Früher|Nächster

Lithological classification from the ASTER data based on wavelet transform， SVM， and voting methods： A case study for the Weiya area in the eastern Tian Shan

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    School of management, Xi'an University of Finance and Economics, Xi'an 710100, China

  • Email：304714562@qq.com
  • Introduction：唐淑兰，研究方向为遥感影像模式识别。E-mail：304714562@qq.com
TANG Shulan1,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    Xi'ning Centre for Comprehensive Survey of Natural Resources, CGS, Xi'ning 810021, China

  • Email：16392800@ qq.com
  • Introduction：孟勇，研究方向为区域地质。E-mail：16392800@ qq.com
MENG Yong2*

Resümee

In ASTER images, different lithologic units show obvious multiscale texture features, and wavelet transform has the advantage of extracting multiscale features. Support Vector Machine (SVM) is suitable for solving the classification problem of little training data and nonnormal data distribution. SVM is used to complete lithology classification. The classification results have high classification accuracy and low uncertainty. Using the voting method in selecting lithologic classification results can avoid the uncertainty of lithologic classification results caused by the extraction method of lithologic samples, thereby making the classification results statistically significant. An automatic classification method for ASTER image lithology integrating the wavelet texture, SVM, and voting method is proposed to improve the accuracy of ASTER imagery exploited for mapping assistance. First, the Haar wavelet is utilized for decomposing the ASTER image involving a multiscale wavelet, with the mean value of wavelet coefficients considered texture features. Moreover, the variance, homogeneity, and mean values of the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) are extracted concurrently. Then, the feature vectors of the SVM classification are constructed with multiscale texture, GLCM texture, and spectral features. The classification is repeated 10 times. Finally, the lithologic unit is determined by the voting method, and the results are statistically evaluated. The lithologic classification involves 92.1934% accuracy, exceeding the accuracy of spectral classification by 13.3369%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.9202. The multiscale texture extracts detailed lithologic information. The voting method prevents the dynamic lithologic change caused by the spatial variability of samples. The SVM also demonstrates superiority over the maximum likelihood classifier for lithologic classification involving high-dimensional and nonnormal distribution data. The local optimal parameters of SVM are avoided using the artificial bee colony algorithm to search for optimal parameters.

Schlüsselwort

wavelet texture;voting method;support vector machine;ASTER;lithologic classification

