Précédent|Prochain

Comparative evaluation of simulation methods for the maximum light-use efficiency of vegetation

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

    Beijing Engineering Research Center for Global Land Remote Sensing Products, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

  • Email：zhao.cl@mail.bnu.edu.cn
  • Introduction：赵涔良，研究方向为植被生产力。E-mail： zhao.cl@mail.bnu.edu.cn
ZHAO Cenliang,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

    Beijing Engineering Research Center for Global Land Remote Sensing Products, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

  • Email：zhuwq75@bnu.edu.cn
  • Introduction：朱文泉，研究方向为植被与生态遥感。E-mail： zhuwq75@bnu.edu.cn
ZHU Wenquan*,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

    Beijing Engineering Research Center for Global Land Remote Sensing Products, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

XIE Zhiying

résumé

The light-use efficiency model is a parametric model for estimating vegetation productivity based on remote sensing data. Its core parameter, maximum light-use efficiency (LUEmax), was considered a fixed vaLUE for all vegetation types in the early stage. However, it became a parameter that varied with vegetation type since the MODIS-LUE model, and recently, it was considered to require adjusting in time according to the phenological and physiological status of vegetation. Although the current vegetation productivity estimation model based on seasonal dynamic LUEmax parameters showed a relatively higher accuracy, these studies were mostly limited to specific vegetation types or spatial scales. Thus, the applicability of different dynamic LUEmax parameters in a wider range of vegetation types or regions and the differences between geographical areas remain clear. In this paper, we presented a comparative analysis of three typical dynamic LUEmax parameter simulation methods (which are based on the chlorophyll index, leaf area index, and Markov chain Monte Carlo) by using the same dataset (FLUXNET 2015 dataset) and model structure (MODIS-LUE model structure). Results showed that the seasonal variation characteristics of three different dynamic LUEmax parameters differed significantly, generally showing three characteristics of single-peaked, U-shaped, and horizontal fluctuations in different vegetation types. The accuracy of the estimated gross primary productivity (GPP) based on dynamic LUEmax parameters was better than when the original static parameter was used, but it relied on the specific LUEmax parameter simulation method. The Markov chain Monte Carlo method had a good simulation effect on the LUEmax parameter, and its GPP estimation accuracy improved in all vegetation types at all time periods (compared to the original MODIS-LUE static LUEmax, ΔRMSE = 10.9 g/(m2·month), calculated in units of carbon), especially in closed shrub, deciduous needle-leaf forest, and evergreen broadleaf forest. These findings can provide a basis for the uncertainty analysis of light-use-efficiency-based vegetation productivity estimation and the development of new models.

mots-clés

remote sensing;vegetation productivity;gross primary productivity;light use efficiency model;maximum light use efficiency;parameter evaluation

