The application of the phase reconstruction on small InSAR datasets

  • role: First author第一作者
  • Affiliation:

    College of Communication Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China

  • Email:zk@cqu.edu.cn
  • Introduction:张奎(1982— ),男,讲师,研究方向为合成孔径雷达干涉测量理论和应用研究。E-mail:zk@cqu.edu.cn
ZHANG Kui1,  
  • Affiliation:

    College of Communication Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China

WANG Hui1,  
  • Affiliation:

    Institute of Earthquake Science, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100036, China

SONG Ruiqing2,  
  • Affiliation:

    School of Geographical Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

SHENG Yaobin3

résumé

Multi-baseline InSAR techniques have demonstrated their great potential in topographic mapping and ground surface deformation monitoring. In order to minimize the decorrelation noise between stacked SAR images in multi-baseline InSAR processes, the phase reconstruction technique has been developed recently and has become one of the hotspot techniques in radar interferometry. Due to budget limitations and unstable SAR image acquisition frequency, a lot of multi-baseline InSAR applications have to be carried out based on small image datasets. Researchers have made every endeavor to address this problem, some targeted multi-baseline InSAR processing strategies have been therefore developed. Unfortunately, there are few literatures discussing the application of phase reconstruction to small image datasets at this stage. This paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the phase reconstruction technique on a small SAR image datasets. A targeted multi-baseline InSAR processing scheme was designed and applied to real data. The main idea of phase reconstruction technique is to reform phase observations along a SAR stack by taking advantage of a maximum likelihood estimator which is defined on the coherence matrix estimated from each target. The proposed multi-baseline InSAR processing scheme is divided into two modules. The first one is named as " pre-processing module”, which generates the zero-baseline SAR image stack required by the phase reconstruction technique via a series of operations including image coregistration, topographic phase component removal, and so on. The second one firstly constructs coherence matrices based on multilooked pixels, thereby conducting phase reconstruction operations. Subsequently, it isolates ground surface deformation signals based on reconstructed phase observations by taking advantage of the small baseline subset technique. Noted that an atmospheric disturbances estimation and removal step was involved in this module in order to assure the reliability of the output measurements. The proposed scheme is subsequently applied to five PALSAR images acquired over Taiyuan, ShanXi Province, China. During the experimental process, the performance of the phase reconstruction technique in the case of small image subsets was analyzed in different aspects (e.g. the signal-to-noise ratio of the FFT based orbital fringe estimation process, the number of residues contained in phase unwrapping networks). The corresponding annual deformation rate field was presented, as well as the distribution of additional points obtained after the application of the phase reconstruction technique. The results has demonstrated that the phase reconstruction technique can effectively improve interferometric coherence even in the case of small image datasets, which is beneficial to the proliferation of the density of multi-baseline InSAR results. It must be noted that the size of the coherence matrix is relatively small in the case of small image datasets. Thus the precision of the phase reconstruction results is likely to be influenced by the low coherent elements of coherence matrix. In order to make the phase reconstruction technique work with small image datasets better, future works should try to eliminate the negative impacts of low-quality elements on the phase reconstruction procedure.

mots-clés

phase reconstruction;multi-baseline InSAR;small datasets;interferometric coherence;synthetic aperture radar

