References

1. 1.
   Chen B Z, Zhang H F, Wang T and Zhang X Y. 2021. An atmospheric perspective on the carbon budgets of terrestrial ecosystems in China: Progress and challenges. Science Bulletin, 66(17): 1713-1718
2. 2.
   Chen X , Wang R , Shi W, Li X, Zhu X and Wang X. An Individual Tree Segmentation Method That Combines LiDAR Data and Spectral Imagery.Forests (19994907), 2023, 14(5).DOI:.
3. 3.
   Ding Z L. 2021. Research on China’s carbon neutralization framework roadmap. Beijing: The 7th Annual Academic Conference of the Academic Department of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (丁仲礼. 2021. 中国碳中和框架路线图研究. 北京: 中科院学部第七届学术年会) [DOI: 10.19609/j.cnki.cn10-1299/f.2021.08.007]
4. 4.
   Ehlers D, Wang C, Coulston J, Zhang Y L, Pavelsky T, Frankenberg E, Woodcock C and Song C H. 2022. Mapping forest aboveground biomass using multisource remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing, 14(5): 1115
5. 5.
   Fang J Y and Zhu J X. 2021. Carbon Budgets of Forest Ecosystems in China. Beijing: Science Press
6. 6.
   Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2021. Global Forest Resources Assessment. Rome: FAO
7. 7.
   Foody G M, Boyd D S and Cutler M E J. 2003. Predictive relations of tropical forest biomass from Landsat TM data and their transferability between regions. Remote Sensing of Environment, 85(4): 463-474
8. 8.
   Friedlingstein P, O’Sullivan M, Jones M W, Andrew R M, Hauck J, Olsen A, Peters G P, Peters W, Pongratz J, Sitch S, Le Quéré C, Canadell J G, Ciais P, Jackson R B, Alin S, Aragão L E O C, Arneth A, Arora V, Bates N R, Becker M, Benoit-Cattin A, Bittig H C, Bopp L, Bultan S, Chandra N, Chevallier F, Chini L P, Evans W, Florentie L, Forster P M, Gasser T, Gehlen M, Gilfillan D, Gkritzalis T, Gregor L, Gruber N, Harris I, Hartung K, Haverd V, Houghton R A, Ilyina T, Jain A K, Joetzjer E, Kadono K, Kato E, Kitidis V, Korsbakken J I, Landschützer P, Lefèvre N, Lenton A, Lienert S, Liu Z, Lombardozzi D, Marland G, Metzl N, Munro D R, Nabel J E M S, Nakaoka S I, Niwa Y, O’Brien K, Ono T, Palmer P I, Pierrot D, Poulter B, Resplandy L, Robertson E, Rödenbeck C, Schwinger J, Séférian R, Skjelvan I, Smith A J P, Sutton A J, Tanhua T, Tans P P, Tian H Q, Tilbrook B, Van Der Werf G, Vuichard N, Walker A P, Wanninkhof R, Watson A J, Willis D, Wiltshire A J, Yuan W P, Yue X and Zaehle S. 2020. Global carbon budget 2020. Earth System Science Data, 12(4): 3269-3340
9. 9.
   Fu Y Y, He H S, Hawbaker T J, Henne P D, Zhu Z L and Larsen D R. 2019. Evaluating k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) imputation models for species-level aboveground forest biomass mapping in Northeast China. Remote Sensing, 11(17): 2005
10. 10.
    Geng L, Li M Z, Fan W Y and Wang B. 2018. Individual Tree Structure Parameters and Effective Crown of the Stand Extraction Base on Airborn LiDAR Data. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 54(7): 53-64
11. 11.
    Gong J Y. 2021. Tackling Key Technologies and Paving the Way for Future Development. Wuhan: Young Teacher Training Plan
12. 12.
    Gou Y Q, Ryan C M and Reiche J. 2022. Large area aboveground biomass and carbon stock mapping in woodlands in Mozambique with L-band radar: improving accuracy by accounting for soil moisture effects using the water cloud model. Remote Sensing, 14(2): 404
13. 13.
    Hauglin M, Lien V, Næsset E and Gobakken T. 2014. Geo-referencing Forest Field Plots by Coregistration of Terrestrial and Airborne Laser Scanning Data[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 35(9):3135-3149
14. 14.
    Hurteau M D. 2017. Quantifying the carbon balance of forest restoration and wildfire under projected climate in the fire-prone southwestern US. PLoS One, 12(1): e0169275
15. 15.
    Jiang T, Liu S, Zhang Q ,Xu X, Sun J, Wang Y. Segmentation of individual trees in urban MLS point clouds using a deep learning framework based on cylindrical convolution network[J].International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2023, 123.DOI:.
16. 16.
    Jiang X D, Li G Y, Lu D S, Chen E X and Wei X L. 2020. Stratification-based forest aboveground biomass estimation in a subtropical region using airborne lidar data. Remote Sensing, 12(7): 1101
17. 17.
