Précédent|Prochain

Retrieval of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and advancements in carbon cycle application

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Email：15048967116@163.com
  • Introduction：章钊颖，1992年生，女，博士研究生，研究方向为植被定量遥感、全球变化遥感的理论和应用。E-mail：15048967116@163.com
Zhaoying ZHANG,  
  • No information about the author is available
Songhan WANG,  
  • No information about the author is available
Bo QIU,  
  • No information about the author is available
Lian SONG,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Email：yongguang_zhang@nju.edu.cn
  • Introduction：张永光，1980年生，男，教授，研究方向为植被叶绿素荧光遥感和全球碳循环。E-mail：yongguang_zhang@nju.edu.cn
Yongguang ZHANG*

résumé

The emerging technique of remotely sensed sun-induced fluorescence (SIF) offers great advantages for estimating the gross primary photosynthetic (GPP) and investigating carbon cycles at regional and global scales. This novel satellite product is a state-of-the-art and booming avenue in recent years. Particularly, the flourishing progressions in retrieval techniques, vegetation monitoring, and applications in carbon cycle model have been accelerated to implement a satellite-based inversion at a global scale since 2011. During photosynthesis, part of solar radiation absorbed by chlorophyll is re-emitted at long wavelengths (fluorescence). Chlorophyll fluorescence is an electromagnetic emission in the 650–800 nm range originating at the core of the photosynthetic machinery. It been used in leaf-scale studies of photosynthesis in laboratory conditions for several decades. By using new, high-resolution spectrometers, chlorophyll fluorescence can be readily retrieved from satellite platforms. This scheme can be used to quantify the photosynthetic activity and efficiency globally. Satellite observations of chlorophyll fluorescence are important to reduce the uncertainties in research of global carbon cycle and climate change. In this review, we introduced the recent development in the remote sensing of SIF. First, recent instrumental and methodological developments in the field of spaceborne spectroscopy have rendered the measurement of SIF from space possible, which can alleviate the current limitations for the monitoring of terrestrial photosynthesis. Since 2011, the global data of SIF have been retrieved from a series of spaceborne instruments providing high-resolution spectra, such as the GOSAT’s Fourier transform spectrometer, ENVISAT/SCIAMACHY, MetOp-A/GOME-2, and OCO-2. The spatial coverage and resolution, wavelength, acquisition time, and amount of data available for analysis depend on the instrument from which they are derived. As a complement to reflectance-based vegetation indices, SIF offers new possibilities to monitor photosynthesis and GPP of terrestrial ecosystem from space. The potential of SIF, which is an indicator of large-scale GPP, has been demonstrated in a relatively short life time of global SIF data. Recent studies have shown that satellite observations of SIF are an excellent proxy for GPP at canopy and ecosystem scales. Meanwhile, spaceborne SIF data have also been used to monitor large-scale vegetation status in drought conditions, thereby suggesting that SIF provides unique, perhaps most direct, information from space for early warning and accurate monitoring of emerging drought. The potential of SIF as a constraint on regional and global carbon cycle variations has also been demonstrated together with the XCO2 data from GOSAT and OCO-2. Despite this experimental evidence of a direct and linear correlation between spatio-temporal aggregates of remotely sensed SIF data and large-scale GPP, the relationship between instantaneous photosynthesis and SIF is relatively complicated. Further study is necessary to investigate how the remotely sensed SIF signal can be used for plant photosynthesis monitoring, how we can interpret the SIF signal at various spatial and temporal scales, and how we link the active PAM measurements with canopy SIF at the seasonal scale. At the end of this review, we proposed a number of areas where further research can be conducted to better understand the mechanisms that govern the seasonality of canopy- and leaf-level SIF signal and its relation with photosynthesis. Several prospective areas for future work include improving the accuracy of retrievals with additional data, characterizing the mechanistic relationship between SIF and GPP across scales, measurements of near-surface continuous SIF along with eddy covariance flux system, data assimilation of SIF into land surface models, and development of new index for stress detection from SIF.

mots-clés

sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence;GPP modeling;global carbon cycle;phenology monitoring;stress monitoring

References

  1. 1.
    Ač A, Malenovský Z, Olejníčková J, Gallé A, Rascher U and Mohammed G. 2015. Meta-analysis assessing potential of steady-state chlorophyll fluorescence for remote sensing detection of plant water, temperature and nitrogen stress. Remote Sensing of Environment, 168: 420–436
  2. 2.
