Précédent|Prochain

High-resolution snowmelt detection in mountainous areas based on remote sensing retrieved snow surface grain size variation

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China

  • Email：sunhaijiao4684@163.com
  • Introduction：孙海娇，研究方向为冰冻圈遥感。E-mail： sunhaijiao4684@163.com
SUN Haijiao,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China

  • Email：xiongchuan@swjtu.edu.cn
  • Introduction：熊川，研究方向为冰冻圈遥感。E-mail： xiongchuan@swjtu.edu.cn
XIONG Chuan*,  
  • Affiliation：

    Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China

HAN Chenyang

résumé

Snow seasonal evolution is one of the key factors influencing hydrological dynamics in mountainous areas and controlling terrestrial ecology. Accurate information on snowmelt is essential for meteorological, hydrological, and global climate change studies and for disaster prediction and early warning. The traditional snowmelt detection approach based on time-series SAR suffers from the influence of vegetation cover, rugged terrain, and long revisit time in some regions. In this study, we propose a new snowmelt detection method based on high resolution Sentinel-2 optical remote sensing data.The time series snow surface grain size variation is used to detect snowmelt events. As snow starts to melt, the liquid water in snow tend to increase the optical equivalent grain size retrieved from optical remote sensing remarkably. When the wet snow refreezes, the optical equivalent grain size remains considerably larger than dry snow. This provides the theoretical basis for snowmelt onset detection from optical remote sensing. The snow surface optical equivalent grain size is retrieved by applying snow reflectance models, with bidirectional reflectance, sun zenith angle, sensor viewing angle, and relative azimuth angle as inputs. Pure snow pixels are selected for snow optical equivalent grain size retrieval and snowmelt detection. In this study, snowmelt detection results of the Altay Mountain are presented and analyzed. Snowmelt onset detection based on optical remote sensing is also compared with SAR method, and the advantages and shortcomings of the two methods are analyzed.The main advantages of the proposed new method in this study are as follows The new method based on optical remote sensing is more sensitive in detecting the occurrence of snowmelt and provides richer information about the snow melting process. The choice of snow reflectance model can introduce differences in the retrieved snow grain size due to variations in modeling snow particle shape and light scattering and absorption. Additionally, the selection of threshold values for distinguishing between wet and dry snow grain sizes can affect the results. Therefore, the use of different snow reflectance models can lead to certain differences in the results of snowmelt detection. The snowmelt onset dates retrieved using the optical method show overall similarity to those retrieved from the SAR method, exhibiting similar dependencies on elevation and aspect. However, some differences between the two methods, which can be attributed to variations in detection principles and data sources, are observed. Compared with the SAR method, the optical method is less affected by speckle noise, mixed pixels, and vegetation cover. Particularly in low-elevation and vegetated areas, the proposed method demonstrates superior capability in detecting snowmelt events compared to the SAR method.The snowmelt onset date retrieved using Sentinel-2 data is similar to those retrieved from the SAR method using Sentinel-1 data, and they show similar dependencies on elevation and aspect. The new method based on Sentinel-2 data also shows advantages over the SAR method, e.g., the optical method is less affected by speckle noise, mixed pixels, and vegetation cover, and it provides more spatial details about the snowmelt onset data. The proposed snowmelt detection method based on optical data suffers from cloud cover, but it offers an alternative way to detect wet snow with high spatial resolution other than SAR. The snowmelt detection based on SAR and Sentinel-2 data can be complementary to each other, and the snowmelt detection in mountainous area can be improved by combining both methods.

