浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
Published： 07 April 2020 ，
扫 描 看 全 文
张弛,李慧芳,沈焕锋.2020.联合统计信息与散射模型的GF-5 AHSI可见光影像薄云校正.遥感学报,24(4): 368-378
ZHANG Chi,LI Huifang,SHEN Huanfeng. 2020. Thin cloud correction for GF-5 AHSI visible images by combining statistical information with scattering model. Journal of Remote Sensing(Chinese). 24(4): 368-378
针对高分五号可见短波红外高光谱相机AHSI (visible-shortwave infrared Advanced HyperSpectral Imager)可见光波段存在的薄云干扰，本文提出了一种联合统计信息与散射模型的校正方法。利用AHSI影像邻近波段间地表与云雾辐射的统计差异，实现对不同场景下相对薄云辐射
RCR
(Relative Cloud Radiance)的准确估计。基于此，根据不同波段的散射特性，分别利用分级暗目标统计和散射模型约束策略，获取可见光波段的绝对云辐射强度，最终实现影像校正。通过设置模拟与真实实验对方法的有效性和鲁棒性进行目视和定量检验。模拟实验中，可见光波段内的薄云干扰均可被有效地去除，校正结果与真实地表十分一致；此外，RMSE (Root-Mean-Square Error)
MAE (Mean Absolute Error)和SA (Spectral Angle)3个评价指标的值分别为1.9891
1.6822和0.4901，远小于对比方法。真实实验中，不同场景内的薄云可被有效抑制，在较为准确恢复降质地表信息的同时保持晴空区光谱特征；Q指数，SSIM (Structural Similarity Index)和UQI (Universal Quality Index)的计算结果优于对比方法。综上，本文提出方法可用于不同场景下高分五号AHSI影像可见光波段的薄云校正，可得到目视效果良好且光谱保真度高的校正结果。
Thin clouds widely exist in the visible bands of GaoFen-5 visible-shortwave infrared Advanced HyperSpectral Imager (AHSI)
thereby degrading the data quality. In this study
a thin cloud correction method based on statistical information and scattering model was proposed to correct the clouds and restore the surface information with high fidelity.
The proposed method combines the statistical information between two adjacent visible bands and the atmospheric scattering model among visible bands. Two steps are included
that is estimating the Relative Cloud Radiance (
RCR
) and calculating the absolute radiance for different visible bands.
For a pair of adjacent visible bands
the ground radiance of clear pixels is highly and linearly correlated. However
the linear relationship deviates when the pixel is contaminated by clouds. The stronger the cloud contamination is
the larger the deviation will be. Therefore
the
RCR
can be accurately estimated using the two adjacent visible bands of the AHSI. Relying on the
RCR
different strategies were utilized to calculate the absolute cloud radiance for different visible bands in accordance with their scatter properties. A hierarchical dark object strategy was used to calculate the cloud radiance for the bands in blue and green spectral regions. A scattering model was adopted for the bands in red spectral region. The cloud-free results can be obtained by subtracting the band-varied cloud radiance from cloudy images when the absolute cloud radiance of different visible bands were calculated.
Synthetic and real experiments were conducted to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method through qualitative and quantitative analyses. In the synthetic experiments
the cloud contamination in visible bands can be completely cleared
and the results are closest to the ground truth compared with the two other methods. The values of root-mean-square error
mean absolute error
and spectral angle values are only 1.9891
1.6822
and 0.4901
respectively
which are smaller than those of the compared methods. In the real experiments
the thin clouds in various scenes can be completely corrected
whereas the spectral characteristics of the clear regions are relatively maintained. The scores of the Q-index
structural similarity index
and universal quality index showed that the proposed method achieve the best performance in most cases compared with the two other methods. All the comparisons indicated the proposed method has superior cloud correction ability for different scenes.
This study proposed a thin cloud correction method for the GF-5 AHSI visible data. The highly linear correlation between the two adjacent visible bands can be used to accurately estimate the
RCR
. Various strategies were utilized to calculate cloud radiance in accordance with the scattering properties of different bands
wherea hierarchical dark object strategy was used for the bands in blue and green spectral regions
whereas a scattering model strategy was used for the bands in red spectral region. The thin clouds in the visible bands of AHSI data can be completely corrected by combining the statistical information and scattering model. For various scenes
the results achieve the best performance compared with the compared methods in terms ofqualitative and quantitative aspects.
