سابِق|تال

Earth observation knowledge hub： Implications， key technologies and perspectives

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

    National Engineering Research Center of Satellite Remote Sensing Applications, Beijing 100094, China

    Demonstration Centre for Spaceborne Remote Sensing National Space Administration, Beijing 100094, China

  • Email：zhaolm@aircas.ac.cn
  • Introduction：赵利民，研究方向为光学遥感卫星应用工程。E-mail： zhaolm@aircas.ac.cn
ZHAO Limin123,  
  • Affiliation：

    National Remote Sensing Center of China, Beijing 100036, China

MIAO Chen4,  
  • Affiliation：

    Earth Observation System and Data Center, China National Space Administration, Beijing 100101, China

XING Jin5,  
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

    National Earth Observation Data Center, Beijing 100094, China

LI Guoqing16,  
  • Affiliation：

    Qian Xuesen Laboratory, China Academy of Space Technology, Beijing 100094, China

HOU Yukui7,  
  • Affiliation：

    Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

LIU Chuang8,  
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

    National Engineering Research Center of Satellite Remote Sensing Applications, Beijing 100094, China

    Demonstration Centre for Spaceborne Remote Sensing National Space Administration, Beijing 100094, China

LI Jiaguo123,  
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

    National Engineering Research Center of Satellite Remote Sensing Applications, Beijing 100094, China

    Demonstration Centre for Spaceborne Remote Sensing National Space Administration, Beijing 100094, China

CHEN Xingfeng123,  
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

    National Engineering Research Center of Satellite Remote Sensing Applications, Beijing 100094, China

LIU Jun12,  
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

    National Engineering Research Center of Satellite Remote Sensing Applications, Beijing 100094, China

    Demonstration Centre for Spaceborne Remote Sensing National Space Administration, Beijing 100094, China

YANG Jian123,  
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

    National Engineering Research Center of Satellite Remote Sensing Applications, Beijing 100094, China

ZHOU Xiang12,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

    National Engineering Research Center of Satellite Remote Sensing Applications, Beijing 100094, China

    Demonstration Centre for Spaceborne Remote Sensing National Space Administration, Beijing 100094, China

  • Email：guxf@aircas.ac.cn
  • Introduction：顾行发，研究方向为遥感定标与真实性检验。E-mail： guxf@aircas.ac.cn
GU Xingfa123*

ملخص

Intelligently sharing and reusing the knowledge developed by application practices are the keys to break through technical barriers and fully activate and release the effectiveness of Earth Observations (EO). The Earth Observation Knowledge Hub (EOKH), which is used to couple decentralized knowledge bases organically, is a research frontier for the governance and intelligent service of global EO applications. In the design of Group on Earth Observations (GEO), the GEO Knowledge Hub (GKH) is intended to provide authoritative, validated, and reproducible content for evidence-based reporting on policy commitments and decision-making. Thus, the GKH offers a platform for users to discover, learn about, and employ methods, analytical tools, and applications; it also provides opportunities for the GEO community to collaborate and provide mutual assistance related to GKH contents. However, important lessons, such as the sensitive issue of intellectual ethics and how to profit GKH from the recent technological advances in information technologies, have been learned during the implementations. In response to the problems and insights encountered by GEO in developing GKH, we systematically analyzed the connotation and characteristics of EOKH and sorted out the fundamental needs and challenges for the development of EOKH in China.First, we systematically analyzed the connotation and characteristics of EOKH. The study argues that EOKH is the intersection node of high-throughput trusted EO knowledge in knowledge-sharing networks. It has three typical features, i.e., connectivity, high throughput, and lightweight computing. Its core mission is to identify and transfer valuable research in a timely manner and to promote high throughput of application packages. Second, we sorted out the fundamental needs and challenges for the development of EOKH in China. Considering the latest progress in the study of EO ontology, we also analyzed the possible key technical problems and gave strategies to cope with them. On this basis, the system architecture prototype of EOKH, which is drawn on the system design concept of representational state transfer, is proposed, and an ontology model of conceptual EO knowledge and a formalization model of process-oriented EO knowledge are established.The study argues that EOKH should be in an open collaborative environment where humans are in the loop. The key technologies are system metrics, knowledge transfer, knowledge reuse, and knowledge exploration and visualization. The transfer and reuse of knowledge packages can greatly enhance the ease of development and reuse of EO application practices. Ontology modeling helps formalize the intrinsic connection between the human-cyber-physical systems of EO application and enhances the interpretability of higher-order complex problems.EOKH transforms knowledge sharing from point to point at the element level to group collaborative at the system level, which not only reduces the cost of cross-industry and socially integrated EO applications but also avoids repetitive research inputs, helps break through technical barriers and cognitive obstacles, and releases the effectiveness of satellite digital economy services comprehensively. The study argues that connecting EO knowledge in the human–cyber–physical systems and exploring high-throughput knowledge coproduction and transfer technology in a “humans-in-the-loop” environment are necessary to enhance the interpretability of tacit EO knowledge and promote the competitiveness and activeness of EOKH.

