تحليل العلاقة الاستجابية بين الجفاف الهيدرولوجي والجفاف المناخي من منظور مساحة المياه الديناميكية المراقبة عبر الأقمار الصناعية

  • role: First author第一作者
  • Affiliation:

    Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

    College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

  • Email:xxq54@mails.ccnu.edu.cn
  • Introduction:E-mail xxq54@mails.ccnu.edu.cn
XIONG Xuqian12,  
  • role: Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation:

    Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

    College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

  • Email:zhou.j@ccnu.edu.cn
  • Introduction:E-mail zhou.j@ccnu.edu.cn
ZHOU Jie12*,  
  • Affiliation:

    Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

    College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

GUO Dongliang12,  
  • Affiliation:

    Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

    College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

TAN Wenxia12,  
  • Affiliation:

    Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

    College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

CUI Yilin12,  
  • Affiliation:

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

LU Jing3,  
  • Affiliation:

    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

JIA Li3

ملخص

تعد تقنية الاستشعار عن بعد بالأقمار الصناعية للحصول السريع والمراقبة عالية الدقة لمياه سطح الأرض وسيلة مهمة لفهم آليات حدوث الجفاف الهيدرولوجي وقواعد تطوره. توفر المنتجات العالمية المتزايدة لتغطية المياه السطحية الديناميكية فرصًا ثمينة لدراسة التغيرات الديناميكية لمياه سطح الأرض واستجابتها للجفاف. تركز هذه الدراسة على منطقة وسط حوض نهر اليانغتسي و4683 وحدة حوض نهري ضمنها. استنادًا إلى مجموعة بيانات منتج المياه السطحية الديناميكية العالمية GLAD-GSWD، تم بناء مؤشر المياه الديناميكي DWI (مؤشر المياه السطحية الديناميكي) لتوصيف الإشارات غير الطبيعية الموسمية لمساحات المياه في الحوض خلال الفترة 1999-2020. تم دراسة العلاقة الاستجابية بين الجفاف الهيدرولوجي والجفاف المناخي المعبر عنها بمساحات المياه الديناميكية المراقبة عبر الأقمار الصناعية، وأُجريت أيضًا تحليل لعدم اليقين. أظهرت النتائج: (1) يمكن لمؤشر DWI تصوير تغييرات حالة الرطوبة والجفاف بفعالية في منطقة وسط حوض نهر اليانغتسي ووحدات الحوض. في المنطقة، تتفق سلسلة زمنية لمؤشر DWI مع مؤشر هطول الأمطار الموحد SPI على أربعة مقاييس زمنية (شهر، 3 أشهر، 6 أشهر، و12 شهرًا)، وتظهر جميعها ارتباطًا إيجابيًا كبيرًا، وكان أعلى معامل ارتباط مع SPI6 (r=0.484, p<0.01). 88.2% من الوحدات الفرعية للحوض تُظهر علاقة إيجابية معنوية بين DWI وSPI، وتتمركز أوقات الاستجابة بين 6-12 شهرًا؛ (2) تنجم عدم اليقين في العلاقة بين DWI و SPI أساسًا من عاملين: جودة البيانات، بما يشمل صغر مساحة المياه الموسمية وقلة البيانات المراقبة الفعالة داخل وحدة الحوض؛ وحجم مقياس الحوض، حيث أن زيادة حجم المقياس تعزز التأثير المباشر للعوامل المناخية على المياه وتحسن قوة الارتباط. استخدام وحدة الحوض كهدف للرصد ومياه ديناميكية كبيانات مراقبة لبناء مؤشرات مراقبة الجفاف الهيدرولوجي يمكّن من رصد الجفاف الهيدرولوجي مستمرًا على نطاقات مكانية متواصلة، ويقدم قيمة مرجعية مهمة لخدمات منتجات المياه الديناميكية في رصد وتقييم الجفاف الهيدرولوجي على المستويين الإقليمي والعالمي.

مفهوم

الاستشعار عن بعد; المياه السطحية الديناميكية; الجفاف الهيدرولوجي; الجفاف المناخي; وسط حوض نهر اليانغتسي; مؤشر الجفاف