mots-clés

Snow grain size;backscattering;Snowmelt;SAR;optical remote sensing

References

  1. 1.
    Antropova Y K, Komarov A S, Richardson M, Millard K and Smith K. 2022. Detection of wet snow in the Arctic tundra from time-series fully-polarimetric RADARSAT-2 images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 283: 113305
  2. 2.
    Armstrong R L and Brun E. 2008. Snow and Climate: Physical Processes, Surface Energy Exchange and Modeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  3. 3.
    Baghdadi N. 1997. Capability of multitemporal ERS-1 SAR data for wet-snow mapping. Remote Sensing of Environment, 60(2): 174-186
  4. 4.
    Barnett T P, Adam J C and Lettenmaier D P. 2005. Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions. Nature, 438(7066): 303-309
  5. 5.
    Brubaker K L, Pinker R T and Deviatova E. 2005. Evaluation and comparison of MODIS and IMS snow-cover estimates for the continental United States using station data. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 6(6): 1002-1017
  6. 6.
    Buchelt S, Skov K, Rasmussen K K and Ullmann T. 2022. Sentinel-1 time series for mapping snow cover depletion and timing of snowmelt in Arctic periglacial environments: case study from Zackenberg and Kobbefjord, Greenland. The Cryosphere, 16(2): 625-646
  7. 7.
    Carlsen T, Birnbaum G, Ehrlich A, Freitag J, Heygster G, Istomina L, Kipfstuhl S, Orsi A, Schäfer M and Wendisch M. 2017. Comparison of different methods to retrieve optical-equivalent snow grain size in central Antarctica. The Cryosphere, 11(6): 2727-2741
  8. 8.
    Chen H J. 2018. Wet Snow Mapping in Southern Ontario with Sentinel-1A Observations. Waterloo: University of Waterloo
  9. 9.
    Chen J, Chen J, Liao A P, Cao X, Chen L J, Chen X H, He C Y, Han G, Peng S, Lu M, Zhang W W, Tong X H and Mills J. 2015. Global land cover mapping at 30m resolution: a POK-based operational approach. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 103: 7-27
  10. 10.
    Colbeck S C. 1983. Theory of metamorphism of dry snow. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 88(C9): 5475-5482
  11. 11.
    Crawford C J. 2015. MODIS Terra Collection 6 fractional snow cover validation in mountainous terrain during spring snowmelt using Landsat TM and ETM+. Hydrological Processes, 29(1): 128-138
  12. 12.
    Dozier J, Davis R E and Perla R. 1987. On the Objective Analysis of Snow Microstructure. International Association of Hydrological Sciences Publication No. 162. [s.n.]: 49-59
  13. 13.
    Dozier J, Painter T H, Rittger K and Frew J E. 2008. Time-space continuity of daily maps of fractional snow cover and albedo from MODIS. Advances in Water Resources, 31(11): 1515-1526
  14. 14.
    Fierz C, Armstrong R L, Durand Y, Etchevers P, Greene E, McClung D M, Nishimura K, Satyawali P K and Sokratov S A. 2009. The International Classification for Seasonal Snow on the Ground. lHP-Vll Technical Documents in Hydrology N° 83, IACS Contribution N° 1. UNESCO: 80
  15. 15.
    Gagliano E, Shean D, Henderson S and Vanderwilt S. 2023. Capturing the onset of mountain snowmelt runoff using satellite synthetic aperture radar. Geophysical Research Letters, 50(21): e2023GL105303
  16. 16.
    Grenfell T C and Warren S G. 1999. Representation of a nonspherical ice particle by a collection of independent spheres for scattering and absorption of radiation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 104(D24): 31697-31709
  17. 17.
    Hall D K, Riggs G A, Salomonson V V, Digirolamo N E and Bayr K J. 2002. MODIS snow-cover products. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1/2): 181-194
  18. 18.
    Hallikainen M. 1977. Dielectric Properties of Sea Ice at Microwave Frequencies. [s.n.]: 11293
  19. 19.
    Hao X H, Wang J, Wang J, Zhang P and Huang C L. 2013. The measurement and retrieval of the spectral reflectance of different snow grain size on northern Xinjiang, China. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 33(1): 190-195
  20. 20.
    Jun C, Ban Y F and Li S N. 2014. Open access to Earth land-cover map. Nature, 514(7523): 434-434
  21. 21.
    Karbou F, James G, Durand P and Atto A M. 2021. Thresholds and distances to better detect wet snow over mountains with sentinel-1 image time series//Change Detection and Image Time Series Analysis 1: Unsupervised Methods. [s.l.]: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd: 127-144
  22. 22.
    Kinar N J and Pomeroy J W. 2015. Measurement of the physical properties of the snowpack. Reviews of Geophysics, 53(2): 481-544
  23. 23.
    Kokhanovsky A A and Zege E P. 2004. Scattering optics of snow. Applied Optics, 43(7): 1589
  24. 24.
    Koskinen J T, Pulliainen J T and Hallikainen M T. 1997. The use of ERS-1 SAR data in snow melt monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 35(3): 601-610
  25. 25.
    Leppänen L, Kontu A, Vehviläinen J, Lemmetyinen J and Pulliainen J. 2015. Comparison of traditional and optical grain-size field measurements with SNOWPACK simulations in a taiga snowpack. Journal of Glaciology, 61(225): 151-162
  26. 26.
    Li S M, Yan H and Liu C. 2007. Study of snow detection using FY-2C satellite data. Journal of Remote Sensing (in Chinese), 11(3): 406-413
