Précédent|Prochain

Band selection-based collaborative representation for anomaly detection in hyperspectral images

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China

  • Email：dhzhu95@whu.edu.cn
  • Introduction： 朱德辉，1995年生，男，博士研究生，研究方向为高光谱遥感影像处理、机器学习。E-mail：dhzhu95@whu.edu.cn
ZHU Dehui1,  
  • Affiliation：

    School of Computer Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China

DU Bo2,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China

  • Email：zlp62@whu.edu.cn
  • Introduction： 张良培，1962年生，男，教授，研究方向为测绘、遥感图像处理、人工智能、模式识别。E-mail：zlp62@whu.edu.cn
ZHANG Liangpei1*

résumé

Hyperspectral images with high spectral resolution contain hundreds and even thousands of spectral bands and convey abundant spectral information to distinguish subtle spectral differences, especially between similar materials, thereby providing unique advantage for target detection. At the same time, hyperspectral images cause large number of bands and redundant information between adjacent bands. The high-dimensional data structure frequently reduces the separability between the anomaly and background classes of hyperspectral images. This study proposed a Band Selection-based Collaborative Representation (BSCR) method for hyperspectral anomaly detection to overcome these shortcomings.In BSCR, we first selected hyperspectral bands via an optimal clustering framework and obtained a set of representative bands. The separability between the anomaly and background classes enhanced. Then, we reconstructed each pixel in the image through collaborative representation. We obtained a large residual when reconstructing the anomaly pixel via collaborative representation and achieved a large output value for an anomaly pixel because of the enhanced separability between the anomaly and background classes, thereby improving the separation of the anomaly class from the background class.The proposed algorithm was tested on synthetic and real hyperspectral images. The experimental results of three hyperspectral images show that the proposed BSCR demonstrates outstanding detection performance in the receiver operating characteristic curve, area under the curve value, and separability map compared with other state-of-the-art detectors.BSCR has an improved discriminative ability to separate the target from the background. Compared with several traditional anomaly detection algorithms, BSCR enhances the separability between the target and background through band selection and can effectively separate the anomaly class from the background class in hyperspectral images. Algorithms, such as PCAroCRD, which also conduct collaborative representation after the dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral images, can remove certain anomaly pixels and make the background construction stable. However, the dimensionality reduction mode of such algorithms will change the original signal of the image, thereby making it smooth and increasing the difficulty to distinguish between anomaly and background classes. The dimensionality reduction method of the band selection in BSCR can enhance the separability between the target and background without changing the original signal of the image, thereby making it easy to distinguish when detecting anomaly pixels and enabling sufficient discriminative ability to separate the target from the background.

mots-clés

remote sensing;anomaly detection;band selection;collaborative representation;hyperspectral images;GF-5 satellite

References

  1. 1.
    Acito N, Matteoli S, Rossi A, Diani M and Corsini G . 2016. Hyperspectral airborne “viareggio 2013 trial” data collection for detection algorithm assessment. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 9(6): 2365-2376
  2. 2.
    Banerjee A, Burlina P and Diehl C . 2006. A support vector method for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(8): 2282-2291
  3. 3.
    Billor N, Hadi A S and Velleman P F . 2000. BACON: blocked adaptive computationally efficient outlier nominators. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 34(3): 279-298
  4. 4.
    Carlotto M J . 2005. A cluster-based approach for detecting man-made objects and changes in imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(2): 374-387
  5. 5.
    Chang C I and Chang S S . 2002. Anomaly detection and classification for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40(6): 1314-1325
  6. 6.
    Chang S Z, Du B and Zhang L P . 2018. BASO: a background-anomaly component projection and separation optimized filter for anomaly detection in hyperspectral images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(7): 3747-3761
  7. 7.
    Dong Y N, Du B, Zhang L F and Zhang L P . 2018. Hyperspectral target detection based on locally adaptive information-theoretic metric learning method. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan Univers, 43(8): 1271-1277
  8. 8.
    Hughes G . 1968. On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 14(1): 55-63
  9. 9.
    Kang X D, Zhang X P, Li S T, Li K L, Li J and Benediktsson J A . 2017. Hyperspectral anomaly detection with attribute and edge-preserving filters. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(10): 5600-5611
  10. 10.
    Kwon H, Der S Z and Nasrabadi N M . 2003. Dual-window-based anomaly detection for hyperspectral imagery//Proceedings of SPIE Automatic Target Recognition XIII. Orlando, Florida, United States: SPIE [DOI: 10.1117/12.486056]
  11. 11.
    Kwon H and Nasrabadi N M . 2005. Kernel RX-algorithm: a nonlinear anomaly detector for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(2): 388-397
  12. 12.
    Li w Du Q . 2015. Collaborative representation for hyperspectral anomaly detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(3): 1463-1474
  13. 13.
    Manolakis D and Shaw G . 2002. Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 19(1): 29-43
  14. 14.
    Nasrabadi N M . 2014. Hyperspectral target detection: an overview of current and future challenges. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 31(1): 34-44
  15. 15.
    Reed I S and Yu X . 1990. Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 38(10): 1760-1770
  16. 16.
    Schaum A P . 2007. Hyperspectral anomaly detection beyond RX. Proceedings of SPIE Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XIII. Orlando, Florida, United States: SPIE: 656502
  17. 17.
    Su H J, Wu Z Y, Du Q and Du P J . 2018. Hyperspectral anomaly detection using collaborative representation with outlier removal. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 11(12): 5029-5038
  18. 18.
    Vane G, Goetz A F H . 1988. Terrestrial imaging spectroscopy. Remote Sensing of Environment, 24(1): 1-29
  19. 19.
    Wang Q, Zhang F H and Li X L . 2018. Optimal clustering framework for hyperspectral band selection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(10): 5910-5922
  20. 20.
    Zhang L F, Zhang L P, Tao D C, Huang X and Du B . 2014. Hyperspectral remote sensing image subpixel target detection based on supervised metric learning. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(8): 4955-4965
  21. 21.
    Zhang L F, Zhang L P and Tao D C . 2010. Tensor-based learning machine for remotely sensed image target detection. Journal of Remote Sensing. 14(3): 519—533
  22. 22.
    Zhao R, Du B and Zhang L P . 2014. A robust nonlinear hyperspectral anomaly detection approach. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 7(4): 1227-1234
  23. 23.
    Zhao R, Du B, Zhang L P and Zhang L F . 2016a. Beyond background feature extraction: an anomaly detection algorithm inspired by slowly varying signal analysis. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(3): 1757-1774
  24. 24.
    Zhao R, Du B, Zhang L P and Zhang L F . 2016b. A robust background regression based score estimation algorithm for hyperspectral anomaly detection. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 122: 126-144
  25. 25.
    Zhao R, Du B and Zhang L P . 2017. Hyperspectral anomaly detection via a sparsity score estimation framework. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(6): 3208-3222
  26. 26.
    Zhao R and Zhang L P . 2017. GSEAD: graphical scoring estimation for hyperspectral anomaly detection. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 10(2): 725-739
  27. 27.
    Zhu D H, Du B and Zhang L P . 2019. Target dictionary construction-based sparse representation hyperspectral target detection methods. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 12(4): 1254-1264

Lire l'article complet

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website