Précédent|Prochain

Extraction method of burned area using GF-1 WFV images and FY-3D MERSI fire-point products

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    National Satellite Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081, China

  • Email：shantc9165@163.com
  • Introduction：单天婵，研究方向为地表环境灾害遥感监测的研究。E-mail： shantc9165@163.com
SHAN Tianchan,  
  • Affiliation：

    National Satellite Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081, China

ZHENG Wei,  
  • Affiliation：

    National Satellite Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081, China

CHEN Jie

résumé

Using remote-sensing technology to obtain information about burned areas is important for ecological environment monitoring. High-resolution data are more suitable for extracting small-scale burned areas. To develop the fire monitoring ability of domestic remote-sensing data and improve the extraction efficiency and accuracy of a small-scale burned area, two GF-1 WFV images (before and after fires) and multi temporal FY-3D MERSI fire products are used to extract burned areas for two study areas, respectively, located in the Tibetan Autonomous County of Muli and Xichang City, Sichuan Province.The reference true values are obtained by human-computer interaction for verification. The results of burned areas extracted by neural network classification are compared with the result of the proposed method. Our results show that the accuracy of burned areas detected by the proposed method is higher than that by neural network classification, and the Kappa coefficients in two study areas are 0.82 and 0.87, respectively. The regions of commission and omission are usually distributed at the edge of the burned area patch. The distribution of burned area in Xichang is more compact than that in Muli, so the accuracy of burned area mapping in Xichang is higher.The method can fully combine the advantages of the two kinds of data, reduce the uncertainty and time cost caused by sample selection, and extract the small-scale burned area quickly and accurately. Fully exploiting the temporal, spatial, and spectral characteristics of fire points and burned areas can compensate for the shortcomings of GF-1 WFV images in temporal and spectral resolution. Meanwhile, the method can fully combine the two kinds of data and minimize the impact of the difference of spatial resolution. In the future, the method can be improved using a higher accuracy of fire-point products. The accuracy of the reference true value of the burned area can be improved through field investigation.The method is primarily divided into two partsrough extraction and fine extraction. In rough extraction, according to the relationship between fire points and the formation of burned areas, the fire-point pixels are selected and expanded into the rough range of burned areas by combining temporal, spatial, and spectral characteristics. Temporal characteristic refers to fire points with concentrated occurrence time that easily form burned areas; spatial characteristic refers to fire points with concentrated location that easily form burned areas, and burned pixels are usually adjacent to fire-point pixels; spectral characteristics refer to pixels with higher NDVI difference before and after fire, which may be burned pixels. In fine extraction, the land-cover types included in the burned area are determined according to the number of fire-point pixels. The segmentation threshold is determined using the iterative-threshold method for each land-cover type. Burned pixels and unburned pixels in each land-cover type are classified using the segmentation threshold. The small patches are removed to obtain the result of burned-area extraction.

mots-clés

remote sensing;burned area;fire point product;FY-3D MERSI;GF-1 WFV;NDVI;segmentation threshold

