سابِق|تال

Retrieval of snow depth on the Antarctic Sea Ice from the FY-3B MWRI satellite data

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China

  • Email：yanzhongnan@whu.edu.cn
  • Introduction：闫忠男，研究方向为南极海冰表面积雪遥感反演。E-mail：yanzhongnan@whu.edu.cn
YAN Zhongnan1,  
  • Affiliation：

    Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China

    Key Laboratory of Polar Surveying and Mapping Science, Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan 430079, China

PANG Xiaoping12,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China

    Key Laboratory of Polar Surveying and Mapping Science, Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan 430079, China

  • Email：jiqing@whu.edu.cn
  • Introduction：季青，研究方向为极地海冰遥感。E-mail：jiqing@whu.edu.cn
JI Qing12*,  
  • Affiliation：

    Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China

XIAO Zehui1

ملخص

Snow depth on sea ice is an important part of the cryosphere and global climate system because it is essential in the energy transfer of the ocean, sea ice, and atmosphere. Monitoring and understanding the change of snow depth on the Antarctic sea ice is beneficial to sea ice research and global climate change. Given the lack of Chinese satellite data products for snow depth on the Antarctic sea ice, we explored the application of FY-3B MWRI passive microwave brightness temperature data to retrieve the snow depth on the Antarctic sea ice.We used FY-3B MWRI 18.7 GHz, 36.5 GHz vertical polarization brightness temperature, and sea ice concentration data to retrieve the snow depth on the Antarctic sea ice by using Comiso03 model. The accuracy of snow depth on the Antarctic sea ice based on Markus98 and Comiso03 models was evaluated and compared with GCOM-W1 AMSR-2 snow depth product. The influence of brightness temperature on the retrieval of snow depth on Antarctic sea ice from FY-3B MWRI was discussed.Snow depth on the Antarctic sea ice retrieved by using Comiso03 model than Markus98 model is better based on FY-3B MWRI 18.7 GHz, 36.5 GHz vertical polarization brightness temperature, and sea ice concentration data in 2016, and the average deviation against with ice mass balance buoy measurements (2016S31, 2016S37, and 2016S40) in the Weddell Sea in 2016 is -1.72 cm. The snow depth retrieved on the Antarctic sea ice in 2016 form FY-3B MWRI, which is consistent with that of GCOM-W1 AMSR-2 released data product by NSIDC (the average deviation is -0.11 cm, and the correlation coefficient is 0.90). The difference between the FY-3B-derived and the NSIDC-released AMSR-2 snow depths is small (the spatial-temporal average deviation is -0.80 cm, and the correlation coefficient is 0.93) in the snow accumulation and stable period (from April to October), and relative large (the spatial–temporal average deviation is 2.76 cm, and the correlation coefficient is 0.85) in the snow melting period (from November to March). These differences mainly distributed in the northern Weddell Sea and margin ice zones.Snow depth on the Antarctic sea ice retrieved by Comiso03 model based on FY-3B MWRI satellite data is in good agreement with the GCOM-W1 AMSR-2 snow depth product released by NSIDC. The study on the retrieval of snow depth on the Antarctic sea ice using FY-3B MWRI satellite data can provide scientific data and technical support for monitoring polar ice and snow environment and evaluation of Antarctic sea ice change with its global effects.

مفهوم

snow depth;Antarctic sea ice;passive microwave remote sensing;satellite remote sensing

