Analysis of Sensibility on Split-window Algorithms for Retrieving Land-surface Temperature
- Issue 1, Pages: 8-13(2000)
Published:2000
DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20000102
移动端阅览


浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
Published:2000
移动端阅览
劈窗算法是目前由热红外遥感图像数据获取陆面温度最主要的方法。由于进行地面像元尺度实时陆面温度同步测量的困难,尚无法直接对现有各劈窗算法进行评判。该文借助于辐射传输模型LOWTRAN7及其提供的6 种标准大气模式,进行模拟计算,分析了6 种主要劈窗算法对大气廓线误差和比辐射率的敏感度,作为对劈窗算法适用性的一间接判据。
Thermal infrared remote sensing technology supplies an attractive way to measure land
s
uface temperature (LST) on a large scale simultaneously. NOAA
A
VHRR data is commonly used in the inversion study of LST. But the inversion is a challenge for the scientists because of the complexity of land surface. So far split
w
indow algorithm is a major solution to retrieve land
s
urface temperature from thermal infrared remote sensing data. But because of the obstacle to obtain the in
s
itu validation measurements simultaneously
including land
s
urface temperature and emissivity especially in pixel scale
it is confined to judge directly which one is more precious and more applicable.\;In this paper
using radiative transfer code LOWTRAN
7
and six standard atmosphere models supplied by it
we analyzed
by simulation
the sensibility of the six common split
w
indow algorithms to the atmospheric profile error
including atmospheric water vapor profile and temperature profile. The sensibility to spectral emissivity
including the average emissivity and the differential emissivity between AVHRR channels 4 and 5
is also analyzed. It turns out that
(1) algorithms of SOB and UVM have less sensibility to atmospheric profile
and have more satisfactory accuracy of better than 1.5K; (2) most algorithms are more sensible to the mean emissivity than to the emissivity difference. Sobrino (1991) algorithm has the least sensibility to emissivity. As a result
we obtained an indirect criterion priliminarily for the six split
w
indow algorithms.
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621