TROPOMI NO2 기반 화석 에너지 CO2 일일 배출량 간접 추정

  • role: First author第一作者
  • Affiliation:

    School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics,China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China

  • Email:lulingxiao@cumt.edu.cn
  • Introduction:E-maillulingxiao@cumt.edu.cn
LU Lingxiao1,  
  • role: Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation:

    School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics,China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China

  • Email:qinkai@cumt.edu.cn
  • Introduction:E-mailqinkai@cumt.edu.cn
QIN Kai1*,  
  • Affiliation:

    School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics,China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China

COHEN Jason Blake1,  
  • Affiliation:

    School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics,China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China

LI Xiaolu1,  
  • Affiliation:

    Satellite Application Center for Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100094, China

ZHOU Chunyan2

추상적인

‘탄소중립’ 목표를 달성하기 위해 위성 원격탐사 기술을 활용하여 화석 에너지 소비로 인한 이산화탄소(CO2) 배출량을 추정하는 것은 매우 중요하다. 그러나 CO2가 대기 중에 오랜 시간 머무르고 기존 CO2 위성 센서들의 공간적 커버리지가 제한적이기 때문에 위성 관측으로부터 역산된 CO2 기둥 농도 데이터를 직접 사용하여 배출량을 추정하는 것은 어려운 점이 많다. 화석 에너지 소비는 CO2와 질소산화물(NOxx)을 동시에 배출하며, NOxx는 수명이 짧고 위성 원격탐사를 통해 배출량을 추정하는 것이 비교적 용이하다. 본 연구는 28개의 동부 도시와 1개의 서부 에너지 골든 트라이앵글 지역을 연구 대상으로 선정하여 TROPOMI NO2 기둥 농도를 기반으로 화석 에너지 CO2 일일 배출량을 간접 추정하는 연구를 수행하였다. 우선, 본 연구는 2019년 TROPOMI NO2 대류권 기둥 농도 데이터 제품과 질량 보존 모델을 사용하여 NOxx 일일 배출량과 불확실성을 추정하였다. 다음으로, 다중 규모 배출 목록 모델(MEIC)에서 CO2와 NOxx 배출량의 관계를 분석하였다. 마지막으로 화석 에너지 소비로 인한 CO2 일일 배출량을 추정하였다. 결과는 추정치가 MEIC 목록 내 CO2 배출 공간 분포와 일치하지만, 더 높은 공간 해상도와 시간 빈도로 인해 통계 자료 부족으로 인한 신흥 및 소규모 배출원을 밝혀낼 수 있음을 보여준다. 동부 도시인 베이징을 예로 들면, 시 중심 주변 교외 지역의 원격탐사 추정치는 MEIC 목록보다 약 104% 높아 동부 도시의 급속한 확장과 함께 많은 신흥 배출원이 나타나고 있음을 시사한다. 서부 에너지 골든 트라이앵글 지역인 위린을 예로 들면, 해당 지역 발전소, 제철소 및 탄광 지역에서 일부 배출원은 MEIC 목록 내 전체 배출량의 10%에 불과하지만 추정 결과에서는 이 비율이 37%로, 목록에 포함되지 않은 소규모 발전소와 산업원이 위성 원격탐사를 통해 포착될 수 있음을 나타낸다. 본 연구 결과는 중국의 화석 에너지 탄소 배출량 산정을 위한 기술적 지원을 제공할 수 있다.