References

  1. 1.
    Alonso-Canas I and Chuvieco E. 2015. Global burned area mapping from ENVISAT-MERIS and MODIS active fire data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 163: 140-152
  2. 2.
    Boschetti L, Roy D P, Justice C O and Humber M L. 2015. MODIS-landsat fusion for large area 30 m burned area mapping. Remote Sensing of Environment, 161: 27-42
  3. 3.
    Dong X R and Wei Y. 2014. FY-3 Satellite’s support for forest fire remote sensing monitoring in Heilongjiang Province. Heilongjiang Meteorology, 31(2): 23, 32
  4. 4.
    Giglio L, Boschetti L, Roy D P, Humber M L and Justice C O. 2018. The collection 6 MODIS burned area mapping algorithm and product. Remote Sensing of Environment, 217: 72-85
  5. 5.
    Giglio L, Loboda T, Roy D P, Quayle B and Justice C O. 2009. An active-fire based burned area mapping algorithm for the MODIS sensor. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(2): 408-420
  6. 6.
    Hu X W, Jin T, Yin W Q, Huo Z B, Song Y P, Zhang S K, Wang Y and Yang Y. 2020. The characteristics of forest fire burned area and sus-ceptibility assessment of post-fire debris flow in Jingjiu Township, Xichang City. Journal of Engineering Geology, 28(4): 762-771
  7. 7.
    Li J, Gong A D, Chen Y L, Wang J M and Zeng T T. 2018. Analysis on the characteristics of change and recovery of vegetation indices for forests in burned area. Journal of Geo-information Science, 20(3): 368-376
  8. 8.
    Li J J and Fu Q Y. 2020. Automatic cloud detection of GF-7 satellite imagery. Spacecraft Recovery and Remote Sensing, 41(2): 108-115
  9. 9.
    Li L L. 2012. A Study on Auto-Thresholding Selection Methods for Image Segmentation. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University
  10. 10.
    Lu D L. 2019. Discussion on forest resource protection and forest fire management. Forestry Science and Technology Information, 51(1): 18-19
  11. 11.
    McFeeters S K. 1996. The use of the normalized difference water index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(7): 1425-1432
  12. 12.
    Merino-de-Miguel S, Huesca M and González-Alonso F. 2010. MODIS reflectance and active fire data for burn mapping and assessment at regional level. Ecological Modelling, 221(1): 67-74
  13. 13.
    Rao Y M, Wang C and Huang H G. 2020. Forest fire monitoring based on multisensor remote sensing techniques in Muli County, Sichuan Province. Journal of Remote Sensing (Chinese), 24(5): 559-570
  14. 14.
    Sun G F, Qin X L, Liu S C, Li X T, Chen X Z and Zhong X Q. 2019. Potential analysis of typical vegetation index for identifying burned area. Remote Sensing for Land and Resources, 31(1): 204-211
  15. 15.
    Tan M Y, Chen Z X, Cao X, Chen J, Yang W and Gu Z H. 2007. Burn scar mapping in steppe using MODIS data. Journal of Remote Sensing, 11(3): 340-349
  16. 16.
    Tong L X, Yan Q, Luo C F and Du Y K. 2017. Water body information extraction based on NDWI segmentation and object-oriented method. Geospatial Information, 15(5): 57-59
  17. 17.
    Wang Z. 2011. Research and evaluation of the algorithm of land surface fire detection based on FY3-VIRR data. Fire Safety Science, 20(3): 140-145
  18. 18.
    Wu J W, Sun L Y, Ji R P, Feng R, Yu W Y and Zhang Y S. 2020. Research progress and prospect of remote sensing on extracting burned areas information. Journal of Catastrophology, 35(4): 151-156
  19. 19.
    Xu W N, Wang P X, Han P, Yan T L and Zhang S Y. 2011. Application of Kappa coefficient to accuracy assessments of drought forecasting model: a case study of Guanzhong plain. Journal of Natural Disasters, 20(6): 81-86
  20. 20.
    Xu X L, Liu J Y, Zhang S W, Li R D, Yan C Z and Wu S X. 2018. China land use/land cover change (CNLUCC). Registration and Publishing System of Resource and Environment Science and Data Center Data, China Academy of Science
  21. 21.
    Yang L, Wang J, Gao Y H, Zhang Z J and Dong Z X. 2019. Case application of forest fire monitoring based on Fengyun-3 meteorological satellite remote sensing. Environment and Development, 31(1): 129, 131
  22. 22.
    Yang W, Zhang S W, Tang J M, Bu K, Yang J C and Chang L P. 2013. A MODIS time series data based algorithm for mapping forest fire burned area. Chinese Geographical Science, 23(3): 344-352
  23. 23.
    Zhang J, Zhang W Y, Feng J D, Wang H Y, Yu Z and Song W. 2016. An improved algorithm for forest fire detection: a study based on brightness temperature, vegetation index and AOD. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 31(5): 886-892
  24. 24.
    Zhao L C. 2004. The operation and application of FY-1C/D polar orbiting meteorological satellite. Aerospace Shanghai, 21(4): 12-15
  25. 25.
    Zheng W, Chen J, Yan H, Liu C and Tang S H. 2020. Global fire monitoring products of FY-3D/MERSI-II and their applications. Journal of Remote Sensing (Chinese), 24(5): 521-530
  26. 26.
    Zheng W, Li Y J, Liu C and Wang M. 2011. Extracting forest burned scar region area based on multi-source remote sensing data. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 47(8): 192-195
  27. 27.
    Zu X F, Qin X L, Yin L Y, Chen X Z and Zhong X Q. 2015. Decision tree method for burned area identification based on the spectral index of GF-1 WFV image. Forest Resources Management, 4: 73-78, 83

Lire l'article complet

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website