Früher|Nächster

Time-series absolute radiometric calibration and trend analysis of the wide swath sensor onboard GF-6 satellite with automatic radiometric calibration site

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing Information Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

  • Email：liuyk@aircas.ac.cn
  • Introduction：刘耀开， 研究方向为遥感载荷定标与真实性检验、遥感建模与参数反演。E-mail： liuyk@aircas.ac.cn
LIU Yaokai1,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing Information Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

  • Email：mall@aircas.ac.cn
  • Introduction：马灵玲，研究方向为遥感定标与真实性检验方法及高光谱遥感数据处理。E-mail： mall@aircas.ac.cn
MA Lingling1*,  
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing Information Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

WANG Renfei1,  
  • Affiliation：

    Inner Mongolia North Heavy Industry Group Co., Ltd, Baotou 014033, China

ZHENG QingChuan2,  
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing Information Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

SONG Peilan1,  
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing Information Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

LI Wan1,  
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing Information Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

ZHAO Yongguang1,  
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing Information Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

WANG Ning1,  
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing Information Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

GAO Caixia1,  
  • Affiliation：

    Inner Mongolia North Heavy Industry Group Co., Ltd, Baotou 014033, China

HOU Xiaoxin2,  
  • Affiliation：

    Inner Mongolia North Heavy Industry Group Co., Ltd, Baotou 014033, China

JIN Jin2

Resümee

The on-orbit absolute radiometric calibration of satellite remote sensing payloads is crucial to ensuring the radiometric consistency of products from different sources and improving the inversion accuracy of high spatial resolution products. The traditional site calibration method based on manual synchronous measurement is limited by the imaging, surface and atmospheric measurement conditions at the time of satellite overpassing, which is difficult to meet the needs of correcting the radiometric performance change accurately during the life cycle. In this paper, according to the characteristics of large viewing angle observation of the wide width sensor onboard Gaofen6 satellite (GF-6/WFV), a time series absolute radiometric calibration method for the GF-6/WFV sensor with automatic radiometric calibration site is proposed. The proposed method not only can track the trend of satellite payload radiation performance by significantly increasing the frequency of on-orbit calibration, but also can give the calibration results with uncertainties. Based on proposed method, 41 of frequencies automatic radiometric calibration results of GF-6/WFV sensor were calculated from August 2019 to October 2021, and the traceability uncertainty of the calibration results was better than 5% (except for the 7th band). The trend analysis of the time series calibration results shows that the annual variation of the radiometric calibration coefficients of the GF-6/WFV sensor are from 1.10% to 4.59%. In addition, the high-precision in-orbit satellite payloads MODIS and Sentinel-2/MSI are used as reference to cross validate the GF-6/WFV sensor’s calibration results. And, the averaged absolute relative differences of the cross validation were between 2.12% to 6.09% respect to the bands 1 to 4 of GF-6/WFV sensor. The proposed method in this paper can realize the time-series on-orbit absolute radiometric calibration of the GF-6/WFV sensor and its radiometric performance trend change monitoring during the whole life cycle, which can effectively support the production of high spatial resolution remote sensing products and improve the quantitative application level of Chinese remote sensing data.

Schlüsselwort

time-series radiometric calibration;GF-6/WFV;uncertainty analysis;trend analysis;cross calibration

