Cloud detection over ocean from PARASOL/POLDER3 satellite data

Zhenting CHEN; Xiaobing SUN; Yanli QIAO

doi:10.11834/jrs.20187366

Polarization Remote Sensing | Views : 0 下载量: 218 CSCD: 7 更多指标

PDF
Export
Share
Collection
Album

Cloud detection over ocean from PARASOL/POLDER3 satellite data
Vol. 22, Issue 6, Pages: 996-1004(2018)
Published： 2018-11 ，

Accepted： 23 September 2017
DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20187366

扫描看全文

陈震霆, 孙晓兵, 乔延利. 2018. PARASOL/POLDER3卫星数据的海洋上空云检测. 遥感学报, 22(6): 996–1004

Chen Z T, Sun X B and Qiao Y L. 2018. Cloud detection over ocean from PARASOL/POLDER3 satellite data. Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(6): 996–1004
陈震霆, 孙晓兵, 乔延利. 2018. PARASOL/POLDER3卫星数据的海洋上空云检测. 遥感学报, 22(6): 996–1004 DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20187366.

Chen Z T, Sun X B and Qiao Y L. 2018. Cloud detection over ocean from PARASOL/POLDER3 satellite data. Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(6): 996–1004 DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20187366.

摘要

在卫星海洋遥感中，云作为海气耦合系统最重要的调节器之一，其检测结果对海洋上空云微物理特性的反演精度有较大影响。因此，快速而准确识别海洋上空的云像元是卫星遥感数据处理过程中首要解决的关键问题。以PARASOL (Polarization and Anisotropy of Reflectances for Atmospheric Sciences coupled with Observations from a Lidar)卫星搭载的POLDER3载荷遥感数据为研究对象，提出一种改进的海洋上空云检测方法。首先剔除海洋耀光；接着利用有云与晴空区近红外反射率差异检验识别有云像元，并利用偏振反射率检验进一步识别低反射率的云像元；然后利用近红外与可见光反射率比值检验识别晴空像元；最后建立多角度云检测结果空间融合规则，重新标记有云、晴空和未定像元。以印度洋海区为例进行实验分析，将云检测结果与Buriez方法进行对比，发现检测精度基本相当，而有云像元的识别速度却平均提高约3倍。结果表明：该方法能有效的检测出海洋上空的云像元，满足业务化数据处理的高精度及时效性要求，为后续云微物理特性反演提供可靠的数据源。

Abstract

Clouds are important regulators of the ocean–atmosphere coupling system in ocean satellite remote sensing. The results of cloud detection have a significant influence on the retrieval accuracy of cloud microphysical properties over the ocean. Therefore

achieving cloud detection over the ocean and determining methods to improve the processing speed of operational algorithm and the precision of cloud pixel recognition for polarized sensors are urgent concerns. This work proposes an Improved Cloud Detection (ICD) algorithm over the ocean according to operational cloud detection problems in satellite polarized sensor data. A series of continuous processes and tests is used to identify the clear-sky and pixel-by-pixel cloudy area using the data of Polarization and Directionality of Earth’s Reflectances (POLDER3). Such data are loaded by Polarization and Anisotropy of Reflectances for Atmospheric Sciences coupled with Observations from a LiDAR (PARASOL) satellite. The pixels are divided into ocean and land parts. Then

the ocean glint pixels are eliminated via the glint angle computing formula and the empirical threshold (see MODIS 40 degrees). Thereafter

the cloudy pixels are identified using the characteristic difference of near-infrared reflectance between cloud and clear-sky regions. Cloudy pixels with low reflectance are also further recognized using a polarized reflectance test according to the polarized sensitive characteristics of cloud particles. Next

the clear-sky pixels are identified by the reflectance ratio test between near- infrared and visible light. Finally

the spatial registration rule is created with multi-angle cloud detecting results

and all pixels are relabeled to cloudy

clear-sky

and undetermined pixels with this rule. The Indian Ocean is used as an example for experimental analysis. The results of improved cloud detection are compared with those of the Buriez method. The detection accuracy is very close to the Buriez algorithm but is more time-efficient. In the case of clear-sky pixels

the recognition rates of ICD and of the Buriez algorithm are approximately 30. For cloudy pixels

the recognition rate of ICD is approximately 47%. The error range of cloudy and undetermined pixels is approximately 1% compared with the Buriez algorithm. Furthermore

the efficiency of our cloud detection algorithm greatly improved. The data processing speed is improved approximately three times without considering the time consumption of external data acquisition. Results show that the algorithm is highly effective in achieving high-precision results of cloud detection. At the same time

the processing time of cloudy pixels is significantly reduced

and the operational speed of cloud-detecting products is considerably improved. This algorithm can provide real-time and accurate products for the inversion of atmosphere and ocean parameters to meet the high-precision and -efficiency requirements of operational processing in satellite ground systems. This algorithm is also dominant in the cloud detection process for Directional Polarimetric Camera (DPC) in the GF-5 satellite which is planned for launch in 2017.

