The inversion and quality validation of FY-3C MWRI sea surface temperature

Miao ZHANG; Sujuan WANG; Danyu QIN; Hong QIU; Shihao TANG

doi:10.11834/jrs.20187217

Chinese Satellites | Views : 0 下载量: 96 CSCD: 4 更多指标

PDF
Export
Share
Collection
Album

The inversion and quality validation of FY-3C MWRI sea surface temperature
Vol. 22, Issue 5, Pages: 713-722(2018)
Published： 2018-9 ，

Accepted： 7 February 2018
DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20187217

扫描看全文

张淼, 王素娟, 覃丹宇, 邱红, 唐世浩. 2018. FY-3C微波成像仪海面温度产品算法及精度检验. 遥感学报, 22(5): 713–722

Zhang M, Wang S J, Qin D Y, Qiu H and Tang S H. 2018. The inversion and quality validation of FY-3C MWRI sea surface temperature. Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(5): 713–722
张淼, 王素娟, 覃丹宇, 邱红, 唐世浩. 2018. FY-3C微波成像仪海面温度产品算法及精度检验. 遥感学报, 22(5): 713–722 DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20187217.

Zhang M, Wang S J, Qin D Y, Qiu H and Tang S H. 2018. The inversion and quality validation of FY-3C MWRI sea surface temperature. Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(5): 713–722 DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20187217.

摘要

海洋表面温度(SST)是海洋学和气候学一个十分重要的物理因子，而卫星被动微波遥感能够穿透云层，实现全天候、大范围观测，因此利用中国FY-3C微波成像仪(MWRI)反演SST具有重要意义。FY-3C MWRI SST产品采用统计算法，首先利用MWRI降水和海冰产品剔除含降水和海冰的像元，之后选择时空间隔0.2 h和0.2°离海岸100 km以外的FY-3C MWRI观测亮温与浮标观测值进行匹配，再将全球在空间上分为4个纬度带，时间上分为12个月，并分升轨和降轨，分别建立浮标海温观测结果和MWRI亮温之间的统计关系，实现对SST的估算。将|估算海温－30年月平均海温|≥2.5 K的像元标识为51，发现这些像元基本分布在陆地边缘地区及大风速地区，剔除标识为51的像元后的精度验证结果表明：与全球浮标资料相比，FY-3C MWRI SST轨道产品升轨精度为–0.02±1.22 K，降轨精度为–0.15±1.28 K；与全球分析场日平均海温OISST相比，FY-3C MWRI SST日产品升轨精度为0.00±1.03 K，降轨精度为–0.09±1.08 K。微波辐射计的性能及其定位定标精度、上游卫星产品(降水检测和海冰检测)的精度、陆地的干扰及高风速对微波信号的影响均会造成SST估算误差，如何改进算法中风速大于12 m/s时的估算精度是下一步的工作重点。

Abstract

Sea Surface Temperature (SST) is an important physical parameter in the field of marine and climate research. Passive microwave remote sensing has the advantage of completing all weather observations that disregard cloud interference

which has received increasing attention. FY-3C satellites

which carry a Microwave Radiometer Imager (MWRI) onboard

were successfully launched on December 23

2013. Therefore

using the FY-3C MWRI to retrieve the SST is crucial. The FY-3C MWRI SST uses statistical algorithms. First

MWRI precipitation and sea ice products were used to remove the precipitation and sea ice data. Second

the MWRI brightness temperature was matched with the buoy SST using a temporal window of 0.2 h and a spatial window of 0.2°. The matchup with land within 100 km was excluded. Third

the descending and ascending statistical relationship

which was divided into four latitudes and 12 months

between the buoy SST observation and MWRI bright temperature was established. In addition

4 × 12 × 2 regression coefficients were obtained

and corresponding regression coefficients were used to estimate the SST. The daily SST was obtained using a 0.25° × 0.25° equal latitude and longitude projections. The quality flag is set to 51 when the FY-3C MWRI SST minus a 30-year monthly mean SST is greater than 2.5 K

thereby indicating that these pixels were distributed on the edge of the land and high wind-speed region. The quality validation of the FY-3C MWRI SST after excluding the pixels with a quality flag of 51 shows that the precision of the ascending orbit SST is –0.02±1.22 K and that of the descending orbit SST is –0.15±1.28 K in comparison with the global buoy data. The precision of the ascending daily SST is 0.00±1.03 K and that of the descending daily SST is –0.09±1.08 K in comparison with the global analysis field OISST. The ascending orbit is more accurate than the descending orbit considering the non-uniform heating of the ocean surface during the day (the descending orbit). The Kuroshio Current

Gulf Stream

Western Pacific Warm Pool

and La Nina are included in the monthly SST

thereby suggesting that this SST is applicable to climatology investigation. The results of the quality validation of the FY-3C MWRI SST include the FY-3C quality control system. The SST precision is influenced by the performance

calibration

and positioning accuracy of the MWRI

precipitation and sea ice detection accuracy

land interference

and high wind speed. The improvement of the precision of the SST with a wind speed that is higher than 12 m/s is the emphasis of the next step. The buoy SST and global analysis field OISST cannot be considered a completely true value. Therefore

the triple collocation method will be utilized in the future to improve the comprehensive analysis of the error characteristics of the SST.

