предыдущий|следующий

Estimating forest stand characteristics in a coastal plain forest plantation based on vertical structure profile parameters derived from ALS data

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

  • Email：liuhao_njfu@hotmail.com
  • Introduction：刘浩，1994年生，男，硕士研究生，研究方向为激光雷达森林参数反演。E-mail：liuhao_njfu@hotmail.com
Hao LIU,  
  • Affiliation：

    Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Zhengnan ZHANG,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

  • Email：lincao@njfu.edu.cn
  • Introduction：曹林，1983年生，男，副教授，研究方向为遥感森林资源监测。E-mail：lincao@njfu.edu.cn
Lin CAO*

реферат

China is a country with the largest plantation area in the world. Timely, quantitatively, and accurately acquiring planted forest stand characteristics is the key to monitoring and managing forest plantation, which contributes to the global carbon cycle. This study was conducted at a north subtropical coastal plain forest plantation to estimate forest stand characteristics using light detection and ranging (LiDAR) point clouds combined with 55 field-measured data. First, Canopy Height Distribution (CHD) and Foliage Profile (FP) were extracted and used to obtain Weibull parameters by fitting a Weibull density function to the profiles (Suite 1). Second, Height-Related Metrics (HRM) and Density-Related Metrics (DRM) (Suite 2) were directly extracted from the LiDAR point clouds. Finally, multiple regression models were constructed to predict the stand characteristics (i.e., stand density, diameter of breast height (DBH), basal area, Lorey’s tree height, volume, and aboveground biomass) on the basis of the field-measured data and two suites of metrics. Results showed that (1) the accuracies of the forest stand characteristics that use point cloud (Suite 2) and canopy vertical profile metrics simultaneously (Suite 1) were relatively higher than that only using point cloud metrics (Suite 2) ( ΔAdjusted R2=0—0.13, ΔrRMSE=0.08%—3.65%). (2) For all the forest stand characteristic estimations, the models of Lorey’s tree height (Adjusted R2=0.85, rRMSE=7.66%) and volume (Adjusted R2=0.84, rRMSE=14.27%) demonstrated the highest accuracies, followed by the aboveground biomass (Adjusted R2=0.78, rRMSE=14.15%), basal area (Adjusted R2=0.73, rRMSE=14.70%), and mean DBH (Adjusted R2=0.64, rRMSE=15.05%). Stand density exhibited the lowest accuracies (Adjusted R2=0.58, rRMSE=26.16%). (3) The Weibull function was appropriate for describing the vertical stand canopy structure of planted forests. The Weibull metrics can be favorable in effectively improving the estimation accuracy of the forest stand characteristics. This study provided an effective approach in estimating the forest stand characteristics that use the LiDAR point clouds by combining vertical profile and point cloud metrics. This study also proved that the vertical profile metrics can help in increasing the accuracy of the predictive models and provide the mechanism for interpreting the forest stand vertical structure.

ключеви́че слова́

lidar;canopy vertical structure profiles;Weibull;foliage profile;point clouds metrics