遥感高分五号AHSI数据可见光影像统计信息大气散射模型薄云校正
remote sensingGF-5 AHSI datavisible imagesstatistical informationscattering modelthin cloud correction
Bucholtz A . 1995. Rayleigh-scattering calculations for the terrestrial atmosphere. Applied Optics, 34(15): 2765-2773 [DOI: 10.1364/AO.34.002765http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.002765 ]
Chavez Jr P S . 1988. An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 24(3): 459-479 [DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(88)90019-3http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90019-3 ]
Curcio J A . 1961. Evaluation of atmospheric aerosol particle size distribution from scattering measurements in the visible and infrared. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 51(5): 548-551 [DOI: 10.1364/JOSA.51.000548http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.51.000548 ]
Dai S B, Xu W, Piao Y J and Chen Y T . 2017. Remote sensing image defogging based on dark channel prior. Acta Optica Sinica, 37(3): 337-343
代书博, 徐伟, 朴永杰, 陈彦彤 . 2017. 基于暗原色先验的遥感图像去雾方法. 光学学报, 37(3): 337-343） [DOI: 10.3788/AOS201737.0328002http://dx.doi.org/10.3788/AOS201737.0328002 ]
Ebenezer J P, Das B and Mukhopadhyay S . 2019. Single image haze removal using conditional Wasserstein generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.00395
Fang L, Yu T, Gu X F, Wang S P, Gao J and Liu Q Y . 2013. Aerosol retrieval and atmospheric correction of HJ-1 CCD data over Beijing. Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(1): 151-164
方莉, 余涛, 顾行发, 王舒鹏, 高军, 刘其悦 . 2013. 北京地区HJ-1卫星CCD数据的气溶胶反演及在大气校正中的应用. 遥感学报, 17(1): 151-164） [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20131373http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20131373 ]
Gao B C, Yang P, Han W, Li R R and Wiscombe W J . 2002. An algorithm using visible and 1.38-μm channels to retrieve cirrus cloud reflectances from aircraft and satellite data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40(8): 1659-1668 [DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2002.802454http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.802454 ]
He K M, Sun J and Tang X O . 2010. Single image haze removal using dark channel prior. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 33(12): 2341-2353 [DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2010.168http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2010.168 ]
Jiang H, Lv N and Yao L . 2016. HOT-transform based method to remove haze or thin cloud for Landsat 8 OLI satellite data. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(4): 620-631
姜侯, 吕宁, 姚凌 . 2016. 改进HOT法的Landsat 8 OLI遥感影像雾霾及薄云去除. 遥感学报, 20(4): 620-631） [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20165276http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20165276 ]
Jiang H, Lv N and Yao L . 2016. A high-fidelity haze removal method based on hot for visible remote sensing images. Remote Sensing, 8(10): 844 [DOI: 10.3390/rs8100844http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs8100844 ]
Jiang H and Lv N . 2018. Multi-scale residual convolutional neural network for haze removal of remote sensing images. Remote Sensing, 10(6): 945 [DOI: 10.3390/rs10060945http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs10060945 ]
Li H F, Zhang L P, Shen H F and Li P X . 2012. A variational gradient-based fusion method for visible and SWIR imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 78(9): 947-958 [DOI: 10.14358/pers.78.9.947http://dx.doi.org/10.14358/pers.78.9.947 ]
Liu J, Wang X, Chen M, Liu S G, Zhou X R, Shao Z F and Liu P . 2014. Thin cloud removal from single satellite images. Optics Express, 22(1): 618-632 [DOI: 10.1364/OE.22.000618http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.000618 ]
Liu W Q . 2019. GaoFen-5 satellite payload development. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 14(1): 1
刘文清 . 2019. “高分五号卫星载荷研制”专辑. 大气与环境光学学报, 14(1): 1
Liu Y N . 2018. Visible-shortwave infrared hyperspectral imager of GF-5 satellite. Spacecraft Recovery and Remote Sensing, 39(3): 25-28
刘银年 . 2018. “高分五号”卫星可见短波红外高光谱相机的研制. 航天返回与遥感, 39(3): 25-28） [DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8518.2018.03.003http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8518.2018.03.003 ]
