État actuel et perspectives de la télédétection active des nuages embarquée

  • role: First author第一作者
  • Affiliation:

    Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

    School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

  • Email:cassie320@163.com
  • Introduction:E-mail cassie320@163.com
KOU Leilei12,  
  • role: Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation:

    Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

    School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

  • Email:yuanzineng@126.com
  • Introduction:E-mailyuanzineng@126.com
GAO Haiyang12*,  
  • Affiliation:

    School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

LIN Zhengjian2,  
  • Affiliation:

    School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

LIAO Shujun2,  
  • Affiliation:

    Shanghai Institute of Satellite Engineering, Shanghai 201109, China

DING Piman3,  
  • Affiliation:

    Shanghai Institute of Satellite Engineering, Shanghai 201109, China

ZHU Wei3,  
  • Affiliation:

    National Satellite Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081, China

SHANG Jian4,  
  • Affiliation:

    National Satellite Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081, China

HU Xiuqing4

résumé

Les nuages sont un indicateur important des changements météorologiques et climatiques, jouant un rôle crucial dans la distribution de l'énergie atmosphérique et le transfert radiatif. La télédétection satellitaire, avec sa large couverture, son volume important d'informations et sa fréquence de répétition élevée, est devenue le principal moyen d'étude des nuages. Actuellement, les techniques actives de télédétection des nuages embarquées comprennent principalement les radars millimétriques et les lidars. Cet article présente l'évolution des techniques de mesure des nuages par radar millimétrique et lidar embarqués ainsi que l'état des recherches sur l'application des données. L'accent est mis sur l'analyse des résultats des observations conjointes du radar de profil des nuages CPR embarqué sur CloudSat et du lidar aérosol-lumière CALIOP embarqué sur CALIPSO, ainsi que sur les besoins de développement futur. À partir de l'analyse des besoins en paramètres structuraux tridimensionnels des nuages à l'échelle mondiale, sont discutés le développement et le potentiel d'application des nouvelles technologies de mesure des nuages comme le radar térahertz, le lidar hyperspectral, la fusion de données multisenseurs, ainsi que les clés technologiques et l'influence de l'altitude orbitale sur les performances de détection dans les nouveaux modes d'observation coopérative, notamment les systèmes multi-satellites et les plateformes multi-charges sur un seul satellite. Une proposition est faite pour une observation coopérative multi-senseurs sur une même plateforme et pour la fusion des données afin d'étudier l'information structurale tridimensionnelle des nuages.

mots-clés

mesure des nuages par satellite; télédétection active; radar millimétrique embarqué; lidar embarqué; observation coopérative; fusion de données

