طريقة توليد عينات الصور البعيدة الحساسة للتوقيت الطويل القائمة على زيادة العينة التلقائية والهجرة التكيفية

  • role: First author第一作者
  • Affiliation:

    School of Computer Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China

  • Email:Lvzhiyong_fly@ hotmail.com
  • Introduction:E-mailLvzhiyong_fly@ hotmail.com
LYU Zhiyong1,  
  • Affiliation:

    School of Computer Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China

CHANG Yiming1,  
  • role: Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation:

    Department of Geography and Spatial Information Technology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China

  • Email:yanggang@nbu.edu.cn
  • Introduction:E-mailyanggang@nbu.edu.cn
YANG Gang2*,  
  • Affiliation:

    School of Computer Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China

ZHANG Pengfei1,  
  • Affiliation:

    Department of Geography and Spatial Information Technology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China

SUN Weiwei2

ملخص

تُعد طريقة توليد عينات الصور البعيدة الحساسة للتوقيت الطويل أساسية لتحقيق تصنيف تغطية سطح الأرض، ومراقبة اتجاهات تغيير سطح الأرض، وتحليل حالة استخدام الأراضي. ومع ذلك، تتطلب طرق التصنيف الخاضعة للإشراف التقليدية عادةً تصنيف كميات كبيرة من العينات، مما يؤدي إلى تكاليف زمنية وبشرية عالية لمهام تصنيف تغطية سطح الأرض، ويحد أيضًا من دقة وموثوقية التصنيف. لمواجهة هذه المشكلة، تقترح هذه الورقة طريقة توليد عينات الصور البعيدة الحساسة للتوقيت الطويل القائمة على زيادة العينة التلقائية والهجرة التكيفية المشتركة، بهدف تحقيق "تصنيف مرة واحدة، إعادة استخدام متعددة" للعينات، وتقليل تصنيف العينات وتحسين كفاءة تصنيف الصور البعيدة الحساسة للمشاهد الكبيرة والطويلة الأجل. وتتمثل الفكرة المحددة في: أولاً، استخدام التجميع المحلي لتعزيز فلترة نقاط بكسل العينات المحتملة، من خلال قياس ارتباط الخصائص الطيفية لتحديد العينات الموسعة؛ ثانيًا، بناءً على تحليل التغير بين صور الفترات الزمنية المتجاورة، يتم اختيار العينات التي تتوافق مع قواعد الهجرة بين المجالات بناءً على قواعد التشابه عبر المجالات. وقد أجريت تجارب التحقق باستخدام سلسلة زمنية من صور Landsat8 OLI لمنطقة خليج هانغتشو من عام 2013 إلى 2022، وأظهرت النتائج: (1) يمكن لاستراتيجية زيادة العينات التلقائية المقترحة تعزيز جودة وكمية العينات بشكل فعال وتحسين نتائج ودقة التصنيف؛ (2) يمكن لاستراتيجية الهجرة التكيفية للعينات المقترحة تنفيذ هجرة العينات بين صور نفس المنطقة في أوقات مختلفة بفعالية، مما يتجنب تصنيف العينات السنوي بشكل متكرر، ويحسن بشكل فعال كفاءة وجودة توليد العينات؛ (3) أظهرت التطبيقات مع مصنفات مختلفة مثل جهاز دعم المتجهات (SVM) وk أقرب الجيران (KNN) أن العينات المعززة والهجرة المقدمة في هذه الطريقة لديها قابلية عامة لأنواع متعددة من المصنفات.

