предыдущий|следующий

Wind speed inversion for imaging microwave altimeter

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Space Ocean Remote Sensing and Application, National Satellite Ocean Application Service, Beijing 100081, China

    Center for Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

  • Email：baoqingliu2000@163.com
  • Introduction：鲍青柳(1986—　)，男，博士后，研究方向为海洋遥感、遥感数据处理等。E-mail：baoqingliu2000@163.com
Qingliu BAO12,  
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Space Ocean Remote Sensing and Application, National Satellite Ocean Application Service, Beijing 100081, China

Mingsen LIN1,  
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Space Ocean Remote Sensing and Application, National Satellite Ocean Application Service, Beijing 100081, China

Youguang ZHANG1,  
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Space Ocean Remote Sensing and Application, National Satellite Ocean Application Service, Beijing 100081, China

Yongjun JIA1,  
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Space Ocean Remote Sensing and Application, National Satellite Ocean Application Service, Beijing 100081, China

Shuyan LANG1

реферат

As the development of space technology and the launch of new type microwave payloads, such as imaging microwave altimeter, more and more radars that observe the ocean at low incident will be in orbit, such as the Precipitation Radar (PR) (incident angle: 0°—18°) on Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite, the Imaging ALTimeter (IALT) (incident angle: 1°—7°) on the TG-2 space station which is lunched on September 15, 2016, and the Surface Ware Investigation and Monitoring (SWIM) (incident angle: 0°—10°) on China France Oceanography Satellite which is scheduled to launch in 2018. How to make use of the Normalized Radar Cross Section (NRCS) at low incident angle effectively is a very hot topic. Can the NRCS at low incident angle be used for wind speed inversion? This is also the motivation of our research. This paper uses the PR data on TRMM to research the sea surface wind speed inversion method and analyze the inversion accuracy. In this paper, the empirical Geophysical Model Function (GMF) model is established by crossing the PRNRCS with the QuikScat wind speed, and the GMF Table is given out in section 2. The Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) method is used for PR wind speed inversion, and the objective function of MLE is provided in section 3. At last, the retrieved wind speeds are compared with the buoy and advanced scatterometer (ASCAT) wind speed. The performance of MLE method and the wind speed inversion accuracy are analyzed. By the performance analysis, we find that the bias and standard deviation of retrieved wind speed is smaller than 0.28 m/s and 1.51 m/s respectively. Moreover, the wind speed retrieval performances versus wind speed and incident angle are analyzed. The wind speed retrieval performance at medium wind speed is better than that at low and high wind speed. The inversion accuracy with 0°—8° incident angles is better than that with 8°—12° incident angles. From the results of this paper we can concluded that the NRCS at low incident angle can be used for wind speed retrieval. And the wind speed retrieval accuracy is even higher than that of scatterometer (typically 2 m/s). Thus, for the radars that operate near nadir, such as the IALT and the SWIM on China France Oceanography Satellite, we can offer the product of wind speed.

ключеви́че слова́

TRMM PR;wind speed inversion;low incident angle;inversion accuracy

References

  1. 1.
    Apel J R. 1994. An improved model of the ocean surface wave vector spectrum and its effects on radar backscatter. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 99(C8): 16269–16291
  2. 2.
    Barrick D. 1974. Wind dependence of quasi-specular microwave sea scatter. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 22(1): 135–136
  3. 3.
    Brown G S. 1990. Quasi-specular scattering from the air-sea interface//Geernaert G L and Plant W L, eds. Surface Waves and Fluxes: Volume II—Remote Sensing. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer: 1–39 [DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-0627-3_1]
  4. 4.
    Cox C S and Munk W H. 1954. Statistics of the sea surface derived from sun glitter. Journal of Marine Research, 13: 198–227
  5. 5.
    Freilich M H and Vanhoff B A. 2003. The relationship between winds, surface roughness, and radar backscatter at low incidence angles from TRMM Precipitation Radar measurements. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 20(4): 549–562
  6. 6.
    Hesany V, Plant W J and Keller W C. 2000. The normalized radar cross section of the sea at 10° incidence. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38(1): 64–72
  7. 7.
    Jackson F C, Walton W T, Hines D E, Walter B A and Peng C Y. 1992. Sea surface mean square slope from K u-band backscatter data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 97(C7): 11411–11427
  8. 8.
    Kuroiwa H, Kawanishi T, Kojima M, Oikawa K and Kozu T. 1996. Precipitation radar onboard TRMM satellite//Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Phased Array Systems and Technology. Boston, MA: IEEE: 249–254 [DOI: 10.1109/PAST.1996.566094]
  9. 9.
    Li L, Im E, Connor L N and Chang P S. 2004. Retrieving ocean surface wind speed from the TRMM Precipitation Radar measurements. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(6): 1271–1282
  10. 10.
    Mears C A, Smith D K and Wentz F J. 2001. Comparison of special sensor microwave imager and buoy-measured wind speeds from 1987 to 1997. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 106(C6): 11719–11729
  11. 11.
    Valenzuela G R. 1978. Theories for the interaction of electromagnetic and oceanic waves—a review. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 13(1/4): 61–85
  12. 12.
    Wentz F J, Peteherych S and Thomas L A. 1984. A model function for ocean radar cross sections at 14. 6 GHz. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 89(C3): 3689–3704
  13. 13.
    Wu J. 1972. Sea-surface slope and equilibrium wind-wave spectra. Physics of Fluids, 15(5): 741–747
  14. 14.
    Wu J. 1990. Mean square slopes of the wind-disturbed water surface, their magnitude, directionality, and composition. Radio Science, 25(1): 37–48
  15. 15.
    Zhang Y H, Xu K, Li M T, Li J, Liu H G and Wang X Z. 1999. Study on spaceborne topography mapping altimeter. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 14(1): 11–14 (
  16. 16.
    Zhang Y H, Zhang X K, Meng X, Luo W, Zhou Z X and Jiang J S. 2007. An interferometric imaging altimeter applied for both ocean and land observation//Proceedings of the IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). Barcelona: IEEE: 3821–3824 [DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2007.4423676]

Читать полностью

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website