References

  1. 1.
    Adhikari L and Wang Z E. 2013. An A-train satellite based stratiform mixed-phase cloud retrieval algorithm by combining active and passive sensor measurements. British Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 3(4): 587-611
  2. 2.
    Adhikari L, Wang Z E and Deng M. 2012. Seasonal variations of Antarctic clouds observed by CloudSat and CALIPSO satellites. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 117(D4): D04202
  3. 3.
    Austin R T, Heymsfield A J and Stephens G L. 2009. Retrieval of ice cloud microphysical parameters using the CloudSat millimeter-wave radar and temperature. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 114(D8): D00A23
  4. 4.
    Barker H W, Jerg M P, Wehr T, Kato S, Donovan D P and Hogan R J. 2011. A 3D cloud-construction algorithm for the EarthCARE satellite mission. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 137(657): 1042-1058
  5. 5.
    Battaglia A, Dhillon R and Illingworth A. 2018. Doppler W-band polarization diversity space-borne radar simulator for wind studies. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 11(11): 5965-5979
  6. 6.
    Battaglia A, Kollias P, Dhillon R, Roy R, Tanelli S, Lamer K, Grecu M, Lebsock M, Watters D, Mroz K, Heymsfield G, Li L H and Furukawa K. 2020. Spaceborne cloud and precipitation radars: status, challenges, and ways forward. Reviews of Geophysics, 58(3): e2019RG000686
  7. 7.
    Battaglia A, Westbrook C D, Kneifel S, Kollias P, Humpage N, Löhnert U, Tyynelä J and Petty G W. 2014. G band atmospheric radars: new frontiers in cloud physics. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 7(6): 1527-1546
  8. 8.
    Carminati F, Atkinson N, Candy B and Lu Q F. 2021. Insights into the microwave instruments onboard the Fengyun 3D satellite: data quality and assimilation in the Met office NWP system. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 38(8): 1379-1396
  9. 9.
    Casella D, Panegrossi G, Sanò P, Marra A C, Dietrich S, Johnson B T and Kulie M S. 2017. Evaluation of the GPM-DPR snowfall detection capability: comparison with CloudSat-CPR. Atmospheric Research, 197: 64-75
  10. 10.
    Chen G, Yang J, Zhang B T and Ma C Y. 2019. Thoughts and prospects on the new generation of marine science satellites. Periodical of Ocean University of China, 49(10): 110-117
  11. 11.
    Chen T M, Guo J P, Li Z Q, Zhao C F, Liu H, Cribb M, Wang F and He J. 2016. A CloudSat perspective on the cloud climatology and its association with aerosol perturbations in the vertical over eastern China. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 73(9): 3599-3616
  12. 12.
    Chen Z T and Sun X B. 2019. Dynamic spatial fusion of cloud top phase from PARASOL, CALIPSO, CloudSat satellite data. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 224: 176-184
  13. 13.
    Chepfer H, Bony S, Winker D, Chiriaco M, Dufresne J L and Sèze G. 2008. Use of CALIPSO lidar observations to evaluate the cloudiness simulated by a climate model. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(15): L15704
  14. 14.
    Da Silva A M, Maring H, Seidel F, Behrenfeld M, Ferrare R and Mace G. 2020. Aerosol, cloud, ecosystems (ACE) final study report. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center. [2020-09-17]
  15. 15.
    Das S K, Golhait P B and Uma K N. 2017. Clouds vertical properties over the Northern Hemisphere monsoon regions from CloudSat-CALIPSO measurements. Atmospheric Research, 183: 73-83
  16. 16.
    Deng M, Mace G G, Wang Z E and Berry E. 2015. CloudSat 2C-ICE product update with a new Ze parameterization in lidar-only region. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 120(23): 12198-12208
  17. 17.
    Devasthale A and Thomas M A. 2011. A global survey of aerosol-liquid water cloud overlap based on four years of CALIPSO-CALIOP data. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11(3): 1143-1154
  18. 18.
    Ding S G, Zhao C S, Shi G Y and Wu C A. 2005. Analysis of global total cloud amount variation over the past 20 years. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 16(5): 670-677
  19. 19.
