دراسة تغيرات الزمكانية والزمانية لنباتات الغابات في مناطق تجمع الغاز الطبيعي باستخدام بيانات GOSIF بدقة منخفضة - مثال على جنوب حوض مقاطعة Qinshui

  • role: First author第一作者
  • Affiliation:

    School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

    School of History and Geography, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou 363000, China

  • Email:zhaocong2013@pku.edu.cn
  • Introduction:E-mail zhaocong2013@pku.edu.cn
ZHAO Cong12,  
  • Affiliation:

    School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

XU Wei1,  
  • Affiliation:

    School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

    School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, China

ZHANG Zhaoxu13,  
  • Affiliation:

    School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

WU Zihua1,  
  • Affiliation:

    School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

HAN Guhuai1,  
  • role: Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation:

    School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

    Beijing Key Lab of Spatial Information Integration & Its Applications, Beijing 100871, China

    Technology Innovation Center for Geospatial Information Systems, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100871, China

  • Email:qmqin@pku.edu.cn
  • Introduction:E-mail qmqin@pku.edu.cn
QIN Qiming145*

ملخص

الغاز الطبيعي في الطبقات الفحمية هو مصدر طاقة نظيفة غير تقليدية ذاتية الإنتاج والتخزين الموجودة في الطبقات الفحمية والصخور المحيطة بها ، وهو غاز هيدروكربوني مرافق ينتج أثناء تكون الفحم. تسرب الهيدروكربونات في الطبقات الفحمية يمكن أن يغير تركيب التربة والبيئة الكيميائية لها ، مما يؤثر على عمل جذور النباتات في التنفس ، وبالتالي يعيق تخمير الكلوروفيل في الأوراق النباتية ويقمع عملية التمثيل الضوئي للنباتات ، مما يؤدي في النهاية إلى تغيرات استثنائية في تألق كلوروفيل النباتات الناجمة عن ضوء الشمس (SIF). لاستكشاف تأثير تسرب الهيدروكربونات في الطبقات الفحمية على SIF للنباتات ، تم في هذه الدراسة استخدام طريقة تصغير الـSIF القائمة على الشبكات العصبية التمريرية CNN (Convolutional Neural Networks) في مقاطعة Qinshui في جنوب حوض Qinshui. تم الحصول على بيانات SIF بدقة مسافية 1 كيلومتر لعام 2000-2020 في المنطقة الدراسية ، وتم تقسيم النباتات في المنطقة الدراسية إلى ثلاثة أنواع: الحقول الزراعية والمروج والغابات. وقد أظهرت النتائج أن متوسط قيم SIF لثلاثة أنواع من النباتات في منطقة الدراسة هي أعلى في الغابات ، تليها المروج ، وأقل في الحقول الزراعية ؛. كانت هناك اتجاهات واضحة في زيادة SIF للنباتات في منطقة الدراسة خلال الفترة 2000-2020. بالإضافة إلى ذلك ، كانت قيم SIF للغابات في منطقة تراكم الغاز الطبيعي نسبياً منخفضة بشكل واضح مقارنةً بالمنطقة الضابطة ، وكانت سرعة زيادة المتوسط السنوي لـ SIF أقل من المنطقة الضابطة خلال الفترة 2000-2020 ، مما يدل على أن أثر تسرب الغاز الطبيعي في المنطقة المتراكمة يكون أكثر وضوحاً على الغابات. بشكل عام ، تظهر هذه الدراسة أن التغيرات الاستثنائية لـ SIF النباتي يمكن أن تعكس إلى حد ما حالة تسرب الهيدروكربونات في الطبقات الفحمية ، وهو ما يوفر أساسًا علميًا لتحديد مواقع تجمع الغاز الطبيعي في الفقاعة بعيدة المدى.

مفهوم

غاز طبيعي; SIF الكلوروفيل المحفز بالضوء الشمسي; تحليل التغيرات الزمكانية والزمانية; الضغط على نمو النباتات; تسرب الهيدروكربونات; تصغير; شبكة عصبية تمريرية; حوض Qinshui