References

  1. 1.
    Abrams M and Yamaguchi Y, 2019. Twenty years of ASTER contributions to lithologic mapping and mineral exploration. Remote Sensing, 11(11): 1394.
  2. 2.
    Amer R and El-Desoky H. 2017. A remote sensing method for mapping sillimanite mineralization. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 134: 373-382
  3. 3.
    Gahlan H and Ghrefat H. 2018. Detection of gossan zones in Arid regions using Landsat 8 OLI data: implication for mineral exploration in the eastern Arabian shield, Saudi Arabia. Natural Resources Research, 27(1): 109-124
  4. 4.
    Hadigheh S M H and Ranjbar H. 2013. Lithological mapping in the eastern part of the central Iranian volcanic belt using combined ASTER and IRS data. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 41(4): 921-931
  5. 5.
    Hall-Beyer M. 2017. Practical guidelines for choosing GLCM textures to use in landscape classification tasks over a range of moderate spatial scales. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 38(5): 1312-1338
  6. 6.
    Harris J R, Grunsky E C, He J, Gorodetzky D and Brown N. 2012. A robust, cross-validation classification method (RCM) for improved mapping accuracy and confidence metrics. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 38(1): 69-90
  7. 7.
    He J, Harris J R, Sawada M and Behnia P. 2015. A comparison of classification algorithms using Landsat-7 and Landsat-8 data for mapping lithology in Canada’s Arctic. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 36(8): 2252-2276
  8. 8.
    Hosseinjani Zadeh M, Tangestani M H, Roldan F V and Yusta I. 2014. Sub-pixel mineral mapping of a porphyry copper belt using EO-1 Hyperion data. Advances in Space Research, 53(3): 440-451
  9. 9.
    Li Q Y, Huang X, Wen D W and Liu H. 2017. Integrating multiple textural features for remote sensing image change detection. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 83(2): 109-121
  10. 10.
    Ma D and Lai H C. 2019. Remote sensing image matching based improved ORB in NSCT domain. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 47(5): 801-807
  11. 11.
    Masoumi F, Eslamkish T, Abkar A A, Honarmand M and Harris J R. 2017. Integration of spectral, thermal, and textural features of ASTER data using random forests classification for lithological mapping. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 129: 445-457
  12. 12.
    Moonon A U, Hu J W and Li S T. 2015. Remote sensing image fusion method based on nonsubsampled shearlet transform and sparse representation. Sensing and Imaging, 16(1): 23
  13. 13.
    Myint S W, Zhu T and Zheng B J. 2015. A novel image classification algorithm using overcomplete wavelet transforms. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 12(6): 1232-1236
  14. 14.
    Qin D D，Wan L，He P E，Zhang Y，Guo Y and Chen J. 2022. Multiscale object detection in remote sensing image by combining data fusion and feature selection. National Remote Sensing Bulletin，26（8）：1662-1673
  15. 15.
    Shu L S, Deng X L and Ma X X. 2019. Tectonic affinity between central Tianshan Basement and Tarim block craton. Earth Science, 44(5): 1584-1601
  16. 16.
    Singh A, Armstrong R T, Regenauer-Lieb K and Mostaghimi P. 2019. Rock characterization using Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix: an objective perspective of digital rock statistics. Water Resources Research, 55(3): 1912-1927
  17. 17.
    Wu K J, Zeng Y N, Jin W P, He L L and Li J. 2013. Remote sensing image classification based on improved ant-miner. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 42(1): 59-66
  18. 18.
    Yu L, Porwal A, Holden E J and Dentith M C. 2012. Towards automatic lithological classification from remote sensing data using support vector machines. Computers and Geosciences, 45: 229-239
  19. 19.
    Yu Y F, Yang J Z, Chen S B and Wang N. 2015. Lithologic classification from remote sensing images based on spectral index. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 40(8): 1415-1419
  20. 20.
    Zang S Y, Zhang C, Zhang L J and Zhang Y H. 2012. Wetland remote sensing classification using support vector machine optimized with genetic algorithm: a case study in Honghe nature national reserve. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 32(4): 434-441
  21. 21.
    Zhang C F, Yu J, Hao L N and Wang S J. 2017. Lithology extraction from synergies muti-scale texture and muti-spectra images. Geological Science and Technology Information, 36(4): 236-243
  22. 22.
    Zhang R S, Cao H, Zeng M, Zhang D X and Li G X. 2016. Scientific belt lithologic mapping based on ASTER spectral analysis: A case study from the Tashkorgan area (Xinjiang, China). Acta Petrologica Sinica, 32(12): 3835-3846
  23. 23.
    Zheng S, An Y F, Shi P L and Zhao T. 2021. Mapping the lithological features and ore-controlling structures related to Ni-Cu mineralization in the eastern Tian Shan, NW China from ASTER data. Remote Sensing, 13(2): 206
  24. 24.
    Zheng S and Fu B H. 2013. Lithological mapping of granitiods in the western Junggar from ASTER SWIR-TIR multispectral data: Case study in Karamay pluton, Xinjiang. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 29(8): 2936-2948
  25. 25.
    Zhou G Q, Wang H Y, Sun Y, Shao Y and Yue T. 2019. Lithologic classification using multilevel spectral characteristics. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 13(1): 016513
  26. 26.
    Zhang J X，Gu H Y，Yang Y，Zhang H and Li H T. 2021. Research progress and trend of high-resolution remote sensing imagery intelligent interpretation. National Remote Sensing Bulletin，25（11）：2198-2210

Lesen Sie die ganze Passage

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website