关键词

云检测POLDER3载荷偏振反射率多角度空间融合近红外

Keywords

cloud detectionPOLDER3 sensorpolarized reflectancemultidirectional spatial fusionnear infrared

references

Ackerman S A. 1996. Global satellite observations of negative brightness temperature differences between 11 and 6.7 μm. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 53(19): 2803–2812

Ackerman S A, Strabala K I, Menzel W P, Frey R A, Moeller C C and Gumley L E. 1998. Discriminating clear sky from clouds with MODIS. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103(D24): 32141–32157

Bankert R L. 1994. Cloud classification of AVHRR imagery in maritime regions using a probabilistic neural network. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 33(8): 909–918

Baum B A, Tovinkere V, Titlow J and Welch R M. 1997. Automated cloud classification of global AVHRR data using a fuzzy logic approach. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 36(11): 1519–1540

Bouffiès S and Bréon F M. 1996. A multi-year composite of GVI data as a clear reflectance database. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(9): 1711–1726

Bréon F M and Colzy S. 1999. Cloud detection from the spaceborne POLDER instrument and validation against surface synoptic observations. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 38(6): 777–785

Bréon F M. 2006. PARASOL Level-1 Product Data Format and User Manual. Paris: CNES: 2–31

Buriez J C, Vanbauce C, Parol F, Goloub P, Herman M, Bonnel B, Fouquart Y, Couvert P and Seze G. 1997. Cloud detection and derivation of cloud properties from POLDER. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18(13): 2785–2813

Cox C and Munk W. 1954. Measurement of the roughness of the sea surface from photographs of the sun’s glitter. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 44(11): 838–850

Deschamps P Y, Bréon F M, Leroy M, Podaire A, Bricaud A, Buriez J C and Sèze G. 1994. The POLDER mission: instrument characteristics and scientific objectives. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 32(3): 598–615

Fougnie B, Bracco G, Lafrance B, Ruffel C, Hagolle O and Tinel C. 2007. PARASOL in-flight calibration and performance. Applied Optics, 46(22): 5435–5451

Goloub P, Herman M and Parol F. 1995. Polarization of clouds//Proceedings of SPIE 2582, Atmospheric Sensing and Modeling II. Paris, France: SPIE: 21–31 [DOI: 10.1117/12.228551]

顾行发, 程天海, 李正强, 乔延利. 2015. 大气气溶胶偏振遥感. 北京: 高等教育出版社: 1–22

Gu X F, Cheng T H, Li Z Q and Qiao Y L. 2015. Atmospheric Aerosol Polarized Remote Sensing. Beijing: Higher Education Press: 1–22

Hagolle O, Goloub P, Deschamps P Y, Cosnefroy H, Briottet X, Bailleul T, Nicolas J M, Parol F, Lafrance B and Herman M. 1999. Results of POLDER in-flight calibration. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37(3): 1550–1566

Hagolle O, Nicolas J M, Fougnie B, Cabot F and Henry P. 2004. Absolute calibration of VEGETATION derived from an interband method based on the sun glint over ocean. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(7): 1472–1481

Leroy M, Deuzé J L, Bréon F M, Hautecoeur O, Herman M, Buriez J C, Tanré D, Bouffiès S, Chazette P and Roujean J L. 1997. Retrieval of atmospheric properties and surface bidirectional reflectances over land from POLDER/ADEOS. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102(D14): 17023–17037

Parol F, Buriez J C, Vanbauce C, Couvert P, Seze G, Goloub P and Cheinet S. 1999. First results of the POLDER “Earth Radiation Budget and Clouds” operational algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37(3): 1597–1612

Porcú F and Levizzani V. 1992. Cloud classification using METEOSAT VIS-IR imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 13(5): 893–909

Remer L A, Kaufman Y J, Tanré D, Mattoo S, Chu D A, Martins J V, Li R R, Ichoku C, Levy R C, Kleidman R G, Eck T F, Vermote E and Holben B N. 2005. The MODIS aerosol algorithm, products, and validation. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 62(4): 947–973

Rossow W B and Schiffer R A. 1991. ISCCP cloud data products. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 72(1): 2–20

Rossow W B and Garder L C. 1993. Cloud detection using satellite measurements of infrared and visible radiances for ISCCP. Journal of Climate, 6(12): 2341–2369

Saunders R W and Kriebel K T. 1988. An improved method for detecting clear sky and cloudy radiances from AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 9(1): 123–150

Séze G, Vanbauce C, Burie J C, Parol F and Couvert P. 1999. Cloud cover observed simultaneously from FOLDER and METEOSAT. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere, 24(8): 921–926

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Retrieval and validation of sea surface temperature from HY-1D COCTS

Research on multispectral satellite image cloud and cloud shadow detection algorithm of domestic satellite

Research on cloud detection for HY-1C CZI remote sensing images collected over lands

Cloud detection for FY-3D MERSI Ⅱ images combine radiative transfer simulation and shallow neural network

Improvement of unified sample cloud detection technology and its application in GF-6 WFV cloud detection