مفهوم

طريقة توليد العينات;تصنيف تغطية سطح الأرض;زيادة العينة التلقائية;الهجرة التكيفية للعينات;خليج هانغتشو;الصور البعيدة الحساسة للتوقيت الطويل

References

  1. 1.
    Acción Á, Argüello F and Heras D B. 2020. Dual-window superpixel data augmentation for hyperspectral image classification. Applied Sciences, 10(24): 8833
  2. 2.
    Belgiu M and Drăguţ L. 2016. Random forest in remote sensing: a review of applications and future directions. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 114: 24-31
  3. 3.
    Chen H J, Lyu D N, Zhou X and Liu J. 2024. Cross-domain transfer learning algorithm for few-shot ship recognition in remote-sensing images. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 28(3): 793-804
  4. 4.
    Chen X, Ma J W and Dai Q. 2005. Remote sensing change detection based on bayesian networks classifications. Journal of Remote Sensing (in Chinese), 9(6): 667-672
  5. 5.
    Chua L O. 1997. CNN: a vision of complexity. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 7(10): 2219-2425
  6. 6.
    Danielsson P E. 1980. Euclidean distance mapping. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 14(3): 227-248
  7. 7.
    Fan X N, Yan W, Shi P F and Zhang X W. 2022. Remote sensing image target detection based on a multi-scale deep feature fusion network. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 26(11): 2292-2303
  8. 8.
    Fekri E, Latifi H, Amani M and Zobeidinezhad A. 2021. A training sample migration method for wetland mapping and monitoring using sentinel data in google earth engine. Remote Sensing, 13(20): 4169
  9. 9.
    Ghorbanian A, Kakooei M, Amani M, Mahdavi S, Mohammadzadeh A and Hasanlou M. 2020. Improved land cover map of Iran using Sentinel imagery within Google Earth Engine and a novel automatic workflow for land cover classification using migrated training samples. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 167: 276-288
  10. 10.
    Glanz H and Carvalho L. 2018. An expectation-maximization algorithm for the matrix normal distribution with an application in remote sensing. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 167: 31-48
  11. 11.
    Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A and Bengio Y. 2020. Generative adversarial networks. Communications of the ACM, 63(11): 139-144
  12. 12.
    Grabska E, Hostert P, Pflugmacher D and Ostapowicz K. 2019. Forest stand species mapping using the Sentinel-2 time series. Remote Sensing, 11(10): 1197
  13. 13.
    Guo G D, Wang H, Bell D, Bi Y X and Greer K. 2003. KNN model-based approach in classification//Proceedings of OTM Confederated International Conferences CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE 2003 on the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE. Sicily: IEEE: 986-996
  14. 14.
    Hong D F, Yokoya N, Ge N, Chanussot J and Zhu X X. 2019. Learnable manifold alignment (LeMA): a semi-supervised cross-modality learning framework for land cover and land use classification. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 147: 193-205
  15. 15.
    Huang H B, Chen Y L, Clinton N, Wang J, Wang X Y, Liu C X, Gong P, Yang J, Bai Y Q, Zheng Y M and Zhu Z L. 2017. Mapping major land cover dynamics in Beijing using all Landsat images in Google Earth Engine. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202: 166-176
  16. 16.
    Huang H B, Wang J, Liu C X, Liang L, Li C C and Gong P. 2020. The migration of training samples towards dynamic global land cover mapping. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 161: 27-36
  17. 17.
    Li J, Li Z W, Ding X L, Zhu J and Wang C C. 2021. Filtering strong noisy synthetic aperture radar (SAR) interferogram with integrated Contoured Median and Goldstein two-step filter. Journal of Remote Sensing (in Chinese), 15(4): 750-765
  18. 18.
    Li X and Guo Y H. 2013. Adaptive active learning for image classification//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Portland: IEEE: 859-866
  19. 19.
    Li X and Ye J A. 1997. Accuracy improvement of land use change detection using principal components analysis: a case study in the Pearl River Delta. Journal of Remote Sensing (in Chinese), 1(4): 282-289
  20. 20.
    Liang J T, Chen C, Sun W W, Yang G, Liu Z S and Zhang Z L. 2023. Spatio-temporal land use/cover change dynamics in Hangzhou Bay, China, using long-term Landsat time series and GEE platform. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 27(6): 1480-1495