References

  1. 1.
    Aber J D. 1979. A method for estimating foliage-height profiles in broad-leaved forests. The Journal of Ecology, 67(1): 35–40
  2. 2.
    Bengio Y and Grandvalet Y. 2004. No unbiased estimator of the variance of K-fold cross-validation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5: 1089–1105
  3. 3.
    Bottalico F, Chirici G, Giannini R, Mele S, Mura M, Puxeddu M, McRoberts R E, Valbuena R and Travaglini D. 2017. Modeling Mediterranean forest structure using airborne laser scanning data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 57: 145–153
  4. 4.
    Cao L, Gao S, Li P H, Yun T, Shen X and Ruan H H. 2016. Aboveground biomass estimation of individual trees in a coastal planted forest using full-waveform airborne laser scanning data. Remote Sensing, 8(9): 729
  5. 5.
    Carle J, Vuorinen P and Del Lungo L. 2002. Status and trends in global forest plantation development. Forest Products Society, 52: 12–23
  6. 6.
    Coops N C, Hilker T, Wulder M A, St-Onge B, Newnham G, Siggins A and Trofymow J A. 2007. Estimating canopy structure of Douglas-fir forest stands from discrete-return Lidar. Trees, 21(3): 295–310
  7. 7.
    Coops N C, Smith M L, Jacobsen K L, Martin M and Ollinger S. 2004. Estimation of plant and leaf area index using three techniques in a mature native eucalypt canopy. Austral Ecology, 29(3): 332–341
  8. 8.
    Ding Y. 2008. Biomass and Carbon Storage in Poplar Plantations in the North of Jiangsu Province. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University.
  9. 9.
    Duncanson L I, Niemann K O and Wulder M A. 2010. Integration of GLAS and Landsat TM data for aboveground biomass estimation. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 36(2): 129–141
  10. 10.
    Fan H, Wang S J, Ruan H H, Tan Y, Zheng A B, Xu Y, Xu K and Cao G H. 2014. Effects of soil fauna on litter decomposition and its community structure under different land use patterns in coastal region of northern Jiangsu province. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 38(3): 1–7 (
  11. 11.
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2015. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  12. 12.
    Frazer G W, Magnussen S, Wulder M A and Niemann K O. 2011. Simulated impact of sample plot size and co-registration error on the accuracy and uncertainty of lidar-derived estimates of forest stand biomass. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(2): 636–649
  13. 13.
    Fu T, Pang Y, Huang Q F, Liu Q W and Xu G C. 2011. Prediction of subtropical forest parameters using airborne laser scanner. Journal of Remote Sensing, 15(5): 1092–1104 (
  14. 14.
    Hall S A, Burke I C, Box D O, Kaufmann M R and Stoker J M. 2005. Estimating stand structure using discrete-return lidar: an example from low density, fire prone ponderosa pine forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 208(1/3): 189–209
  15. 15.
    He D, Lu Z L and Li D Z. 2009. Differentiation characteristics of a 50-year-established Metasequoia glyptostroboides Plantation. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 17(2): 122–130 (
  16. 16.
    Hilker T, van Leeuwen M, Coops N C, Wulder M A, Newnham G J, Juup D L B and Culvenor D S. 2010. Comparing canopy metrics derived from terrestrial and airborne laser scanning in a Douglas-fir dominated forest stand. Trees, 24(5): 819–832
  17. 17.
    Hurtt G, Xiao X M, Keller M, Palace M, Asner G P, Braswell R, Brondízio E S, Cardoso M, Carvalho C J R, Fearon M G, Guild L, Hagen S, Hetrick S, Moore B, Nobre C, Read J M, Sá T, Schloss A, Vourlitis G and Wickel A J. 2003. IKONOS imagery for the Large Scale Biosphere–Atmosphere Experiment in Amazonia (LBA). Remote Sensing of Environment, 88(1/2): 111–127
  18. 18.
    Kankare V, Vastaranta M, Holopainen M, Räty M, Yu X W, Hyyppä J, Hyyppä H , Alho P and Viitala R. 2013. Retrieval of forest aboveground biomass and stem volume with airborne scanning Lidar. Remote Sensing, 5(5): 2257–2274
  19. 19.
    Kerr J T and Ostrovsky M. 2003. From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18(6): 299–305
  20. 20.
    Kershaw J A Jr and Maguire D A. 1995. Crown structure in western hemlock, Douglas-fir, and grand fir in western Washington: trends in branch-level mass and leaf area. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 25(12): 1897–1912
  21. 21.
    Kraus K and Pfeifer N. 1998. Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 53(4): 193–203
  22. 22.
    Latham P A, Zuuring H R and Coble D W. 1998. A method for quantifying vertical forest structure. Forest Ecology and Management, 104(1/3): 157–170
  23. 23.
    Lefsky M A, Cohen W B, Acker S A, Parker G G, Spies T A and Harding D. 1999. Lidar remote sensing of the canopy structure and biophysical properties of Douglas-fir western hemlock forests. Remote Sensing of Environment, 70(3): 339–361
  24. 24.
    Li Z Y, Liu Q W and Pang Y. 2016. Review on forest parameters inversion using LiDAR. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(5): 1138–1150 (
  25. 25.
    Lovell J L, Jupp D L B, Culvenor D S and Coops N C. 2003. Using airborne and ground-based ranging Lidar to measure canopy structure in Australian forests. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(5): 607–622