키워드

원격탐사;화석 에너지;질소산화물;이산화탄소;TROPOMI;배출 목록;간접 추정;질량 보존;신흥 배출원

References

  1. 1.
    Akimoto H, Ohara T, Kurokawa J I and Horii N. 2006. Verification of energy consumption in China during 1996-2003 by using satellite observational data. Atmospheric Environment, 40(40): 7663-7667
  2. 2.
    Berezin E V, Konovalov I B, Ciais P, Richter A, Tao S, Janssens-Maenhout G, Beekmann M and Schulze E D. 2013. Multiannual changes of CO2 emissions in China: indirect estimates derived from satellite measurements of tropospheric NO2 columns. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 13(18): 9415-9438
  3. 3.
    Brasseur G P and Jacob D J. 2017. Modeling of Atmospheric Chemistry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  4. 4.
    Canadell J G, Le Quéré C, Raupach M R, Field C B, Buitenhuis E T, Ciais P, Conway T J, Gillett N P, Houghton R A and Marland G. 2007. Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(47): 18866-18870
  5. 5.
    Ciais P, Dolman A J, Bombelli A, Duren R, Peregon A, Rayner P J, Miller C, Gobron N, Kinderman G, Marland G, Gruber N, Chevallier F, Andres R J, Balsamo G, Bopp L, Bréon F M, Broquet G, Dargaville R, Battin T J, Borges A, Bovensmann H, Buchwitz M, Butler J, Canadell J G, Cook R B, Defries R, Engelen R, Gurney K R, Heinze C, Heimann M, Held A, Henry M, Law B, Luyssaert S, Miller J, Moriyama T, Moulin C, Myneni R B, Nussli C, Obersteiner M, Ojima D, Pan Y, Paris J D, Piao S L, Poulter B, Plummer S, Quegan S, Raymond P, Reichstein M, Rivier L, Sabine C, Schimel D, Tarasova O, Valentini R, Wang R, Van Der werf G, Wickland D, Williams M and Zehner C. 2014. Current systematic carbon-cycle observations and the need for implementing a policy-relevant carbon observing system. Biogeosciences, 11(13): 3547-3602
  6. 6.
    Eldering A, Wennberg P O, Crisp D, Schimel D S, Gunson M R, Chatterjee A, Liu J, Schwandner F M, Sun Y, O’dell C W, Frankenberg C, Taylor T, Fisher B, Osterman G B, Wunch D, Hakkarainen J, Tamminen J and Weir B. 2017. The orbiting carbon observatory-2 early science investigations of regional carbon dioxide fluxes. Science, 358(6360): eaam5745
  7. 7.
    Goldberg D L, Lu Z F, Oda T, Lamsal L N, Liu F, Griffin D, McLinden Chris A, Krotkov N A, Duncan B N and Streets D G. 2019. Exploiting OMI NO2 satellite observations to infer fossil-fuel CO2 emissions from U.S. megacities. Science of the Total Environment, 695: 133805
  8. 8.
    Guan D B, Liu Z, Geng Y, Lindner S and Hubacek K. 2012. The gigatonne gap in China’s carbon dioxide inventories. Nature Climate Change, 2(9): 672-675
  9. 9.
    Hakkarainen J, Ialongo I, Oda T, Szeląg M E, O’Dell C W, Eldering A and Crisp D. 2023. Building a bridge: characterizing major anthropogenic point sources in the South African Highveld region using OCO-3 carbon dioxide snapshot area maps and Sentinel-5P/TROPOMI nitrogen dioxide columns. Environmental Research Letters, 18(3): 035003
  10. 10.
    Hakkarainen J, Ialongo I and Tamminen J. 2016. Direct space‐based observations of anthropogenic CO2 emission areas from OCO‐2. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(21): 11400-11406
  11. 11.
    Hammerling D M, Michalak A M, O’Dell C and Kawa S R. 2012. Global CO2 distributions over land from the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT). Geophysical Research Letters, 39(8): L08804
  12. 12.
    IPCC. 2014. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. IPCC
  13. 13.
    Janssens-Maenhout G, Crippa M, Guizzardi D, Muntean M, Schaaf E, Dentener F, Bergamaschi P, Pagliari V, Olivier J G J, Peters J A H W, Van Aardenne J A, Monni S, Doering U, Petrescu A M R, Solazzo E and Oreggioni G D. 2019. EDGAR v4.3.2 Global Atlas of the three major greenhouse gas emissions for the period 1970-2012. Earth System Science Data, 11(3): 959-1002
  14. 14.
    Konovalov I B, Berezin E V, Ciais P, Broquet G, Beekmann M, Hadji-Lazaro J, Clerbaux C, Andreae M O, Kaiser J W and Schulze E D. 2014. Constraining CO2 emissions from open biomass burning by satellite observations of co-emitted species: a method and its application to wildfires in Siberia. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14(19): 10383-10410
  15. 15.
    Konovalov I B, Berezin E V, Ciais P, Broquet G, Zhuravlev R V and Janssens-Maenhout G. 2016. Estimation of fossil-fuel CO2 emissions using satellite measurements of “proxy” species. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 16(21): 13509-13540
  16. 16.
    Korsbakken J I, Peters G P and Andrew R M. 2016. Uncertainties around reductions in China’s coal use and CO2 emissions. Nature Climate Change, 6(7): 687-690
  17. 17.
    Kort E A, Frankenberg C, Miller C E and Oda T. 2012. Space‐based observations of megacity carbon dioxide. Geophysical Research Letters, 39(17): L17806
  18. 18.
    Li M, Liu H, Geng G N, Hong C P, Liu F, Song Y, Tong D, Zheng B, Cui H Y, Man H Y, Zhang Q and He K B. 2017a. Anthropogenic emission inventories in China: a review. National Science Review, 4(6): 834-866
  19. 19.
