浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
Published： 2019-1 ，
Accepted： 16 March 2018
扫 描 看 全 文
李洪鹏, 李国元, 蔡志坚, 吴冠豪. 2019. 全波形激光雷达回波分解方法. 遥感学报, 23(1): 89–98
Li H P, Li G Y, Cai Z J and Wu G H. 2019. Full-waveform LiDAR echo decomposition method. Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(1): 89–98
全波形激光雷达的回波中携带了被测目标的距离与特征信息，为了获取这些信息，本文提出了一种回波分解方法。本方法将原始的全波形回波分解为几个独立的高斯脉冲，并得到其函数表达式，从而提取出被测目标的距离等信息。分解过程中，首先，采用可变阈值的经验模态分解滤波法(EMD-soft)对原始波形进行滤波和噪声水平评估；其次，采用一套应对多种波形组成的初始参数估计方法，获取后续拟合所需的初始参数；最后，采用LM(Levenberg-Marquardt)优化算法对回波进行拟合优化，从而获取全波形回波中包含的独立高斯脉冲及其函数表达式。仿真波形的分解实验表明，分解误差在0.1 ns量级，换算成距离误差为15 mm，通过实验室自制的全波形激光雷达实验系统获取的回波的分解实验表明，分解的距离误差小于0.1 m。对比另外两种高斯分解方法对于相同仿真与实验数据的分解结果可以看出，本方法在分解成功率与精度上都有较大的提高。回波分解后的独立高斯脉冲中，除距离外还含有被测目标的反射率、粗糙度、面型等丰富的信息，回波分解方法作为回波分析的基础，将在遥感、测绘等生产与科研领域中发挥非常重要的作用。
The echoes of full-waveform light detection and ranging (LiDAR) contain information on the targets such as distances and properties. To access such information
we demonstrate an echo decomposition method based on soft-thresholding Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD-soft) filter
Levenberg–Marquardt (LM) optimization
and a method to estimate the initial parameters consisting of a variety of waveforms. This method decomposes raw full-waveform echoes into independent Gaussian pulses and derives their function expressions. Distances and properties of the targets can be extracted from the parameters of these Gaussian pulses. First
EMD-soft is used to filter the noise of raw echoes and estimate the amount of noise. Then
initial parameters for follow-up optimization are estimated through peak and inflection points of the filtered echoes by a given process. Lastly
after these initial parameters are input
LM optimization is applied to optimize the parameters
and function expressions of Gaussian pulses can be obtained through the parameters. Finally
information on the targets can be accurately extracted. Simulations and experiments are carried out to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. Simulated waveforms are generated by adding Gaussian white noise into a waveform consisting of several independent Gaussian pulses. Decomposition experiments of these simulated waveforms indicate that the decomposition error of this method is around 0.1 ns
which means 15 mm in ranging error. In actual experiments
a laboratory-built full-waveform LiDAR experimental system is utilized to generate and obtain echoes. Decomposition experiments of these real waveforms also show that the ranging error of this method is less than 0.1 m. Compared with two other Gaussian decomposition methods in decomposing the same echoes mentioned above
this method shows enhanced decomposition success rate and accuracy. The proposed method realizes high success rate and accuracy decomposition. It can provide reliable data for the subsequent analysis and will play an important role in many fields
such as remote sensing and mapping. Compared with other decomposition methods
the EMD-soft we used does not have a threshold of filter frequency
that is
it will be effective in any frequency
unlike some other filters that will make mistakes when close to their thresholds. In addition
EMD-soft does not need a given kernel function or parameter
which means it is a more generic method to deal with various LiDAR echoes. LM optimization is one of the most popular algorithms for optimizing LiDAR echoes
but requiring high-accuracy initial parameters is a big problem for the algorithm. Sometimes if the initial parameters do not have enough accuracy
the algorithm may converge to a local minimum instead of a global minimum and lead to a wrong fitting. Thus
in this method
a special process is realized in the section on evaluating initial parameters and enhancing the optimization effect from another way. Echo decomposition is the foundation of echo analysis. We will try to extract more properties of targets from the decomposed waveforms and build the functional relationship of these properties with the parameters of waveforms in future work.
