Relationship between popular spatial scale sets of remote sensing image and the national primary scale

  • role: First author第一作者
  • Affiliation:

    National Engineering Laboratory for Remote Sensing Satellite Applications, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China

  • Email:huangxz@radi.ac.cn
  • Introduction:黄祥志,1985年生,男,助理研究员,研究方向为空间信息、大数据与智能挖掘。E-mail: huangxz@radi.ac.cn
Xiangzhi HUANG,  
  • Affiliation:

    National Engineering Laboratory for Remote Sensing Satellite Applications, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China

Dong WANG,  
  • Affiliation:

    National Engineering Laboratory for Remote Sensing Satellite Applications, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China

Yameng ZHAO,  
  • role: Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation:

    National Engineering Laboratory for Remote Sensing Satellite Applications, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China

  • Introduction:臧文乾,1984年生,男,助理研究员,研究方向为遥感图像处理技术。E-mail:zangwq@radi.ac.cn
Wenqian ZANG*

résumé

The progress of Internet and remote sensing technologies has increased the amount of available remote sensing satellite resources. Thus, extraction ability of remote sensing information becomes increasingly strong, and social application need for such data becomes increasingly diverse. Comprehensive application of multi-source remote sensing data has become an inevitable trend. Given that remote sensing data are spatiotemporal data, their comprehensive application needs to be carried out in a certain spatial scale. A unified spatial scale set for remote sensing data is a basic requirement for the integration and comprehensive application of multi-source data. Many popular spatial scale sets are available, and each of them exhibits its own advantages and disadvantages. However, none of them is currently applied as a standard. The lack of a standard spatial scale set restricts the comprehensive application of multi-source remote sensing data. Thus, popular spatial scale sets should be evaluated to establish or optimize a reasonable spatial scale set as a standard. Information density depends on the amount of information in a unit area. Thus, the spatial resolution of remote sensing images is an effective way of expressing the information density of remote sensing data. Map scale refers to the ratio of the distance on the map to that on the field, which imposes strong information requirements. A large map scale requires high information density, which indicates high spatial resolution. High image spatial resolution is necessary to obtain considerable surface details from a large map scale. If the image spatial resolution is insufficiently high, then the map will present inferior quality or will even be unavailable for use. However, high image space resolution is not always ideal for a specific scale. Excessively high resolution data indicate redundant data, which require high computational cost and storage and network resource. All these factors may affect the data display. The national primary scale is a widely used mapping scale grading system and is a perfect reference system to evaluate an optimal spatial scale set for remote sensing data application. Apart from map scale, visual precision is also an important index that affects the spatial resolution requirements. Visual precision requirements to remote sensing image application involve two levels. One is high visual precision requirement, which is suitable for application types of quantitative calculation, scientific analysis, and human–computer interaction. The other is low visual precision requirement, which is suitable for remote sensing data exhibition in long distance, such as image displays in a large screen and a wall map. In this study, the spatial resolutions required by the national primary scale in two visual precision levels were analyzed. Then, the optimal spatial resolution scale of current popular spatial scale sets was built by matching the requirements. The popular spatial scale sets included OGC popular scale sets “GlobalCRS84Pixel” and “GoogleMapsCompatible”, the grid system of NASA WorldWind, Google Map, Baidu Map, Map World, and the “five-layer fifteen-level” remote sensing data organization model. Thereafter, the data redundancy rates of these popular spatial scale sets were calculated and compared from the optimal resolutions to the required spatial resolutions of the national primary scale in two visual precision levels. Results show that, compared with other popular spatial scale sets, the “five-layer fifteen-level” remote sensing data organization model best matches the requirements of the national primary scale. In particular, the model presents the lowest average redundancy rates in the two visual precision levels among others. Therefore, the “five-layer fifteen-level” remote sensing data organization model is a suitable standard spatial scale set for the multi-scale comprehensive application of multi-source remote sensing data.

mots-clés

spatial scale set;spatial resolution of remote sensing image;the national primary scale;comprehensive application of multi-sources remote sensing data;five-layer fifteen-levels

References

  1. 1.
    Gu X F, Yu T, Gao J, Tian G L, Wang C M, Zheng F J, Li J, Dong W, Mi X F, Hu X L, Xie Y, Meng Q Y, Liu Q Y, Yang J, Wei Z, Zhang Z W, Fang L, Lin Y H, Gao H L, Zhao L M, Zheng L J, Liu M, Li L L, Sun Y, Cheng Y, Zhang Y Z, Huang X Z, Zang W Q, Xu H, Wu Y, Liu P, Liu D H and Deng A J. 2016. Application-oriented scientific demonstration research for spaceborne remote sensing. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(5): 807–826 (
  2. 2.
    Liu S X, You S C and Zhang D X. 2003. An analysis of the requirement for spatial resolution of chinese earth observation satellite after CBERS- 1 in land resource management. Remote Sensing for Land and Resources, 58(4): 6–8 (
  3. 3.
    Liu Y, Xin R and Sun X M. 2012. Applicability analysis of eye resolution, satellite resolution and mapping scale. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences(9): 126–129 (
  4. 4.
    Lou J H, Wang H Y and Xie X Y. 2015. The discussion of the relation between map scale and remote sensing image resolution. Geomatics and Spatial Information Technology, 38(12): 61–64, 71 (
  5. 5.
    MapWorld(天地图国家地理信息公共服务平台). (2017).[2017-06-27]
  6. 6.
    NASA World Wind. (2017).[2017-06-27]
  7. 7.
    OGC. Open GIS Web Map TileService Implementation Standard. (2010).[2017-06-27]
  8. 8.
    Pan J W, Zhu D H, Yan T L and Sun L. 2005. Application of the relationship between spatial resolution of RS image and mapping scale. Transactions of the CSAE, 21(9): 124–128 (
  9. 9.
    Wang D, Zheng F B, Lai J B, Yu T, Li J G and Guo S. 2012. A new parallel algorithm based on Five-layer Fifteen-level Remote Sensing data organization. , 28(1): 166–167 (
  10. 10.
    Wang J N, Gu X F, Ming T and Zhou X. 2013. Classification and gradation rule for remote sensing satellite data products. Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(3): 566–577 (
  11. 11.
    Wei X Q, Gu X F, Yu T, Meng Q Y, Li B and Guo H. 2012. Spatial resolution standardization of payload on board of remote sensing satellite based on application requirements. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysi, 32(3): 781–785 (

Lire l'article complet

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website