предыдущий|следующий

Simulation model of land use dynamics and application: Progress and prospects

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    School of Geographical Sciences, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China

  • Email：lsy_0130@163.com
  • Introduction：李少英(1987—　)，女，副教授，研究方向为遥感与地理信息系统应用、多智能体模拟。E-mail：lsy_0130@163.com
LI Shaoying1,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    School of Geographical Sciences, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China

  • Email：liuxp3@mail.sysu.edu.cn
  • Introduction：刘小平(1978—　)，男，教授，研究方向为地理模拟空间智能及优化决策。E-mail：liuxp3@mail.sysu.edu.cn
LIU Xiaoping2*,  
  • Affiliation：

    School of Geographical Sciences, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China

LI Xia2,  
  • Affiliation：

    School of Geographical Sciences, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China

CHEN Yimin2

реферат

Land Use and Land Cover change (LUCC) is a main research subject of global environmental change and sustainable development. LUCC is a complex and dynamic process that involves both natural and human systems. Land use simulation models are powerful tools for understanding the driving forces of LUCC, for supporting urban planning and decision making, and for providing important information to evaluate the ecosystem effects of LUCC. Land use dynamic systems are difficult to predict through traditional " top–down” models. The Cellular Automata (CA) model and Agent-Based Model (ABM) are " bottom–up” approaches that have attracted increasing attention as powerful modeling tools in simulating land use patterns and evolution processes. In a CA model, each cell has a finite number of states, which can represent land use or land cover types. Changes in individual cells are defined by transition rules and generate the macro pattern of land use changes. The CA model has outstanding advantages in simulating the natural driving factors of land use dynamics. However, the influences of human factors are difficult to represent in a CA model. ABM, by contrast, can reflect the decisions and behaviors of individuals, such as government, investors, and residents. In an ABM, agents can move and interact with each other and with the environment. These local interactions generate certain land use patterns on the global scale. Thus, the two models have distinct advantages in modeling land use dynamics. Currently, the development of the CA and ABM models has achieved several important breakthroughs. This paper summarizes the recent progress in land use simulation models from the perspective of theory and methodology, including scale sensitivity, CA transition and ABM behavior rules, and coupled CA and ABM models. This paper also outlines the applications of these models in virtual city simulation and theoretical verification, realistic city simulation and scenario prediction, multitype land use and cover simulation, and decision support. However, the current land use models have obvious limitations on some crucial issues, such as fine and large-scale simulation. Hence, this paper discusses these problems and proposes the inclusion of three-dimensional modeling, big data, and rule-mining for fine simulation, as well as large-scale simulation and knowledge transfer, in future studies.

ключеви́че слова́

Land Use/Land Cover change;progress modelling and simulation;Cellular Automata (CA);multi-agent system (ABM);scale