关键词

FY-3C微波成像仪海面温度产品精度检验

Keywords

FY-3Cmicrowave imagersea surface temperatureinversionquality validation

references

Gentemann C L, Meissner T and Wentz F J. 2010. Accuracy of satellite sea surface temperatures at 7 and 11 GHz. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48(3): 1009–1018

胡晓悦, 张彩云, 商少凌. 2015. 南海及周边海域融合海表温度产品的验证与互较. 遥感学报, 19(2): 328–338

Hu X Y, Zhang C Y and Shang S L. 2015. Validation and inter-comparison of multi-satellite merged sea surface temperature products in the South China Sea and its adjacent waters. Journal of Remote Sensing, 19(2): 328–338 (

Ignatov A. 2010. GOES-R advanced baseline imager (ABI) algorithm theoretical basis document for sea surface temperature[EB/OL].http://www.goes-r.gov/products/ATBDs/baseline/baseline-SST-v2.0.pdfhttp://www.goes-r.gov/products/ATBDs/baseline/baseline-SST-v2.0.pdf

Krasnopolsky V M, Gemmill W H and Breaker L C. 2000. A neural network multiparameter algorithm for SSM/I ocean retrievals: comparisons and validations. Remote Sensing of Environment, 73(2): 133–142

买佳阳, 蒋雪中. 2015. 2000年以来长江河口海表温度变化MODIS分析. 遥感学报, 19(5): 818–826

Mai J Y and Jiang X Z. 2015. Analysis of sea surface temperature variations in the Yangtze Estuarine Waters since 2000 using MODIS. Journal of Remote Sensing, 19(5): 818–826 (

O’Carroll A G, Eyre J R and Saunders R W. 2008. Three-way error analysis between AATSR, AMSR-E, and in situ sea surface temperature observations. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 25(7): 1197–1207

Reynolds R W, Rayner N A, Smith T M, Stokes D C and Wang W Q. 2002. An improved in situ and satellite SST analysis for climate. Journal of Climate, 15(13): 1609–1625

Reynolds R W, Smith T M, Liu C Y, Chelton D B, Casey K S and Schlax M G. 2007. Daily high-resolution-blended analyses for SST. Journal of Climate, 20(22): 5473–5496

Ricciardulli L and Wentz F J. 2004. Uncertainties in sea surface temperature retrievals from space: comparison of microwave and infrared observations from TRMM. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 109(C12): C12013

Smith T M, Reynolds R W, Peterson T C and Lawrimore J. 2008. Improvements to NOAA’s historical merged land-ocean surface temperature analysis (1880-2006). Journal of Climate, 21(10): 2283–2296

孙立娥, 王进, 崔廷伟, 郝艳玲, 张杰. 2012. FY-3B微波成像仪海表面温度和风速统计反演算法. 遥感学报, 16(6): 1262–1671

Sun L E, Wang J, Cui T W, Hao Y L and Zhang J. 2012. Statistical retrieval algorithms of the sea surface temperature (SST) and wind speed (SSW) for FY-3B Microwave Radiometer Imager (MWRI). Journal of Remote Sensing, 16(6): 1262–1671 (

王素娟, 崔鹏, 冉茂农, 陆风. 2014. FY3A/VIRR海面温度业务产品算法改进与质量检验. 气象科技, 42(5): 748–752

Wang S J, Cui P, Ran M N and Lu F. 2014. Algorithm improvement and quality validation of operational FY3A/VIRR SST product. Meteorological Science and Technology, 42(5): 748–752 (

王雨, 傅云飞, 刘奇, 刘国胜, 刘显通, 程静. 2011. 一种基于TMI观测结果的海表温度反演算法. 气象学报, 69(1): 149–160

Wang Y, Fu Y F, Liu Q, Liu G S, Liu X T and Cheng J. 2011. An algorithm for sea surface temperature retrieval based on TMI measurements. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 69(1): 149–160 (

Wentz F J, Gentemann C, Smith D and Chelton D. 2000. Satellite measurements of sea surface temperature through clouds. Science, 288(5467): 847–850

Wentz F J and Meissner T. 2007. Supplement 1 Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document for AMSR-E Ocean Algorithms. RSS Technical Rpt. 051707. Santa Rosa, CA, USA: NASA

殷晓斌, 刘玉光, 王振占, 程永存, 顾艳振, 文凡. 2007. 红外和微波辐射计反演海表面温度的比较. 海洋通报, 26(5): 1–12

Yin X B, Liu Y G, Wang Z Z, Cheng Y C, Gu Y Z and Wen F. 2007. Comparison between infrared and microwave radiometers for retrieving sea surface temperature. Marine Science Bulletin, 26(5): 1–12 (

朱恩泽, 张雷, 石汉青, 廖麒翔, 龙智勇. 2016. 2004年—2013年WindSat海表面温度产品与浮标观测对比. 遥感学报, 20(2): 315–327

Zhu E Z, Zhang L, Shi H Q, Liao Q X and Long Z Y. 2016. Accuracy of WindSat sea surface temperature: comparison of buoy data from 2004 to 2013. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(2): 315–327 (

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Recalibration of the FY-3 microwave payload historical data records

Study on the correction of sunlight pollution in mid-infrared image of FY-3C/VIRR

Analysis and correction of the difference between the ascending and descending orbits of the FY-3C microwave imager

Effect of FY-3C snow cover products on the quality control of assimilating satellite microwave sounding data