  27. 27.
    Li X, Che T and Li X W. 2020. Cryopshere Remote Sensing. Beijing: Science Press.
  28. 28.
    Liang S L, Bai R, Chen X N, Cheng J, Fan W J, He T, Jia K, Jiang B, Jiang L M, Jiao Z T, Liu Y B, Ni W J, Qiu F, Song L L, Sun L, Tang B H, Wen J G, Wu G P, Xie D H, Yao Y J, Yuan W P, Zhang Y G, Zhang Y Z, Zhang Y T, Zhang X T, Zhao T J and Zhao X. 2020. Review of China’s land surface quantitative remote sensing development in 2019. Journal of Remote Sensing (in Chinese), 24(6): 618-671
  29. 29.
    Libois Q, Picard G, France J L, Arnaud L, Dumont M, Carmagnola C M and King M D. 2013. Influence of grain shape on light penetration in snow. The Cryosphere, 7(6): 1803-1818
  30. 30.
    Liu H X, Wang L and Jezek K C. 2006. Automated delineation of dry and melt snow zones in Antarctica using active and passive microwave observations from space. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(8): 2152-2163
  31. 31.
    Marin C, Bertoldi G, Premier V, Callegari M, Brida C, Hürkamp K, Tschiersch J, Zebisch M and Notarnicola C. 2020. Use of Sentinel-1 radar observations to evaluate snowmelt dynamics in alpine regions. The Cryosphere, 14(3): 935-956
  32. 32.
    Mätzler C and Schanda E. 1984. Snow mapping with active microwave sensors. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 5(2): 409-422
  33. 33.
    Nagler T and Rott H. 2000. Retrieval of wet snow by means of multitemporal SAR data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38(2): 754-765
  34. 34.
    Nagler T and Rott H. 2005. Snow classification algorithm for envisat ASAR//Proceedings of the 2004 Envisat and ERS Symposium. Salzburg: European Space Agency
  35. 35.
    Nagler T, Rott H, Ripper E, Bippus G and Hetzenecker M. 2016. Advancements for snowmelt monitoring by means of sentinel-1 SAR. Remote Sensing, 8(4): 348
  36. 36.
    Nolin A W. 2010. Recent advances in remote sensing of seasonal snow. Journal of Glaciology, 56(200): 1141-1150
  37. 37.
    Parajka J and Blöschl G. 2006. Validation of MODIS snow cover images over Austria. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 10(5): 679-689
  38. 38.
    Pivot F C. 2012. C-Band SAR imagery for snow-cover monitoring at Treeline, Churchill, Manitoba, Canada. Remote Sensing, 4(7): 2133-2155
  39. 39.
    Rondeau-Genesse G, Trudel M and Leconte R. 2016. Monitoring snow wetness in an Alpine Basin using combined C-band SAR and MODIS data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 183: 304-317
  40. 40.
    Salomonson V V and Appel I. 2004. Estimating fractional snow cover from MODIS using the normalized difference snow index. Remote Sensing of Environment, 89(3): 351-360
  41. 41.
    Su Y W. 2004. Altay Regional Journal. Urumqi: Xinjiang People’s Press
  42. 42.
    Vandecrux B, Box J E, Wehrlé A, Kokhanovsky A A, Picard G, Niwano M, Hörhold M, Faber A K and Steen-Larsen H C. 2022. The determination of the snow optical grain diameter and snowmelt area on the Greenland ice sheet using spaceborne optical observations. Remote Sensing, 14(4): 932
  43. 43.
    Wang J, Che T, Dai L Y, Yue S N and Zheng Z J. 2023. Spatio-temporal comparison of snow depth between passive microwave remote sensing inversion data and meteorological station observation data. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 27(9): 2060-2071
  44. 44.
    Wang X Y, Wang J, Li H Y and Hao X H. 2017. Combination of NDSI and NDFSI for snow cover mapping in a mountainous and forested region. Journal of Remote Sensing (in Chinese), 21(2): 310-317
  45. 45.
    Warren S G. 2019. Optical properties of ice and snow. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 377(2146): 20180161
  46. 46.
    Wiscombe W J and Warren S G. 1980. A model for the spectral albedo of snow. I: Pure snow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 37(12): 2712-2733
  47. 47.
    Woodhouse I H. 2006. Introduction to Microwave Remote Sensing. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis
  48. 48.
    Xiong C and Shi J C. 2018. Snow specific surface area remote sensing retrieval using a microstructure based reflectance model. Remote Sensing of Environment, 204: 838-849
  49. 49.
    Xiong C, Shi J C, Ji D B, Wang T X, Xu Y L and Zhao T J. 2015. A new hybrid snow light scattering model based on geometric optics theory and vector radiative transfer theory. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(9): 4862-4875
  50. 50.
    Xiong C, Yao R Z, Shi J C, Lei Y H and Pan J M. 2019. Change of snow and ice melting time in High Mountain Asia. Chinese Science Bulletin, 64(27): 2885-2893
  51. 51.
    Zege E P, Katsev I L, Malinka A V, Prikhach A S, Heygster G and Wiebe H. 2011. Algorithm for retrieval of the effective snow grain size and pollution amount from satellite measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(10): 2674-2685
  52. 52.
    Zhang Y L and Zhang L P. 2020. Snow cover identification and area change in mountainous regions based on Sentinel-2 time series data. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 39(8): 2810-2820

Lire l'article complet

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website