    Do Carmo J P, De Villele G, Helière A, Wallace K, Lefebvre A and Chassat F. 2019. ATLID, ESA atmospheric backscatter LIDAR for the ESA EarthCARE mission. CEAS Space Journal, 11(4): 423-435
  20. 20.
    Dodson J B, Taylor P C and Branson M. 2018. Microphysical variability of Amazonian deep convective cores observed by CloudSat and simulated by a multi-scale modeling framework. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18(9): 6493-6510
  21. 21.
    Donaldson Jr R J. 1955. The measurement of cloud liquid-water content by radar. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 12(3): 238-244
  22. 22.
    Fu Y F. 2018. Research actuality of remote sensing on cloud precipitation and reflections on summer East Asian cloud precipitation. Torrential Rain and Disasters, 37(6): 493-501
  23. 23.
    Galletti M, Huang D and Kollias P. 2014. Zenith/nadir pointing mm-wave radars: linear or circular polarization?. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(1): 628-639
  24. 24.
    Grenier P and Blanchet J P. 2010. Investigation of the sulphate-induced freezing inhibition effect from CloudSat and CALIPSO measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 115(D22): D22205
  25. 25.
    Grenier P, Blanchet J P and Muñoz‐Alpizar R. 2009. Study of polar thin ice clouds and aerosols seen by CloudSat and CALIPSO during midwinter 2007. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 114(D9): D09201
  26. 26.
    Guo J J, Yan Z A, Wu S H, Song X Q and Liu Z S. 2008. Low level atmospheric temperature measurement with high spectral resolution lidar. Journal of Optoelectronics Laser, 19(1): 66-69
  27. 27.
    Guo J P, Liu B M, Gong W, Shi L J, Zhang Y, Ma Y Y, Zhang J, Chen T M, Bai K X, Stoffelen A, De Leeuw G and Xu X F. 2021. Technical note: First comparison of wind observations from ESA’s satellite mission Aeolus and ground-based radar wind profiler network of China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21(4): 2945-2958
  28. 28.
    Guo J P, Liu H, Wang F, Huang J F, Xia F, Lou M Y, Wu Y R, Jiang J H, Xie T, Zhaxi Y Z and Yung Y L. 2016. Three-dimensional structure of aerosol in China: A perspective from multi-satellite observations. Atmospheric Research, 178-179: 580-589
  29. 29.
    Guo J P, Lou M Y, Miao Y C, Wang Y, Zeng Z L, Liu H, He J, Xu H, Wang F, Min M and Zhai P M. 2017. Trans-Pacific transport of dust aerosols from East Asia: Insights gained from multiple observations and modeling. Environmental Pollution, 230: 1030-1039
  30. 30.
    Guo Z and Zhou T J. 2015. Seasonal variation and physical properties of the cloud system over southeastern China derived from CloudSat products. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 32(5): 659-670
  31. 31.
    Hashino T, Satoh M, Hagihara Y, Kubota T, Matsui T, Nasuno T and Okamoto H. 2013. Evaluating cloud microphysics from NICAM against CloudSat and CALIPSO. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118(13): 7273-7292
  32. 32.
    Hélière A, Gelsthorpe R, Le Hors L and Toulemont Y. 2017. ATLID, the atmospheric lidar on board the Earthcare Satellite//Proceedings of the SPIE 10564, International Conference on Space Optics. Ajaccio: SPIE: 105642D
  33. 33.
    Helière A, Wallace K, Do Carmo P J, Eisinger M, Wehr T and Lefebvre A. 2017. EarthCARE instruments description , ESA (European Space Agency) Report . [2017-05-24]. [2017-05-24]
  34. 34.
    Holzworth G C and Edinger J G. 1960. Angcl observations with the AN/TPQ-6 at Santa Monica, Calif//Proceedings of the Eighth Weather Radar Conference, San Francisco, California: 135-142
  35. 35.
    Hu Z Y, Zhao C, Huang J P, Leung L R, Qian Y, Yu H B, Huang L and Kalashnikova O V. 2016. Trans-Pacific transport and evolution of aerosols: evaluation of quasi-global WRF-Chem simulation with multiple observations. Geoscientific Model Development, 9(5): 1725-1746
  36. 36.
    Huang J, Fu Q, Su J, Tang Q, Minnis P, Hu Y, Yi Y and Zhao Q. 2009. Taklimakan dust aerosol radiative heating derived from CALIPSO observations using the Fu-Liou radiation model with CERES constraints. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 9(12): 4011-4021
  37. 37.