References

  1. 1.
    Anav A, Friedlingstein P, Beer C, Ciais P, Harper A, Jones C, Murray-Tortarolo G, Papale D, Parazoo N C, Peylin P, Piao S L, Sitch S, Viovy N, Wiltshire A and Zhao M S. 2015. Spatiotemporal patterns of terrestrial gross primary production: a review. Reviews of Geophysics, 53(3): 785-818
  2. 2.
    Badgley G, Anderegg L D L, Berry J A and Field C B. 2019. Terrestrial gross primary production: Using NIRV to scale from site to globe. Global Change Biology, 25(11): 3731-3740
  3. 3.
    Chen J, Zhang H F, Liu Z R, Che M L and Chen B Z. 2014. Evaluating parameter adjustment in the modis gross primary production algorithm based on eddy covariance tower measurements. Remote Sensing, 6(4): 3321-3348
  4. 4.
    Dong J W, Xiao X M, Wagle P, Zhang G L, Zhou Y T, Jin C, Torn M S, Meyers T P, Suyker A E, Wang J B, Yan H M, Biradar C and Moore III B. 2015. Comparison of four EVI-based models for estimating gross primary production of maize and soybean croplands and tallgrass prairie under severe drought. Remote Sensing of Environment, 162: 154-168
  5. 5.
    Fang J Y, Ke J H, Tang Z Y and Chen A P. 2001. Implications and estimations of four terrestrial productivity parameters. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 25(4): 414-419
  6. 6.
    Farquhar G D, von Caemmerer S and Berry J A. 1980. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta, 149(1): 78-90
  7. 7.
    Hammer G L and Wright G C. 1994. A theoretical analysis of nitrogen and radiation effects on radiation use efficiency in peanut. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 45(3): 575-589
  8. 8.
    Hashimoto H, Wang W L, Milesi C, Xiong J, Ganguly S, Zhu Z C and Nemani R R. 2013. Structural uncertainty in model-simulated trends of global gross primary production. Remote Sensing, 5(3): 1258-1273
  9. 9.
    Houborg R, Anderson M C, Norman J M, Wilson T and Meyers T. 2009. Intercomparison of a ‘bottom-up’ and ‘top-down’ modeling paradigm for estimating carbon and energy fluxes over a variety of vegetative regimes across the U.S. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 149(11): 1875-1895
  10. 10.
    Kosugi Y, Shibata S and Kobashi S. 2003. Parameterization of the CO2 and H2O gas exchange of several temperate deciduous broad-leaved trees at the leaf scale considering seasonal changes. Plant, Cell and Environment, 26(2): 285-301
  11. 11.
    Limousin J M, Misson L, Lavoir A V, Martin N K and Rambal S. 2010. Do photosynthetic limitations of evergreen Quercus ilex leaves change with long-term increased drought severity?. Plant, Cell and Environment, 33(5): 863-875
  12. 12.
    Lin X F, Chen B Z, Chen J, Zhang H F, Sun S B, Xu G, Guo L F, Ge M Y, Qu J F, Li L J and Kong Y W. 2017. Seasonal fluctuations of photosynthetic parameters for light use efficiency models and the impacts on gross primary production estimation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 236: 22-35
  13. 13.
    Liu J, Chen J M, Cihlar J and Chen W. 2002. Net primary productivity mapped for Canada at 1-km resolution. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11(2): 115-129
  14. 14.
    Mahadevan P, Wofsy S C, Matross D M, Xiao X M, Dunn A L, Lin J C, Gerbig C, Munger J W, Chow V Y and Gottlieb E W. 2008. A satellite‐based biosphere parameterization for net ecosystem CO2 exchange: Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (VPRM). Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 22(2): GB2005
  15. 15.
    Medlyn B E. 1998. Physiological basis of the light use efficiency model. Tree Physiology, 18(3): 167-176
  16. 16.
    Medlyn B E, Loustau D and Delzon S. 2002. Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis. I. Seasonal changes in mature maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Plant, Cell and Environment, 25(9): 1155-1165
  17. 17.
    Monteith J L. 1972. Solar radiation and productivity in tropical ecosystems. Journal of Applied Ecology, 9(3): 747-766
  18. 18.
    Muramatsu K, Furumi S, Soyama N and Daigo M. 2014. Estimating the seasonal maximum light use efficiency//Proceedings of the SPIE 9260, Land Surface Remote Sensing II. Beijing: SPIE: 92603R
  19. 19.
    Potter C S, Randerson J T, Field C B, Matson P A, Vitousek P M, Mooney H A and Klooster S A. 1993. Terrestrial ecosystem production: a process model based on global satellite and surface data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 7(4): 811-841
  20. 20.
    Running S W, Nemani R, Glassy J M and Thornton P E. 1999. MODIS daily photosynthesis (PSN) and annual net primary production (NPP) product (MOD17) Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document[EB/OL]. University of Montana, SCF At-Launch Algorithm ATBD Documents. .
  21. 21.
    Running S W, Thornton P E, Nemani R and Glassy J M. 2000. Global terrestrial gross and net primary productivity from the earth observing system//Sala O E, Jackson R B, Mooney H A and Howarth R W, eds. Methods in Ecosystem Science. New York: Springer: 44-57