    Agati G. 1998. Response of the in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence spectrum to environmental factors and laser excitation wavelength. Pure and Applied Optics, 7(4): 797–807
  3. 3.
    Amoros-Lopez J, Gomez-Chova L, Vila-Frances J, Alonso L, Calpe J, Moreno J and del Valle-Tascon S. 2008. Evaluation of remote sensing of vegetation fluorescence by the analysis of diurnal cycles. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(17/18): 5423–5436
  4. 4.
    Bauerle W L, Oren R, Way D A, Qian S S, Stoy P C, Thornton P E, Bowden J D, Hoffman F M and Reynolds R F. 2012. Photoperiodic regulation of the seasonal pattern of photosynthetic capacity and the implications for carbon cycling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(22): 8612–8617
  5. 5.
    Breshears D D, Cobb N S, Rich P M, Price K P, Allen C D, Balice R G, Romme W H, Kastens J H, Floyd M L, Belnap J, Anderson J J, Myers O B and Meyer C W. 2005. Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(42): 15144–15148
  6. 6.
    Cogliati S, Verhoef W, Kraft S, Sabater N, Alonso L, Vicent J, Moreno J, Drusch M and Colombo R. 2015. Retrieval of sun-induced fluorescence using advanced spectral fitting methods. Remote Sensing of Environment, 169: 344–357
  7. 7.
    Croft H, Chen J M, Luo X Z, Bartlett P, Chen B and Staebler R M. 2017. Leaf chlorophyll content as a proxy for leaf photosynthetic capacity. Global Change Biology, 23(9): 3513–3524
  8. 8.
    Damm A, Elbers J, Erler A, Gioli B, Hamdi K, Hutjes R, Kosvancova M, Meroni M, Miglietta F, Moersch A, Moreno J, Schickling A, Sonnenschein R, Udelhoven T, Van Der Linden S, Hostert P and Rascher U. 2010. Remote sensing of sun-induced fluorescence to improve modeling of diurnal courses of gross primary production (GPP). Global Change Biology, 16(1): 171–186
  9. 9.
    Damm A, Guanter L, Paul-Limoges E, van der Tol C, Hueni A, Buchmann N, Eugster W, Ammann C and Schaepman M E. 2015a. Far-red sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence shows ecosystem-specific relationships to gross primary production: an assessment based on observational and modeling approaches. Remote Sensing of Environment, 166: 91–105
  10. 10.
    Damm A, Guanter L, Verhoef W, Schläpfer D, Garbari S and Schaepman M E. 2015b. Impact of varying irradiance on vegetation indices and chlorophyll fluorescence derived from spectroscopy data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 156: 202–215
  11. 11.
    Detmers R G, Hasekamp O, Aben I, Houweling S, van Leeuwen T T, Butz A, Landgraf J, Köhler P, Guanter L and Poulter B. 2015. Anomalous carbon uptake in Australia as seen by GOSAT. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(19): 8177–8184
  12. 12.
    Di L P, Rundquis D C and Han L H. 1994. Modelling relationships between NDVI and precipitation during vegetative growth cycles. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 15(10): 2121–2136
  13. 13.
    Dobrowski S Z, Pushnik J C, Zarco-Tejada P J and Ustin S L. 2005. Simple reflectance indices track heat and water stress-induced changes in steady-state chlorophyll fluorescence at the canopy scale. Remote Sensing of Environment, 97(3): 403–414
  14. 14.
    Dragoni D, Schmid H P, Wayson C A, Potter H, Grimmond C S B and Randolph J C. 2011. Evidence of increased net ecosystem productivity associated with a longer vegetated season in a deciduous forest in south-central Indiana, USA. Global Change Biology, 17(2): 886–897
  15. 15.
    Du S S, Liu L Y, Liu X J and Hu J C. 2017. Response of canopy solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence to the absorbed photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by chlorophyll. Remote Sensing, 9(12): 911
  16. 16.
    Flexas J, Escalona J M, Evain S, Gulías J, Moya I, Osmond C B and Medrano H. 2002. Steady-state chlorophyll fluorescence (Fs) measurements as a tool to follow variations of net CO2 assimilation and stomatal conductance during water-stress in C3 plants. Physiologia Plantarum, 114(2): 231–240
  17. 17.
    Franck F, Juneau P and Popovic R. 2002. Resolution of the Photosystem I and Photosystem II contributions to chlorophyll fluorescence of intact leaves at room temperature. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics, 1556(2/3): 239–246
  18. 18.
