Früher|Nächster

Vertical accuracy correction and analysis of ASTER GDEM V2 over Antarctic Glacier

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science （Ministry of Education）, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

    School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

  • Email：18130558688@163.com
  • Introduction： 陈昊楠，1993年生, 男, 硕士研究生, 研究方向为极地遥感。E-mail: 18130558688@163.com
CHEN Haonan12,  
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science （Ministry of Education）, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

    School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

XU Shifeng12,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science （Ministry of Education）, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

    School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

    University Corporation for Polar Research, Beijing 100875, China

  • Email：yhuang@geo.ecnu.edu.cn
  • Introduction： 黄艳，1988年生， 女, 副教授,研究方向为冰雪遥感。E-mail: yhuang@geo.ecnu.edu.cn
HUANG Yan123*,  
  • Affiliation：

    Department of Geography, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati 45221, USA

WANG Shujie4,  
  • Affiliation：

    Department of Geography and Planning, Appalachian State University, Boone 28608，USA

SHU Song5,  
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science （Ministry of Education）, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

    School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

    University Corporation for Polar Research, Beijing 100875, China

YU Bailang123,  
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science （Ministry of Education）, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

    School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

WU Jianping12

Resümee

ASTER GDEM V2 is one of the most widely used DEM data for Antarctic Ice Sheet analysis. However, it cannot be directly used due to its large anomalies in the snow-covered plateaus of the continent, where the surface reflectance is very high and no obvious surface features are available for the generation of high-quality DEM.This study rectifies the large anomalies in ASTER GDEM V2 over Byrd Glacier using a contour correction method. Then the accuracy of the anomaly-corrected ASTER GDEM V2 is quantitatively evaluated against.Results show that the RMSE of ASTER GDEM V2 decreases from 26.56 m to 18.77 m （-6.79 m）, which is lower than the RMSE of ICESat-1 DEM （121.24 m）. In addition, the accuracy of the corrected ASTER GDEM V2 is barely influenced by slope and no significant systematic errors can be observed. In contrast, the accuracy of ICESat-1 DEM is very sensitive to slope. Through further topographic profile analysis, the noises on previously non-corrected ASTER GDEM V2 are found to be mainly distributed in the low flat areas. Those noises can be effectively removed by using the contour correction method.This study indicates that the corrected ASTER GDEM V2 is well qualified for analyzing Byrd Glacier, Antarctica.

Schlüsselwort

remote sensing;Digital Elevation Model （DEM）;ASTER GDEM V2;ICESat/GLAS;Antarctic;Glacier