    Kallio A M I, Salminen O and Sievänen R. 2016. Forests in the Finnish low carbon scenarios. Journal of Forest Economics, 23: 45-62
18. 18.
    Kankare V, Holopainen M, Vastaranta M, Puttonen E, Yu X W, Hyyppä J, Vaaja M, Hyyppä H and Alho P. 2013a. Individual tree biomass estimation using terrestrial laser scanning. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 75: 64-75
19. 19.
    Kankare V, Räty M, Yu XW, Holopainen M, Vastaranta M, Kantola T, Hyyppä J, Hyyppä H, Alho P and Viitala R. 2013b. Single tree biomass modelling using airborne laser scanning. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 85: 66-73
20. 20.
    Karthik V, Bhaskar B V, Ramachandran S and Gertler A W. 2022. Quantification of organic carbon and black carbon emissions, distribution, and carbon variation in diverse vegetative ecosystems across India. Environmental Pollution, 309: 119790
21. 21.
    Li D R, Wang C W, Hu Y M and Liu S G. 2012. General review on remote sensing-based biomass estimation. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 37(6): 631-635
22. 22.
    Li H K. 2021. Research advance of forest carbon sink assessment methods and carbon sequestration potential estimation under carbon neutral vision. Geological Survey of China, 8(4): 79-86
23. 23.
    Li H K and Lei Y C. 2010. Estimation and Evaluation of Forest Biomass Carbon Storage in China. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House
24. 24.
    Li W, Niu Z, Shang R, Qin Y C, Wang L and Chen H Y. 2020. High-resolution mapping of forest canopy height using machine learning by coupling ICESat-2 LiDAR with Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 92: 102163
25. 25.
    Li W B and Li J H. 2023. Application of UAV High-density Point Cloud for Individual Tree Segmentation in High Canopy Density Artificial Forests. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 51(09):76-82
26. 26.
    Liu Y, Gong W S, Xing Y Q, Hu X Y and Gong J Y. 2019. Estimation of the forest stand mean height and aboveground biomass in Northeast China using SAR Sentinel-1B, multispectral Sentinel-2A, and DEM imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 151: 277-289
27. 27.
    Liu Y C, Gao X L, Fu C, Yu G R and Liu Z Y. 2019. Estimation of carbon sequestration potential of forest biomass in China based on National Forest Resources Inventory. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(11): 4002-4010
28. 28.
    Los S O. 2013. Analysis of trends in fused AVHRR and MODIS NDVI data for 1982-2006: indication foraCO₂ fertilization effect in global vegetation. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 27(2): 318-330
29. 29.
    Lu D S and Batistella M. 2005. Exploring TM image texture and its relationships with biomass estimation in Rondônia, Brazilian Amazon. Acta Amazonica, 35(2): 249-257
30. 30.
    Lu D S, Chen Q, Wang G X, Liu L J, Li G Y and Moran E. 2016. A survey of remote sensing-based aboveground biomass estimation methods in forest ecosystems. International Journal of Digital Earth, 9(1): 63-105
31. 31.
    Meng X Q, Li J L, Hu W, Tian M J, Ma C T and Wang R R. 2024. Single Wood Extraction Method Combining LiDAR Data and Spectral Images. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 55(01):203-211+262
32. 32.
    Næsset E. 2002. Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80(1): 88-99
33. 33.
    Narine L L, Popescu S C and Malambo L. 2019. Synergy of ICESat-2 and Landsat for mapping forest aboveground biomass with deep learning. Remote Sensing, 11(12): 1503
34. 34.
    Paris C, Kelbe D, Aardt J V and Bruzzone L. A Novel Automatic Method for the Fusion of ALS and TLS LiDAR Data for Robust Assessment of Tree Crown Structure. IEEE Transactions on Geoence and Remote Sensing, 2017, 55(7):3 679-3 693
35. 35.
    Piao S, Fang J Y, Zhu B and Tan K. 2005. Forest biomass carbon stocks in China over the past 2 decades: estimation based on integrated inventory and satellite data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 110(G1): G01006
36. 36.
    Polewski P, Ericksonc A, YAO W, Coops N and Stilla U. Object Based co-registration of Terrestrial Photogrammetric and ALS Point Clouds in Forested Areas[C]. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2016:347-354
37. 37.
    Potapov P, Li X Y, Hernandez-Serna A, Tyukavina A, Hansen M C, Kommareddy A, Pickens A, Turubanova S, Tang H, Silva C E, Armston J, Dubayah R, Blair J B and Hofton M. 2021. Mapping global forest canopy height through integration of GEDI and Landsat data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 253: 112165
38. 38.
    Puliti S, Breidenbach J, Schumacher J, Hauglin M, Klingenberg T F and Astrup R. 2021. Above-ground biomass change estimation using national forest inventory data with Sentinel-2 and Landsat. Remote Sensing of Environment, 265: 112644
39. 39.
