浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
Published： 07 July 2020 ，
扫 描 看 全 文
王心源,骆磊.2020.从遥感考古走向空间考古——文化遗产保护时代的新任务.遥感学报,24(7): 837-841
Wang X Y and Luo L. 2020. From remote sensing archaeology to space archaeology: A new task in the era of cultural heritage protection. Journal of Remote Sensing(Chinese)，24(7): 837-841[DOI：10.11834/jrs.20200016]
基于遥感考古发展历程与主要进展分析，提出从遥感考古走向空间考古的认识，构划空间考古内涵、主要研究内容与实验区选择。空间考古既是适应文化遗产保护需求的新任务、新发展与新使命，也是文化、科学与技术融合发展的一支新学科，将促进“一带一路”的建设，并为提升中国参与全球治理软实力贡献力量。
In the past century
remote sensing has been of particular interest for archaeological specialists and the public because of the combination of three key points of archaeologicalresearch objects
space
and time. Remote sensing has become an important and powerful tool for helping archaeologists to explore and understand cultural and archaeological sites
discovering and monitoring archaeological sites
documenting and preserving cultural heritage
and resolving real archaeological problems. Recently
the focus of remote sensing-based archaeological applications has moved away from survey
mapping
monitoring
and documentation to the deep-mining of archaeological big data
archaeological knowledge (re-) discovery and understanding
and settlement pattern analysis and archaeolandscape reconstruction. These improvements and transformations have been jointly pushing remote sensing archaeology toward a new stage of space archaeology. In this study
the major achievements in remote sensing that is used for cultural heritage conservation are reviewed. Then
a brief dissection of connotations
tasks
methods
and potentials of the new paradigm of space archaeology is provided. The research object of space archaeology is the culture–space or human–land complex containing the remains of anthrophonic production
living activities
and their supporting eco-environments. Space archaeology
a new subfield of archaeology
has the technical advantages and disciplinary characteristics of shaping the unique cognition of cultural heritage. Space archaeology represents an invaluable set of powerful tools for prospecting
monitoring and documentation. It also supports the conservation of archaeological and cultural heritage sites and their supporting environments. The establishment and construction of space archaeology need experimental areas and bases. On the one hand
this study presents the layout of the experimental areas of “three lines and four zones” for domestic research on the basis of the comprehensive consideration of the occurrence conditions of cultural heritage sites in China
the characteristics of human production and living activities that took place in the sites
and the adaptability and differences of methods and approaches in space archaeology. The three lines are the Grand Canal
the Great Wall
and the Silk Road. The four zones are the desert environment in northwest China
the semi-humid valley landscape in central China
the wetland landscape in south China
and the farming-pastoral ecotone in northeast and northwest China. On the other hand
three international experiment areas are given priority for carrying out the demonstrations of space archaeology based on historical
natural and cultural
social and economic backgrounds and the current physical geographical conditions of Eurasia and Africa. These experimental areas are Southeast China and Southeast Asia
Northwest China and Central and South Asia
North Africa
and the Mediterranean Regions. The delimitation of these experimental areas contribute to the integration and cross innovation of different disciplines in the fields of culture
science
and technology. On the basis of the analysis of the research progress and current development of spatial information technology
this study puts forward the cognition from remote sensing archaeology to space archaeology and describes the connotation of space archaeology
the main research content
and the suggestion on domestic and international experimental regions. Space archaeology not only discusses with the need to adapt to the new tasks
new development
and new disciplines under the era of conservation and sustainable development of cultural heritage. It also deals with the requirement and mission of culture
science
and technology to promote the construction of “One Belt and One Road” and to contribute to improving the soft-power of participating in global governance. Space archaeology should contribute its unique strength and value to the conservation and development of cultural heritage in the new era.
