Précédent|Prochain

Comparison of lunar irradiance models and validation of lunar observation on Earth

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    Chinese Academy of Meteorology Science, Beijing 100081, China

    Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

    National Satellite Meteorological Center China, Beijing 100081, China

  • Email：l-zhang@hotmail.com
  • Introduction：张璐(1988—　)，男，博士研究生，研究方向为遥感仪器可见光谱段辐射定标。E-mail：l-zhang@hotmail.com
Lu ZHANG123,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    National Satellite Meteorological Center China, Beijing 100081, China

  • Email：zhangp@cma.gov.cn
  • Introduction：张鹏(1970—　)，男，研究员，研究方向为遥感仪器定标、卫星大气遥感、卫星资料定量应用。E-mail：zhangp@cma.gov.cn
Peng ZHANG3*,  
  • Affiliation：

    National Satellite Meteorological Center China, Beijing 100081, China

Xiuqing HU3,  
  • Affiliation：

    National Satellite Meteorological Center China, Beijing 100081, China

Lin CHEN3,  
  • Affiliation：

    Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130033, China

Yang WANG4,  
  • Affiliation：

    Chinese Academy of Meteorology Science, Beijing 100081, China

    National Satellite Meteorological Center China, Beijing 100081, China

Wei WANG13

résumé

Lunar is the second largest field-of-angle object near the Earth, and its reflectance can be considered stable to 10–8 per year. Thus, lunar is selected as the radiometric standard for the calibration of Earth-orbiting satellite-borne instruments and as the radiance source at night similar to solar at daytime for ground-based and satellite remote sensing. However, the precision of existing lunar irradiance models is insufficient to satisfy application requirements. To improve lunar irradiance models and verify the accuracy of the models, a three-month Earth-based observation of lunar was conducted on December 2015 by the National Satellite Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration. The hyper-spectral irradiance of lunar ranging from 399 nm to 1060 nm was retrieved by an imaging spectrometer in Lijiang, Yunnan. This study compared Earth-based lunar observations and other models (ROLO and MT2009 models). Results show that the observations are more similar to the ROLO model than to the MT2009 model, and the difference between the two models is larger in the shortwave infrared region than in the visible region. The average relative difference between the ROLO model and ground-based observations is approximately 5.86%. Causes of this difference are discussed in this study, which provides a theoretical foundation for establishing an accurate model of lunar irradiance.

mots-clés

ROLO;MT2009;lunar irradiance model;Earth-based observation;radiometric calibration

References

  1. 1.
    Acton C H Jr. 1996. Ancillary data services of NASA’s navigation and ancillary information facility. Planetary and Space Science, 44(1): 65–70
  2. 2.
    Barreto A, Cuevas E, Damiri B, Guirado C, Berkoff T, Berjón A J, Hernández Y, Almansa F and Gil M. 2013. A new method for nocturnal aerosol measurements with a lunar photometer prototype. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 6(3): 585–598
  3. 3.
    Eliason E M, McEwen A S, Robinson M S, Lee E M, Becker T L, Gaddis L, Weller L A, Isbell C E, Shinaman J R, Duxbury T and Malaret E. 1999. Clementine: a global multi-spectral map of the moon from the clementine UVVIS imaging instrument. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 30: 1933–1934
  4. 4.
    Green P D and Lobb D. 2015. The traceable radiometry underpinning terrestrial and helio studies (truths) mission//Proceedings of SPIE 9639, Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XIX. Toulouse: SPIE: 96391C [DOI: 10.1117/12.2192593]
  5. 5.
    Hapke B. 2012. Theory of Reflectance and Emittance Spectroscopy. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press
  6. 6.
    Kieffer H H, Anderson J M. 1998. Use of the moon for spacecraft calibration over 350 to 2500 nm. 325–336 [DOI: 10.1117/12.333646]
  7. 7.
    Kieffer H H and Wildey R L. 1985. Absolute calibration of landsat instruments using the moon. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 51(9): 1391–1393
  8. 8.
    Kieffer H H. 1997. Photometric stability of the lunar surface. Icarus, 130(2): 323–327
  9. 9.
    Kieffer H H and Stone T C. 2005. The spectral irradiance of the moon. The Astronomical Journal, 129(6): 2887
  10. 10.
    Lane A P and Irvine W M. 1973. Monochromatic phase curves and albedos for the lunar disk. Astronomical Journal, 78: 267
  11. 11.
    Lawrence S J, Lau E, Steutel D, Stopar J D, Wilcox B B and Lucey P G. 2003. A new measurement of the absolute spectral reflectance of the moon//34th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. League City, Texas: LPI
  12. 12.
    Leckey J. 2015. Climate absolute radiance and refractivity observatory (CLARREO). International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XL-7/W3: 213–217 [DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-7-W3-213-2015]
  13. 13.
    Miller S D and Turner R E. 2009. A dynamic lunar spectral irradiance data set for npoess/viirs day/night band nighttime environmental applications. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 47(7): 2316–2329
  14. 14.
    Pieters C M, Boardman J, Buratti B, Chatterjee A, Clark R, Glavich T, Green R, Head J, Isaacson P, Malaret E, McCord T, Mustard J, Petro N, Runyon C, Staid M, Sunshine J, Taylor L, Tompkins S, Varanasi P and White M. 2009. The moon mineralogy mapper (M3) on chandrayaan-1. Current Science, 96(4): 500–505
  15. 15.
    Saiki K, Saito K, Okuno H, Suzuki A, Yamanoi Y, Hirata N and Nakamura R. 2008. Estimation of the lunar reflectance by ground-based observation using a tunable liquid-crystal filter telescope. Earth, Planets and Space, 60: BF03352806 [DOI: 10.1186/BF03352806]
  16. 16.
    Shaw J A. 1999. Modeling infrared lunar radiance. Optical Engineering, 38(10): 1763–1764
  17. 17.
    Velikodsky Y I, Opanasenko N V, Akimov L A, Korokhin V V, Shkuratov Y G, Kaydash V G, Videen G, Ehgamberdiev S A and Berdalieva N E. 2011. New earth-based absolute photometry of the moon. Icarus, 214(1): 30–45
  18. 18.
    Wu R H, Zhang P, Yang Z D, Hu X Q, Ding L and Chen L. 2016. Monitor radiance calibration of the remote sensing instrument with reflected lunar irradiance. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(2): 278–289 (
  19. 19.
    Wu Y Z, Besse S, Li J Y, Combe J P, Wang Z C, Zhou X F and Wang C. 2013. Photometric correction and in-flight calibration of chang’E-1 interference imaging spectrometer (IIM) data. Icarus, 222(1): 283–295
  20. 20.
    Yokota Y, Matsunaga T, Ohtake M, Haruyama J, Nakamura R, Yamamoto S, Ogawa Y, Morota T, Honda C, Saiki K, Nagasawa K, Kitazato K, Sasaki S, Iwasaki A, Demura H, Hirata N, Hiroi T, Honda R, Iijima Y and Mizutani H. 2011. Lunar photometric properties at wavelengths 0.5—1.6 μm acquired by SELENE spectral profiler and their dependency on local albedo and latitudinal zones. Icarus, 215(2): 639–660
  21. 21.
    Younkin R L. 1970. Optical reflectance of local areas of the moon. Astronomical Journal, 75: 831

Lire l'article complet

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website