Operational regrouping algorithm for HSCAT

  • role: First author第一作者
  • Email:zoujuhong@mail.nsoas.org.cn
  • Introduction:邹巨洪(1981— ),男,副研究员,研究方向为海洋微波遥感、海洋遥感应用。E-mail:zoujuhong@mail.nsoas.org.cn
Juhong ZOU,  
  • No information about the author is available
Mingsen LIN,  
  • No information about the author is available
Yi ZHANG,  
  • No information about the author is available
Bo MU,  
  • No information about the author is available
Maohua GUO,  
  • No information about the author is available
Songxue CUI

résumé

Regrouping refers to the process of resampling the backscattering coefficients that are stored according to the observation sequence and the corresponding parameters of wind vector cell observation geometry. Regrouping is important in scatterometer data processing because it directly affects the final measurement accuracy. In August 2011, China launched its first operational satellite-borne scatterometer HSCAT. Thus, designing a suitable regrouping algorithm for accurately retrieving wind speed and direction data from HACAT observations is necessary. On the basis of the regrouping method for QuikSCAT and Shenzhou-4 multi-mode microwave remote sensing scatterometer, the present work has designed a business operational regrouping algorithm for HSCAT in accordance with its observation characteristics. This study offers a re-designed regrouping algorithm that includes two critical steps: (1) the generation of a ground grid and (2) the resampling of observation results. To simplify the resampling process, HSCAT adopted a convenient grid model along the sub-track swath, which centered on the nadir track, with a coordinate system specifying the location of a given point in terms of “longitude” parallel to the nadir track and “latitude” perpendicular to the nadir track. The origin of the nadir track grid is at the southernmost orbit latitude (rev boundary), and the resolution is set to 25 km×25 km. After the sub-track grid was set, for each “egg” this study searched the nadir track point with the shortest spherical distance to the observed backscattering coefficient, and this shortest distance was used to calculate the cross-track indices (column_number) in the sub-track grid for the “egg”. Then, the distance between this nadir point and the nadir point at the southernmost orbit latitude (rev boundary) was calculated. Moreover, this distance was used to calculate the along-track indices (column_number)) in the sub-track grid for the “egg”. To improve calculation efficiency, we used coarse and fine search strategies when searching for the minimum spherical distance between the backscattering coefficient and the nadir track point. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed regrouping algorithm, we first analyzed the location distribution of wind vector cells and the spatial distribution of the total independent observation number of each wind vector cell in high-latitude and low-latitude areas. Results show that the wind vector cells are uniformly distributed, and a sufficient number of independently observed backscattering coefficients are included in each cell, which can satisfy the requirements of wind vector retrieval. Meanwhile, comparison of NDBC buoy wind and the retrieved wind shows that the standard deviations of wind speed and wind direction are 1.7 m s –1 and 23.4° for the retrieved wind, respectively, indicating that the proposed regrouping algorithm can meet the requirements for high-quality sea surface wind field retrieval. This article proposes a business operational regrouping method for HSCAT. To simplify the resampling process, this method adopts the sub-track grid in along-track and cross-track directions with grid cells having approximately 25 km resolution. Meanwhile, the shortest spherical distance between each independent backscattering coefficient measurement (“egg”) and the nadir track point was used to calculate the cross-track indices (column_number) in the sub-track grid for each “egg” and the distance between the nadir point with “shortest spherical distance” and the nadir point at the southernmost orbit latitude (rev boundary) was used to calculate the along-track indices (column_number) in the sub-track grid for the “egg” In this way, the grid cells corresponding to the observed backscattering coefficients in the along-track/cross-track coordinate network were determined, and the resampling was completed. We used coarse and fine search strategies when searching for the minimum spherical distance between the backscattering coefficient and the nadir track point, effectively improving calculation efficiency. According to the post-regrouping location distribution of wind vector cells and the spatial distribution of the observation number of each wind vector cell, the proposed regrouping algorithm can achieve effective resampling of backscattering coefficient. After resampling, the acquired wind vector cells are uniformly distributed, and a sufficient number of independently observed backscattering coefficients are included in each wind vector cell. These results indicate that the backscattering coefficients can be resampled effectively.

mots-clés

regrouping;HY-2 satellite;HSCAT;wind vector cell;sub-track grid

References

  1. 1.
    Attema E P W. 1991. The active microwave instrument on-board the ERS-1 satellite. Proceedings of the IEEE, 79(6): 791–799
  2. 2.
    Dunbar R S, Hsiao S V, Kim Y J, Pak K S, Weiss B H and Zhang A. 2001. Science Algorithm Specification for SeaWinds on QuikSCAT and SeaWinds on ADEOS-II. Pasadena, California: JET Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology: 209–239
  3. 3.
    Figa-Saldaña J, Wilson J J W, Attema E, Gelsthorpe R, Drinkwater M R and Stoffelen A. 2002. The advanced scatterometer (ASCAT) on the meteorological operational (MetOp) platform: a follow on for European wind scatterometers. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(3): 404–412
  4. 4.
    Gohil B S, Sikhakolli R and Gangwar R K. 2013. Development of geophysical model functions for oceansat-2 scatterometer. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 10(2): 377–380
  5. 5.
    Grantham W, Bracalente E, Jones W and Johnson J. 1977. The SeaSat—a satellite scatterometer. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 22(2): 200–206
  6. 6.
    Lecomte P. 1998. The ERS scatterometer instrument and the on-ground processing of its data//Proceedings of Workshop on Emerging Scatterometer Applications: From Research to Operations. Noordwijk, The Netherlands: European Space Agency, Special Publication 424: 241–260
  7. 7.
    Naderi F M, Freilich M H and Long D G. 1991. Spaceborne radar measurement of wind velocity over the ocean—an overview of the NSCAT scatterometer system. Proceedings of the IEEE, 79(6): 850–866
  8. 8.
    Wang X Z and Jiang J S. 1997. Study of ocean surface wind field detection of scan-scatterometer. Journal of Remote Sensing, 1(3): 185–191 (
  9. 9.
    Wu C, Liu Y, Kellogg K H, Pak K S and Glenister R L. 2003. Design and calibration of the SeaWinds scatterometer. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 39(1): 94–109
  10. 10.
    Zhang Y H, Jiang J S, Zhang X K, Sun B and Fu W J. 2005. SZ-4 scatterometer mode of multimode microwave sensors (CNSCAT/M3RS). Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 20(1): 58–63 (
  11. 11.
    Zou J H, Lin M S, Pan D L, Chen Z H and Yang L. 2009. A quick-look wind-vector retrieval algorithm for QuikSCAT. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 28(2): 36–41 (
  12. 12.
    Zou J H, Xie X T, Zhang Y and Lin M S. 2014. Wind retrieval processing for HY-2A microwave scatterometer//Proceeding of 2014 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). Quebec City, QC: IEEE: 5160–5163 [DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2014.6947660]

Lire l'article complet

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website