  21. 21.
    Liang W, Liang Y Z and Jia J G. 2023. MiAMix: enhancing image classification through a multi-stage augmented mixed sample data augmentation method. Processes, 11(12): 3284
  22. 22.
    Lin C J, Jeng S Y and Chen M K. 2020. Using 2D CNN with Taguchi parametric optimization for lung cancer recognition from CT images. Applied Sciences, 10(7): 2591
  23. 23.
    Liu H, Gong P, Wang J, Wang X, Ning G and Xu B. 2021. Production of global daily seamless data cubes and quantification of global land cover change from 1985 to 2020-iMap World 1.0. Remote Sensing of Environment, 258: 112364
  24. 24.
    Liu S J, Shi Q and Zhang L P. 2020. Few-shot hyperspectral image classification with unknown classes using multitask deep learning. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 59(6): 5085-5102
  25. 25.
    Liu Z G, Shi W Z, Li D R and Qin Q Q. 2005. Partially supervised classification of remotely sensed imagery using support vector machines. Journal of Remote Sensing (in Chinese), 9(4): 363-373
  26. 26.
    Loh W Y. 2011. Classification and regression trees. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1(1): 14-23
  27. 27.
    Luo Z, Li M and Zhang D C. 2022. Building detection based on a boundary-regulated network and watershed segmentation. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 26(7): 1459-1468
  28. 28.
    Lv Z Y, Zhang P F, Sun W W, Benediktsson J A and Lei T. 2023a. Novel land-cover classification approach with nonparametric sample augmentation for hyperspectral remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 61: 4407613
  29. 29.
    Lv Z Y, Zhang P F, Sun W W, Benediktsson J A, Li J H and Wang W. 2023b. Novel adaptive region spectral-spatial features for land cover classification with high spatial resolution remotely sensed imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 61: 5609412
  30. 30.
    Lv Z Y, Zhang P F, Sun W W, Lei T, Benediktsson J A and Li P. 2024. Sample iterative enhancement approach for improving classification performance of hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 21: 2500605
  31. 31.
    Mateo-García G, Gómez-Chova L, Amorós-López J, Muñoz-Marí J and Camps-Valls G. 2018. Multitemporal cloud masking in the Google Earth Engine. Remote Sensing, 10(7): 1079
  32. 32.
    Naboureh A, Li A N, Ebrahimy H, Bian J H, Azadbakht M, Amani M, Lei G B and Nan X. 2021. Assessing the effects of irrigated agricultural expansions on Lake Urmia using multi-decadal Landsat imagery and a sample migration technique within Google Earth Engine. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 105: 102607
  33. 33.
    Pal M. 2005. Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(1): 217-222
  34. 34.
    Qin D D, Wan L, He P E, Zhang Y, Guo Y and Chen J. 2022. Multiscale object detection in remote sensing image by combining data fusion and feature selection. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 26(8): 1662-1673
  35. 35.
    Richards J A and Jia X P. 2008. Using suitable neighbors to augment the training set in hyperspectral maximum likelihood classification. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 5(4): 774-777
  36. 36.
    Samat A, Gamba P, Liu S C, Du P J and Abuduwaili J. 2016. Jointly informative and manifold structure representative sampling based active learning for remote sensing image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(11): 6803-6817
  37. 37.
    Su Y C, Xu R Q, Gao L R, Han Z and Sun X. 2024. Development of deep learning-based hyperspectral remote sensing image unmixing. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 28(1): 1-19
  38. 38.
    Sudmanns M, Tiede D, Wendt L and Baraldi A. 2017. Automatic ex-post flood assessment using long time series of optical earth observation images. Journal for Geographic Information Science, 5(1): 217-227
  39. 39.
    Tang W S, Long G D, Liu L, Zhou T Y, Jiang J and Blumenstein M. 2020. Rethinking 1d-cnn for time series classification: a stronger baseline. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2002.10061.
  40. 40.
    Wambugu N, Chen Y P, Xiao Z L, Tan K, Wei M Q, Liu X X and Li J. 2021. Hyperspectral image classification on insufficient-sample and feature learning using deep neural networks: a review. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 105: 102603