References

  1. 1.
    Berardino P, Fornaro G, Lanari R and Sansosti E. 2002. A new algorithm for surface deformation monitoring based on small baseline differential SAR interferograms. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40(11): 2375–2383
  2. 2.
    Cao N, Lee H and Jung H C. 2015. Mathematical framework for phase-triangulation algorithms in distributed-scatterer interferometry. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 12(9): 1838–1842
  3. 3.
    Ferretti A, Fumagalli A, Novali F, Prati C, Rocca F and Rucci A. 2011. A new algorithm for processing interferometric data-stacks: SqueeSAR. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 49(9): 3460–3470
  4. 4.
    Ferretti A, Prati C and Rocca F. 2000. Nonlinear subsidence rate estimation using permanent scatterers in differential SAR interferometry. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38(5): 2202–2212
  5. 5.
    Ferretti A, Prati C and Rocca F. 2001. Permanent scatterers in SAR interferometry. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39(1): 8–20
  6. 6.
    Ge D Q, Guo X F, Wang Y, Wang Y and Liu S W. 2007. Surface deformation rate derivation based on differential interferograms stack. Remote Sensing for Land and Resources, 19(1): 24–26
  7. 7.
    Guarnieri A M and Tebaldini S. 2008. On the exploitation of target statistics for SAR interferometry applications. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46(11): 3436–3443
  8. 8.
    Ji L Y, Xu J D, Zhao B, Wan Y and Shen H H. 2013. Present-day activity of Ashikule volcanic group from InSAR. Seismology and Geology, 35(3): 532–541
  9. 9.
    Kampes B M and Hanssen R F. 2004. Ambiguity resolution for permanent scatterer interferometry. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(11): 2446–2453
  10. 10.
    Li Y S, Zhang J F, Li Z H and Luo Y. 2013. Land subsidence in Beijing City from InSAR time series analysis with small baseline subset. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 38(11): 1374–1377
  11. 11.
    Liao M S, Tang J, Wang T, Balz T and Zhang L. 2012. Landslide monitoring with high-resolution SAR data in the Three Gorges region. Science China Earth Sciences, 42(2): 217–229
  12. 12.
    Liu G X, Buckley S M, Ding X L, Chen Q and Luo X J. 2009. Estimating spatiotemporal ground deformation with improved permanent-scatterer radar interferometry. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 47(8): 2762–2772
  13. 13.
    Liu Z G, Bian Z F, Lv F X and Dong B Q. 2013. Subsidence monitoring caused by repeated excavation with time-series DInSAR. Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering, 30(3): 390–395
  14. 14.
    Lu P, Casagli N, Catani F and Tofani V. 2012. Persistent scatterers interferometry hotspot and cluster analysis (PSI-HCA) for detection of extremely slow-moving landslides. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 33(2): 466–489
  15. 15.
    Mora O, Mallorqui J and Broquetas A. 2003. Linear and nonlinear terrain deformation maps from a reduced set of interferometric SAR Images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(10): 2243–2253
  16. 16.
    Wu H A, Zhang Y H, Chen X Y, Zhong L, Du J, Sun Z H and Sun G T. 2011. Ground deformation monitoring using small baseline DInSAR technique: a case study in Taiyuan City from 2003 to 2009. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 54(3): 673–680
  17. 17.
    Wu T, Zhang H, Wang C, Tang Y X and Wu H A. 2008. Retrieval of urban slow deformation using the multi-baseline DInSAR technique. Chinese Science Bulletin, 53(15): 1849–1857
  18. 18.
    Xu C J, He P and Wen Y M. 2011. Surface deformation of Mt. Etna, Italy from PSInSAR.Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 36(9): 1012–1016
  19. 19.
    Xu X B, Qu C Y, Shan X J, Ma C, Zhang G F and Meng X J. 2012. An experimental study of monitoring fault crustal deformation using PS-InSAR technology. Advances in Earth Science, 27(4): 452–459
  20. 20.
    Yin H J, Zhu J J, Li Z W, Ding X L and Wang C C. 2011. Ground subsidence monitoring in mining area using DInSAR SBAS algorithm. ActaGeodaeticaet CartographicaSinica, 40(1): 52–58
  21. 21.
    Zhang J F, Gong L X and Jiang W L. 2006. Application of PS InSAR technique to measurement of long-term crustal deformation. Recent Developments in World Seismology(6): 1–6
  22. 22.
    Zhang K, Ge LL, Li X J and Ng A H M. 2012. Monitoring ground surface deformation over the North China Plain using coherent ALOS PALSAR differential interferograms. Journal of Geodesy, 87(3): 253–265

Lire l'article complet

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website