaluation of gap-filling approaches in satellite-based daily PM2.5 prediction models. Atmospheric Environment, 244: 117921
  35. 35.
    Xu Z, Xia X P, Liu X N and Qian Z G. 2015. Combining DMSP/OLS nighttime light with echo state network for prediction of daily PM2.5 average concentrations in Shanghai, China. Atmosphere, 6(10): 1507-1520
  36. 36.
    Yan X, Zang Z, Luo N N, Jiang Y Z and Li Z Q. 2020. New interpretable deep learning model to monitor real-time PM2.5 concentrations from satellite data. Environment International, 144: 106060
  37. 37.
    Yin J H, Mao F Y, Zang L, Chen J P, Lu X and Hong J. 2021. Retrieving PM2.5 with high spatio-temporal coverage by TOA reflectance of Himawari-8. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 12(4): 14-20
  38. 38.
    Zhang Y and Li Z Q. 2013. Estimation of PM2.5 from fine-mode aerosol optical depth. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 17(4): 929-943
  39. 39.
    Zhang Y, Li Z Q, Bai K X, Wei Y Y, Xie Y S, Zhang Y X, Ou Y, Cohen J, Zhang Y H, Peng Z R, Zhang X Y, Chen C, Hong J, Xu H, Guang J, Lv Y, Li K T and Li D H. 2021. Satellite remote sensing of atmospheric particulate matter mass concentration: Advances, challenges, and perspectives. Fundamental Research, 1(3): 240-258
  40. 40.
    Zhang Y J, Zhao T L, Yin C Z, Wang Z F, Ge B Z, Liu D Y and Du X X. 2019. Seasonal variation of the relationship between surface PM2.5 and O3 concentrations in Xuzhou. China Environmental Science, 39(6): 2267-2272
  41. 41.
    Zou B, Pu Q, Bilal M, Weng Q, Zhai L and Nichol J. 2017. High-resolution satellite mapping of fine particulates based on geographically weighted regression. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 13(4): 495-499

قراءة النص الكامل

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website