    Huang J F, Guo J P, Wang F, Liu Z Y, Jeong M J, Yu H B and Zhang Z B. 2015. CALIPSO inferred most probable heights of global dust and smoke layers. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 120(10): 5085-5100
  38. 38.
    Hunt W H, Winker D M, Vaughan M A, Powell K A, Lucker P L and Weimer C. 2009. CALIPSO lidar description and performance assessment. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 26(7): 1214-1228
  39. 39.
    Illingworth A J, Barker H W, Beljaars A, Ceccaldi M, Chepfer H, Clerbaux N, Cole J, Delanoë J, Domenech C, Donovan D P, Fukuda S, Hirakata M, Hogan R J, Huenerbein A, Kollias P, Kubota T, Nakajima T, Nakajima T Y, Nishizawa T, Ohno Y, Okamoto H, Oki R, Sato K, Satoh M, Shephard M W, Velázquez-Blázquez A, Wandinger U, Wehr T and Van Zadelhoff G J. 2015. The EarthCARE satellite: the next step forward in global measurements of clouds, aerosols, precipitation, and radiation. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 96(8): 1311-1332
  40. 40.
    Im E, Durden S L, Li F K, Wu C and Haddad Z S. 2001. CloudSat radar instrument design and development status//IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217). Sydney, Australia: IEEE: 691-693
  41. 41.
    Kalesse H, Kollias P and Szyrmer W. 2013. On using the relationship between Doppler velocity and radar reflectivity to identify microphysical processes in midlatitudinal ice clouds. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118(21): 12168-12179
  42. 42.
    Kato S, Rose F G, Sun-Mack S, Miller W F, Chen Y, Rutan D A, Stephens G L, Loeb N G, Minnis P, Wielicki B A, Winker D M, Charlock T P, Stackhouse Jr P W, Xu K M and Collins W D. 2011. Improvements of top-of-atmosphere and surface irradiance computations with CALIPSO-, CloudSat-, and MODIS-derived cloud and aerosol properties. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 116(D19): D19209
  43. 43.
    Kato S, Sun-Mack S, Miller W F, Rose F G, Chen Y, Minnis P and Wielicki B A. 2010. Relationships among cloud occurrence frequency, overlap, and effective thickness derived from CALIPSO and CloudSat merged cloud vertical profiles. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 115(D4): D00H28
  44. 44.
    Kollias P, Clothiaux E E, Ackerman T P, Albrecht B A, Widener K B, Moran K P, Luke E P, Johnson K L, Bharadwaj N, Mead J B, Miller M A, Verlinde J, Marchand R T and Mace G G. 2016. Development and applications of ARM millimeter-wavelength cloud radars. Meteorological Monographs, 57(1): 17.1-17.19
  45. 45.
    Kollias P, Clothiaux E E, Miller M A, Albrecht B A, Stephens G L and Ackerman T P. 2007. Millimeter-wavelength radars: new frontier in atmospheric cloud and precipitation research. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 88(10): 1608-1624
  46. 46.
    Kukulies J, Chen D L and Wang M H. 2019. Temporal and spatial variations of convection and precipitation over the Tibetan Plateau based on recent satellite observations. Part I: cloud climatology derived from CloudSat and CALIPSO. International Journal of Climatology, 39(14): 5396-5412
  47. 47.
    LaBelle R, Girard R and Arbery G. 2003. A 94 GHz RF electronics subsystem for the CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar//33rd European Microwave Conference Proceedings. Munich: IEEE: 1139-1142
  48. 48.
    L’Ecuyer T S and Jiang J H. 2011. Touring the atmosphere aboard the A-train. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1401(1): 245-256
  49. 49.
    L’Ecuyer T S, Wood N B, Haladay T, Stephens G L and Stackhouse Jr P W. 2008. Impact of clouds on atmospheric heating based on the R04 CloudSat fluxes and heating rates data set. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 113(D8): D00A15
  50. 50.
    Li J, Qin Z K and Liu G Q. 2016. A new generation of Chinese FY-3C microwave sounding measurements and the initial assessments of its observations. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 37(17): 4035-4058
  51. 51.
    Li L H, Heymsfield G M, Racette P E, Tian L and Zenker E. 2004. A 94-GHz cloud radar system on a NASA high-altitude ER-2 aircraft. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 21(9): 1378-1388
  52. 52.