遥感考古空间考古文化遗产一带一路空间信息考古大数据
remote sensing archaeologyspace archaeologycultural heritageOne Belt and One Roadspatial informationbig archaeological data
Bachagha N, Wang X Y, Luo L, Li L, Houcine K and Lasaponara R . 2020. Remote sensing and GIS techniques for reconstructing the military fort system on the Roman boundary (Tunisian section) and identifying archaeological sites. Remote Sensing of Environment, 236: 111418 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111418http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111418 ]
Clarke D L . 1977. Spatial Archaeology. New York: Academic Press
Crawford O G S . 1923. Air survey and archaeology. The Geographical Journal, 61(5): 342-360 [DOI: 10.2307/1781831http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1781831 ]
Deng B, Guo H D, Wang C L and Nie Y P . 2010. Applications of remote sensing technique in archaeology: a review. Journal of Remote Sensing, 14(1): 187-206
邓飚, 郭华东, 王长林, 聂跃平 . 2010. 遥感技术在考古中的应用综述. 遥感学报, 14(1): 187-206 [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20100115http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20100115 ]
Gumerman G J and Lyons T R . 1971. Archeological methodology and remote sensing. Science, 172(3979): 126-132 [DOI: 10.1126/science.172.3979.126http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.172.3979.126 ]
Guo H D, Liu H, Wang X Y, Shao Y and Sun Y . 2000. Subsurface old drainage detection and paleoenvironment analysis using spaceborne radar images in Alxa plateau. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 43(4): 439-448 [DOI: 10.1007/BF02959455http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02959455 ]
Lin H, Hu M Y and Chen F L . 2014. Review on multi-source detection technology and environment reconstruction of cultural heritage. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 16(5): 673-679
林珲, 胡明远, 陈富龙 . 2014. 文化遗产多源探测技术与环境重建展望. 地球信息科学学报, 16(5): 673-679 [DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2014.00673http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1047.2014.00673 ]
Liu J G and Wang Q S . 2006. The summarization of the study of remote sensing in archaeology. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, (12): 32-36
刘建国, 王清山 . 2006. 考古遥感研究综述. 测绘通报, (12): 32-36 [DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0494-0911.2006.12.010http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0494-0911.2006.12.010]
Luo L, Wang X Y, Liu C S, Guo H D and Du X C . 2014. Integrated RS, GIS and GPS approaches to archaeological prospecting in the Hexi Corridor, NW China: a case study of the royal road to ancient Dunhuang. Journal of Archaeological Science, 50: 178-190 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2014.07.009http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.07.009 ]
Luo L, Wang X Y, Guo H D, Lasaponara R, Shi P L, Bachagha N, Li L, Yao Y, Masini N, Chen F L, Ji W, Cao H, Li C and Hu N K . 2018. Google Earth as a powerful tool for archaeological and cultural heritage applications: a review. Remote Sensing, 10(10): 1558 [DOI: 10.3390/rs10101558http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs10101558 ]
Luo L, Wang X Y, Guo H D, Lasaponara R, Zong X, Masini N, Wang G Z, Shi P L, Khatteli H, Chen F L, Tariq S, Shao J, Bachagha N, Yang Y X and Yao Y . 2019. Airborne and spaceborne remote sensing for archaeological and cultural heritage applications: a review of the century (1907-2017). Remote Sensing of Environment, 232: 111280 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111280http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111280 ]
Nie Y P and Yang L . 2009. Applications and development of archaeological remote sensing technology in China. Journal of Remote Sensing, 13(5): 940-962
聂跃平, 杨林 . 2009. 中国遥感技术在考古中的应用与发展. 遥感学报, 13(5): 940-962 [DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-4619.2009.05.014http://dx.doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1007-4619.2009.05.014 ]
Smith M E, Feinman G M, Drennan R D, Earle T and Morris I . 2012. Archaeology as a social science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(20): 7617-7621 [DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1201714109http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201714109 ]
Wang X Y, Guo H D, Chang Y M and Zha L S . 2004. On paleodrainage evolution in mid-late Epipleistocene based on radar remote sensing in Northeastern Ejin Banner, Inner Mongolia. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 14(2): 235-241 [DOI: 10.1007/BF02837539http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02837539 ]
Wang X Y, He H, Zhou Y Q, Gao C and Han S W . 2006. Analysis of remote sensing archaeology on traffic function transformation of Tongji Grand Canal in Sui and Tang Dynasty. Chinese Geographical Science, 16(2): 95-101 [DOI: 10.1007/s11769-006-0001-xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11769-006-0001-x ]
Wang X Y, Zhang G S, Wu L, Zhang X H, Zhang E L, Xiao X Y and Jiang Q F . 2008. Environmental changes during early-middle Holocene from the sediment record of the Chaohu Lake, Anhui Province. Chinese Science Bulletin, 153: 153-160 [DOI: 10.1007/s11434-008-5009-4http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-5009-4 ]
Wang X Y and Guo H D . 2015. Space archaeology: disciplinary attribute, research object, method and tasks. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 30(3): 360-367
王心源, 郭华东 . 2015. 空间考古学: 对象、性质、方法及任务. 中国科学院院刊, 30(3): 360-367
Wang X Y, Liu J, Luo L and Li L . 2016. Observation and cognition for conservation and usage of cultural heritage along the belt and road. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 31(5): 550-558
王心源, 刘洁, 骆磊, 李丽 . 2016. “一带一路”沿线文化遗产保护与利用的观察与认知. 中国科学院院刊, 31(5): 550-558
Wang X Y, Lasaponara R, Tariq S, Khatteli H, Luo L, Liu J, Masini N, Ishwaran N and Chen F L . 2017. Conservation and utilization of cultural heritage along the Belt and Road: challenges and solutions. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 32 (Z 1): 42-51
王心源, Rosa Lasaponara, Shahina Tariq, Houcine Khatteli, 骆磊, 刘洁, Nicola Masini, Natarajan Ishwaran, 陈富龙 . 2017. “一带一路”文化遗产保护与利用的挑战与应对. 中国科学院院刊, 32 (Z 1): 42-51
Wu L, Wang X Y, Zhu C, Zhang G S, Li F, Li L and Li S Y . 2012. Ancient culture decline after the Han Dynasty in the Chaohu Lake basin, East China: a geoarchaeological perspective. Quaternary International, 275: 23-29 [DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2011.08.027http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2011.08.027 ]
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621