References

  1. 1.
    Alhammoud B, Jackson J, Clerc S, Arias M, Bouzinac C, Gascon F, Cadau E G, Iannone R Q and Boccia V. 2019. Sentinel-2 level-1 radiometry assessment using vicarious methods from DIMITRI toolbox and field measurements from RadCalNet database. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 12(9): 3470-3479
  2. 2.
    Barsi J A, Alhammoud B, Czapla-Myers J, Gascon F, Haque O, Kaewmanee M, Leigh L and Markham B L. 2018. Sentinel-2A MSI and Landsat-8 OLI radiometric cross comparison over desert sites. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 51(1): 822-837
  3. 3.
    Berk A, Anderson G P, Acharya P K and Shettle E P. 2011. MODTRAN®5.2.2 User’s Manual. Burlington: Spectral Sciences, Inc
  4. 4.
    Bouvet M, Thome K, Berthelot B, Bialek A, Czapla-Myers J, Fox N P, Goryl P, Henry P, Ma L L, Marcq S, Meygret A, Wenny B N and Woolliams E R. 2019. RadCalNet: a radiometric calibration network for earth observing imagers operating in the visible to shortwave infrared spectral range. Remote Sensing, 11(20): 2401
  5. 5.
    Chen L, Xu N, Hu X Q, Lu F and Zhang P. 2016. Study on orbit radiometric calibration for FY-2 visible band based on deep convective cloud. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 36(8): 2639-2645
  6. 6.
    Czapla-Myers J and Anderson N. 2020. Calibration and validation of earth-observing sensors using the radiometric calibration test site (RadCaTS) at Railroad Valley, Nevada, USA//22nd EGU General Assembly: EGU
  7. 7.
    Czapla-Myers J, McCorkel J, Anderson N, Thome K, Biggar S, Helder D, Aaron D, Leigh L and Mishra N. 2015. The ground-based absolute radiometric calibration of landsat 8 OLI. Remote Sensing, 7(1): 600-626
  8. 8.
    Czapla-Myers J S, Thome K J and Leisso N P. 2010. Radiometric calibration of earth-observing sensors using an automated test site at Railroad Valley, Nevada. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 36(5): 474-487
  9. 9.
    Gao C X, Liu Y K, Liu J R, Ma L L, Wu Z F, Qiu S, Li C R, Zhao Y G, Han Q J, Zhao E Y, Qian Y G and Wang N. 2020. Determination of the key comparison reference value from multiple field calibration of Sentinel-2B/MSI over the Baotou site. Remote Sensing, 12(15): 2404 [DOI: 10.3390/rs12152404].
  10. 10.
    Gong H, Tian G L, Yu T, Gu X F, Gao H L and Li X Y. 2010. Vicarious radiometric calibration and validation of CBERS02B CCD data. Journal of Remote Sensing, 14(1): 1-12
  11. 11.
    Holben B N, Eck T F, Slutsker I, Tanré D, Buis J P, Setzer A, Vermote E, Reagan J A, Kaufman Y J, Nakajima T, Lavenu F, Jankowiak I and Smirnov A. 1998. AERONET—A federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization. Remote Sensing of Environment, 66(1): 1-16
  12. 12.
    Huang J W, Li Z Y, Chen E X, Zhao L and Mo B P. 2021. Classification of plantation types based on WFV multispectral imagery of the GF-6 satellite. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 25(2): 539-548
  13. 13.
    Jing X, Leigh L, Pinto C T and Helder D. 2019. Evaluation of RadCalNet output data using Landsat 7, Landsat 8, Sentinel 2A, and Sentinel 2B sensors. Remote Sensing, 11(5): 541
  14. 14.
    Kim K and Lee K. 2020. Validation experiment of the reflectance products of KOMPSAT-3A based on RadCalNet data and its applicability to vegetation indexing. Remote Sensing, 12(23): 3971
  15. 15.
    Li C R, Ma L L, Tang L L, Gao C X, Qian Y G, Wang N and Wang X H. 2021. A comprehensive calibration site for high resolution remote sensors dedicated to quantitative remote sensing and its applications. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 25(1): 198-219
  16. 16.
    Li W, Ma L L, Zhao Y G, Liu Y K, Wang N, Qian Y G, Li K, Li C R and Tang L L. 2021. Temporal vicarious radiometric calibration of ZY-3 Mux sensor using automatic ground measurement of Baotou sandy site in China//Proceedings of 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Brussels: IEEE: 7767-7770 [DOI: .
  17. 17.
    Li X Y, Tian X, Duan T, Cao X M, Yang K J, Lu Q and Wang F. 2021. From UAV to satellite: fractional woody and herbaceous vegetation cover estimation in the temperate sparse forest grassland based on machine learning algorithm. Journal of Remote Sensing
  18. 18.
    Li Y, Rong Z G, Li Y Q, Zhang Y, Ba X T, Zhang Y N, Chen L, Zhang L J, Wei W and Sun L. 2019. Solar reflection band site automatic calibration by the Dunhuang site automatic observation radiometric calibration operational system//Proceedings of SPIE 11127, Earth Observing Systems XXIV. San Diego: SPIE: 111271M
  19. 19.
    Liang J, Zheng Z W, Xia S T, Zhang X T and Tang Y Y. 2020. Crop recognition and evaluationusing red edge features of GF-6 satellite. Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(10): 1168-1179
  20. 20.
    Liu Y K, Li C R, Ma L L, Wang N, Qian Y G and Tang L L. 2017. An automatic reflectance-based approach to vicarious radiometric calibrate the Landsat8 operational land imager//Proceedings of 2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Fort Worth: IEEE: 4699-4702
  21. 21.
    Liu Y K, Ma Z H, Ma L L, Wang N, Qian Y G, Li C R and Tang L L. 2018. Vicarious radiometric calibration using a ground radiance-based approach: a case study of Sentinel 2A MSI//Proceedings of 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Valencia: IEEE: 3296-3299