  26. 26.
    Lu D S, Chen Q, Wang G X, Moran E, Batistella M, Zhang M Z, Laurin G V and Saah D. 2012. Aboveground Forest Biomass Estimation with Landsat and LiDAR Data and Uncertainty Analysis of the Estimates. International Journal of Forestry Research, 2012:Article ID 436537 [DOI: 10.1155/2012/436537]
  27. 27.
    Ma L Q and Li A N. 2011. Review of application of LiDAR to estimation of forest vertical structure parameters. World Forestry Research, 24(1): 41–45 (
  28. 28.
    Magnussen S, Eggermont P and Lariccia V N. 1999. Recovering tree heights from airborne laser scanner data. Forest Science, 45(3): 407–422
  29. 29.
    Maltamo M, Eerikäinen K, Pitkänen J, Hyyppä J and Vehmas M. 2004. Estimation of timber volume and stem density based on scanning laser altimetry and expected tree size distribution functions. Remote Sensing of Environment, 90(3): 319–330
  30. 30.
    McElhinny C, Gibbons P, Brack C and Bauhus J. 2005. Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: its definition and measurement. Forest Ecology and Management, 218(1/3): 1–24
  31. 31.
    Miura N and Jones S D. 2010. Characterizing forest ecological structure using pulse types and heights of airborne laser scanning. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(5): 1069–1076
  32. 32.
    Montealegre A L, Lamelas M T, de la Riva J, García-Martín A and Escribano F. 2016. Use of low point density ALS data to estimate stand-level structural variables in Mediterranean Aleppo pine forest. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 89(4): 373–382
  33. 33.
    Morsdorf F, Kötz B, Meier E, Itten K I and Allgöwer B. 2006. Estimation of LAI and fractional cover from small footprint airborne laser scanning data based on gap fraction. Remote Sensing of Environment, 104(1): 50–61
  34. 34.
    Næsset E. 1997. Determination of mean tree height of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 52(2): 49–56
  35. 35.
    Næsset E. 2009. Effects of different sensors, flying altitudes, and pulse repetition frequencies on forest canopy metrics and biophysical stand properties derived from small-footprint airborne laser data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(1): 148–159
  36. 36.
    Næsset E and Bjerknes K O. 2001. Estimating tree heights and number of stems in young forest stands using airborne laser scanner data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 78(3): 328–340
  37. 37.
    Næsset E and Gobakken T. 2005. Estimating forest growth using canopy metrics derived from airborne laser scanner data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 96(3/4): 453–465
  38. 38.
    Næsset E and Gobakken T. 2008. Estimation of above- and below-ground biomass across regions of the boreal forest zone using airborne laser. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(6): 3079–3090
  39. 39.
    Næsset E and Økland T. 2002. Estimating tree height and tree crown properties using airborne scanning laser in a boreal nature reserve. Remote Sensing of Environment, 79(1): 105–115
  40. 40.
    Ni-Meister W, Jupp D L B and Dubayah R. 2001. Modeling Lidar waveforms in heterogeneous and discrete canopies. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39(9): 1943–1958
  41. 41.
    Pang Y, Li Z Y, Chen E X and Sun G Q. 2005. Lidar remote sensing technology and its application in forestry. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 41(3): 129–136 (
  42. 42.
    Pang Y, Zhao F, Li Z Y, Zhou S F, Deng G, Liu Q W and Chen E X. 2008. Forest height inversion using airborne Lidar technology. Journal of Remote Sensing, 12(1): 152–158 (
  43. 43.
    Pang Y, Li Z Y, Ju H B, Lu H, Jia W, Si L, Guo Y, Liu Q W, Li S M, Liu L X, Xie B B, Tan B X and Dian Y Y. 2016. LiCHy: the CAF's Lidar, CCD and hyperspectral integrated airborne observation system. Remote Sensing, 8(5): 398
  44. 44.
    Parker G G, Lefsky M A and Harding D J. 2001. Light transmittance in forest canopies determined using airborne laser altimetry and in-canopy quantum measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment, 76(3): 298–309
  45. 45.
    Payn T, Carnus J M, Freer-Smith P, Kimberley M, Kollert W, Liu S R, Orazio C, Rodriguez L, Silva L N and Wingfield M J. 2015. Changes in planted forests and future global implications. Forest Ecology and Management, 352: 57–67
  46. 46.
    Porté A, Trichet P, Bert D and Loustau D. 2002. Allometric relationships for branch and tree woody biomass of Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aït. ). Forest Ecology and Management, 158(1/3): 71–83
  47. 47.
    Qin H M, Wang C, Xi X H, Tian J L and Zhou G Q. 2017. Simulating the effects of the airborne Lidar scanning angle, flying altitude, and pulse density for forest foliage profile retrieval. Applied Sciences, 7(7): 712
  48. 48.
    Radtke P J and Bolstad P V. 2001. Laser point-quadrat sampling for estimating foliage-height profiles in broad-leaved forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31(3): 410–418
  49. 49.