مفهوم

remote sensing;Knowledge hub;Earth observations;ontologies;knowledge packages;knowledge recusing;cyber-physical-social systems;humans in the loop

References

  1. 1.
    Abdalla G, Damasceno C D N, Guessi M, Oquendo F and Nakagawa E Y. 2015. A systematic literature review on knowledge representation approaches for systems-of-systems//2015 IX Brazilian Symposium on Components, Architectures and Reuse Software. Belo Horizonte: IEEE: 70-79
  2. 2.
    Albinet C, Whitehurst A S, Jewell L A, Bugbee K, Laur H, Murphy K J, Frommknecht B, Scipal K, Costa G, Jai B, Ramachandran R, Lavalle M and Duncanson L. 2019. A joint ESA-NASA multi-mission algorithm and analysis platform (MAAP) for biomass, NISAR, and GEDI. Surveys in Geophysics, 40(4): 1017-1027
  3. 3.
    Aldana-Martín J F, García-Nieto J, del Mar Roldán-García M and Aldana-Montes J F. 2022. Semantic modelling of Earth Observation remote sensing. Expert Systems with Applications, 187: 115838
  4. 4.
    Aronson J E. 2003. Expert systems//Bidgoli H, ed. Encyclopedia of Information Systems. Boston: Academic Press: 277-289
  5. 5.
    Arvor D, Belgiu M, Falomir Z, Mougenot I and Durieux L. 2019. Ontologies to interpret remote sensing images: why do we need them? Giscience and Remote Sensing, 56(6): 911-939
  6. 6.
    Bathelt H, Malmberg A and Maskell P. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1): 31-56
  7. 7.
    Bloom N, Jones C I, Van Reenen J and Webb M. 2020. Are ideas getting harder to find? American Economic Review, 110(4): 1104-1144
  8. 8.
    Bohle S. 2014. Online repository for lab notebooks. Nature, 506(7487): 159-159
  9. 9.
    Carroll S R, Herczog E, Hudson M, Russell K and Stall S. 2021. Operationalizing the CARE and FAIR Principles for Indigenous data futures. Scientific Data, 8(1): 108
  10. 10.
    Chen X F, Zhao L M, Zheng F J, Li J G, Li L, Ding H N, Zhang K N, Liu S M, Li D H and de Leeuw G. 2022. Neural network AEROsol retrieval for geostationary satellite (NNAeroG) based on temporal, spatial and spectral measurements. Remote Sensing, 14(4): 980
  11. 11.
    Chen X F, Zheng F J, Guo D, Wang L L, Zhao L M, Li J G, Li L, Zhang Y H, Zhang K N, Xi M and Li K T. 2021. Review of machine learning methods for aerosol quantitative remote sensing. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 25(11): 2220-2233
  12. 12.
    陈兴峰, 郑逢杰, 郭丁, 王莉莉, 赵利民, 李家国, 李雷, 张玉环, 张凯南, 奚萌, 李凯涛. 2021. 气溶胶定量遥感的机器学习方法综述. 遥感学报, 25(11): 2220-2233
  13. 13.
    Cheng X Q, Liu S H and Zhang R Q. 2022. Thinking on new system for big data technology. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 37(1): 60-67
  14. 14.
    程学旗, 刘盛华, 张儒清. 2022. 大数据分析处理技术新体系的思考. 中国科学院院刊, 37(1): 60-67
  15. 15.
    Cheng X Q, Mei H, Zhao W, Wah W S B, Shen H W and Li G J. 2020. Data science and computing intelligence: concept, paradigm, and opportunities. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 35(12): 1470-1481
  16. 16.
    程学旗, 梅宏, 赵伟, 华云生, 沈华伟, 李国杰. 2020. 数据科学与计算智能: 内涵、范式与机遇. 中国科学院院刊, 35(12): 1470-1481
  17. 17.