References

  1. 1.
    Aghakouchak A, Feldman D, Stewardson M J, Saphores J D, Grant S and Sanders B. 2014. Australia’s drought: lessons for California. Science, 343(6178): 1430-1431
  2. 2.
    Alahacoon N and Edirisinghe M. 2022. Novel index for hydrological drought monitoring using remote sensing approach: Standardized Water Surface Index (SWSI). Remote Sensing, 14(21): 5324
  3. 3.
    Asuero A G, Sayago A and González A G. 2006. The correlation coefficient: an overview. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 36(1): 41-59
  4. 4.
    Chen L, Song W L, Yang Y M, Li X T, Xin J F, Lin S J and Xu J X. 2023. Remote sensing monitoring of drought in the Yangtze River basin in 2022. China Flood and Drought Management, 33(2): 26-30
  5. 5.
    Chen S D, Zhang L P, Tian X Y, Tang R X and Liu X. 2019. Comparative analysis of potential evapotranspiration estimation between Penman-Monteith model and MOD16 data in Middle and Lower Yangtze River Basin. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 52(4): 283-289, 296
  6. 6.
    Deng Y, Jiang W G, Tang Z H, Ling Z Y and Wu Z F. 2019. Long-term changes of open-surface water bodies in the yangtze river basin based on the google earth engine cloud platform. Remote Sensing, 11(19): 2213
  7. 7.
    Dinku T, Funk C, Peterson P, Maidment R, Tadesse T, Gadain H and Ceccato P. 2018. Validation of the CHIRPS satellite rainfall estimates over eastern of Africa. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 144(S1): 292-312
  8. 8.
    Donchyts G, Winsemius H, Baart F, Dahm R, Schellekens J, Gorelick N, Iceland C and Schmeier S. 2022. High-resolution surface water dynamics in Earth’s small and medium-sized reservoirs. Scientific Reports, 12(1): 13776
  9. 9.
    Dong Y D and Yang W Y. 2016. Analysis on the monthly water area change of Danjiangkou reservoir in recent 20 years. Science and Technology of West China, 15(1): 68-73
  10. 10.
    Fan Y D, Wu W, Wang W, Liu M and Wen Q. 2016. Research progress of disaster remote sensing in China. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 20(5): 1170-1184
  11. 11.
    Feizizadeh B, Garajeh M K, Lakes T and Blaschke T. 2021. A deep learning convolutional neural network algorithm for detecting saline flow sources and mapping the environmental impacts of the Urmia Lake drought in Iran. Catena, 207: 105585
  12. 12.
    Funk C C, Peterson P J, Landsfeld M F, Pedreros D H, Verdin J P, Rowland J D, Romero B E, Husak G J, Michaelsen J C and Verdin A P. 2014. A quasi-global precipitation time series for drought monitoring. Data Series 832. U. S. Geological Survey
  13. 13.
    Gorsuch R L and Lehmann C S. 2010. Correlation coefficients: mean bias and confidence interval distortions. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 1(2): 52-65
  14. 14.
    Huang C, Chen Y, Zhang S Q and Wu J P. 2018. Detecting, extracting, and monitoring surface water from space using optical sensors: a review. Reviews of Geophysics, 56(2): 333-360
  15. 15.
    Lehner B and Grill G. 2013. Global river hydrography and network routing: baseline data and new approaches to study the world’s large river systems. Hydrological Processes, 27(15): 2171-2186
  16. 16.
    Lehner B, Liermann C R, Revenga C, Vörösmarty C, Fekete B, Crouzet P, Döll P, Endejan M, Frenken K, Magome J, Nilsson C, Robertson J C, Rödel R, Sindorf N and Wisser D. 2011. High-resolution mapping of the world’s reservoirs and dams for sustainable river-flow management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9(9): 494-502
  17. 17.
    Li H, Wan W, Ji R, Li G Y, Chen X N, Zhu S Y, Liu B J, Xu Y, Luo Z L, Wang S L and Cui Y K. 2023a. Inspects and prospects of satellite remote sensing monitoring ability for land surface water in China. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 27(7): 1554-1573
  18. 18.
    Li Q Z, Yan N N, Zhang F F, Chang S and Wu B F. 2010. Drought monitoring and its impacts assessment in Southwest China using remote sensing in the spring of 2010. Acta Geographica Sinica, 65(7): 771-780
  19. 19.
    Li S, Zeng L, Zhang C J, Xiao C, Zhang Q and Gong W T. 2023b. Spatio-temporal variations and propagation from meteorological to hydrological drought in the upper Yangtze River basin over last 120 years. Climate Change Research, 19(3): 263-277
  20. 20.
    Li X Y, Ling F, Cai X B, Ge Y, Li X D, Yin Z X, Shang C, Jia X F and Du Y. 2021. Mapping water bodies under cloud cover using remotely sensed optical images and a spatiotemporal dependence model. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 103: 102470
  21. 21.
    Liu Y C and Gao Y N. 2022. Surface water extraction in Yangtze River Basin based on sentinel time series image. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 26(2): 358-372
  22. 22.
    López-de-los-Mozos M C and Mesa J A. 2001. The maximum absolute deviation measure in location problems on networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 135(1): 184-194