  41. 41.
    Wang C, Zhang L, Wei W and Zhang Y N. 2020. Hyperspectral image classification with data augmentation and classifier fusion. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 17(8): 1420-1424
  42. 42.
    Wang G A, Hwang J N, Rose C and Wallace F. 2019. Uncertainty-based active learning via sparse modeling for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 28(1): 316-329
  43. 43.
    Wang L Q, Zhou J L, Li Z W, Zhao X, Wu C L and Xu M M. 2023. Adversarial MixUp with implicit semantic preservation for semi-supervised hyperspectral image classification. Signal Processing, 211: 109116
  44. 44.
    Wang W Q, Chen Y S, He X and Li Z K. 2022. Soft augmentation-based Siamese CNN for hyperspectral image classification with limited training samples. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 19: 5508505
  45. 45.
    Wu H and Prasad S. 2018. Semi-supervised deep learning using pseudo labels for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 27(3): 1259-1270
  46. 46.
    Xia P P, Zhang L and Li F Z. 2015. Learning similarity with cosine similarity ensemble. Information Sciences, 307: 39-52
  47. 47.
    Xue Z H, Zhou Y Y and Du P J. 2022. S3Net: spectral–spatial Siamese network for few-shot hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60: 5531219
  48. 48.
    Yang B, Mao Y, Chen J, Liu J Q, Chen J and Yan K. 2023. Review of remote sensing change detection in deep learning: bibliometric and analysis. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 27(9): 1988-2005
  49. 49.
    Yang X, Fang L Y and Yue J. 2024. Advances in semi-supervised classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 28(1): 20-41
  50. 50.
    Yao Y Q, Cheng G, Xie X X and Han J W. 2021. Optical remote sensing image object detection based on multi-resolution feature fusion. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 25(5): 1124-1137
  51. 51.
    Yu Y, Ai H, He X J, Yu S H, Zhong X and Zhu R F. 2021. Attention-based feature pyramid networks for ship detection of optical remote sensing image. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 24(2): 107-115
  52. 52.
    Zhang L, Liao J J, Yuan X, Mu X D, Song X X and Bi J P. 2020. Remote sensing analysis of coastline changes in Hainan Island during 1987-2017. Tropical Geography, 40(4): 659-674
  53. 53.
    Zhang L, Luo W T, Zhang H H, Yin X W and Li B. 2023. Classification scheme for mapping wetland herbaceous plant communities using time series Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 27(6): 1362-1375
  54. 54.
    Zhang S, Li S S, Wei G F, Zhang X N and Gao J W. 2022. Refined multi-scale feature-oriented object detection of remote sensing images. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 26(12): 2616-2628
  55. 55.
    Zhang S C. 2012. Nearest neighbor selection for iteratively kNN imputation. Journal of Systems and Software, 85(11): 2541-2552
  56. 56.
    Zhang Y J, Gao Y X, Huang H and Ren L L. 2006. Research on remote sensing classification of urban vegetation species based on SVM decision-making tree. Journal of Remote Sensing (in Chinese), (2): 191-196
  57. 57.
    Zhang Y Q, Cao G, Shafique A and Fu P. 2019. Label propagation ensemble for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 12(9): 3623-3636
  58. 58.
    Zhao L J and Tang P. 2016. Scalability analysis of typical remote sensing data classification methods: a case of remote sensing image scene. Journal of Remote Sensing (in Chinese), 20(2): 157-171
  59. 59.
    Zheng J H, Sun C, Lin Y, Li L and Liu Y C. 2023. Classification of salt marsh vegetation based on pixel-level time series from Landsat images. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 27(6): 1400-1413
  60. 60.
    Zhong B, Yang A X, Jue K and Wu J J. 2021. Long time series high-quality and high-consistency land cover mapping based on machine learning method at heihe river basin. Remote Sensing, 13(8): 1596
  61. 61.
    Zurqani H A, Post C J, Mikhailova E A, Schlautman M A and Sharp J L. 2018. Geospatial analysis of land use change in the Savannah River Basin using Google Earth Engine. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 69: 175-185

قراءة النص الكامل

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website