    China National Space Administration (CNSA). 2019. 2019 National Report of China High-Resolution Earth Observation System Applications (Business Application Volume). China National Space Administration (国家航天局. 2019. 2019《中国高分卫星应用国家报告》(业务应用卷). 国家航天局)
  18. 18.
    Chu J S G and Evans J A. 2021. Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(41): e2021636118
  19. 19.
    De Simone F, D’Amore F, Bencardino M, Carbone F, Hedgecock I M, Sprovieri F, Cinnirella S and Pirrone N. 2021. The GOS4M Knowledge Hub: a web-based effectiveness evaluation platform in support of the Minamata Convention on Mercury. Environmental Science and Policy, 124: 235-246
  20. 20.
    Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (European Commission). 2018. OSPP-REC: Open Science Policy Platform Recommendations. Publications Office of the European Union
  21. 21.
    Editorial Office of Journal of Global Change Data and Discovery. 2017. Guidelines of global change research data publishing & repository. Journal of Global Change Data and Discovery, 1(3): 253-261
  22. 22.
    《全球变化数据学报》(中英文)编辑部. 2017. 全球变化科学研究数据出版与共享指南. 全球变化数据学报, 1(3): 253-261
  23. 23.
    Esch T, Asamer H, Bachofer F, Balhar J, Boettcher M, Boissier E, d’Angelo P, Gevaert C M, Hirner A, Jupova K, Kurz F, Kwarteng A Y, Mathot E, Marconcini M, Marin A, Metz-Marconcini A, Pacini F, Paganini M, Permana H, Soukup T, Uereyen S, Small C, Svaton V and Zeidler J N. 2020. Digital world meets urban planet-new prospects for evidence-based urban studies arising from joint exploitation of big earth data, information technology and shared knowledge. International Journal of Digital Earth, 13(1): 136-157
  24. 24.
    Esch T, Üreyen S, Zeidler J, Metz-Marconcini A, Hirner A, Asamer H, Tum M, Böttcher M, Kuchar S, Svaton V and Marconcini M. 2018. Exploiting big earth data from space-first experiences with the timescan processing chain. Big Earth Data, 2(1): 36-55
  25. 25.
    Evers H D, Gerke S and Menkhoff T. 2010. Knowledge clusters and knowledge hubs: designing epistemic landscapes for development. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(5): 678-689
  26. 26.
    GEO Secretariat. 2019. 2020-2022 GEO Work Programme Summary Document (Version 5.1). In, 120-1. Canberra, Group on Earth Observations
  27. 27.
    GEO Secretariat. 2020a. Draft implementation plan for the GEO knowledge hub//16th Programme Board Meeting. Geneva: GEO Secretariat
  28. 28.
    GEO Secretariat. 2020b. GEO knowledge hub implementation plan//17th Programme Board Meeting. [s.l.]: GEO Secretariat
  29. 29.
    GEO Secretariat. 2021a. GEO statement on open knowledge//21st Programme Board Meeting. [s.l.]: GEO Secretariat
  30. 30.
    GEO Secretariat. 2021b. Report on the development of the GEO knowledge hub//21st Programme Board Meeting. [s.l.]: GEO Secretariat
  31. 31.
    Gill K S. 2020. Pearl, Judea and Mackenzie, Dana: the book of why: the new science of cause and effect (2018). AI and Society, 35(3): 767-768
  32. 32.
    Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, Ilyushchenko S, Thau D and Moore R. 2017. Google Earth Engine: planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202: 18-27
  33. 33.
    Gu X F and Yu T. 2018. Application-Oriented Space Remote Sensing Scientific Argumentation Theory, Method and Technology. Beijing: Science Press
  34. 34.
    顾行发, 余涛. 2018. 面向应用的航天遥感科学论证理论、方法与技术. 北京: 科学出版社
  35. 35.
    He G J, Wang G Z, Long T F, Peng Y, Jiang W, Yin R Y, Jiao W L and Zhang Z M. 2018. Opening and sharing of big earth observation data: challenges and countermeasures. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33(8): 783-790
  36. 36.
    何国金, 王桂周, 龙腾飞, 彭燕, 江威, 尹然宇, 焦伟利, 张兆明. 2018. 对地观测大数据开放共享: 挑战与思考. 中国科学院院刊, 33(8): 783-790
  37. 37.
    Hogan A, Blomqvist E, Cochez M, D’amato C, De Melo G, Gutierrez C, Kirrane S, Gayo J E L, Navigli R, Neumaier S, Ngomo A C N, Polleres A, Rashid S M, Rula A, Schmelzeisen L, Sequeda J, Staab S and Zimmermann A. 2022. Knowledge graphs. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(4): 71
  38. 38.
    Horsburgh J S, Aufdenkampe A K, Mayorga E, Lehnert K A, Hsu L, Song L L, Jones A S, Damiano S G, Tarboton D G, Valentine D, Zaslavsky I and Whitenack T. 2016. Observations Data Model 2: a community information model for spatially discrete Earth observations. Environmental Modelling and Software, 79: 55-74
  39. 39.
    Howells J R L. 2002. Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography. Urban Studies, 39(5/6): 871-884
  40. 40.
    IEEE Standards Association. 2011. IEEE Std 2030-2011 IEEE guide for smart grid interoperability of energy technology and information technology operation with the electric power system (EPS), end-use applications, and loads. New York: IEEE: 1-126
  41. 41.
    Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Tsinghua University, Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence and Tsinghua China Academy of Engineering Knowledge Intelligence Joint Research Center. 2020. Blockchain Development Research Report.Beijing (清华大学人工智能研究院, 北京智源人工智能研究院, 清华—中国工程院知识智能联合研究中心. 2020. 区块链发展研究报告.北京)static.aminer.cn
  42. 42.
    Janowicz K, Haller A, Cox S J D, Le Phuoc D and Lefrancois M. 2019. SOSA: a lightweight ontology for sensors, observations, samples, and actuators. Journal of Web Semantics, 56: 1-10
  43. 43.
    Ji S X, Pan S R, Cambria E, Marttinen P and Yu P S. 2022. A survey on knowledge graphs: representation, acquisition, and applications. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 33(2): 494-514
  44. 44.
    Jordan M I. 2019. Artificial Intelligence—The Revolution Hasn’t Happened Yet. Harvard Data Science Review
  45. 45.
    Klein T, Nilsson M, Persson A and Håkansson B. 2017. From open data to open analyses—new opportunities for environmental applications? Environments, 4(2): 32
  46. 46.
    Kleinberg J, Ludwig J, Mullainathan S and Sunstein C R. 2018. Discrimination in the age of algorithms. Journal of Legal Analysis, 10: 113-174
  47. 47.