  23. 23.
    Mckee T B, Doesken N J and Kleist J. 1993. The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales//Eighth Conference on Applied Climatology. Anaheim: American Meteorological Society: 17-22
  24. 24.
    Menenti M, Azzali S, Verhoef W and van Swol R. 1993. Mapping agroecological zones and time lag in vegetation growth by means of fourier analysis of time series of NDVI images. Advances in Space Research, 13(5): 233-237
  25. 25.
    Nalbantis I and Tsakiris G. 2009. Assessment of hydrological drought revisited. Water Resources Management, 23(5): 881-897
  26. 26.
    Pickens A H, Hansen M C, Hancher M, Stehman S V, Tyukavina A, Potapov P, Marroquin B and Sherani Z. 2020. Mapping and sampling to characterize global inland water dynamics from 1999 to 2018 with full Landsat time-series. Remote Sensing of Environment, 243: 111792
  27. 27.
    Seibert M, Merz B and Apel H. 2017. Seasonal forecasting of hydrological drought in the Limpopo Basin: a comparison of statistical methods. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21(3): 1611-1629
  28. 28.
    Sheffield J, Wood E F, Pan M, Beck H, Coccia G, Serrat-Capdevila A and Verbist K. 2018. Satellite remote sensing for water resources management: potential for supporting sustainable development in data-poor regions. Water Resources Research, 54(12): 9724-9758
  29. 29.
    Sogno P, Klein I and Kuenzer C. 2022. Remote sensing of surface water dynamics in the context of global change—a review. Remote Sensing, 14(10): 2475
  30. 30.
    Sun H, Gao J H, Yan T T, Hu K K, Xu Z H, Wang Y J, Meng J and Zhao Z Y. 2024. Remote sensing of vegetation drought: research progress. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 28(6): 1395-1411
  31. 31.
    Tapley B D, Bettadpur S, Ries J C, Thompson P F and Watkins M M. 2004. GRACE measurements of mass variability in the earth system. Science, 305(5683): 503-505
  32. 32.
    Ummenhofer C C and Meehl G A. 2017. Extreme weather and climate events with ecological relevance: a review. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1723): 20160135
  33. 33.
    van Loon A F. 2015. Hydrological drought explained. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water, 2(4): 359-392
  34. 34.
    Verhoef W, Menenti M and Azzali S. 1996. Cover A colour composite of NOAA-AVHRR-NDVI based on time series analysis (1981-1992). International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(2): 231-235
  35. 35.
    Vicente-Serrano S M and López-Moreno J I. 2005. Hydrological response to different time scales of climatological drought: an evaluation of the Standardized Precipitation Index in a mountainous Mediterranean basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 9(5): 523-533
  36. 36.
    Wilhite D A and Glantz M H. 1985. Understanding: the drought phenomenon: the role of definitions. Water International, 10(3): 111-120
  37. 37.
    Willmott C J and Matsuura K. 2005. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Research, 30(1): 79-82
  38. 38.
    Wu G P and Liu Y B. 2014. Satellite-based detection of water surface variation in China’s largest freshwater lake in response to hydro-climatic drought. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 35(11/12): 4544-4558
  39. 39.
    Zhao G and Gao H L. 2018. Automatic correction of contaminated images for assessment of reservoir surface area dynamics. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(12): 6092-6099
  40. 40.
    Zhao G and Gao H L. 2019. Towards global hydrological drought monitoring using remotely sensed reservoir surface area. Geophysical Research Letters, 46(22): 13027-13035
  41. 41.
    Zhou H, Zhou W, Liu Y B, Yuan Y B, Huang J J and Liu Y W. 2020. Meteorological drought migration in the Poyang Lake basin, China: switching among different climate modes. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 21(3): 415-431
  42. 42.
    Zhou J, Jia L and Menenti M. 2015. Reconstruction of global MODIS NDVI time series: performance of harmonic analysis of time series (HANTS). Remote Sensing of Environment, 163: 217-228
  43. 43.
    Zhou J, Jia L, Menenti M and Liu X. 2021. Optimal estimate of global biome—specific parameter settings to reconstruct NDVI time series with the harmonic analysis of time series (HANTS) method. Remote Sensing, 13(21): 4251
  44. 44.
    Zhou Y and Dong J W. 2019. Review on monitoring open surface water body using remote sensing. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 21(11): 1768-1778
  45. 45.
    Zou Z H, Xiao X M, Dong J W, Qin Y W, Doughty R B, Menarguez M A, Zhang G L and Wang J. 2018. Divergent trends of open-surface water body area in the contiguous United States from 1984 to 2016. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(15): 3810-3815

قراءة النص الكامل

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website