Früher|Nächster

Quantitative determination of the optimal threshold of Permanent Scatterer based on ROC Curve

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China

    State Key Laboratory Incubation Base of Urban Environmental Processes and Digital Simulation, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China

  • Email：wyb@cnu.edu.cn
  • Introduction：王彦兵，1972年生，男，副教授，研究方向为InSAR监测城市地面沉降的理论与方法，地学时空分析与应用等。E-mail：wyb@cnu.edu.cn
WANG Yanbing12,  
  • Affiliation：

    College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China

    State Key Laboratory Incubation Base of Urban Environmental Processes and Digital Simulation, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China

WANG Cong12,  
  • Affiliation：

    College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China

    State Key Laboratory Incubation Base of Urban Environmental Processes and Digital Simulation, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China

ZHAO Yali12,  
  • Affiliation：

    College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China

    State Key Laboratory Incubation Base of Urban Environmental Processes and Digital Simulation, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China

LI Xiaojuan12,  
  • Affiliation：

    College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China

    State Key Laboratory Incubation Base of Urban Environmental Processes and Digital Simulation, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China

YU Jie12,  
  • Affiliation：

    College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China

    State Key Laboratory Incubation Base of Urban Environmental Processes and Digital Simulation, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China

ZHU Lin12

Resümee

Permanent Scatterer (PS) identification is a key step in the PS-InSAR technology, which is mainly used for obtaining ground subsidence data. The density and accuracy of the PS points are determined by setting the optimal threshold of PS identification. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve is used to quantitatively analyze and determine the optimal threshold for PS identification.The ROC curve is drawn with some thresholds of every PS identification algorithm. According to the ROC curve, the larger area under the ROC curve indicates that the PS recognition method is more reliable. When the area under the ROC curve is sufficiently large, the optimal threshold of PS identification, which is the closest to the upper left of the ROC curve, is determined quantitatively according to the maximum sum of the sensitivity and specificity of the ROC curve. The positive ratio of PS points is sufficiently high, the false positive ratio of PS points is sufficiently low, and the density of the PS point is sufficient, using the optimal threshold.The PS points are identified with 60 X-band TerraSAR-X images (2010—2017) by three algorithms as amplitude dispersion (TD), correlation coefficient (Tγ), and dual-threshold (TD, Tγ) with amplitude dispersion index (ADI) and correlation coefficient index (CCI). The experimental area is approximately Beijing Longtan Park. First, three ROC curves are drawn separately with the algorithms ADI, CCI, and dual-threshold. Second, the optimal thresholds of every algorithm have been calculated according to the maximum sum of the sensitivity and specificity of ROC curve. Research found that: (1) the optimal threshold of ADI is TD=0.45; the optimal threshold of CCI is Tγ=0.45; the optimal threshold of dual-threshold of ADI and CCI is (TD, Tγ) = (0.50, 0.50). (2) The area under the ROC curve of dual threshold is AUC=0.762, which is higher than the AUC of the single threshold algorithm, such as ADI and CCI. Evidently the dual-threshold algorithm is much better than the single threshold of ADI or CCI to identify the PS points.Result of this research shows that the ROC curve can not only quantitatively determine the optimal threshold of PS identification, but can also be further applied for the quantitative selection of the thresholds during GIS spatial analysis and remote sensing image interpretation.

Schlüsselwort

remote sensing;ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve;Permanent scatterers;coherence coefficient;amplitude dispersion;dual-threshold;ground subsidence

