Hyperspectral scene classification dataset based on Zhuhai-1 images

  • role: First author第一作者
  • Affiliation:

    Key Laboratory of Spectral Imaging Technology, Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an 710119, China

    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

  • Email:liuyuan213@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • Introduction:E-mail liuyuan213@mails.ucas.ac.cn
LIU Yuan12,  
  • role: Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation:

    College of Physics and Information Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China

  • Email:xiangtaoz@gmail.com
  • Introduction:E-mail xiangtaoz@gmail.com
ZHENG Xiangtao3*,  
  • Affiliation:

    College of Physics and Information Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China

LU Xiaoqiang3

résumé

Hyperspectral remote sensing is a key technology for remotely obtaining the physical parameters of ground objects and realizing fine identification. It can not only get geometrical properties of the target scenes but also obtain radiance that reflects the characteristics of ground objects. With the development of hyperspectral remote sensing data to unprecedented spatial, spectral, temporal resolution and large data volume, how to adapt to the requirements of massive data and achieve efficient and rapid processing of hyperspectral remote sensing data has become the current research focus. Researchers are introducing scene classification into hyperspectral image classification, integrating the spatial and spectral information to obtain semantic information oriented to larger observation units. However, almost all existing multispectral/hyperspectral scene classification datasets have a number of limitations, including inconsistent spectral and spatial resolutions or spatial resolutions too large to meet the needs of fine-grained classification. Based on the hyperspectral images of Xi’an taken by the “Zhuhai-1” constellation, we combine the result of unsupervised spectral clustering and Google Earth to establish a hyperspectral satellite image scene classification dataset named HSCD-ZH (Hyperspectral Scene Classification Dataset from Zhuhai-1). It consists of 737 images divided into six categories: urban, agriculture, rural, forest, water, and unused land. Each image with a size of 64×64 pixels consists of 32 bands covering the wavelength in the range of 400—1000 nm. In addition, we conduct spatial-based and spectral-based experiments to analyze the performance of existing datasets, and the benchmark results are reported as a valuable baseline for subsequent research. We choose false-color image for the spatial-based experiments and then use popular deep and non-deep learning scene classification techniques. In the experiments based on spectral, the spectral vectors at the pixel are directly used as local spectral features, and BoVW, IFK, and LLC are used to encode them to generate global representations for the scene. Using SVM as the classifier, the optimal overall classification achieved by the two experiments on the proposed dataset is 92.34% and 88.96%, respectively. Considering that those methods have a large amount of information loss, we cascade the features extracted by the two approaches to generate spatial-spectral features. The highest overall accuracy obtained reaches 94.64%, which is the highest improvement in overall accuracy compared to the other datasets. We construct HSCD-ZH by effectively exploiting both spectral and spatial features of hyperspectral images, selecting various scenes that either have representative spectral compositions, clear spatial textures, or both. It has the advantages of big intraclass diversity, strong scalability, and adapting to satellite hyperspectral intelligent information extraction requirements. Both dataset and experiments can provide effective data support for remote sensing scene classification research in the hyperspectral field. Meanwhile, experiments can indicate that extracting features based on spatial or spectral misses a large amount of available information, and integrating the features extracted by the two methods can compensate for this deficiency. In our future work, we aim to expand the number of categories and images of HSCD-ZH and continue to explore algorithms for integrating spatial and spectral information that can accelerate the interpretation and efficient exploitation of hyperspectral scene cubes.

mots-clés

hyperspectral remote sensing;Zhuhai-1;scene classification;dataset;feature extraction