  22. 22.
    Teh C B S, Simmonds L P and Wheeler T R. 2000. An equation for irregular distributions of leaf azimuth density. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 102(4): 223-234
  23. 23.
    Thanyapraneedkul J, Muramatsu K, Daigo M, Furumi S, Soyama N, Nasahara K N, Muraoka H, Noda H M, Nagai S, Maeda T, Mano M and Mizoguchi Y. 2012. A vegetation index to estimate terrestrial gross primary production capacity for the global change observation mission-climate (GCOM-C)/second-generation global imager (SGLI) satellite sensor. Remote Sensing, 4(12): 3689-3720
  24. 24.
    Turner D P, Ritts W D, Styles J M, Yang Z, Cohen W B, Law B E and Thornton P E. 2006. A diagnostic carbon flux model to monitor the effects of disturbance and interannual variation in climate on regional NEP. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 58(5): 476-490
  25. 25.
    Veroustraete F, Patyn J and Myneni R B. 1994. Forcing of a simple ecosystem model with fapar and climatic data to estimate regional scale photosynthetic assimilation//Veroustraete F, Ceulemans R, Impens I and Van Rensbergen J, eds. Vegetation Modelling and Climate Change Effects. The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing: 151-177
  26. 26.
    Willmott C J, Ackleson S G, Davis R E, Feddema J J, Klink K M, Legates D R, O’Donnell J and Rowe C M. 1985. Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 90(C5): 8995-9005
  27. 27.
    Willmott C J and Matsuura K. 2005. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Research, 30(1): 79-82
  28. 28.
    Wu C Y, Niu Z and Gao S. 2010. Gross primary production estimation from MODIS data with vegetation index and photosynthetically active radiation in maize. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 115(D12): D12127
  29. 29.
    Xiao X M, Hollinger D, Aber J, Goltz M, Davidson E A, Zhang Q Y and Moore III B. 2004. Satellite-based modeling of gross primary production in an evergreen needleleaf forest. Remote Sensing of Environment, 89(4): 519-534
  30. 30.
    Xiao X M, Zhang Q Y, Hollinger D, Aber J and Moore III B. 2005. Modeling gross primary production of an evergreen needleleaf forest using modis and climate data. Ecological Applications, 15(3): 954-969
  31. 31.
    Xin Q C, Gong P, Suyker A E and Si Y L. 2016. Effects of the partitioning of diffuse and direct solar radiation on satellite-based modeling of crop gross primary production. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 50: 51-63
  32. 32.
    Xu L K and Baldocchi D D. 2003. Seasonal trends in photosynthetic parameters and stomatal conductance of bLUE oak (Quercus douglasii) under prolonged summer drought and high temperature. Tree Physiology, 23(13): 865-877
  33. 33.
    Yuan W P, Cai W W, Liu D and Dong W J. 2014. Satellite-based vegetation production models of terrestrial ecosystem: an overview. Advances in Earth Science, 29(5): 541-550
  34. 34.
    Yuan W P, Cai W W, Xia J Z, Chen J Q, Liu S G, Dong W J, Merbold L, Law B, Arain A, Beringer J, Bernhofer C, Black A, Blanken P D, Cescatti A, Chen Y, Francois L, Gianelle D, Janssens I A, Jung M, Kato T, Kiely G, Liu D, Marcolla B, Montagnani L, Raschi A, Roupsard O, Varlagin A and Wohlfahrt G. 2014. Global comparison of light use efficiency models for simulating terrestrial vegetation gross primary production based on the LaThuile database. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 192-193: 108-120
  35. 35.
    Yuan W P, Liu S G, Zhou G S, Zhou G Y, Tieszen L L, Baldocchi D, Bernhofer C, Gholz H, Goldstein A H, Goulden M L, Hollinger D Y, Hu Y M, Law B E, Stoy P C, Vesala T and Wofsy S C. 2007. Deriving a light use efficiency model from eddy covariance flux data for predicting daily gross primary production across biomes. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 143(3/4): 189-207
  36. 36.
    Zhou X W and Xin Q C. 2019. Improving satellite-based modelling of gross primary production in deciduous broadleaf forests by accounting for seasonality in light use efficiency. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 40(3): 931-955
  37. 37.
    Zhu G F, Li X, Su Y H, Lu L, Huang C L and Niinemets Ü. 2011. Seasonal fluctuations and temperature dependence in photosynthetic parameters and stomatal conductance at the leaf scale of Populus euphratica Oliv. Tree Physiology, 31(2): 178-195
  38. 38.
    Zhu W Q, Pan Y Z, He H, Yu D Y and Hu H B. 2006. Simulation of maximum light use efficiency for some typical vegetation types in China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 51(4): 457-463
  39. 39.
    Zhu W Q, Pan Y Z and Zhang J S. 2007. Estimation of net primary productivity of Chinese terrestrial vegetation based on remote sensing. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 31(3): 413-424

Lire l'article complet

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website