References

  1. 1.
    Almeida C M, Gleriani J M, Castejon E F and Soares-Filho B S. 2008. Using neural networks and cellular automata for modelling intra-urban land-use dynamics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22(9): 943–963
  2. 2.
    Bathrellos G D, Skilodimou H D, Kelepertsis A, Alexakis D, Chrisanthaki I and Archonti D. 2008. Environmental research of groundwater in the urban and suburban areas of Attica region, Greece. Environmental Geology, 56(1): 11–18
  3. 3.
    Batty M and Xie Y. 1994. From cells to cities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 21(7): 531–548
  4. 4.
    Batty M, Xie Y C and Sun Z L. 1999. Modeling urban dynamics through GIS-based cellular automata. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 23(3): 205–233
  5. 5.
    Benenson I. 1998. Multi-agent simulations of residential dynamics in the city. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 22(1): 25–42
  6. 6.
    Benenson I, Omer I and Hatna E. 2002. Entity-based modeling of urban residential dynamics: the case of Yaffo, Tel Aviv. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29(4): 491–512
  7. 7.
    Blaschke T, Hay G J, Kelly M, Lang S, Hofmann P, Addink E, Feitosa R Q, van der Meer F, van der Werff H, van Coillie F and Tiede D. 2014. Geographic object-based image analysis-towards a new paradigm. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 87: 180–191
  8. 8.
    Cao Y and Zhen F. 2015. The overall architecture of sustainable urban spatial development model based on the construction of smart cities. Progress in Geography, 34(4): 430–437
  9. 9.
    Chen Y M, Li X, Wang S J and Liu X P. 2012. Defining agents’ behaviour based on urban economic theory to simulate complex urban residential dynamics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26(7): 1155–1172
  10. 10.
    Chen Y M, Li X, Liu X P and Ai B. 2014. Modeling urban land-use dynamics in a fast developing city using the modified logistic cellular automaton with a patch-based simulation strategy. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28(2): 234–255
  11. 11.
    Clarke K C and Gaydos L J. 1998. Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12(7): 699–714
  12. 12.
    Clarke K C, Hoppen S and Gaydos L. 1997. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24(2): 247–261
  13. 13.
    Couclelis H. 1985. Cellular worlds: a framework for modelling micro-macro dynamics. Environment and Planning A, 17(5): 585–596
  14. 14.
    Couclelis H. 1997. From cellular automata to urban models: new principles for model development and implementation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24(2): 165–174
  15. 15.
    Crooks A T. 2010. Constructing and implementing an agent-based model of residential segregation through vector GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(5): 661–675
  16. 16.
    Crooks A T and Heppenstall A J. 2012. Introduction to agent-based modelling // Heppenstall A J, Crooks A T, See L M and Batty M, eds. Agent-Based Models of Geographical Systems. Netherlands: Springer: 85–105
  17. 17.
    Feng H H, Liu H P and Lü Y. 2012. Scenario prediction and analysis of urban growth using SLEUTH model. Pedosphere, 22(2): 206–216
  18. 18.
    Grinberger A Y and Shoval N. 2015. A temporal-contextual analysis of urban dynamics using location-based data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29(11): 1969–1987
  19. 19.
    Haase D, Lautenbach S and Seppelt R. 2010. Modeling and simulating residential mobility in a shrinking city using an agent-based approach. Environmental Modelling and Software, 25(10): 1225–1240
  20. 20.
    He C Y, Okada N, Zhang Q F, Shi P J and Li J G. 2008. Modelling dynamic urban expansion processes incorporating a potential model with cellular automata. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86(1): 79–91
  21. 21.
    He C Y, Zhao Y Y, Tian J and Shi P J. 2013. Modeling the urban landscape dynamics in a megalopolitan cluster area by incorporating a gravitational field model with cellular automata. Landscape and Urban Planning, 113: 78–89
  22. 22.
    Heckbert S, Baynes T and Reeson A. 2010. Agent-based modeling in ecological economics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1185: 39–53
  23. 23.
    Hosseinali F, Alesheikh A A and Nourian F. 2015. Assessing urban land-use development: developing an agent-based model. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 19(1): 285–295
  24. 24.
    Hu M G, Fu X Y, Zhang S Q, Song K S and Wang Z M. 2007. Land-cover simulation and forcast of Melmeg wetland using cellular automata. Resources Science, 29(2): 142–148