References

  1. 1.
    Benediktsson J A, Palmason J A and Sveinsson J R. 2005. Classification of hyperspectral data from urban areas based on extended morphological profiles. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(3): 480-491
  2. 2.
    Chen R, Pu D, Tong Y and Wu M H. 2022. Image-denoising algorithm based on improved K-singular value decomposition and atom optimization. CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology, 7(1): 117-127 [DOI ]
  3. 3.
    Du P J, Xia J S, Xue Z H, Tan K, Su H J and Bao R. 2016. Review of hyperspectral remote sensing image classification. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(2): 236-256
  4. 4.
    He K M, Zhang X Y, Ren S Q and Sun J. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Las Vegas: IEEE: 770-778
  5. 5.
    Helber P, Bischke B, Dengel A and Borth D. 2019. EuroSAT: a novel dataset and deep learning benchmark for land use and land cover classification. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 12(7): 2217-2226
  6. 6.
    Kang X D, Li S T and Benediktsson J A. 2014. Spectral-spatial hyperspectral image classification with edge-preserving filtering. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(5): 2666-2677
  7. 7.
    Kuras A, Brell M, Rizzi J and Burud I. 2021. Hyperspectral and lidar data applied to the urban land cover machine learning and neural-network-based classification: a review. Remote Sensing, 13(17): 3393
  8. 8.
    Li D R, Zhang L P and Xia G S. 2014. Automatic analysis and mining of remote sensing big data. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 43(12): 1211-1216
  9. 9.
    Li S T, Song W W, Fang L Y, Chen Y S, Ghamisi P and Benediktsson J A. 2019. Deep learning for hyperspectral image classification: an overview. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(9): 6690-6709 [DOI ]
  10. 10.
    Liu H, Li W, Xia X G, Zhang M M, Gao C Z and Tao R. 2022a. Central attention network for hyperspectral imagery classification. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 34(11): 8989-9003
  11. 11.
    Liu H, Qu Y and Zhang L Q. 2022b. Multispectral scene classification via cross-modal knowledge distillation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60: 1-12
  12. 12.
    Liu K, Zhou Z, Li S Y, Liu Y F, Wan X, Liu Z W, Tan H and Zhang W F. 2020. Scene classification dataset using the Tiangong-1 hyperspectral remote sensing imagery and its applications. Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(9): 1077-1087
  13. 13.
    Liu Y N. 2021. Development of hyperspectral imaging remote sensing technology. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 25(1): 439-459
  14. 14.
    Liu Z, Lin Y T, Cao Y, Hu H, Wei Y X, Zhang Z, Lin S and Guo B N. 2021. Swin transformer: hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows//Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. Montreal: IEEE: 10012-10022
  15. 15.
    Lowe D G. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 60(2): 91-110
  16. 16.
    Ojala T, Pietikainen M and Maenpaa T. 2002. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(7): 971-987
  17. 17.
    Perronnin F, Sánchez J and Mensink T. 2010. Improving the fisher kernel for large-scale image classification//Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Computer Vision. Heraklion: Springer: 143-156
  18. 18.
    Simonyan K and Zisserman A. 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1409.1556
  19. 19.
    Sivic J and Zisserman A. 2003. Video Google: a text retrieval approach to object matching in videos//Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Nice: IEEE: 1470-1470
  20. 20.
    Swain M J and Ballard D H. 1991. Color indexing. International Journal of Computer Vision, 7(1): 11-32
  21. 21.
    Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez A N, Kaiser Ł and Polosukhin I. 2017. Attention is all you need// Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Red Hook: Curran Associates Inc.
  22. 22.
    Wang J J, Yang J C, Yu K, Lv F J, Huang T and Gong Y H. 2010. Locality-constrained linear coding for image classification//Proceedings of 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. San Francisco: IEEE: 3360-3367
  23. 23.
    Xia G S, Hu J W, Hu F, Shi B G, Bai X, Zhong Y F, Zhang L P and Lu X Q. 2017. AID: a benchmark data set for performance evaluation of aerial scene classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(7): 3965-3981
  24. 24.
    Xu K J, Deng P F and Huang H. 2021. HSRS-SC: a hyperspectral image dataset for remote sensing scene classification. Journal of Image and Graphics, 26(8): 1809-1822
  25. 25.
    Yang X F, Cao W J, Lu Y and Zhou Y C. 2022. Hyperspectral image transformer classification networks. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60: 1-15
  26. 26.
    Yang Y and Newsam S. 2010. Bag-of-visual-words and spatial extensions for land-use classification//Proceedings of the 18th SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. San Jose: ACM: 270-279
  27. 27.
    Zhang C Y, Li J, Lei S G, Yang J Z and Yang N. 2022. Progress and prospect of the quantitative remote sensing for monitoring the eco-environment in mining area. Metal Mine, (3): 1-27
  28. 28.
    Zhang J X, Gu H Y, Yang Y, Zhang H and Li H T. 2021. Research progress and trend of high-resolution remote sensing imagery intelligent interpretation. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 25(11): 2198-2210
  29. 29.
    Zhong L, Qian J W, Chu X Y, Qian Z H, Wang M and Li J L. 2023. Monitoring heavy metal contamination of wheat soil using hyperspectral remote sensing technology. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 39(5): 265-270
  30. 30.
    Zhou Z, Li S Y, Wu W, Guo W L, Li X, Xia G S and Zhao Z F. 2021. NaSC-TG2: natural scene classification with tiangong-2 remotely sensed imagery. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 14: 3228-3242 [DOI ]

Lire l'article complet

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website