    Li Z Q, Barker H W and Moreau L. 1995. The variable effect of clouds on atmospheric absorption of solar radiation. Nature, 376(6540): 486-490
  53. 53.
    Liu B M, Ma Y Y, Gong W, Zhang M, Wang W and Shi Y F. 2018. Comparison of AOD from CALIPSO, MODIS, and sun photometer under different conditions over Central China. Scientific Reports, 8(1): 10066.
  54. 54.
    Liu Y H, Key J R, Ackerman S A, Mace G G and Zhang Q Q. 2012. Arctic cloud macrophysical characteristics from CloudSat and CALIPSO. Remote Sensing of Environment, 124: 159-173
  55. 55.
    Liu Y M, Yan Y F, Lv J H and Liu X L. 2018. Review of current investigations of cloud, radiation and rainfall over the Tibetan Plateau with the CloudSat/CALIPSO dataset. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 42(4): 847-858
  56. 56.
    Liu Z Y, Vaughan M, Winker D, Kittaka C, Getzewich B, Kuehn R, Omar A, Powell K, Trepte C and Hostetler C. 2009. The CALIPSO lidar cloud and aerosol discrimination: version 2 algorithm and initial assessment of performance. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 26(7): 1198-1213
  57. 57.
    Lu N M, Min M, Dong L X, Guo J P, Niu T, Liu H L, Bi Y M, Wang X and Chen L. 2016. Development and prospect of spaceborne LiDAR for atmospheric detection. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(1): 1-10
  58. 58.
    Luo Z Z, Liu G Y and Stephens G L. 2008. CloudSat adding new insight into tropical penetrating convection. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(19): L19819
  59. 59.
    Lux O, Lemmerz C, Weiler F, Marksteiner U, Witschas B, Rahm S, Geiß A and Reitebuch O. 2020. Intercomparison of wind observations from the European Space Agency’s Aeolus satellite mission and the ALADIN Airborne Demonstrator. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 13(4): 2075-2097
  60. 60.
    Mace G G, Zhang Q Q, Vaughan M, Marchand R, Stephens G L, Trepte C and Winker D M. 2009. A description of hydrometeor layer occurrence statistics derived from the first year of merged Cloudsat and CALIPSO data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 114(D8): D00A26
  61. 61.
    Mao F Y, Zhao M D, Gong W, Chen L Z and Liang Z X. 2021. Layer detection algorithm for CALIPSO observation based on automatic segmentation with a minimum cost function. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 261: 107498
  62. 62.
    Marchand R, Haynes J, Mace G G, Ackerman T and Stephens G. 2009. A comparison of simulated cloud radar output from the multiscale modeling framework global climate model with CloudSat cloud radar observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 114(D8): D00A20
  63. 63.
    Marini A E. 1998. ATLID: the technology development programme for ESA’s satellite-borne atmospheric lidar .ESA Bulletin, [1998-08-15]
  64. 64.
    Matrosov S Y. 2011. CloudSat measurements of landfalling hurricanes Gustav and Ike (2008). Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 116(D1): D01203
  65. 65.
    Min M, Wang P C, Campbell J R, Zong X M and Li Y. 2010. Midlatitude cirrus cloud radiative forcing over China. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 115(D20): D20210
  66. 66.
    Mu Y J, Wan Y, Liu J Q, Hou X and Chen W B. 2018. Optomechanical analysis and optimization of spaceborne lidar telescope primary mirror. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 47(7): 0718002
  67. 67.
    Müller D, Hostetler C A, Ferrare R A, Burton S P, Chemyakin E, Kolgotin A, Hair J W, Cook A L, Harper D B, Rogers R R, Hare R W, Cleckner C S, Obland M D, Tomlinson J, Berg L K and Schmid B. 2014. Airborne Multiwavelength High Spectral Resolution Lidar (HSRL-2) observations during TCAP 2012: vertical profiles of optical and microphysical properties of a smoke/urban haze plume over the northeastern coast of the US. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 7(10): 3487-3496
  68. 68.
    Nam C C W and Quaas J. 2012. Evaluation of clouds and precipitation in the ECHAM5 general circulation model using CALIPSO and CloudSat satellite data. Journal of Climate, 25(14): 4975-4992
  69. 69.
    Nazaryan H, McCormick M P and Menzel W P. 2008. Global characterization of cirrus clouds using CALIPSO data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 113(D16): D16211