    Leiserson C E, Thompson N C, Emer J S, Kuszmaul B C, Lampson B W, Sanchez D and Schardl T B. 2020. There's plenty of room at the top: what will drive computer performance after Moore’s law? Science, 368(6495): eaam9744
  48. 48.
    Li G Q, Zhang H Y, Zhang L C, Wang Y Y and Tian C Z. 2016. Development and trend of earth observation data sharing. Journal of Remote Sensing (in Chinese), 20(5): 979-990
  49. 49.
    李国庆, 张红月, 张连翀, 王媛媛, 田传召. 2016. 地球观测数据共享的发展和趋势. 遥感学报, 20(5): 979-990
  50. 50.
    Little J D C. 2011. OR FORUM—Little’s law as viewed on its 50th anniversary. Operations Research, 59(3): 536-549
  51. 51.
    Liu S M, Zhang Y L, Zhao L M, Chen X F, Zhou R X, Zheng F J, Li Z L, Li J G, Yang H, Li H F, Yang J, Gao H L and Gu X F. 2022. QUantitative and automatic atmospheric correction (QUAAC): application and validation. Sensors, 22(9): 3280
  52. 52.
    Liu Z M and Wang J. 2020. Human-cyber-physical systems: concepts, challenges, and research opportunities. Frontiers of Information Technology and Electronic Engineering, 21(11): 1535-1553
  53. 53.
    Masmoudi M, Karray M H, Ben Abdallah Ben Lamine S, Zghal H B and Archimede B. 2020. MEMOn: modular environmental monitoring ontology to link heterogeneous earth observed data. Environmental Modelling and Software, 124: 104581
  54. 54.
    Mei H, Cao D G and Xie T. 2022. Ubiquitous operating system: toward the blue ocean of human-cyber-physical ternary ubiquitous computing. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 37(1): 30-37
  55. 55.
    梅宏, 曹东刚, 谢涛. 2022. 泛在操作系统: 面向人机物融合泛在计算的新蓝海. 中国科学院院刊, 37(1): 30-37
  56. 56.
    Nativi S, Mazzetti P, Santoro M, Papeschi F, Craglia M and Ochiai O. 2015. Big data challenges in building the global earth observation system of systems. Environmental Modelling and Software, 68: 1-26
  57. 57.
    Owusu C, Snigdha N J, Martin M T and Kalyanapu A J. 2022. PyGEE-SWToolbox: a python jupyter notebook toolbox for interactive surface water mapping and analysis using google earth engine. Sustainability, 14(5): 2557
  58. 58.
    Pathirage C P, Amaratunga R D G and Haigh R P. 2006. Managing construction workers and their tacit knowledge in a knowledge environment: a conceptual framework//6th International Postgraduate Research Conference in the Built and Human Environment. Delft: Delft University of Technology and TNO, Delft University: 733-743
  59. 59.
    Paulheim H. 2018. How much is a triple? Estimating the cost of knowledge graph creation//Proceedings of the ISWC 2018 Posters and Demonstrations, Industry and Blue Sky Ideas Tracks co-located with 17th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2018). Monterey: CEUR Workshop Proceedings
  60. 60.
    Pu Z Q, Yi J Q, Liu Z, Qiu T H, Sun J L and Li F M. 2022. Knowledge-based and data-driven integrating methodologies for collective intelligence decision making: a survey. Acta Automatica Sinica, 48(3): 627-643
  61. 61.
    蒲志强, 易建强, 刘振, 丘腾海, 孙金林, 李非墨. 2022. 知识和数据协同驱动的群体智能决策方法研究综述. 自动化学报, 48(3): 627-643
  62. 62.
    Rapiński J, Bednarczyk M and Zinkiewicz D. 2019. JupyTEP IDE as an online tool for earth observation data processing. Remote Sensing, 11(17): 1973