    Frankenberg C, Fisher J B, Worden J, Badgley G, Saatchi S S, Lee J E, Toon G C, Butz A, Jung M, Kuze A and Yokota T. 2011. New global observations of the terrestrial carbon cycle from GOSAT: patterns of plant fluorescence with gross primary productivity. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(17): L17706
  19. 19.
    Frankenberg C, O’Dell C, Berry J, Guanter L, Joiner J, Köhler P, Pollock R and Taylor T E. 2014. Prospects for chlorophyll fluorescence remote sensing from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2. Remote Sensing of Environment, 147: 1–12
  20. 20.
    Green J K, Konings A G, Alemohammad S H, Berry J, Entekhabi D, Kolassa J, Lee J E and Gentine P. 2017. Regionally strong feedbacks between the atmosphere and terrestrial biosphere. Nature Geoscience, 10(6): 410–414
  21. 21.
    Guan K Y, Berry J A, Zhang Y G, Joiner J, Guanter L, Badgley G and Lobell D B. 2016. Improving the monitoring of crop productivity using spaceborne solar-induced fluorescence. Global Change Biology, 22(2): 716–726
  22. 22.
    Guanter L, Aben I, Tol P, Krijger J M, Hollstein A, Köhler P, Damm A, Joiner J, Frankenberg C and Landgraf J. 2015. Potential of the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) onboard the Sentinel-5 Precursor for the monitoring of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 8(3): 1337–1352
  23. 23.
    Guanter L, Alonso L, Gómez-Chova L, Amorós-López J, Vila J and Moreno J. 2007. Estimation of solar-induced vegetation fluorescence from space measurements. Geophysical Research Letters, 34: L08401
  24. 24.
    Guanter L, Alonso L, Gómez-Chova L, Meroni M, Preusker R, Fischer J and Moreno J. 2010. Developments for vegetation fluorescence retrieval from spaceborne high-resolution spectrometry in the O2-A and O2-B absorption bands. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115: D19303
  25. 25.
    Guanter L, Frankenberg C, Dudhia A, Lewis P E, Gómez-Dans J, Kuze A, Suto H and Grainger R G. 2012. Retrieval and global assessment of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from GOSAT space measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment, 121: 236–251
  26. 26.
    Guanter L, Rossini M, Colombo R, Meroni M, Frankenberg C, Lee J E and Joiner J. 2013. Using field spectroscopy to assess the potential of statistical approaches for the retrieval of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from ground and space. Remote Sensing of Environment, 133: 52–61
  27. 27.
    Guanter L, Zhang Y G, Jung M, Joiner J, Voigt M, Berry J A, Frankenberg C, Huete A R, Zarco-Tejada P, Lee J E, Moran M S, Ponce-Campos G, Beer C, Camps-Valls G, Buchmann N, Gianelle D, Klumpp K, Cescatti A, Baker J M and Griffis T J. 2014. Global and time-resolved monitoring of crop photosynthesis with chlorophyll fluorescence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(14): E1327–E1333
  28. 28.
    He L M, Chen J M, Liu J, Mo G and Joiner J. 2017. Angular normalization of GOME-2 Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence observation as a better proxy of vegetation productivity. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(11): 5691–5699
  29. 29.
    Jeong S J, Schimel D, Frankenberg C, Drewry D T, Fisher J B, Verma M, Berry J A, Lee J E and Joiner J. 2017. Application of satellite solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence to understanding large-scale variations in vegetation phenology and function over northern high latitude forests. Remote Sensing of Environment, 190: 178–187
  30. 30.
    Jeong S J, Ho C H, Choi S D, Kim J, Lee E J and Gim H J. 2013. Satellite data-based phenological evaluation of the nationwide reforestation of South Korea. PLoS One, 8(3): e58900
  31. 31.
    Jeong S J, Ho C H, Gim H J and Brown M E. 2011. Phenology shifts at start vs. end of growing season in temperate vegetation over the Northern Hemisphere for the period 1982-2008. Global Change Biology, 17(7): 2385–2399
  32. 32.
    Ji L and Peters A J. 2003. Assessing vegetation response to drought in the northern Great Plains using vegetation and drought indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 87(1): 85–98
  33. 33.
    Joiner J, Guanter L, Lindstrot R, Voigt M, Vasilkov A P, Middleton E M, Huemmrich K F, Yoshida Y and Frankenberg C. 2013. Global monitoring of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from moderate-spectral-resolution near-infrared satellite measurements: methodology, simulations, and application to GOME-2. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 6(10): 2803–2823
  34. 34.