  70. 70.
    Norin L, Devasthale A, L’Ecuyer T S, Wood N B and Smalley M. 2015. Intercomparison of snowfall estimates derived from the CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar and the ground-based weather radar network over Sweden. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 8(12): 5009-5021
  71. 71.
    Pan H L, Bu L B, Kumar K R, Gao H Y, Huang X Y and Zhang W T. 2017. A new retrieval method for the ice water content of cirrus using data from the CloudSat and CALIPSO. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 161: 134-142
  72. 72.
    Parkinson C L. 2003. Aqua: An Earth-observing satellite mission to examine water and other climate variables. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(2): 173-183
  73. 73.
    Pitts M C, Poole L R and Thomason L W. 2009. CALIPSO polar stratospheric cloud observations: Second-generation detection algorithm and composition discrimination. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 9(19): 7577-7589
  74. 74.
    Qiu J H, Lv D R, Chen H B, Wang G C and Shi G Y. 2003. Modern research progresses in atmospheric physics. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 27(4): 628-652
  75. 75.
    Qiu J W, Xia H Y, Shangguan M J, Dou X K, Li M Y, Wang C, Shang X, Lin S F and Liu J J. 2017. Micro-pulse polarization lidar at 1.5 μm using a single superconducting nanowire single-photon detector. Optics Letters, 42(21): 4454-4457
  76. 76.
    Qiu Y J and Wang H A. 2017. The vertical distribution of cloud properties in two regions of northern China based on CloudSat/CALIPSO data. Transactions of Atmospheric Sciences, 40(4): 553-561
  77. 77.
    Randall D, Khairoutdinov M, Arakawa A and Grabowski W. 2003. Breaking the cloud parameterization deadlock. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 84(11): 1547-1564
  78. 78.
    Sassen K and Wang Z E. 2008. Classifying clouds around the globe with the CloudSat radar: 1-year of results. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(4): L04805
  79. 79.
    Sekiyama T T, Tanaka T Y, Shimizu A and Miyoshi T. 2010. Data assimilation of CALIPSO aerosol observations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10(1): 39-49
  80. 80.
    Shang J, Wu Q, Dou F L and An D W. 2018. Requirements index analysis and demonstration of spaceborne terahertz cloud measuring radar. Meteorological and Environmental Sciences, 41(1): 125-131
  81. 81.
    Shang J, Yang H, Yin H G, Wu Q and Guo Y. 2012. First results from field campaign of spaceborne precipitation radar in China: radar performance analysis. Journal of Remote Sensing, 16(3): 435-447
  82. 82.
    Shao J F, Hua D X, Wang L, Wang D and Pan R. 2020. Development of ultraviolet dual-wavelength lidar and analysis of its signal-to-noise ratio. Acta Optica Sinica, 40(12): 1201004
  83. 83.
    Skofronick-Jackson G, Kirschbaum D, Petersen W, Huffman G, Kidd C, Stocker E and Kakar R. 2018. The global precipitation measurement (GPM) mission’s scientific achievements and societal contributions: reviewing four years of advanced rain and snow observations. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 144(S1): 27-48
  84. 84.
    Song C B and Zhao Y M. 2017. Development status and direction of spaceborne Lidar and radar for cloud and aerosol remote sensing. Journal of Telemetry, Tracking and Command, 38(6): 10-16
  85. 85.
    Stephens G L. 2005. Cloud feedbacks in the climate system: a critical review. Journal of Climate, 18(2): 237-273
  86. 86.
    Stephens G L, Vane D G, Boain R J, Mace G G, Sassen K, Wang Z E, Illingworth A J, O’connor E J, Rossow W B, Durden S L, Miller S D, Austin R T, Benedetti A, Mitrescu C and The CloudSat Science Team. 2002. The CloudSat mission and the A-Train. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 83(12): 1771-1790
  87. 87.
    Stephens G L, Vane D G, Tanelli S, Im E, Durden S, Rokey M, Reinke D, Partain P, Mace G G, Austin R, L’Ecuyer T, Haynes J, Lebsock M, Suzuki K, Waliser D, Wu D, Kay J, Gettelman A, Wang Z E and Marchand R. 2008. CloudSat mission: performance and early science after the first year of operation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 113(D8): D00A18