  63. 63.
    Stacey P and Berry D. 2018. Towards a Digital Earth: using archetypes to enable knowledge interoperability within geo-observational sensor systems design. Earth Science Informatics, 11(2): 307-323
  64. 64.
    Su W J. 2021. You are the best reviewer of your own papers: an owner-assisted scoring mechanism//35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. [s.l.]: [s.n.]: 27929-27939
  65. 65.
    Sun K, Zhu Y Q, Pan P, Hou Z W, Wang D X, Li W R and Song J. 2019. Geospatial data ontology: the semantic foundation of geospatial data integration and sharing. Big Earth Data, 3(3): 269-296
  66. 66.
    Wing J M. 2021. Trustworthy AI. Communications of the ACM, 64(10): 64-71
  67. 67.
    Wulder M A and Coops N C. 2014. Satellites: make Earth observations open access. Nature, 513(7516): 30-31
  68. 68.
    Xing L N and Chen Y W. 2011. Research progress on intelligent optimization guidance approaches using knowledge. Acta Automatica Sinica, 37(11): 1285-1289
  69. 69.
    邢立宁, 陈英武. 2011. 基于知识的智能优化引导方法研究进展. 自动化学报, 37(11): 1285-1289
  70. 70.
    Xu H, Li S, Bai Y Q, Dong W H, Huang W Y, Xu S M, Lin Y L, Wang B, Wu F H, Xin X G, Zhang L, Wang Z Z and Wu T W. 2019. A collaborative analysis framework for distributed gridded environmental data. Environmental Modelling and Software, 111: 324-339
  71. 71.
    Xu Z W, Li G J and Sun N H. 2022. Information superbahn: towards new type of cyberinfrastructure. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 37(1): 46-52
  72. 72.
    徐志伟, 李国杰, 孙凝晖. 2022. 一种新型信息基础设施: 高通量低熵算力网(信息高铁). 中国科学院院刊, 37(1): 46-52
  73. 73.
    Yang Q Q, Jin C Y, Li T W, Yuan Q Q, Shen H F and Zhang L P. 2022. Research progress and challenges of data-driven quantitative remote sensing. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 26(2): 268-285
  74. 74.
    杨倩倩, 靳才溢, 李同文, 袁强强, 沈焕锋, 张良培. 2022. 数据驱动的定量遥感研究进展与挑战. 遥感学报, 26(2): 268-285
  75. 75.
    Zhang H Y, Zhou C H, Lv G N, Wu Z F, Lu F, Wang J F, Yue T X, Luo J C, Ge Y and Qin C Z. 2020. The connotation and inheritance of Geo-information Tupu. Journal of Geo-information Science, 22(4): 653-661
  76. 76.
    张洪岩, 周成虎, 闾国年, 吴志峰, 陆锋, 王劲峰, 岳天祥, 骆剑承, 葛咏, 秦承志. 2020. 试论地学信息图谱思想的内涵与传承. 地球信息科学学报, 22(4): 653-661
  77. 77.
    Zhu C Q, Xu D J, Ren N, Cui H C and Zhao Y Z. 2021. Model and implementation of geographic data transaction certificate and copyright protection based on blockchain and digital watermarking. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 50(12): 1694-1704
  78. 78.
    朱长青, 徐鼎捷, 任娜, 崔瀚川, 赵亚宙. 2021. 区块链与数字水印相结合的地理数据交易存证及版权保护模型. 测绘学报, 50(12): 1694-1704
  79. 79.
    Zhu Z, Wulder M A, Roy D P, Woodcock C E, Hansen M C, Radeloff V C, Healey S P, Schaaf C, Hostert P, Strobl P, Pekel J F, Lymburner L, Pahlevan N and Scambos T A. 2019. Benefits of the free and open Landsat data policy. Remote Sensing of Environment, 224: 382-385

قراءة النص الكامل

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website