A subspace band selection method for hyperspectral imagery

  • role: First author第一作者
  • Affiliation:

    College of Information and Communication Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China

  • Email:zl_zhaoliang_zl@163.com
  • Introduction:赵亮,1987年生,女,博士研究生,研究方向为高光谱遥感图像波段选择技术。E-mail:zl_zhaoliang_zl@163.com
ZHAO Liang1,  
  • role: Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation:

    College of Information and Communication Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China

  • Email:wangliguo@hrbeu.edu.cn
  • Introduction:王立国,1974年生,男,教授,研究方向为高光谱遥感图像处理技术。E-mail:wangliguo@hrbeu.edu.cn
WANG Liguo1*,  
  • Affiliation:

    College of Information and Communication Engineering, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian 116600, China

LIU Danfeng2

Resümee

Hyperspectral remote sensing data have a wealth of spectral information that can describe objects in detail. However, redundancy occurs due to the high correlation of adjacent bands in the narrow-band continuous spectrum space. This redundancy leads to high computational complexity and dimension disaster in data analysis. As an important means of dimension reduction, band selection can reduce these negative effects. The goal of band selection is to retain the relevant information needed in practical applications with as few bands as possible. Therefore, two aspects of discussion are involved: selection criteria and selection methods (search methods). A new band search method based on band subspace is proposed to improve band searching efficiency. This method needs to input the required number of bands without any other parameter settings. First, the spectral space of hyperspectral data is partitioned according to the block characteristics of band correlation coefficient matrix image and the adjacent transitive correlation, which is partitioned as a first subspace. Then, on the basis of the actual demand band number, the first subspace is divided secondary according to the proportion of the subspace size, and the final band subspace is obtained. Second, a band is selected according to certain rules (e.g., the maximum standard deviation) in each final band subspace to form an initial band subset. Lastly, after the objective function (e.g., the average correlation of the band subsets, the best index, the overall classification accuracy) is set, bands are replaced by each subspace to increase (or decrease) the value of objective function until no replacement can improve the goal further, which is the final band subset we pursued. The other three band selection methods are compared with our method on two opened hyperspectral data to verify the validity of the proposed method. Experimental results show that as a fast search strategy, the computational time of the proposed method is much less than the exhaustive band combination. The proposed method has faster search efficiency and convergence than the artificial bee colony algorithm for all kinds of objective functions. Moreover, compared with band selection method based on spectral clustering and adaptive band selection, this method can flexibly transform the target function for specific applications and obtain more suitable band subsets for different requirements. The correlation of spectral space of hyperspectral data is flexibly used in this study. It substantially reduces the computational complexity of the search algorithm in the band selection that combined the subspace partition with band search. Moreover, few parameters are used to simplify the complexity of the model and reduce the time spent in parameter tuning. For different application requirements, the proposed method flexibly transforms the objective function so that the searched bands’ combination becomes suitable for these requirements.

Schlüsselwort

remote sensing;hyperspectral images;band selection;subspace partition;criterion function;classification, search strategy

References

  1. 1.
    Agarwal A, El-Ghazawi T, El-Askary H and Le-Moigne J. 2007. Efficient hierarchical-PCA dimension reduction for hyperspectral image//Proceedings of 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology. Giza, Egypt: IEEE: 353-356
  2. 2.
    Chang C I and Wang S. 2006. Constrained band selection for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(6): 1575–1585
  3. 3.
    Chavez P S, Berlin G L and Sowers L B. 1982. Statistical method for selecting Landsat MSS ratios. Journal of Applied Photographic Engineering, 8(1): 23–30
  4. 4.
    Gu Y F and Zhang Y. 2003. Feature extraction based on automatic subspace partition for hyperspectral images. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 18(6): 384–387
  5. 5.
    Li W, Prasad S, Fowler J E and Bruce L M. 2012. Locality-preserving dimensionality reduction and classification for hyperspectral image analysis. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(4): 1185–1198
  6. 6.
    Pal M and Foody G M. 2010. Feature selection for classification of hyperspectral data by SVM. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48(5): 2297–2307
  7. 7.
    Pudil P, Novovičová J and Kittler J. 1994. Floating search methods in feature selection. Pattern Recognition Letters, 15(11): 1119–1125
  8. 8.
    Serpico S B and Bruzzone L. 2001. A new search algorithm for feature selection in hyperspectral remote sensing image. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39(7): 1360–1367
  9. 9.
    Sun K, Geng X R and Ji L Y. 2015. Exemplar component analysis: a fast band selection method for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 12(5): 998–1002
  10. 10.
    Tong Q X, Zhang B and Zheng L F. 2006. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing. Beijing: Higher Education Press
  11. 11.
    Wang J and Chang C I. 2006. Independent component analysis-based dimensionality reduction with applications in hyperspectral image analysis. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(6): 1586–1600
  12. 12.
    Wang L G and Wei F J. 2013. Artificial physics optimization algorithm combined band selection for hyperspectral imagery. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 45(9): 100–106
  13. 13.
    Wang L G, Zhao L and Liu D F. 2015. Artificial bee colony algorithm-based band selection for hyperspectral imagery. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 47(11): 82–88
  14. 14.
    Zhao D and Zhao G H. 2009. Band selection of hyperspectral image based on improved genetic algorithm. Journal of the Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 26(6): 795–802

Lesen Sie die ganze Passage

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website