    Purohit S, Aggarwal S P and Patel N R. 2021. Estimation of forest aboveground biomass using combination of Landsat 8 and Sentinel-1A data with random forest regression algorithm in Himalayan Foothills. Tropical Ecology, 62(2): 288-300
40. 40.
    Qin H M, Zhou W Q, Yao Y and Wang W M. Individual tree segmentation and tree species classification in subtropical broadleaf forests using UAV-based LiDAR, hyperspectral, and ultrahigh-resolution RGB data[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment,2022,280.
41. 41.
    Reinmann A B, Hutyra L R, Trlica A and Olofsson P. 2016. Assessing the global warming potential of human settlement expansion in a mesic temperate landscape from 2005 to 2050. Science of the Total Environment, 545-546: 512-524
42. 42.
    Ren J Q and Xia J Y. 2017. Prediction of forest carbon sink potential in Heilongjiang province: the carbon density-age relationship-based approach. Research of Environmental Sciences, 30(4): 552-558
43. 43.
    Safari A, Sohrabi H, Powell S and Shataee S. 2017. A comparative assessment of multi-temporal Landsat 8 and machine learning algorithms for estimating aboveground carbon stock in coppice oak forests. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 38(22): 6407-6432
44. 44.
    Silva C A, Duncanson L, Hancock S, Neuenschwander A, Thomas N, Hofton M, Fatoyinbo L, Simard M, Marshak C Z, Armston J, Lutchke S and Dubayah R. 2021. Fusing simulated GEDI, ICESat-2 and NISAR data for regional aboveground biomass mapping. Remote Sensing of Environment, 253: 112234
45. 45.
    Stümer W, Kenter B and Köhl M. 2010. Spatial interpolation of in situ data by self-organizing map algorithms (neural networks) for the assessment of carbon stocks in European forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 260(3): 287-293
46. 46.
    State Forestry and Grassland Administration. 2019. China Forest Resources Report: 2014-2018. Beijing: China Forestry Press
47. 47.
    Timothy D, Onisimo M, Cletah S, Adelabu S and Tsitsi B. 2016. Remote sensing of aboveground forest biomass: a review. Tropical Ecology, 57(2): 125-132
48. 48.
    Vatandaşlar C and Abdikan S. 2022. Carbon stock estimation by dual-polarized synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and forest inventory data in a Mediterranean forest landscape. Journal of Forestry Research, 33(3): 827-838
49. 49.
    Wang W W, Pang Y, Du L M , Zhang Z J and Liang X J. 2022. Individual tree segmentation for airborne LiDAR point cloud data using spectral clustering and supervoxel-based algorithm. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 26(8):1650-1661
50. 50.
    Wu Q B, Wang X K, Duan X N, Deng L B, Lu F, Ouyang Z Y and Feng Z W. 2008. Carbon sequestration and its potential by forest ecosystems in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28(2): 517-524
51. 51.
    Yan F, Wu B and Wang Y J. 2013. Estimating aboveground biomass in Mu Us Sandy Land using Landsat spectral derived vegetation indices over the past 30 years. Journal of Arid Land, 5(4): 521-530
52. 52.
    Yang J T, Kang Z, Cheng S, Yang Z and Akwensi P. An individual tree segmentation method based on watershed algorithm and 3D spatial distribution analysis from airborne LiDAR point clouds. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2020, PP(99):1-1.
53. 53.
    Yang Z K, Su Y J, Li W K, Cheng K, Guan H C, Ren Y, Hu T Y, Xu G C and Guo Q H. Segmenting Individual Trees From Terrestrial LiDAR Data Using Tree Branch Directivity. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2024, 17:956-969.
54. 54.
    Yu G R, Wang Q F, Liu Y C and Liu Y H. 2011. Conceptual framework of carbon sequestration rate and potential increment of carbon sink of regional terrestrial ecosystem and scientific basis for quantitative carbon authentification. Progress in Geography, 30(7): 771-787
55. 55.
    Yu G R, Zhang L M and Sun X M. 2014. Progresses and prospects of Chinese terrestrial ecosystem flux observation and research network (ChinaFLUX). Progress in Geography, 33(7): 903-917
56. 56.
    Zhang X X, Brandt M, Tong X W, Ciais P, Yue Y M, Xiao X M, Zhang W M, Wang K L and Fensholt R. 2022. A large but transient carbon sink from urbanization and rural depopulation in China. Nature Sustainability, 5(4): 321-328
57. 57.
    Zhao K G, Suarez J C, Garcia M, Hu T X, Wang C and Londo A. 2018. Utility of multitemporal lidar for forest and carbon monitoring: tree growth, biomass dynamics, and carbon flux. Remote Sensing of Environment, 204: 883-897
58. 58.
    Zhu N N, Yang B S and Dong Z. 2024. The explicit model of forest carbon storage based on remote sensing. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 53(1): 36-49
59. 59.
    Zhuo G Y, Yin G C and Tang X L. 2018. Carbon Storage-Biomass Equation of Forest Ecosystem in China. Beijing: Science Press