  22. 22.
    Liu Y K, Ma L L, Wang N, Zhao Y G, Gao C X, Li C R and Tang L L. 2019. Uncertainty analysis of vicarious radiometric calibration of optical sensor using a Monte Carlo statistical approach//Proceedings of SPIE 11127, Earth Observing Systems XXIV. San Diego: SPIE: 111271O
  23. 23.
    Lü J Y, He M Y, Chen L, Hu X Q and Li X. 2017. Automated radiation calibration method based on Dunhuang radiometric calibration site. Acta Optica Sinica, 37(8): 0801003
  24. 24.
    Ma L L, Zhao Y G, Woolliams E R, Dai C H, Wang N, Liu Y K, Li L, Wang X H, Gao C X, Li C R and Tang L L. 2020. Uncertainty analysis for RadCalNet instrumented test sites using the Baotou sites BTCN and BSCN as examples. Remote Sensing, 12(11): 1696
  25. 25.
    Marcq S, Meygret A, Bouvet M, Fox N, Greenwell C, Scott B, Berthelot B, Besson B, Guilleminot N and Damiri B. 2018. New radcalnet site at gobabeb, namibia: installation of the instrumentation and first satellite calibration results//Proceedings of 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Valencia: IEEE: 6444-6447
  26. 26.
    Meygret A, Santer R P and Berthelot B. 2011. ROSAS: a robotic station for atmosphere and surface characterization dedicated to on-orbit calibration//Proceedings of SPIE 8153, Earth Observing Systems XVI. San Diego: SPIE: 815311 [DOI: 10.1117/12.892759]
  27. 27.
    Pang B, Ma L L, Liu Y K, Wang N, Zhao Y G, Han Q J, Meng F R, Li C R, Tang L L, Chen Z M and Wang G Z. 2019. Ground-based automatic radiometric calibration of land observation satellite optical sensors and cross validation analysis. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 34(1): 146-154
  28. 28.
    Qiu G G, Li X, Wei W, Zhang Q and Zheng X B. 2016. Experiment and analysis of on-orbit radiometric calibration for remote sensors based on in-site automated observation technology. Acta Optica Sinica, 36(7): 0701001
  29. 29.
    Revel C, Lonjou V, Marcq S, Desjardins C, Fougnie B, Luche C C D, Guilleminot N, Lacamp A S, Lourme E, Miquel C and Lenot X. 2019. Sentinel-2A and 2B absolute calibration monitoring. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 52(1): 122-137
  30. 30.
    Roujean J L, Leroy M and Deschamps P Y. 1992. A bidirectional reflectance model of the earth’s surface for the correction of remote sensing data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97(D18): 20455-20468
  31. 31.
    Santer R P, Six C and Buis J. 2003. Vicarious calibration on land site using automatic ground-based optical measurements: applications to SPOT-HRV//Proceedings of SPIE 4891, Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Clouds III. Hangzhou: SPIE
  32. 32.
    Schmechtig C, Santer R P, Roger J C and Meygret A. 1997. Automatic ground-based station for vicarious calibration//Proceedings of SPIE 3221, Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites. London: SPIE [DOI: 10.1117/12.298097].
  33. 33.
    Sterckx S and Wolters E. 2019. Radiometric top-of-atmosphere reflectance consistency assessment for Landsat 8/OLI, Sentinel-2/MSI, PROBA-V, and DEIMOS-1 over Libya-4 and RadCalNet calibration sites. Remote Sensing, 11(19): 2253
  34. 34.
    Tang H Z, Tang X M, Xie J F, Chen W and Qian Y G. 2022. On-orbit radiometric calibration and validation of GF-7 satellite based on RadCalNet Baotou site. National Remote Sensing Bulletin
  35. 35.
    Thuillier G, Hersé M, Labs D, Foujols T, Peetermans W, Gillotay D, Simon P C and Mandel H. 2003. The solar spectral irradiance from 200 to 2400 nm as measured by the SOLSPEC spectrometer from the Atlas and Eureca Missions. Solar Physics, 214(1): 1-22
  36. 36.
    Thuillier G, Hersé M, Simon P C, Labs D, Mandel H, Gillotay D and Foujols T. 1998. The visible solar spectral irradiance from 350 to 850 nm as measured by the SOLSPEC spectrometer during the atlas I mission. Solar Physics, 177(1/2): 41-61
  37. 37.
    Wang N, Li C R, Ma L L, Liu Y K, Meng F R, Zhao Y G, Pang B, Qian Y G, Li W, Tang L L and Wang D J. 2017. Ground-based automated radiometric calibration system in Baotou site, China//Proceedings of SPIE 10427, Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing XXIII. Warsaw: SPIE: 104271J
  38. 38.
    Xiong X X, Chiang K F, Wu A S, Barnes W L, Guenther B and Salomonson V V. 2008. Multiyear on-orbit calibration and performance of Terra MODIS thermal emissive bands. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46(6): 1790-1803
  39. 39.
    Yang A X, Zhong B, Hu L F, Wu S L, Xu Z P, Wu H B, Wu J J, Gong X S, Wang H B and Liu Q H. 2020. Radiometric cross-calibration of the wide field view camera onboard GaoFen-6 in multispectral bands. Remote Sensing, 12(6): 1037
  40. 40.
    Zhang M, Wei W, Zhang Y N, Zhao C Y, Li X and Zheng X B. 2019. High-frequency on-orbit radiometric calibration of SNPP VIIRS based on in-site automated observation technology. Acta Photonica Sinica, 48(4): 0428001
  41. 41.
    Zhong B, Ma Y B, Yang A X and Wu J J. 2021. Radiometric performance evaluation of FY-4A/AGRI based on Aqua/MODIS. Sensors, 21(5): 1859

Lesen Sie die ganze Passage

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website