Lv H T, Wang Y and Shen Y . 2016. An empirical and radiative transfer model based algorithm to remove thin clouds in visible bands. Remote Sensing of Environment, 179: 183-195 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.03.034http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.03.034 ]
Makarau A, Richter R, Müller R and Reinartz P . 2014. Haze detection and removal in remotely sensed multispectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(9): 5895-5905 [DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2013.2293662http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2013.2293662 ]
Pan X X, Xie F Y, Jiang Z G and Yin J H . 2015. Haze removal for a single remote sensing image based on deformed haze imaging model. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 22(10): 1806-1810 [DOI: 10.1109/LSP.2015.2432466http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2015.2432466 ]
Rayleigh L . 1881. X. On the electromagnetic theory of light. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 12(73): 81-101 [DOI: 10.1080/14786448108627074http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786448108627074 ]
Richter R . 1996. Atmospheric correction of satellite data with haze removal including a haze/clear transition region. Computers and Geosciences, 22(6): 675-681 [DOI: 10.1016/0098-3004(96)00010-6http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(96)00010-6 ]
Shen H F, Li H F, Qian Y, Zhang L P and Yuan Q Q . 2014. An effective thin cloud removal procedure for visible remote sensing images. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 96: 224-235 [DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.06.011http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.06.011 ]
Tarel J P and Hautière N. 2009. Fast visibility restoration from a single color or gray level image//Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Vision. Kyoto, Japan: IEEE [DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2009.5459251]
Vermote E F, El Saleous N Z and Justice C O . 2002. Atmospheric correction of MODIS data in the visible to middle infrared: first results. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1/2): 97-111 [DOI: 10.1016/s0034-4257(02)00089-5http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0034-4257(02)00089-5 ]
Wang Z T, Li X Y, Li S S and Chen L F . 2016. Quickly atmospheric correction for GF-1 WFV cameras. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(3): 353-360
王中挺, 李小英, 李莘莘, 陈良富 . 2016. GF-1星WFV相机的快速大气校正. 遥感学报, 20(3): 353-360） [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20165156http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20165156 ]
Wu S J, Li L, Gong B X and Gong M . 2012. Comparison of the methods for haze elimination of GeoEye － 1 remote sensing image. Remote Sensing for Land and Resources , (3): 50-53
吴寿江, 李亮, 宫本旭, 龚梅 . 2012. GeoEye-1遥感图像去雾霾方法比较. 国土资源遥感 , (3): 50-53） [DOI: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2012.03.10http://dx.doi.org/10.6046/gtzyyg.2012.03.10 ]
Xu H, Zhang Y H, Hou W Z, Lv Y, Li L, Gu X F and Li Z Q . 2013. Monitoring haze in Beijing using HJ-1 satellite. Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(2): 476-477
许华, 张玉环, 侯伟真, 吕阳, 李莉, 顾行发, 李正强 . 2013. 利用环境一号卫星监测北京地区雾霾. 遥感学报, 17(2): 476-477） [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.2013016http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.2013016 ]
Yang S, Yong W, Lv H T and Qian J . 2015. Removal of thin clouds in Landsat-8 OLI data with independent component analysis. Remote Sensing, 7(9): 11481-1150 0 [DOI: 10.3390/rs70911481http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs70911481 ]
Zhang Y, Guindon B and Cihlar J . 2002. An image transform to characterize and compensate for spatial variations in thin cloud contamination of Landsat images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 82(2/3): 173-187 [DOI: 10.1016/s0034-4257(02)00034-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0034-4257(02)00034-2 ]
Zhu X and Milanfar P . 2010. Automatic parameter selection for denoising algorithms using a no-reference measure of image content. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 19(12): 3116-3132 [DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2010.2052820http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2010.2052820 ]
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621