References

  1. 1.
    Abrams M, Tsu H, Hulley G, Iwao K, Pieri D, Cudahy T and Kargel J . 2015. The Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer （ASTER） after fifteen years: review of global products. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 38: 292-301
  2. 2.
    Abshire J B, Sun X L, Riris H, Sirota J M, McGarry J, Palm S, Yi D H and Liiva P . 2005. Geoscience Laser Altimeter System （GLAS） on the ICESat mission: on-orbit measurement performance. Geophysical Research Letters, 32（21）: L21S02
  3. 3.
    ASTER GDEM Validation Team . 2009. ASTER Global DEM validation summary report[EB/OL].
  4. 4.
    ASTER GDEM Validation Team . 2011. ASTER global digital elevation model version 2 - summary of validation results[EB/OL]. NASA Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center and the Joint Japan-US ASTER Science Team. [2017-05-23].
  5. 5.
    Bamber J and Jonathan L . 1994. A digital elevation model of the Antarctic ice sheet derived from ERS-1 altimeter data and comparison with terrestrial measurements. Annals of Glaciology, 20: 48-54
  6. 6.
    Bamber J and Gomez-Dans J L . 2005. The accuracy of digital elevation models of the Antarctic continent. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 237（ 3/4）: 516-523
  7. 7.
    Bamber J L and Bindschadler R A . 1997. An improved elevation dataset for climate and ice-sheet modelling: validation with satellite imagery. Annals of Glaciology, 25: 439-444
  8. 8.
    Bamber J L, Gomez-Dans J L and Griggs J A . 2009. A new 1 km digital elevation model of the Antarctic derived from combined satellite radar and laser data – Part 1: data and methods. The Cryosphere, 3（1）: 101-111
  9. 9.
    Bindschadler R, Vornberger P, Fleming A, Fox A, Mullins J, Binnie D, Paulsen S J, Granneman B and Gorodetzky D . 2008. The Landsat image mosaic of Antarctica. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112（12）: 4214-4226
  10. 10.
    Budd W F, Jenssen D and Smith I N . 1984. A three-dimensional time-dependent model of the West Antarctic ice sheet. Annals of Glaciology, 5: 29-36
  11. 11.
    Cook A J, Murray T, Luckman A, Vaughan D G and Barrand N E . 2012. A new 100-m digital elevation model of the Antarctic Peninsula derived from ASTER Global DEM: methods and accuracy assessment. Earth System Science Data, 4（1）: 129-142
  12. 12.
    Drewry D J . 1983. Antarctica: Glaciological and Geophysical Folio. Cambridge: Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge
  13. 13.
    DiMarzio J, Brenner A, Schutz R, Shuman C A and Zwally H J . 2007. GLAS/ICESat 500 m laser altimetry digital elevation model of Antarctica[DB/OL]. Boulder, Colorado: National Snow and Ice Data Center. [2017-03-18].
  14. 14.
    Du X P, Guo H D, Fan X T, Zhu J J, Yan Z Z and Zhan Q . 2013. Vertical accuracy assessment of SRTM and ASTER GDEM over typical regions of China using ICESat/GLAS. Earth Science - Journal of China University of Geosciences, 38（4）: 887-897
  15. 15.
    E D C, Shen Q, Xu Y and Chen G . 2009. High-accuracy topographical information extraction based on fusion of ASTER stereo-data and ICESat/GLAS data in Antarctica. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 52（5）: 714-722
  16. 16.
    E D C, Xu Y and Zhang X H . 2007. ICESat’s performance and its application in Dome A area in Antarctica. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 32（12）: 1139-1142
  17. 17.
    Enßle F, Heinzel J and Koch B . 2012. Evaluating height differences between global digital surface models and ICESat Heights at footprint Geolocation//Proceedings of GIS Ostrava 2012 -Surface Models for Geosciences. At Ostrava, Czech Republic, [s.n.]
  18. 18.
    Huang K W, Li F, Zhang S K, Hao W F, Xiao F and Yuan L X . 2016. Validation and analysis of the antarctic digital elevation models based on airborne altimetry-a case study of Thwaites Glacier, West Antarctica. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 45（5）: 544-551
  19. 19.
    Jessica C, Paola C M, Paolo C, Chris B and Meric S . 2018. Independent DEM of Antarctica using GNSS-R data from TechDemoSat-1. Geophysical Research Letters, 45（12）: 6117-6123
  20. 20.
    Li Y K and Liu G N . 2000. The cross-section variation of glacial valley and its reflection to the glaciation. Acta Geographica Sinica, 55（2）: 235-242
  21. 21.