    Joiner J, Yoshida Y, Guanter L and Middleton E M. 2016. New methods for the retrieval of chlorophyll red fluorescence from hyperspectral satellite instruments: simulations and application to GOME-2 and SCIAMACHY. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 9: 3939–3967
  35. 35.
    Joiner J, Yoshida Y, Vasilkov A P, Middleton E M, Campbell P K E, Yoshida Y, Kuze A and Corp L A. 2012. Filling-in of near-infrared solar lines by terrestrial fluorescence and other geophysical effects: simulations and space-based observations from SCIAMACHY and GOSAT. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 5(4): 809–829
  36. 36.
    Joiner J, Yoshida Y, Vasilkov A P, Schaefer K, Jung M, Guanter L, Zhang Y, Garrity S, Middleton E M, Huemmrich K F, Gu L and Belelli Marchesini L. 2014. The seasonal cycle of satellite chlorophyll fluorescence observations and its relationship to vegetation phenology and ecosystem atmosphere carbon exchange. Remote Sensing of Environment, 152: 375–391
  37. 37.
    Joiner J, Yoshida Y, Vasilkov A P, Yoshida Y, Corp L A and Middleton E M. 2011. First observations of global and seasonal terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from space. Biogeosciences, 8(3): 637–651
  38. 38.
    Knyazikhin Y, Schull M A, Stenberg P, Mottus M, Rautiainen M, Yang Y, Marshak A, Latorre Carmona P, Kaufmann R K, Lewis P, Disney M I, Vanderbilt V, Davis A B, Baret F, Jacquemoud S, Lyapustin A and Myneni R B. 2013. Hyperspectral remote sensing of foliar nitrogen content. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(3): E185–E192
  39. 39.
    Koffi E N, Rayner P J, Norton A J, Frankenberg C and Scholze M. 2015. Investigating the usefulness of satellite derived fluorescence data in inferring gross primary productivity within the carbon cycle data assimilation system. Biogeosciences, 12(13): 4067–4084
  40. 40.
    Köhler P, Guanter L and Joiner J. 2015. A linear method for the retrieval of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from GOME-2 and SCIAMACHY data. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 8(6): 2589–2608
  41. 41.
    Krumov A, Nikolova A, Vassilev V and Vassilev N. 2008. Assessment of plant vitality detection through fluorescence and reflectance imagery. Advances in Space Research, 41(11): 1870–1875
  42. 42.
    Lee J E, Berry J A, van der Tol C, Yang X, Guanter L, Damm A, Baker I and Frankenberg C. 2015. Simulations of chlorophyll fluorescence incorporated into the Community Land Model version 4. Global Change Biology, 21(9): 3469–3477
  43. 43.
    Lee J E, Frankenberg C, van der Tol C, Berry J A, Guanter L, Boyce C K, Fisher J B, Morrow E, Worden J R, Asefi S, Badgley G and Saatchi S. 2013. Forest productivity and water stress in Amazonia: observations from GOSAT chlorophyll fluorescence. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1761): 20130171
  44. 44.
    Liu J J, Bowman K W, Schimel D S, Parazoo N C, Jiang Z, Lee M, Bloom A A, Wunch D, Frankenberg C, Sun Y, O’Dell C W, Gurney K R, Menemenlis D, Gierach M, Crisp D and Eldering A. 2017. Contrasting carbon cycle responses of the tropical continents to the 2015-2016 El Niño. Science, 358(6360): eaam5690
  45. 45.
    Liu X J, Liu L Y, Zhang S and Zhou X F. 2015. New spectral fitting method for full-spectrum solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence retrieval based on principal components analysis. Remote Sensing, 7(8): 10626–10645
  46. 46.
    Luus K A, Commane R, Parazoo N C, Benmergui J, Euskirchen E S, Frankenberg C, Joiner J, Lindaas J, Miller C E, Oechel W C, Zona D, Wofsy S and Lin J C. 2017. Tundra photosynthesis captured by satellite-observed solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(3): 1564–1573
  47. 47.
    Mazzoni M, Meroni M, Fortunato C, Colombo R and Verhoef W. 2012. Retrieval of maize canopy fluorescence and reflectance by spectral fitting in the O2–A absorption band. Remote Sensing of Environment, 124: 72–82
  48. 48.
    Medrano H, Escalona J M, Bota J, Gulías J and Flexas J. 2002. Regulation of photosynthesis of C3 plants in response to progressive drought: stomatal conductance as a reference parameter. Annals of Botany, 89(7): 895–905
  49. 49.