References

  1. 1.
    Akther S, Sun W Z, Suzuki J and Fujita M. 2022. Tolerance of benthic foraminifer Calcarina gaudichaudii to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon pyrene: effects on photosynthesis. Coral Reefs, 41(6): 1585-1594.
  2. 2.
    Arellano P, Tansey K, Balzter H and Boyd D S. 2015. Detecting the effects of hydrocarbon pollution in the Amazon forest using hyperspectral satellite images. Environmental Pollution, 205: 225-239.
  3. 3.
    Baker N R. 2008. Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59: 89-113.
  4. 4.
    Cai B F and Yu R. Advance and evaluation in the long time series vegetation trends research based on remote sensing. Journal of Remote Sensing (in Chinese), 13(6): 1170-1186
  5. 5.
    Clayton J L. 1998. Geochemistry of coalbed gas-a review. International Journal of Coal Geology, 35(1/4): 159-173.
  6. 6.
    Dai J X, Qi H F, Song Y and Guan D S. 1986. Composition, carbon isotope types, genesis, and significance of coalbed methane in China. Scientia Sinica Part B, (12): 1317-1326
  7. 7.
    Ding Y B, He X F, Zhou Z Q, Hu J, Cai H J, Wang X Y, Li L S, Xu J T and Shi H Y. 2022. Response of vegetation to drought and yield monitoring based on NDVI and SIF. CATENA, 219: 106328.
  8. 8.
    Drew M C. 1997. Oxygen deficiency and root metabolism: injury and acclimation under hypoxia and anoxia. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 48: 223-250.
  9. 9.
    Drew M C, Cobb B G, Johnson J R, Andrews D, Morgan P W, Jordan W and He C J. 1994. Metabolic acclimation of root tips to oxygen deficiency. Annals of Botany, 74(3): 281-286.
  10. 10.
    Frankenberg C, Fisher J B, Worden J, Badgley G, Saatchi S S, Lee J E, Toon G C, Butz A, Jung M, Kuze A and Yokota T. 2011. New global observations of the terrestrial carbon cycle from GOSAT: patterns of plant fluorescence with gross primary productivity. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(17): L17706.
  11. 11.
    Frankenberg C, O’Dell C, Berry J, Guanter L, Joiner J, Köhler P, Pollock R and Taylor T E. 2014. Prospects for chlorophyll fluorescence remote sensing from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2. Remote Sensing of Environment, 147: 1-12.
  12. 12.
    Gentine P and Alemohammad S H. 2018. Reconstructed solar-induced fluorescence: a machine learning vegetation product based on MODIS surface reflectance to reproduce GOME-2 solar-induced fluorescence. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(7): 3136-3146.
  13. 13.
    Guan K Y, Berry J A, Zhang Y G, Joiner J, Guanter L, Badgley G and Lobell D B. 2016. Improving the monitoring of crop productivity using spaceborne solar-induced fluorescence. Global Change Biology, 22(2): 716-726.
  14. 14.
    Guanter L, Alonso L, Gómez-Chova L, Amorós-López J, Vila J and Moreno J. 2007. Estimation of solar-induced vegetation fluorescence from space measurements. Geophysical Research Letters, 34(8): L08401.
  15. 15.
    Guanter L, Frankenberg C, Dudhia A, Lewis P E, Gómez-Dans J, Kuze A, Suto H and Grainger R G. 2012. Retrieval and global assessment of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from GOSAT space measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment, 121: 236-251.
  16. 16.
    Han G H, Sun Y H, Qin Q M. 2023. Extraction of vegetation anomaly caused by coalbed methane hydrocarbon microseepage based on Sentinel-2/MSI. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 27(7):1713-1730
  17. 17.
    Hong Z M, Hu Y J, Cui C L, Yang X N, Tao C X, Luo W R, Zhang W, Li L Y and Meng L K. 2022. An operational downscaling method of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) for regional drought monitoring. Agriculture, 12(4): 547.
  18. 18.
    Jamaludin M I, Matori A N and Myint K C. 2015. Application of NIR to determine effects of hydrocarbon microseepage in oil palm vegetation stress//Proceedings of 2015 International Conference on Space Science and Communication (IconSpace). Langkawi, Malaysia: IEEE: 215-220.
  19. 19.
    Joiner J, Guanter L, Lindstrot R, Voigt M, Vasilkov A P, Middleton E M, Huemmrich K F, Yoshida Y and Frankenberg C. 2013. Global monitoring of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from moderate-spectral-resolution near-infrared satellite measurements: methodology, simulations, and application to GOME-2. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 6(10): 2803-2823.
  20. 20.
    Joiner J, Yoshida Y, Guanter L and Middleton E M. 2016. New methods for the retrieval of chlorophyll red fluorescence from hyperspectral satellite instruments: simulations and application to GOME-2 and SCIAMACHY. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 9(8): 3939-3967.
  21. 21.
    Joiner J, Yoshida Y, Vasilkov A P, Middleton E M, Campbell P K E, Kuze A and Corp L A. 2012. Filling-in of far-red and near-infrared solar lines by terrestrial and atmospheric effects: simulations and space-based observations from SCHIAMACHY and GOSAT. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions, 5(1): 163-210.
  22. 22.
    Joiner J, Yoshida Y, Vasilkov A P, Yoshida Y, Corp L A and Middleton E. 2011. First observations of global and seasonal terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from space. Biogeosciences, 8(3): 637-651.
  23. 23.
    Justice C O, Townshend J R G, Vermote E F, Masuoka E, Wolfe R F, Saleous N, Roy D P and Morisette J T. 2002. An overview of MODIS Land data processing and product status. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1/2): 3-15.
  24. 24.