  25. 25.
    Huang Q X, Parker D C, Filatova T and Sun S P. 2014. A review of urban residential choice models using agent-based modeling. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41(4): 661–689
  26. 26.
    Irwin E G. 2010. New directions for urban economic models of land use change: incorporating spatial dynamics and heterogeneity. Journal of Regional Science, 50(1): 65–91
  27. 27.
    Jantz C A, Goetz S J and Shelley M K. 2004. Using the SLEUTH urban growth model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on urban land use in the Baltimore-Washington metropolitan area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(2): 251–271
  28. 28.
    Kang T J, Zhang X C, Zhao Y, Wang H Y and Zhang W. 2012. Agent-based urban population distribution model. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 32(7): 790–797
  29. 29.
    Ke X L, Deng X Z and He S J. 2010. Scale sensitivity and its causality for geo-cellular automata modelling. Geographical Research, 29(5): 863–872
  30. 30.
    Koomen E and Stillwell J. 2007. Modelling land-use change: theories and methods // Koomen E, Stillwell J, Bakema A and Scholten H J, eds. Modelling Land-Use Change: Progress and Applications. Netherlands: Springer: 1–22
  31. 31.
    Kuang W H. 2011. Simulating dynamic urban expansion at regional scale in Beijing-Tianjin-Tangshan metropolitan area. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 21: 317–330
  32. 32.
    Lagarias A. 2012. Urban sprawl simulation linking macro-scale processes to micro-dynamics through cellular automata, an application in Thessaloniki, Greece. Applied Geography, 34: 146–160
  33. 33.
    Li D, Li X, Liu X P, Chen Y M, Li S Y, Liu K, Qiao J G, Zheng Y Z, Zhang Y H and Lao C H. 2012. GPU-CA model for large-scale land-use change simulation. Chinese Science Bulletin, 57(19): 2442–2452
  34. 34.
    Li D R, Gong J Y and Shao Z F. 2010. From digital earth to smart earth. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 35(2): 127–132
  35. 35.
    Li M C, Ma L, Blaschke T, Cheng L and Tiede D. 2016. A systematic comparison of different object-based classification techniques using high spatial resolution imagery in agricultural environments. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 49: 87–98
  36. 36.
    Li S Y, Li X, Liu X P, Wu Z F, Ai B and Wang F. 2013a. Simulation of spatial population dynamics based on labor economics and multi-agent systems: a case study on a rapidly developing manufacturing metropolis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27(12): 2410–2435
  37. 37.
    Li T H and Li W K. 2015. Multiple land use change simulation with Monte Carlo approach and CA-ANN model, a case study in Shenzhen, China. Environmental Systems Research, 4: 1
  38. 38.
    Li X, Liu X P and Li S Y. 2010. Intelligent GIS and Spatial Optimization. Beijing: Science Press
  39. 39.
    Li X and Liu X P. 2006. An extended cellular automaton using case-based reasoning for simulating urban development in a large complex region. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(10): 1109–1136
  40. 40.
    Li X and Liu X P. 2007. Defining agents’ behaviors to simulate complex residential development using multi criteria evaluation. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(4): 1063–1075
  41. 41.
    Li X and Liu X P. 2008. Embedding sustainable development strategies in agent-based models for use as a planning tool. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22(1): 21–45
  42. 42.
    Li X, Liu Y L, Liu X P, Chen Y M and Ai B. 2013b. Knowledge transfer and adaptation for land-use simulation with a logistic cellular automaton. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27(10): 1829–1848
  43. 43.
    Li X, Yang Q S and Liu X P. 2007. Genetic algorithms for determining the parameters of cellular automata in urban simulation. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 50(12): 1857–1866
  44. 44.
    Li X and Yeh A G O. 2000. Modelling sustainable urban development by the integration of constrained cellular automata and GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14(2): 131–152
  45. 45.
    Li X and Yeh A G O. 2001. Zoning land for agricultural protection by the integration of remote sensing, GIS, and cellular automata. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67(4): 471–477
  46. 46.
    Li X and Yeh G O. 2002a. Integration of principal components analysis and cellular automata for spatial decisionmaking and urban simulation. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 45(6): 521–529