  88. 88.
    Stephens G, Winker D, Pelon J, Trepte C, Vane D, Yuhas C, L’Ecuyer T and Lebsock M. 2018. CloudSat and CALIPSO within the A-Train: Ten years of actively observing the Earth system. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 99(3): 569-581
  89. 89.
    Takahashi H, Suzuki K and Stephens G. 2017. Land-ocean differences in the warm-rain formation process in satellite and ground-based observations and model simulations. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 143(705): 1804-1815
  90. 90.
    Tanelli S, Durden S L, Im E, Pak K S, Reinke D G, Partain P, Haynes J M and Marchand R T. 2008. CloudSat’s cloud profiling radar after two years in orbit: performance, calibration, and processing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46(11): 3560-3573
  91. 91.
    Tang Y H, Zhou Y Q, Cai M and Ma Q R. 2020. Global distribution of clouds based on CloudSat and CALIPSO combined observations. Transactions of Atmospheric Sciences, 43(5): 917-931
  92. 92.
    Tian X M, Liu D, Xu J W, Wang Z Z, Wang B X, Wu D C, Zhong Z Q, Xie C B and Wang Y J. 2018. Review of lidar technology for atmosphere monitoring. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 13(5): 321-341
  93. 93.
    Tomiyama N, Tomita E, Furukawa K, Nakatsuka H, Seki Y, Aida Y, Okada K, Maruyama K, Ishii Y, Ohno Y, Horie H and Satoh K. 2020. EarthCARE/CPR development status and performance//Proceedings of the SPIE 11531, Remote Sensing of Clouds and the Atmosphere XXV. United Kingdom: SPIE: 115310K
  94. 94.
    Varnai T and Marshak A. 2011. Global CALIPSO observations of aerosol changes near clouds. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 8(1): 19-23
  95. 95.
    Vernier J P, Thomason L W and Kar J. 2011. CALIPSO detection of an Asian tropopause aerosol layer. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(7): L07804
  96. 96.
    Wang F, Guo J P, Zhang J H, Huang J F, Min M, Chen T M, Liu H, Deng M J and Li X W. 2015. Multi-sensor quantification of aerosol-induced variability in warm clouds over eastern China. Atmospheric Environment, 113: 1-9
  97. 97.
    Wang H, Luo Y L and Zhang R H. 2011. Analyzing seasonal variation of clouds over the Asian monsoon regions and the Tibetan Plateau region using CloudSat/CALIPSO data. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 35(6): 1117-1131
  98. 98.
    Wang P and Wang H T. 2017. Discussion of spaceborne Terahertz active cloud profiling radar. Journal of Terahertz Science and Electronic Information Technology, 15(5): 733-739
  99. 99.
    Wang S H, Han Z G, Yao Z G and Zhao Z L. 2011. An analysis of cloud types and macroscopic characteristics over China and its neighborhood based on the CloudSat data. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 69(5): 883-899
  100. 100.
    Wang T, Fetzer E J, Wong S, Kahn B H and Yue Q. 2016. Validation of MODIS cloud mask and multilayer flag using CloudSat-CALIPSO cloud profiles and a cross-reference of their cloud classifications. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 121(19): 11620-11635
  101. 101.
    Weisz E, Li J, Menzel W P, Heidinger A K, Kahn B H and Liu C Y. 2007. Comparison of AIRS, MODIS, CloudSat and CALIPSO cloud top height retrievals. Geophysical Research Letters, 34(17): L17811
  102. 102.
    Winker D M, Couch R H and McCormick M P. 1996. An overview of LITE: NASA’s Lidar in-space technology experiment. Proceedings of the IEEE, 84(2): 164-180
  103. 103.
    Winker D M, Pelon J, Coakley Jr J A, Ackerman S A, Charlson R J, Colarco P R, Flamant P, Fu Q, Hoff R M, Kittaka C, Kubar T L, Le Treut H, Mccormick M P, Mégie G, Poole L, Powell K, Trepte C, Vaughan M A and Wielicki B A. 2010. The CALIPSO mission: a global 3D view of aerosols and clouds. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 91(9): 1211-1230
  104. 104.
    Winker D M, Vaughan M A, Omar A, Hu Y X, Powell K A, Liu Z Y, Hunt W H and Young S A. 2009. Overview of the CALIPSO mission and CALIOP data processing algorithms. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 26(11): 2310-2323
  105. 105.