    Liu H X, Jezek K C and Li B . 1999. Development of an Antarctic digital elevation model by integrating cartographic and remotely sensed data: a geographic information system based approach. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 104 （B 10）: 23199-23213
  22. 22.
    Lythe M B and Vaughan D G . 2001. BEDMAP: a new ice thickness and subglacial topographic model of Antarctica. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 106 （B 6）: 11335-11351
  23. 23.
    Marsiat I and Bamber J L . 1997. The climate of Antarctica in the UGAMP GCM: sensitivity to topography. Annals of Glaciology, 25: 79-84
  24. 24.
    Rees W G . 2012. Assessment of ASTER global digital elevation model data for Arctic research. Polar Record, 48（1）: 31-39
  25. 25.
    Rignot E and Thomas R H . 2002. Mass balance of polar ice sheets. Science, 297（5586）: 1502-1506
  26. 26.
    Satgé F, Bonnet M P, Timouk F, Calmant S, Pillco R, Molina J, Lavado-Casimiro W, Arsen A, Crétaux J F and Garnier J . 2015. Accuracy assessment of SRTM v4 and ASTER GDEM v2 over the Altiplano watershed using ICESat/GLAS data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 36（2）: 465-488
  27. 27.
    Scambos T A, Bohlander J A, Shuman C A and Skvarca P . 2004. Glacier acceleration and thinning after ice shelf collapse in the Larsen B embayment, Antarctica. Geophysical Research Letters, 31（18）: L18402
  28. 28.
    Schenk T, Csatho B, van der Veen C J, Brecher H, Ahn Y and Yoon T . 2005. Registering imagery to ICESat data for measuring elevation changes on Byrd Glacier, Antarctica. Geophysical Research Letters, 32（23）: L23S05
  29. 29.
    Shuman C A, Zwally H J, Schutz B E, Brenner A C, DiMarzio J P, Suchdeo V P and Fricker H A . 2006. ICESat Antarctic elevation data: preliminary precision and accuracy assessment. Geophysical Research Letters, 33（7）: L07501
  30. 30.
    Stearns L and Hamilton G . 2005. A new velocity map for Byrd Glacier, East Antarctica, from sequential ASTER satellite imagery. Annals of Glaciology, 41（1）: 71-76
  31. 31.
    Stearns L A . 2007. Outlet Glacier Dynamics in East Greenland and East Antarctica. Maine: University of Maine
  32. 32.
    Stearns L A, Smith B E and Hamilton G S . 2008. Increased flow speed on a large East Antarctic outlet glacier caused by subglacial floods. Nature Geoscience, 1（12）: 827-831
  33. 33.
    Stokes C R and Clark C D . 2003. Giant glacial grooves detected on Landsat ETM+ satellite imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24（5）: 905-910
  34. 34.
    Tachikawa T, Hato M, Kaku M and Iwasaki A . 2011. Characteristics of ASTER GDEM version 2//Proceedings of Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Vancouver: IEEE: 3657-3660
  35. 35.
    Toutin T . 2008. ASTER DEMs for geomatic and geoscientific applications: a review. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29（7）: 1855-1875
  36. 36.
    Wan L, Zhou C X, E D C and Deng F H . 2015. DEM generation and precision analysis of Antarctic ice sheet based on InSAR and ICESat data. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 37（5）: 1160-1167
  37. 37.
    Xiao F, Zhang S K, E D C, Li F, Hao W F and Yuan L X . 2014. Precision comparison and analysis of the four Antarctic digital elevation models. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 36（3）: 640-648
  38. 38.
    Zhan L, Tang G A and Yang X . 2010. Evaluation of SRTM DEMs’ elevation accuracy: a case study in Shaanxi Province. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 26（1）: 34-36
  39. 39.
    Zhang H P, Yang N, Liu S F, Zhang Y Q . 2006. Recent progress in the DEM-based tectonogeomorphic study. Geological Bulletin of China, 25（6）: 660-669
  40. 40.
    Zwally H, Schutz R, Bentley C, Bufton J, Herring T, Minster J B, Spinhirne J and Thomas R . 2009. GLAS/ICESat L2 Antarctic and Greenland Ice Sheet Altimetry Data, Version 34. Boulder, Colorado. NASA National Snow & Ice Data Center.
  41. 41.
    Zwally H J, Bindschadler R A, Brenner A C, Martin T V and Thomas R H . 1983. Surface elevation contours of greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 88 （C 3）: 1589-1596
  42. 42.
    Zwally H J, Bindschadler R A, Major J A and Brenner A C . 1987. Ice measurements by GEOSAT radar altimetry. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 8（2）: 251-254

Lesen Sie die ganze Passage

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website