References

  1. 1.
    Baker A M, Hsu F C and Gayzik F S. 2018. A method to measure predictive ability of an injury risk curve using an observation-adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Journal of Biomechanics, 72: 23-28
  2. 2.
    Bianchini S, Del Soldato M, Solari L, Nolesini T, Pratesi F and Moretti S. 2016. Badland susceptibility assessment in volterra municipality (Tuscany, Italy) by means of GIS and statistical analysis. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(10): 889
  3. 3.
    Bianchini S, Solar L, Del Soldato M, Raspini F, Montalti R, Ciampalini A and Casagli N. 2019. Ground subsidence susceptibility (GSS) mapping in Grosseto plain (Tuscany, Italy) based on satellite Insar data using frequency ratio and fuzzy logic. Remote Sensing, 11(17): 2015
  4. 4.
    Chen Q, Liu G X, Li Y S and Ding X L. 2006. Automated detection of permanent scatterers in radar interferometry: algorithm and testing results. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 35(2): 112-117
  5. 5.
    Crosetto M, Monserrat O, Cuevas-González M, Devanthéry M and Crippa M. 2016. Persistent scatterer interferometry: a review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 115: 78-89
  6. 6.
    Fawcett T. 2006. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8): 861-874
  7. 7.
    Ferretti A, Fumagalli A, Novali F, Prati C, Rocca F and Rucci A. 2011. A new algorithm for processing interferometric data-stacks: squeeSAR. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 49(9): 3460-3470
  8. 8.
    Ferretti A, Prati C and Rocca F. 2000. Nonlinear subsidence rate estimation using permanent scatterers in differential SAR interferometry. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38(5): 2202-2212
  9. 9.
    Ferretti A, Prati C and Rocca F. 2001. Permanent scatterers in SAR interferometry. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39(1): 8-20
  10. 10.
    Giannecchini R, Galanti, Y, D’Amato Avanzi G and Barsanti M. 2016. Probabilistic rainfall thresholds for triggering debris flows in a human-modified landscape. Geomorphology, 257: 94-107
  11. 11.
    Han J, Lai T, Zhao Y J and Huang J. 2015. Method on PS detection of small dataset PS-DInSAR. Journal of Signal Processing, 31(6): 679-685
  12. 12.
    Hanley J A and McNeil B J. 1982. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143(1): 29-36
  13. 13.
    Heleno S I N, Oliveira L G S, Henriques M J, Falcão A P, Lima J N P, Cooksley G, Ferretti A, Fonseca A M, Lobo-Ferreira J P and Fonseca J F B D. 2011. Persistent Scatterers Interferometry detects and measures ground subsidence in Lisbon. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(8): 2152-2167
  14. 14.
    Hooper A, Zebker H, Segall P and Kampes B. 2004. A new method for measuring deformation on volcanoes and other natural terrains using InSAR persistent scatterers. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(23): L23611
  15. 15.
    Li G Y, Zhang R, Liu G X, Yu B, Zhang B, Dai K R, Bao J W and Wei B W. 2018. Land subsidence detection and analysis over Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area based on Sentinel-1A TS-DInSAR. Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(4): 633-646
  16. 16.
    Liu G X, Jia H G, Nie Y J, Li T, Zhang R, Yu B and Li Z L. 2014. Detecting subsidence in coastal areas by ultrashort-baseline TCPInSAR on the time series of high-resolution TerraSAR-X images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(4): 1911-1923
  17. 17.
    Lobo J M, Jiménez-Valverde A and Real R. 2008. AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 17(2): 145-151
  18. 18.
    Long S C, Li T and Feng T. 2011. Study on selection of PS point targets. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 31(4): 144-148
  19. 19.
    Luo X J, Huang D F and Liu G X. 2007. Automated detection of permanent scatterers in time serial differential radar interferometry. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 42(4): 414-418
  20. 20.
    Narayan A B, Tiwari A, Dwivedi R and Dikshit O. 2018. A novel measure for categorization and optimal phase history retrieval of distributed scatterers for InSAR applications. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(10): 5843-5849
  21. 21.
    Nie Y J, Liu G X, Shi J F, Yu B and Cheng P G. 2013. Application of PSI technique in deformation monitoring. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 38(2): 80-83, 97
  22. 22.
    Nykänen V, Lahti I, Niiranen T and Korhonen K. 2015. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) as validation tool for prospectivity models—A magmatic Ni-Cu case study from the Central Lapland Greenstone Belt, northern Finland. Ore Geology Reviews, 71: 853-860
  23. 23.
    Sun W W, Li F, Yang G and Zhang D F. 2018. Hyperspectral anomaly detection using column-wise robust principal component analysis. Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(3): 458-465
  24. 24.
    Wang X. 2013. Big Data Analysis: Methods and Applications. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press: 28-29
  25. 25.
    Wu S B, Zhang L, Ding X L and Perissin D. 2019. Pixel-wise MTInSAR estimator for integration of coherent point selection and unwrapped phase vector recovery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(5): 2659-2668
  26. 26.
    Wu W, Li A D, He X H, Ma R, Liu H B and Lv J K. 2018. A comparison of support vector machines, artificial neural network and classification tree for identifying soil texture classes in southwest China. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 144: 86-93
  27. 27.
    Xia L K, Fu W Z, Huang Q H and Xia C X. 2016. Research on PS selection method of GB-SAR images based on dual-thresholding algorithm. Site Investigation Science and Technology, (5): 17-21, 40
  28. 28.
    Xu L F, Wang S Z and Wang B S. 2011. The method of solving the optimal tangent point by ROC curve. Chinese Journal of Health Statistics, 28(6): 701-702, 705
  29. 29.
    Zebker H A and Villasenor J. 1992. Decorrelation in interferometric radar echoes. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 30(5): 950-959

Lesen Sie die ganze Passage

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website