    Riaño D, Meier E, Allgöwer B, Chuvieco E and Ustin S L. 2003. Modeling airborne laser scanning data for the spatial generation of critical forest parameters in fire behavior modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86(2): 177–186
  50. 50.
    Silva A G P, Görgens E B, Campoe O C, Alvares C A, Stape J L and Rodriguez L C E. 2015. Assessing biomass based on canopy height profiles using airborne laser scanning data in eucalypt plantations. Scientia Agricola, 72(6): 504–512
  51. 51.
    Song Y B, Ding Y P and Shen F. 2009. The development and latest progress of JSCORS. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping(2): 73–74 (
  52. 52.
    Spies T A. 1998. Forest structure: a key to the ecosystem. Northwest Science, 72: 34–39
  53. 53.
    State Forestry Administration. 2014. The 8th national forestry inventory results. Forest Resources Management(1): 1–2 (
  54. 54.
    Szulecka J and Zalazar E M. 2017. Forest plantations in Paraguay: historical developments and a critical diagnosis in a SWOT-AHP framework. Land Use Policy, 60: 384–394
  55. 55.
    Tanabe S I, Toda M J and Vinokurova A V. 2001. Tree shape, forest structure and diversity of drosophilid community: comparison between boreal and temperate birch forests. Ecological Research, 16(3): 369–385
  56. 56.
    Thomas V, Oliver R D, Lim K and Woods M. 2008. Lidar and Weibull modeling of diameter and basal area. The Forestry Chronicle, 84(6): 866–875
  57. 57.
    Timilsina N, Cropper W P Jr, Escobedo F J and Lima J M T. 2013. Predicting understory species richness from stand and management characteristics using regression trees. Forests, 4(1): 122–136
  58. 58.
    Wang M H, Wang G B, Ruan H H, Xie T, Xu C B, Xu Y M, Zhao X L and Xu H M. 2012. Characteristics of soil water-soluble organic carbon under four different land use patterns in coastal area of northern Jiangsu. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 31(5): 1165–1170 (
  59. 59.
    Wang Y S, Weinacker H and Koch B. 2008. A Lidar point cloud based procedure for vertical canopy structure analysis and 3d single tree modelling in forest. Sensors, 8(6): 3938–3951
  60. 60.
    Watt M S, Meredith A, Watt P and Gunn A. 2013. Use of Lidar to estimate stand characteristics for thinning operations in young Douglas-fir plantations. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 43(1): 18
  61. 61.
    Weishampel J F, Drake J B, Cooper A, Blair J B and Hofton M. 2007. Forest canopy recovery from the 1938 hurricane and subsequent salvage damage measured with airborne Lidar. Remote Sensing of Environment, 109(2): 142–153
  62. 62.
    Wulder M A, White J C, Nelson R F, Næsset E, Ørka H O, Coops N C, Hilker T, Bater C W and Gobakken T. 2012. Lidar sampling for large-area forest characterization: a review. Remote Sensing of Environment, 121: 196–209
  63. 63.
    Xie T, Zheng A B, Wang G B, Ruan H H, Xu Y M, Xu C B and Ge Z W. 2012. Seasonal variation patterns of soil labile organic carbon in poplar plantations with different ages in northern Jiangsu. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 31(5): 1171–1178 (
  64. 64.
    Xu M G and Harrington T B. 1998. Foliage biomass distribution of loblolly pine as affected by tree dominance, crown size, and stand characteristics. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28(6): 887–892
  65. 65.
    Xu Y M, Xu C B, Cao G H, Feng K Q, Shen C Q and Jiao Z Y. 2009. Preliminary report on the effect of different row spacing on the growth of 35 poplar. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science and Technology, 36(1): 31–33 (
  66. 66.
    Yang X M. 1987. Sustainable utilization of forest resources in the coastal state-run forest farm of Yancheng city. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science and Technology(1): 26–29 (
  67. 67.
    Zhao F, Yang X Y, Schull M A, Román-Colón M O, Yao T, Wang Z S, Zhang Q L, Jupp D L B, Lovell J L, Culvenor D S, Newnham G J, Richardson A D, Ni-Meister W, Schaaf C L, Woodcock C E and Strahler A H. 2011. Measuring effective leaf area index, foliage profile, and stand height in New England forest stands using a full-waveform ground-based Lidar. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(11): 2954–2964
  68. 68.
    Zhao J, Li J and Liu Q H. 2013. Review of forest vertical structure parameter inversion based on remote sensing technology. Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(4): 697–716 (
  69. 69.
    Zhao K G, Popescu S and Nelson R. 2009. Lidar remote sensing of forest biomass: a scale-invariant estimation approach using airborne lasers. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(1): 182–196
  70. 70.
    Zheng J M, Zhang C Y, Zhou J X, Zhao X H, Yu X X and Qin Y S. 2007. Study on vertical structure of forest communities in Yunmengshan. Forest Research, 20(6): 768–774 (
  71. 71.
    Zhuang H L, Becuwe X, Xiao C B, Wang Y H, Wang H, Yin B and Liu C J. 2012. Allometric equation-based estimation of biomass carbon sequestration in Metasequoia glyptostroboides plantations in Chongming Island, Shanghai. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Agricultural Science), 30(2): 48–55 (

Читать полностью

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website