  47. 47.
    Li X and Yeh A G O. 2002b. Neural-network-based cellular automata for simulating multiple land use changes using GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16(4): 323–343
  48. 48.
    Li X and Yeh A G O. 2004. Data mining of cellular automata’s transition rules. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18(8): 723–744
  49. 49.
    Li X, Yeh A G O and Liu X P. 2006. Geographical simulation systems for urban planning. City Planning Review, 30(6): 69–74
  50. 50.
    Li X, Yeh A G O, Liu X P and Yang Q S. 2007. Geographical Simulation Systems: Cellular Automata and Multi-agent System. Beijing: Science Press
  51. 51.
    Li X, Zhang X H, Yeh A and Liu X P. 2010. Parallel cellular automata for large-scale urban simulation using load-balancing techniques. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(6): 803–820
  52. 52.
    Li Y. 2009. The dynamics of residential segregation in buffalo: an agent-based simulation. Urban Studies, 46(13): 2749–2770
  53. 53.
    Ligtenberg A, Bregt A K and van Lammeren R. 2001. Multi-actor-based land use modeloling: spatial planning using agents. Landscape and Urban Planning, 56(1/2): 21–33
  54. 54.
    Liu X P, Li X, Ai B, Tao H Y, Wu S K and Liu T. 2006. Multi-agent systems for simulating and planning land use development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 61(10): 1101–1112
  55. 55.
    Liu X P, Li X, Chen Y M, Liu T and Li S Y. 2010. Agent-based model of residential location. Acta Geographica Sinica, 65(6): 695–707
  56. 56.
    Liu X P, Li X, Shi X, Wu S K and Liu T. 2008. Simulating complex urban development using kernel-based non-linear cellular automata. Ecological Modelling, 211(1/2): 169–181
  57. 57.
    Liu X P, Li X, Shi X, Zhang X H and Chen Y M. 2010. Simulating land-use dynamics under planning policies by integrating artificial immune systems with cellular automata. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(5): 783–802
  58. 58.
    Liu X P, Li X and Yeh A G O. 2006. Multi-agent systems for simulating spatial decision behaviors and land-use dynamics. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 49(11): 1184–1194
  59. 59.
    Liu X P, Li X, Yeh A G O, He J Q and Tao J. 2007. Discovery of transition rules for geographical cellular automata by using ant colony optimization. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 50(10): 1578–1588
  60. 60.
    Liu X P, Ma L, Li X, Ai B, Li S Y and He Z J. 2014. Simulating urban growth by integrating landscape expansion index (LEI) and cellular automata. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28(1): 148–163
  61. 61.
    Liu Y, Wang F H, Xiao Y and Gao S. 2012. Urban land uses and traffic ‘source-sink areas’: evidence from GPS-enabled taxi data in Shanghai. Landscape and Urban Planning, 106(1): 73–87
  62. 62.
    Liu Y L, Kong X S, Liu Y F and Chen Y Y. 2013. Simulating the conversion of rural settlements to town land based on multi-agent systems and cellular automata. PLoS One, 8(11): e79300
  63. 63.
    Liu Y L and Li X. 2014. Knowledge transfer and adaptation for urban simulation cellular automata model base on multi-source Tradaboost algorithm. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 39(6): 695–700
  64. 64.
    Liu Y M, Li Q and Jiang N. 2010. Application Study of 3D cadastre and urban stereoscopic development based on information technology: the case study in Nanjing City. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 12(3): 392–398
  65. 65.
    Long Y, Jin X B, Yang X H and Zhou Y K. 2014. Reconstruction of historical arable land use patterns using constrained cellular automata: a case study of Jiangsu, China. Applied Geography, 52: 67–77
  66. 66.
    Long Y and Zhang Y P. 2015. Land-use pattern scenario analysis using planner agents. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 42(4): 615–637
  67. 67.
    Ma L, Cheng L, Li M C, Liu Y X and Ma X X. 2015. Training set size, scale, and features in geographic object-based image analysis of very high resolution unmanned aerial vehicle imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 102: 14–27
  68. 68.
    Ma S F, Ai B and Nian P H. 2014. Pre-assessment and warning of land use planning with constrained cellular automata. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 30(4): 51–55
  69. 69.
    Macal C M and North M J. 2010. Tutorial on agent-based modelling and simulation. Journal of Simulation, 4(3): 151–162
  70. 70.
    Moghadam H S and Helbich M. 2013. Spatiotemporal urbanization processes in the megacity of Mumbai, India: a Markov chains-cellular automata urban growth model. Applied Geography, 40: 140–149