    Köhler P, Guanter L and Joiner J. 2015. A linear method for the retrieval of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from GOME-2 and SCIAMACHY data. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 8(6): 2589-2608.
  25. 25.
    Li X and Xiao J F. 2019. A global, 0.05-degree product of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence derived from OCO-2, MODIS, and reanalysis data. Remote Sensing, 11(5): 517.
  26. 26.
    Lichtenthaler H K, Buschmann C, Rinderle U and Schmuck G. 1986. Application of chlorophyll fluorescence in ecophysiology. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 25(4): 297-308.
  27. 27.
    Liu L Y, Zhang X, Gao Y, Chen X D, Shuai X and Mi J. 2021. Finer-resolution mapping of global land cover: recent developments, consistency analysis, and prospects. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2021: 5289697.
  28. 28.
    McFarlane J C, Watson R D, Theisen A F, Jackson R D, Ehrler W L, Pinter P J, Idso S B and Reginato R J. 1980. Plant stress detection by remote measurement of fluorescence. Applied Optics, 19(19): 3287-3289.
  29. 29.
    Meroni M, Rossini M, Guanter L, Alonso L, Rascher U, Colombo R and Moreno J. 2009. Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: review of methods and applications. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(10): 2037-2051.
  30. 30.
    Mohammed G H, Colombo R, Middleton E M, Rascher U, van der Tol C, Nedbal L, Goulas Y, Pérez-Priego O, Damm A, Meroni M, Joiner J, Cogliati S, Verhoef W, Malenovský Z, Gastellu-Etchegorry J P, Miller J R, Guanter L, Moreno J, Moya I, Berry J A, Frankenberg C and Zarco-Tejada P J. 2019. Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) in vegetation: 50 years of progress. Remote Sensing of Environment, 231: 111177.
  31. 31.
    Noomen M F. 2007. Hyperspectral reflectance of vegetation affected by underground hydrocarbon gas seepage. Wageningen: Wageningen University.
  32. 32.
    QIN Qiming, WU Zihua, YE Xin, WANG Nan, HAN Guhuai. Remote sensing-based exploration of coalbed methane enrichment areas:Advances in research and prospects. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2024, 36(3): 1-12
  33. 33.
    Qinshui County Bureau of Statistics. 2023. Statistical Communiqué on National Economic and Social Development of Qinshui County in 2022, Qinshui County Bureau of Statistics. (沁水县统计局. 2023. 沁水县2022年国民经济和社会发展统计公报. 沁水县统计局)
  34. 34.
    Ritoré E, Morillo J, Arnáiz C, Coquelet B, Usero J. 2023. Chemical oxidation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil: oxidant comparison study and soil influencing factors. Environmental Engineering Research, 28(6): 220610.
  35. 35.
    Schumacher D. 1996. Hydrocarbon-induced alteration of soils and sediments//Schumacher D, Abrams M A, eds. Hydrocarbon Migration and Its Near-Surface Expression. Tulsa, Okla: American Association of Petroleum Geologists.
  36. 36.
    Song L, Guanter L, Guan K Y, You L Z, Huete A, Ju W M and Zhang Y G. 2018. Satellite sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence detects early response of winter wheat to heat stress in the Indian Indo-Gangetic Plains. Global Change Biology, 24(9): 4023-4037.
  37. 37.
    Thauer R K. 2011. Anaerobic oxidation of methane with sulfate: on the reversibility of the reactions that are catalyzed by enzymes also involved in methanogenesis from CO2. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 14(3): 292-299.
  38. 38.
    Wang D L, Liu W P and Huang X Y. 2013. Trend analysis in vegetation cover in Beijing based on Sen+Mann-Kendall method. Computer Engineering and Applications, 49(5): 13-17
  39. 39.
    Wang S H, Huang C P, Zhang L F, Lin Y, Cen Y and Wu T X. 2016. Monitoring and assessing the 2012 drought in the great plains: analyzing satellite-retrieved solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence, drought indices, and gross primary production. Remote Sensing, 8(2): 61.
  40. 40.
    Yan Z R, Liu L Y, Jing X. 2022. Spatiotemporal variations of satellite-based SIF and its climate response in China from 2007 to 2018. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 37(3): 702-712
  41. 41.
    Yoshida Y, Joiner J, Tucker C, Berry J, Lee J E, Walker G, Reichle R, Koster R, Lyapustin A and Wang Y. 2015. The 2010 Russian drought impact on satellite measurements of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: Insights from modeling and comparisons with parameters derived from satellite reflectances. Remote Sensing of Environment, 166: 163-177.
  42. 42.
    Zhang X, Liu L Y, Chen X D, Gao Y, Xie S and Mi J. 2021a. GLC_FCS30: global land-cover product with fine classification system at 30 m using time-series Landsat imagery. Earth System Science Data, 13(6): 2753-2776.
  43. 43.
    Zhang X, Liu L Y, Wu C S, Chen X, Gao Y, Xie S and Zhang B. 2020. Development of a global 30 m impervious surface map using multisource and multitemporal remote sensing datasets with the Google Earth Engine platform. Earth System Science Data, 12(3): 1625-1648.
  44. 44.
    Zhang Y, Joiner J, Alemohammad S H, Zhou S and Gentine P. 2018. A global spatially contiguous solar-induced fluorescence (CSIF) dataset using neural networks. Biogeosciences, 15(19): 5779-5800.
  45. 45.
    Zhang Z X, Xu W, Qin Q M and Long Z H. 2021b. Downscaling solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence based on convolutional neural network method to monitor agricultural drought. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 59(2): 1012-1028.

قراءة النص الكامل

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website