    Li M, Zhang Q, Kurokawa J I, Woo J H, He K B, Lu Z F, Ohara T, Song Y, Streets D G, Carmichael G R, Cheng Y F, Hong C P, Huo H, Jiang X J, Kang S C, Liu F, Su H and Zheng B. 2017b. MIX: a mosaic Asian anthropogenic emission inventory under the international collaboration framework of the MICS-Asia and HTAP. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 17(2): 935-963
  20. 20.
    Li X L, Cohen J B, Qin K, Geng H, Wu X H, Wu L L, Yang C L, Zhang R and Zhang L Q. 2023. Remotely sensed and surface measurement-derived mass-conserving inversion of daily NOx emissions and inferred combustion technologies in energy-rich northern China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 23(14): 8001-19
  21. 21.
    Liu F, Duncan B N, Krotkov N A. , Lamsal L N, Beirle S, Griffin D, McLinden C A, Goldberg D L and Lu Z F. 2020. A methodology to constrain carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants using satellite observations of co-emitted nitrogen dioxide. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20(1): 99-116
  22. 22.
    Nassar R, Hill T G, McLinden C A, Wunch D, Jones D B A and Crisp D. 2017. Quantifying CO2 emissions from individual power plants from space. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(19): 10045-10053
  23. 23.
    Oda T, Bun R, Kinakh V, Topylko P, Halushchak M, Marland G, Lauvaux T, Jonas M, Maksyutov S, Nahorski Z, Lesiv M, Danylo O and Horabik-Pyzel J. 2019. Errors and uncertainties in a gridded carbon dioxide emissions inventory. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 24(6): 1007-1050
  24. 24.
    Qin K, Lu L X, Liu J, He Q, Shi J C, Deng W Z, Wang S and Cohen J B. 2023. Model-free daily inversion of NOx emissions using TROPOMI (MCMFE-NOx) and its uncertainty: declining regulated emissions and growth of new sources. Remote Sensing of Environment, 295: 113720
  25. 25.
    Reuter M, Buchwitz M, Hilboll A, Richter A, Schneising O, Hilker M, Heymann J, Bovensmann H and Burrows J P. 2014. Decreasing emissions of NOx relative to CO2 in East Asia inferred from satellite observations. Nature Geoscience, 7(11): 792-795
  26. 26.
    Schwandner F M, Gunson M R, Miller C E, Carn S A, Eldering A, Krings T, Verhulst K R, Schimel D S, Nguyen H M, Crisp D, O’dell C W, Osterman G B, Iraci L T and Podolske J R. 2017. Spaceborne detection of localized carbon dioxide sources. Science, 358(6360): eaam5782
  27. 27.
    Solazzo E, Crippa M, Guizzardi D, Muntean M, Choulga M and Janssens-Maenhout G. 2021. Uncertainties in the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) emission inventory of greenhouse gases. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21(7): 5655-5683
  28. 28.
    Van Geffen J, Boersma K F, Eskes H, Sneep M, Ter Linden M, Zara M and Veefkind J P. 2020. S5P TROPOMI NO2 slant column retrieval: method, stability, uncertainties and comparisons with OMI. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 13(3): 1315-1335
  29. 29.
    Veefkind J P, Aben I, McMullan K, Förster H, De Vries J, Otter G, Claas J, Eskes H J, De Haan J F, Kleipool Q, Van Weele M, Hasekamp O, Hoogeveen R, Landgraf J, Snel R, Tol P, Ingmann P, Voors R, Kruizinga B, Vink R, Visser H and Levelt P F. 2012. TROPOMI on the ESA Sentinel-5 Precursor: a GMES mission for global observations of the atmospheric composition for climate, air quality and ozone layer applications. Remote Sensing of Environment, 120: 70-83
  30. 30.
    Wang Y L, Broquet G, Ciais P, Chevallier F, Vogel F, Kadygrov N, Wu L, Yin Y, Wang R and Tao S. 2017. Estimation of observation errors for large-scale atmospheric inversion of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 69(1): 1325723
  31. 31.
    Wheeler D and Ummel K. 2008. Calculating carma: global estimation of CO2 emissions from the power sector. SSRN Electronic Journal
  32. 32.
    Wu D E, Lin J C, Fasoli B, Oda T, Ye X X, Lauvaux T, Yang E G and Kort E A. 2018. A Lagrangian approach towards extracting signals of urban CO2 emissions from satellite observations of atmospheric column CO2 (XCO2): X-Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport model (“X-STILT v1”). Geoscientific Model Development, 11(12): 4843-4871
  33. 33.
    Yang E G, Kort E A, Ott L E, Oda T and Lin J C. 2023. Using space‐based CO2 and NO2 observations to estimate urban CO2 emissions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 128(6): e2022JD037736
  34. 34.
    Zheng B, Geng G N, Ciais P, Davis S J, Martin R V, Meng J, Wu N N, Chevallier F, Broquet G, Boersma F, Van Der A R, Lin J T, Guan D B, Lei Y, He K B and Zhang Q. 2020. Satellite-based estimates of decline and rebound in China’s CO2 emissions during COVID-19 pandemic. Science Advances, 6(49): eabd4998
  35. 35.
    Zheng B, Tong D, Li M, Liu F, Hong C P, Geng G N, Li H Y, Li X, Peng L Q, Qi J, Yan L, Zhang Y X, Zhao H Y, Zheng Y X, He K B and Zhang Q. 2018. Trends in China’s anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18(19): 14095-14111

더 읽기

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website