全波形激光雷达回波分解经验模态分解(EMD)LM(Levenberg–Marquardt)优化算法
full-waveform LiDARecho decompositionEmpirical Mode Decomposition (EMD)LM (Levenberg–Marquardt) optimization
Boudraa A O, Cexus J C and Saidi Z. 2013. EMD-based signal noise reduction. International Journal of Signal Processing, 1(1): 33–37
Bye I J, North P R J, Los S O, Kljun N, Rosette J A B, Hopkinson C, Chasmer L and Mahoney C. 2017. Estimating forest canopy parameters from satellite waveform LiDAR by inversion of the FLIGHT three-dimensional radiative transfer model. Remote Sensing of Environment, 188: 177–189
Dempster A P, Laird N M and Rubin D B. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 39(1): 1–38
Duong H V. 2010. Processing and application of ICESat large footprint full waveform laser range data. Delft: Delft University of Technology
Hofton M A, Minster J B and Blair J B. 2000. Decomposition of laser altimeter waveforms. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote sensing, 38(4): 1989–1996
Hovi A and Korpela I. 2014. Real and simulated waveform-recording LiDAR data in juvenile boreal forest vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 140: 665–678
Huang N E, Shen Z, Long S R, Wu M C, Shih H H , Zheng Q N, Yen N C, Tung C C and Liu H H. 1998. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proceedings: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 454(1971): 903–995
Jutzi B and Stilla U. 2006. Range determination with waveform recording laser systems using a Wiener Filter. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 61(2): 95–107
Koenig K and Höfle B. 2016. Full-waveform airborne laser scanning in vegetation studies—a review of point cloud and waveform features for tree species classification. Forests, 7(9): 198
Kotchenova S Y, Shabanov N V, Knyazikhin Y, Davis A B, Dubayah R and Myneni B R. 2003. Modeling lidar waveforms with time-dependent stochastic radiative transfer theory for remote estimations of forest structure. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(D15): 4484
Li D, Xu L J and Li X L. 2017. Full-waveform LiDAR echo decomposition based on wavelet decomposition and particle swarm optimization. Measurement Science and Technology, 28(4): 045205
Li D, Xu L J, Li X L and Wu D. 2014. A novel full-waveform LiDAR echo decomposition method and simulation verification//Proceedings of 2014 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques. Santorini, Greece: IEEE, 184–189 [DOI: 10.1109/IST.2014.6958470]
Li X L, Xu L J, Tian X R and Kong D M. 2012. Terrain slope estimation within footprint from ICESat/GLAS waveform: model and method. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 6(1): 063534
Ma H C, Zhou W W, Zhang L and Wang S Y. 2017. Decomposition of small-footprint full waveform LiDAR data based on generalized Gaussian model and grouping LM optimization. Measurement Science and Technology, 28(4): 045203
Mahoney C, Kljun N, Los S O, Chasmer L, Hacker J M, Hopkinson C, North P R J, Rosette J A B and van Gorsel E. 2014. Slope Estimation from ICESat/GLAS. Remote Sensing, 6(10): 10051–10069
Mallet C and Bretar F. 2009. Full-waveform topographic lidar: State-of-the-art. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 64(1): 1–16
Marquardt D W. 1963. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear Parameters. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 11(2): 431–441
Pan Z G, Glennie C, Hartzell P, Fernandez-Diaz J C, Legleiter C and Overstreet B. 2015. Performance assessment of high resolution airborne full waveform LiDAR for shallow river bathymetry. Remote Sensing, 7(5): 5133–5159
Qin Y C, Vu T T and Ban Y F. 2012. Toward an optimal algorithm for LiDAR waveform decomposition. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 9(3): 482–486
Shi J C, Menenti M and Lindenbergh R. 2013. Parameterization of surface roughness based on ICESat/GLAS full waveforms: a case study on the tibetan plateau. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 14(4): 1278–1292
Soederman U, Persson A, Toepel J and Ahlberg S. 2005. On analysis and visualization of full-waveform airborne laser scanner data. Proceedings of SPIE 5791, Laser Radar Technology and Applications X, Orlando, Florida, United States: SPIE, 184–192 [DOI: 10.1117/12.604655]
van Leeuwen M, Hilker T, Coops N C, Frazer G, Wulder M A, Newnham G J and Culvenor D S. 2011. Assessment of standing wood and fiber quality using ground and airborne laser scanning: a review. Forest Ecology and Management, 261(9): 1467–1478
Wagner W, Ullrich A, Ducic V, Melzer T and Studnicka N. 2006. Gaussian decomposition and calibration of a novel small-footprint full-waveform digitising airborne laser scanner. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 60(2): 100–112
Xu L J, Li D and Li X L. 2016. A high success rate full-waveform lidar echo decomposition method. Measurement Science and Technology, 27(1): 015205
Zhou Z R, Hua D X, Wang Y F, Yan Q, Li S C, Li Y and Wang H W. 2013. Improvement of the signal to noise ratio of Lidar echo signal based on wavelet de-noising technique. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 51(8): 961–966
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621