  71. 71.
    Moreno N, Wang F and Marceau D J. 2009. Implementation of a dynamic neighborhood in a land-use vector-based cellular automata model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33(1): 44–54
  72. 72.
    Pan Y, Roth A, Yu Z R and Doluschitz R. 2010. The impact of variation in scale on the behavior of a cellular automata used for land use change modeling. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34(5): 400–408
  73. 73.
    Quan Q, Tian G J and Sha M Q. 2011. Dynamic simulation of Shanghai urban expansion based on multi-agent system and cellular automata models. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31(10): 2875–2887
  74. 74.
    Samat N, Hasni R and Elhadary Y A E. 2011. Modelling land use changes at the Peri-urban areas using geographic information systems and cellular automata model. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(6): 72–84
  75. 75.
    Schelling T C. 1971. Dynamic models of segregation. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(2): 143–186
  76. 76.
    Tao H Y, Li X and Chen X X. 2009. Simulation for evolvement of residential spatial patterns in real scene based on multi-agent. Acta Geographica Sinica, 64(6): 665–676
  77. 77.
    Tian G J and Wu J G. 2008. Simulating land use change with agent-based models: progress and prospects. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28(9): 4451–4459
  78. 78.
    Tobler W R. 1979. Cellular geography // Gale S and Olsson G, eds. Philosophy in Geography. Netherlands: Springer: 379–386 [DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-9394-5_18]
  79. 79.
    van Vilet J, Hurkens J, White R and van Delden H. 2012. An activity-based cellular automaton model to simulate land-use dynamics. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39(2): 198–212
  80. 80.
    Wang F and Marceau D J. 2013. A patch-based cellular automaton for simulating land-use changes at fine spatial resolution. Transactions in GIS, 17(6): 828–846
  81. 81.
    Ward D P, Murray A T and Phinn S R. 2000. A stochastically constrained cellular model of urban growth. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24(6): 539–558
  82. 82.
    White R and Engelen G. 1993. Cellular automata and fractal urban form: a cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environment and Planning A, 25(8): 1175–1199
  83. 83.
    White R, Engelen G and Uijee I. 1997. The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modelling of urban land-use dynamics. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24(3): 323–343
  84. 84.
    Wu F and Webster C J. 1998. Simulation of land development through the integration of cellular automata and multicriteria evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25(1): 103–126
  85. 85.
    Wu F L. 2002. Calibration of stochastic cellular automata: the application to rural-urban land conversions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16(8): 795–818
  86. 86.
    Wu J, Jiang C S, Houston D, Baker D and Delfino R. 2011. Automated time activity classification based on global positioning system (GPS) tracking data. Environmental Health, 10: 101
  87. 87.
    Xiao H, Tian H Y, Zhu P J and Yu H K. 2010. The dynamic simulation and forecast of urban population distribution based on the multi-agent system. Progress in Geography, 29(3): 347–354
  88. 88.
    Xu Q L, Yang K, Wang G L and Yang Y L. 2015. Agent-based modeling and simulations of land-use and land-cover change according to ant colony optimization: a case study of the Erhai Lake Basin, China. Natural Hazards, 75(1): 95–118
  89. 89.
    Yang Q S, Li X and Shi X. 2008. Cellular automata for simulating land use changes based on support vector machines. Computers and Geosciences, 34(6): 592–602
  90. 90.
    Zhang H H, Zeng Y N, Jin X B, Yin C L and Zou B. 2008. Urban land expansion model based on multi- agent system and application. Acta Geographica Sinica, 63(8): 869–881
  91. 91.
    Zhang Y H, Li X, Liu X P, Qiao J G and He Z J. 2013. Urban expansion simulation by coupling remote sensing observations and cellular automata. Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(4): 872–886
  92. 92.
    Zhou C H, Sun Z L and Xie Y C. 1999. Geographical Cellular Automata. Beijing: Science Press
  93. 93.
    Zhou S L, Tao H Y and Zhuo L. 2014. Vector-based multi-agent simulation of urban expansion: a case study in Panyu District in Guangzhou City. Progress in Geography, 33(2): 202–210

Читать полностью

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website