    Meroni M, Picchi V, Rossini M, Cogliati S, Panigada C, Nali C, Lorenzini G and Colombo R. 2008. Leaf level early assessment of ozone injuries by passive fluorescence and photochemical reflectance index. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(17/18): 5409–5422
  50. 50.
    Meroni M, Rossini M, Guanter L, Alonso L, Rascher U, Colombo R and Moreno J. 2009. Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: review of methods and applications. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(10): 2037–2051
  51. 51.
    Monteith J L. 1972. Solar radiation and productivity in tropical ecosystems. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 9(3): 747–766
  52. 52.
    Neuner G and Larcher W. 1990. Determination of differences in chilling susceptibility of two soybean varieties by means of in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence measurements. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 164(2): 73–80
  53. 53.
    Norton A J, Rayner P J, Koffi E N and Scholze M. 2017. Assimilating solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence into the terrestrial biosphere model BETHY-SCOPE: model description and information content. Geoscientific Model Development: 1–26
  54. 54.
    Parazoo N C, Bowman K, Frankenberg C, Lee J E, Fisher J B, Worden J, Jones D B A, Berry J, Collatz G J, Baker I T, Jung M, Liu J J, Osterman G, O’Dell C, Sparks At, Butz A, Guerlet S, Yoshida Y, Chen H L and Gerbig C. 2013. Interpreting seasonal changes in the carbon balance of southern Amazonia using measurements of XCO2 and chlorophyll fluorescence from GOSAT. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(11): 2829–2833
  55. 55.
    Perez-Priego O, Zarco-Tejada P J, Miller J R, Sepulcre-Canto G and Fereres E. 2005. Detection of water stress in orchard trees with a high-resolution spectrometer through chlorophyll fluorescence in-filling of the O2-A band. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(12): 2860–2869
  56. 56.
    Piao S L, Ciais P, Friedlingstein P, Peylin P, Reichstein M, Luyssaert S, Margolis H, Fang J Y, Barr A, Chen A P, Grelle A, Hollinger D Y, Laurila T, Lindroth A, Richardson A D and Vesala T. 2008. Net carbon dioxide losses of northern ecosystems in response to autumn warming. Nature, 451(7174): 49–52
  57. 57.
    Piao S L, Mohammat A, Fang J Y, Cai Q and Feng J M. 2006. NDVI-based increase in growth of temperate grasslands and its responses to climate changes in China. Global Environmental Change, 16(4): 340–348
  58. 58.
    Plascyk J A and Gabriel F C. 1975. The fraunhofer line discriminator MKII-An airborne instrument for precise and standardized ecological luminescence measurement. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 24(4): 306–313
  59. 59.
    Porcar-Castell A, Tyystjärvi E, Atherton J, van der Tol C, Flexas J, Pfündel E E, Moreno J, Frankenberg C and Berry J A. 2014. Linking chlorophyll a fluorescence to photosynthesis for remote sensing applications: mechanisms and challenges. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65(15): 4065–4095
  60. 60.
    Rathcke B and Lacey E P. 1985. Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16(1): 179–214
  61. 61.
    Richardson A D, Hollinger D Y, Dail D B, Lee J T, Munger J W and O’Keefe J. 2009. Influence of spring phenology on seasonal and annual carbon balance in two contrasting New England forests. Tree Physiology, 29(3): 321–331
  62. 62.
    Rossini M, Nedbal L, Guanter L, Ač A, Alonso L, Burkart A, Cogliati S, Colombo R, Damm A, Drusch M, Hanus J, Janoutova R, Julitta T, Kokkalis P, Moreno J, Novotny J, Panigada C, Pinto F, Schickling A, Schüttemeyer D, Zemek F and Rascher U. 2015. Red and far red Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence as a measure of plant photosynthesis. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(6): 1632–1639
  63. 63.
    Sanders A F J, Verstraeten W W, Kooreman M L, van Leth T C, Beringer J and Joiner J. 2016. Spaceborne sun-induced vegetation fluorescence time series from 2007 to 2015 evaluated with australian flux tower measurements. Remote Sensing, 8(12): 895
  64. 64.
    Shen M G, Tang Y H, Desai A R, Gough C and Chen J. 2014. Can EVI-derived land-surface phenology be used as a surrogate for phenology of canopy photosynthesis?. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 35(3): 1162–1174
  65. 65.
    Sun Y, Fu R, Dickinson R, Joiner J, Frankenberg C, Gu L H, Xia Y L and Fernando N. 2015. Drought onset mechanisms revealed by satellite solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: insights from two contrasting extreme events. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 120(11): 2427–2440
  66. 66.