    Wu J X, Dou F L, An D W, Gu Y, Zhou Q and Liu W. 2019. Sensitivity of dual wavelength reflectivity ratio of 94/220 GHz space-borne radar to cloud parameters with non-spherical ice crystals. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 77(3): 529-540
  106. 106.
    Wu Q, Yang M L, Dou F L, Guo Y and An D W. 2018. A study of cloud parameters retrieval algorithm for spaceborne millimeter wavelength cloud radar. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 76(1): 160-168
  107. 107.
    Xie Y Y, Liu J Q, Jiang J X and Chen W B. 2014. Wavelengths optimization to decrease error for a space-borne lidar measuring CO2 concentration. Infrared and laser engineering, 43(1): 88-93
  108. 108.
    Xiong X, Angal A, Wu A, Barnes W and Salomonson V. 2016. Terra and Aqua MODIS instrument performance//2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Beijing: IEEE: 7388-7391
  109. 109.
    Xu J J, Bu L B, Liu J Q, Zhang Y, Zhu S Z, Wang Q, Zhu X P and Chen W B. 2020. Airborne high-spectral-resolution lidar for atmospheric aerosol detection. Chinese Journal of lasers, 47(7): 0710003
  110. 110.
    Yan W, Ren J Q, Lu W and Wu X. 2011. Cloud phase discrimination technology based on spaceborne millimeter wave radar and lidar data. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 30(1): 68-73
  111. 111.
    Yan W, Yang H L and Zhou XW. 2008. A-train satellite formation and its application to cloud research. Remote Sensing Information, (2): 93-96
  112. 112.
    Yang B Y, Wu X J and Guo Z. 2017. The characteristics of cloud properties in deep convective clouds across China with the CloudSat dataset. Plateau Meteorology, 36(6): 1655-1664
  113. 113.
    Yu C R, Liu Z S, Bi D C, Li Z G and Liu B Y. 2013. Comparison of simulated performance of filters in space-borne wind lidar system. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 30(5): 615-620
  114. 114.
    Yu H B, Chin M, Winker D M, Omar A H, Liu Z Y, Kittaka C and Diehl T. 2010. Global view of aerosol vertical distributions from CALIPSO lidar measurements and GOCART simulations: Regional and seasonal variations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 115(D4): D00H30
  115. 115.
    Yu L, Fu Y F, Yang Y J, Li R, Qiu X X and Cai H K. 2018. Assessment of longwave radiative effect of nighttime cirrus based on CloudSat and CALIPSO measurements and single-column radiative transfer simulations. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 221: 87-97
  116. 116.
    Zhai X C, Marksteiner U, Weiler F, Lemmerz C, Lux O, Witschas B and Reitebuch O. 2020. Rayleigh wind retrieval for the ALADIN airborne demonstrator of the Aeolus mission using simulated response calibration. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 13(2): 445-465
  117. 117.
    Zhang D A, Liu D, Luo T, Wang Z E and Yin Y C. 2015. Aerosol impacts on cloud thermodynamic phase change over East Asia observed with CALIPSO and CloudSat measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 120(4): 1490-1501
  118. 118.
    Zhang D M, Wang Z E and Liu D. 2010. A global view of midlevel liquid-layer topped stratiform cloud distribution and phase partition from CALIPSO and CloudSat measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 115(D4): D00H13
  119. 119.
    Zhang H, Yang B Y, Peng J, Wang Z L and Jing X W. 2015. The characteristics of cloud microphysical properties in East Asia with the CloudSat dataset. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 39(2): 235-248
  120. 120.
    Zhao Y F, Wang D H and Yin J F. 2014. A study on cloud microphysical characteristics over the Tibetan plateau using CloudSat data. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 30(2): 239-248
  121. 121.
    Zheng J Y, Liu D, Wang Z E, Tian X M, Wang Y J and Xie C B. 2018. Global distribution and seasonal variation of clouds observed from CloudSat/CALIPSO. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 76(3): 420-433
  122. 122.
    Zhong L Z, Liu L P and Ge R S. 2009. Characteristics about the millimeter-wavelength radar and its status and prospect in and abroad. Advances in Earth Science, 24(4): 383-391

Lire l'article complet

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website