Topographic correction method for steep mountain terrain images

  • role: First author第一作者
  • Affiliation:

    The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

  • Email:1056446928@qq.com
  • Introduction:林起楠(1991— ),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为植被辐射传输模型。E-mail:1056446928@qq.com
LIN Qinan1,  
  • role: Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation:

    The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

  • Email:Huaguo_huang@bjfu.edu.cn
  • Introduction:黄华国(1978— ),男,教授,研究方向为植被定量遥感研究。E-mail:Huaguo_huang@bjfu.edu.cn
HUANG Huaguo1*,  
  • Affiliation:

    The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

CHEN Ling1,  
  • Affiliation:

    Institute of Forest Resources Information Technique, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China

CHEN Erxue2

Resümee

The radiation quality of images is severely affected by variations in topography especially in complex mountain areas. Thus, topographic correction is a necessary pre-processing step for remote sensing image radiative correction. However, over-correction problems were easily found in the commonly used topographic correction method in steep mountain areas. We proposed a semi-empirical topographic correction method for steep mountain terrain to overcome the over-correction problems; it is the simple topographic correction method using estimation of diffuse light (SCEDIL). The SCEDIL model estimates the diffuse fraction through finding the horizontal sunlight and shadow pixels based on images and Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data. The three radiation components (direct, diffuse, and terrain irradiance) focused on the impact of the solar irradiance, reaching an inclined surface to recover the actual land surface reflectance. We consider that the solar direct radiation is the main source of incident radiation for horizontal sunlight pixels, and the incident radiation of horizontal shadow pixels come from diffuse and terrain irradiance. Therefore, the diffuse radiation can be estimated by the mean reflectance of horizontal sunlit and shadow pixels. The estimation of the surface actual reflectance is achieved using a two-step procedure. First, the atmospheric correction model (such as 6S or MODTRAN model) was used to calculate the diffuse fraction and irradiance components of horizontal surfaces. Second, SCEDIL was used to remove terrain effects. The GF-1 and Landsat ETM+ images were used to evaluate different topographic corrections (SCEDIL, C, and SCS+C models). Four validation methods were employed to assess the performance under different illumination conditions, as below: (a) visual comparison for different terrain correction models, (b) changes in the correlation coefficient between the incidence angle and the spectral bands, (c) changes in the Standard Deviation (SD) andmean of the reflectance of each spectral band, and (d) land cover classification accuracy. The results show that: (1) SCEDIL, C, and SCS+C corrections performed effectively for the slightly rough mountain area (average slopes<26°, average elevation<600 m). However, SCEDIL-correction produced better and smoother corrected images than SCS+C and C methods for the steep mountain area; the average slope is larger than 26°, and the average elevation is more than 700 m; (2) the SCEDIL method produced the lowest correlation coefficient between the incidence angle and the spectral bands for steep mountain, (3)SCEDIL-correction maintained more closer mean and lesser reduction in SD to original image bands than C-correction and SCS+C-correction; (4) SCEDIL-corrected images have the highest overall accuracy of classification and highest homogeneity within each land cover class using the Support Vector Machine classification method. Therefore, SCEDIL-correction was robust in terms of different terrains, and especially the steep region images in this study.

Schlüsselwort

topographic correction;SCEDIL-correction;C-correction;SCS+C-correction;diffuse fraction

References

  1. 1.
    Civco D L. 1989. Topographic normalisation of Landsat thematic mapper digital imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 55(9): 1303–1309
  2. 2.
    Duan S B and Yan G J. 2007. A review of models for topographic correction of remotely sensed images in mountainous area. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), 43(3): 362–366
  3. 3.
    Ghasemi N, Mohammadzadeh A and Sahebi M R. 2013. Assessment of different topographic correction methods in ALOS AVNIR-2 data over a forest area. International Journal of Digital Earth, 6(5): 504–520
  4. 4.
    Gu D G and Gillespie A. 1998. Topographic normalization of Landsat TM images of forest based on subpixel sun-canopy-sensor geometry. Remote Sensing of Environment, 64(2): 166–175
  5. 5.
    Hantson S and Chuvieco E. 2011. Evaluation of different topographic correction methods for Landsat imagery. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 13(5): 691–700
  6. 6.
    Jiang K, Hu C M, Yu K and Zhao Y C. 2014. Landsat TM/ETM+ topographic correction method based on smoothed terrain and semi-empirical model. Journal of Remote Sensing, 18(2): 287–306
  7. 7.
    Li F Q, Jupp D L B, Thankappan M, Lymburner L, Mueller N, Lewis A and Held A. 2012. A physics-based atmospheric and BRDF correction for Landsat data over mountainous terrain. Remote Sensing of Environment, 124: 756–770
  8. 8.
    Proy C, Tanré D and Deschamps P Y. 1989. Evaluation of topographic effects in remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 30(1): 21–32
  9. 9.
    Richter R, Kellenberger T and Kaufmann H. 2009. Comparison of topographic correction methods. Remote Sensing, 1(3): 184–196
  10. 10.
    Smith J A, Lin T L and Ranson K L. 1980. The Lambertian assumption and Landsat data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 46(9): 1183–1189
  11. 11.
    Sandmeier S and Itten K I. 1997. A physically-based model to correct atmospheric and illumination effects in optical satellite data of rugged terrain. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 35(3): 708–717
  12. 12.
    Soenen S A, Peddle D R and Coburn C A. 2005. SCS+C: a modified sun-canopy-sensor topographic correction in forested terrain. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(9): 2148–2159
  13. 13.
    Teillet P M, Guindon B and Goodenough D G. 1982. On the slope-aspect correction of multispectral scanner data. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 8(2): 84–106
  14. 14.
    Vincini M, Reeder D and Frazzi E. 2002. An empirical topographic normalization method for forest TM data//Proceedings of 2002 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: IEEE, 4: 2091–2093 [DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2002.1026454]

Lesen Sie die ganze Passage

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website