    Sun Y, Frankenberg C, Wood J D, Schimel D S, Jung M, Guanter L, Drewry D T, Verma M, Porcar-Castell A, Griffis T J, Gu L, Magney T S, Köhler P, Evans B and Yuen K. 2017. OCO-2 advances photosynthesis observation from space via solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence. Science, 358(6360): eaam5747
  67. 67.
    Thum T, Zaehle S, Köhler P, Aalto T, Aurela M, Guanter L, Kolari P, Laurila T, Lohila A, Magnani F, Van der Tol C and Markkanen T. 2017. Modelling sun-induced fluorescence and photosynthesis with a land surface model at local and regional scales in northern Europe. Biogeosciences, 14(7): 1969–1987
  68. 68.
    Walther S, Voigt M, Thum T, Gonsamo A, Zhang YvG, Köhler P, Jung M, Varlagin A and Guanter L. 2016. Satellite chlorophyll fluorescence measurements reveal large-scale decoupling of photosynthesis and greenness dynamics in boreal evergreen forests. Global Change Biology, 22(9): 2979–2996
  69. 69.
    Wang R, Liu Z G, and Yang P Q. 2012. Principle and progress in remote sensing of vegetation solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence. Advances in Earth Science, 27(11): 1221–1228 (
  70. 70.
    Wang S H, Huang C P, Zhang L F, Lin Y, Cen Y and Wu T X. 2016. Monitoring and assessing the 2012 drought in the great plains: analyzing satellite-retrieved solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence, drought indices, and gross primary production. Remote Sensing, 8(2): 61
  71. 71.
    White M A, De Beurs K M, Didan K, Inouye D W, Richardson A D, Jensen O P, O’Keefe J, Zhang G, Nemani R R, Van Leeuwen W J D, Brown J F, De Wit A, Schaepman M, Lin X M, Dettinger M, Bailey A S, Kimball J, Schwartz M D, Baldocchi D D, Lee J T and Lauenroth W K. 2009. Intercomparison, interpretation, and assessment of spring phenology in North America estimated from remote sensing for 1982-2006. Global Change Biology, 15(10): 2335–2359
  72. 72.
    Wolanin A, Rozanov V V, Dinter T, Noël S, Vountas M, Burrows J P and Bracher A. 2015. Global retrieval of marine and terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence at its red peak using hyperspectral top of atmosphere radiance measurements: feasibility study and first results. Remote Sensing of Environment, 166: 243–261
  73. 73.
    Yang W, Yang L and Merchant J W. 1997. An assessment of AVHRR/NDVI-ecoclimatological relations in Nebraska, U. S.A. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18(10): 2161–2180
  74. 74.
    Yang X, Tang J W, Mustard J F, Lee J E, Rossini M, Joiner J, Munger J W, Kornfeld A and Richardson A D. 2015. Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence that correlates with canopy photosynthesis on diurnal and seasonal scales in a temperate deciduous forest. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(8): 2977–2987
  75. 75.
    Yoshida Y, Joiner J, Tucker C, Berry J, Lee J E, Walker G, Reichle R, Koster R, Lyapustin A and Wang Y. 2015. The 2010 Russian drought impact on satellite measurements of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: insights from modeling and comparisons with parameters derived from satellite reflectances. Remote Sensing of Environment, 166: 163–177
  76. 76.
    Zarco-Tejada P J, Morales A, Testi L and Villalobos F J. 2013. Spatio-temporal patterns of chlorophyll fluorescence and physiological and structural indices acquired from hyperspectral imagery as compared with carbon fluxes measured with eddy covariance. Remote Sensing of Environment, 133: 102–115
  77. 77.
    Zhang Y G, Guanter L, Berry J A, Joiner J, van der Tol C, Huete A, Gitelson A, Voigt M and Köhler P. 2014. Estimation of vegetation photosynthetic capacity from space-based measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence for terrestrial biosphere models. Global Change Biology, 20(12): 3727–3742
  78. 78.
    Zhang Y G, Guanter L, Berry J A, van der Tol C, Yang X, Tang J W and Zhang F M. 2016. Model-based analysis of the relationship between sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and gross primary production for remote sensing applications. Remote Sensing of Environment, 187: 145–155
  79. 79.
    Zhang Y J, Liu L Y, Hou M Y, Liu L T and Li C D. 2009. Progress in remote sensing of vegetation chlorophyll fluorescence. Journal of Remote Sensing, 13(5): 963–978 (

Lire l'article complet

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website