References

  1. 1.
    Bian L G and Lin X C. 2005. Variation of antarctic sea ice in the latest 30 Years. Chinese Journal of Polar Research, 17(4): 233-244
  2. 2.
    Brucker L and Markus T. 2013. Arctic-scale assessment of satellite passive microwave-derived snow depth on sea ice using Operation IceBridge airborne data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 118(6): 2892-2905
  3. 3.
    Chen Y, Zhao X, Pang X P and Ji Q. 2022. Daily sea ice concentration product based on brightness temperature data of FY-3D MWRI in the Arctic. Big Earth Data, 6(2): 164-178
  4. 4.
    Comiso J C, Cavalieri D J and Markus T. 2003. Sea ice concentration, ice temperature, and snow depth using AMSR-E data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(2): 243-252
  5. 5.
    Du J Y, Kimball J S, Shi J C, Jones L A, Wu S L, Sun R J and Yang H. 2014. Inter-calibration of satellite passive microwave land observations from AMSR-E and AMSR2 using overlapping FY3B-MWRI sensor measurements. Remote Sensing, 6(9): 8594-8616
  6. 6.
    Eicken H, Lange M A and Wadhams P. 1994. Characteristics and distribution patterns of snow and meteoric ice in the Weddell Sea and their contribution to the mass balance of sea ice. Annales Geophysicae, 12(1): 80-93
  7. 7.
    Kelly R E, Chang A T, Tsang L and Foster J L. 2003. A prototype AMSR-E global snow area and snow depth algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(2): 230-242
  8. 8.
    Kern S and Ozsoy B. 2019. An attempt to improve snow depth retrieval using satellite microwave radiometry for rough Antarctic Sea Ice. Remote Sensing, 11(19): 2323
  9. 9.
    Kern S, Ozsoy-Cicek B, Willmes S, Nicolaus M, Haas C and Ackley S. 2011. An intercomparison between AMSR-E snow-depth and satellite C- and Ku-band radar backscatter data for Antarctic sea ice. Annals of Glaciology, 52(57): 279-290
  10. 10.
    Kwok R and Maksym T. 2014. Snow depth of the Weddell and Bellingshausen Sea Ice covers from IceBridge surveys in 2010 and 2011: An examination. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119(7): 4141-4167
  11. 11.
    Lavergne T, Sorensen A M, Kern S, Tonboe R, Notz D, Aaboe S, Bell L, Dybkjær G, Eastwood S, Gabarro C, Heygster G, Killie A M, Kreiner M B, Lavelle J, Saldo R, Sandven S and Pedersen L T. 2019. Version 2 of the EUMETSAT OSI SAF and ESA CCI sea-ice concentration climate data records. The Cryosphere, 13(1): 49-78
  12. 12.
    Li L L, Chen H H and Guan L. 2019. Retrieval of snow depth on sea ice in the arctic using the FengYun-3B microwave radiation imager. Journal of Ocean University of China, 18(3): 580-588
  13. 13.
    Markus T and Cavalieri D J. 1998. Snow depth distribution over sea ice in the southern ocean from satellite passive microwave data//Jeffrie M O, ed. Antarctic Sea Ice: Physical Processes, Interactions and Variability, Volume 74. [s.l.]: American Geophysical Union (AGU): 19-39
  14. 14.
    Markus T and Cavalieri D J. 2009. The AMSR-E NT2 sea ice concentration algorithm: its basis and implementation. Journal of the Remote Sensing Society of Japan, 29(1): 216-225
  15. 15.
    Markus T, Cavalieri D J, Gasiewski A J, Klein M, Maslanik J A, Powell D C, Stankov B B, Stroeve J C and Sturm M. 2006. Microwave signatures of snow on sea ice: observations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(11): 3081-3090
  16. 16.
    Markus T, Massom R, Worby A, Lytle V, Kurtz N and Maksym T. 2011. Freeboard, snow depth and sea-ice roughness in East Antarctica from in situ and multiple satellite data. Annals of Glaciology, 52(57): 242-248
  17. 17.
    Maykut G A. 1986. The surface heat and mass balance//Untersteiner N, ed. The Geophysics of Sea Ice. Boston: Springer
  18. 18.
    Powell D C, Markus T, Cavalieri D J, Gasiewski A J, Klein M, Maslanik J A, Stroeve J C and Sturm M. 2006. Microwave signatures of snow on sea ice: modeling. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(11): 3091-3102
  19. 19.
    Stroeve J C, Markus T, Maslanik J A, Cavalieri D J, Gasiewski A J, Heinrichs J F, Holmgren J, Perovich D K and Sturm M. 2006. Impact of surface roughness on AMSR-E sea ice products. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(11): 3103-3117
  20. 20.
    Sturm M, Perovich D K and Holmgren J. 2002. Thermal conductivity and heat transfer through the snow on the ice of the Beaufort Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 107(C10): 8043
  21. 21.
    Tang X T, Chen H H, Guan L and Li L L. 2020. Intercalibration of FY-3B/MWRI and GCOM-W1/AMSR-2 brightness temperature over the Arctic. Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(8): 1032-1044
  22. 22.
    Wang G X, Jiang L M, Wu S L, Liu X J and Hao S R. 2017. Intercalibrating FY-3B and FY-3C/MWRI for synergistic implementing to snow depth retrieval algorithm. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 32(1): 49-56
  23. 23.
    Wang X Y, Guan L and Li L L. 2018. Comparison and validation of sea ice concentration from FY-3B/MWRI and Aqua/AMSR-E observations. Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(5): 723-736
  24. 24.
    Webster M, Gerland S, Holland M, Hunke E, Kwok R, Lecomte O, Massom R, Perovich D and Sturm M. 2018. Snow in the changing sea-ice systems. Nature Climate Change, 8(11): 946-953
  25. 25.
    Worby A P, Geiger C A, Paget M J, van Woert M, Ackley S F and DeLiberty T L. 2008. Thickness distribution of Antarctic sea ice. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 113(C5): C05S92
  26. 26.
    Wu Z K, Wang X D and Wang F. 2020. Inversion of Arctic sea ice concentration based on FY-3 MWRI data. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 42(4): 1135-1144
  27. 27.
    Yang J, Dong C H, Lu N M, Yang Z D, Shi J M, Zhang P, Liu Y J and Cai B. 2009. FY-3A: the new generation polar-orbiting meteorological satellite of China. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 67(4): 501-509
  28. 28.
    Zhang X, Zhou C X, E D C and An J C. 2014. Monitoring of Antarctic sea ice based on the multichannel MODIS Data. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 39(10): 1194-1198

قراءة النص الكامل

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website