предыдущий|следующий

Effects of humidity on absorbing aerosol index

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    National Space Science Center,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

  • Email：zhangzhuo113@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • Introduction：张卓，1991年生，女，博士研究生，研究方向为星载仪器星上定标及AAI反演结果的影响因素。E-mail：zhangzhuo113@mails.ucas.ac.cn
ZHANG Zhuo12,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    National Satellite Meteorological Center,China Meteorology Administration, Beijing 100081, China

  • Email：wangwh@cma.gov.cn
  • Introduction：王维和，1964年生，男，正研级高级工程师，研究方向为星载紫外探测仪定标和数据处理。E-mail：wangwh@cma.gov.cn
WANG Weihe3*,  
  • Affiliation：

    National Space Science Center,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

WANG Houmao1,  
  • Affiliation：

    National Space Science Center,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

WANG Yongmei12

реферат

Air pollution processes in Northern China have been analyzed using Absorbing Aerosol Index (AAI) products and ground-based data, including Relative Humidity (RH) and Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5. The AAI data are obtained from the total ozone unit load on FY-3B, which is the second-generation polar orbiter of China. The correlation between AAI, which has a fairly high value, and PM2.5 is weak when RH has a high value. In this research, the relationship between satellite-retrieved AAI and RH is simulated. The effects of humidity on AAI are investigated under different aerosol types, such as urban and rural aerosols, using radiative transfer models Doubling–Adding KNMI (DAK) with consideration of the characteristics of the aerosol models of the low atmosphere and mode radii for the aerosol model as a function of RH. Rural aerosol consists of 30% dust-like aerosol and 70% water-soluble materials, including ammonium, calcium sulfate, and organic compounds. Urban aerosol consists of 80% rural aerosol and 20% carbonaceous aerosol-like soot caused by industrial emissions. The AAI increases with Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) for the two aerosol models, whereas the AAI is higher and changes faster with AOD than with urban aerosol for the rural aerosol model. For the two aerosol models, the AAI remains constant with RH when the air is dry but changes rapidly when the air becomes humid, and the effects of RH on the AAI are opposite for rural and urban aerosols. Analysis results show that the AAI strongly depends on RH when absorbing aerosols, such as carbonaceous aerosol-like soot, exist in the atmosphere during air pollution, which frequently occurs in Northern China. This finding can well explain the huge discrepancy of the comparison between the AAI and ground-based measurements under high RH condition using the microphysical properties of aerosols. Under a dry condition and a certain AOD value, the AAI is larger in rural aerosol than in urban aerosol. This condition is due to more dust-like aerosols exist in the rural aerosol model than in the urban aerosol model, and dust-like aerosols have stronger absorbing ability than carbonaceous aerosols. Under the humid condition, dust-like aerosols in the rural model exert a weaker hygroscopic effect than carbonaceous aerosols caused by industrial emission in the urban model, whereas sulfate aerosols demonstrate a strong hygroscopic effect but only produce negative or zero AAI. Thus, the AAI of rural aerosol slightly decreases with the increase in RH. Soot-like aerosol, which only exists in urban aerosol, can grow large by taking a large amount of water in high RH ambient atmosphere and change the chemical composition of particles. Thus, the absorption ability enormously increases with RH. This condition makes RH have a stronger effect on the AAI in the urban aerosol model than in the rural aerosol model. The aerosol type and humidity must be considered important impacting factors when monitoring the AAI data derived from spaceborne UV instruments.

ключеви́че слова́

remote sensing;Absorbing Aerosol Index;Relative Humility;DAK;PM2.5;FY-3/TOU

References

  1. 1.
    Baynard T, Garland R M, Ravishankara A R, Tolbert M A and Lovejoy E R. 2006. Key factors influencing the relative humidity dependence of aerosol light scattering. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(6): L06813
  2. 2.
    Bednarz F. 1995. Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment, GOME, Users Manual, Eur. Space Agency Publ Div, Noordwjik, The Netherlands, 1995.
  3. 3.
    Bollasina M, Nigam S and Lau K M. 2008. Absorbing aerosols and summer monsoon evolution over south Asia: an observational portrayal. Journal of Climate, 21(13): 3221–3239
  4. 4.
    Bond T C, Doherty S J, Fahey D W, Forster P M, Berntsen T, DeAngelo B J, Flanner M G, Ghan S, Kärcher B, Koch D, Kinne S, Kondo Y, Quinn P K, Sarofim M C, Schultz M G, Schulz M, Venkataraman C, Zhang H, Zhang S, Bellouin N, Guttikunda S K, Hopke P K, Jacobson M Z, Kaiser J W, Klimont Z, Lohmann U, Schwarz J P, Shindell D, Storelvmo T, Warren S G and Zender C S. 2013. Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: a scientific assessment. Journal of Geophysical Research, 118(11): 5380–5552
  5. 5.
    Bond T C, Habib G and Bergstrom R W. 2006. Limitations in the enhancement of visible light absorption due to mixing state. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111(D20): D20211
  6. 6.
    Carrico C M, Kus P, Rood M J, Quinn P K and Bates T S. 2003. Mixtures of pollution, dust, sea salt, and volcanic aerosol during ACE-Asia: radiative properties as a function of relative humidity. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(D23): 8650
  7. 7.
    Chiapello I, Prospero J M, Herman J R and Hsu N C. 1999. Detection of mineral dust over the north Atlantic ocean and Africa with the nimbus 7 toms. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104(D8): 9277–9291
  8. 8.
    Dave J V. 1978. Effect of Aerosols on the estimation of total ozone in an atmospheric column from the measurements of its ultraviolet radiance. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 35(5): 899–911
  9. 9.
    de Graaf M and Stammes P. 2005. Sciamachy absorbing aerosol index- calibration issues and global results from 2002-2004. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 5(9): 2385–2394
  10. 10.
    de Graaf M, Stammes P, Torres O and Koelemeijer R B A. 2005. Absorbing aerosol index: sensitivity analysis, application to GOME and comparison with TOMS. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110(D1): D01201
  11. 11.
    de Haan J F, Bosma P B and Hovenier J W. 1987. The adding method for multiple scattering calculations of polarized light. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 183(2): 371–391
  12. 12.
    Fang L, Wang S P, Yu T, Gu X F, Zhang X Y, Wang W H and Ren S L. 2016. Changes in aerosol optical and micro-physical properties over northeast Asia from a severe dust storm in April 2014. Remote Sensing, 8(5): 394
  13. 13.
    Guan H, Esswein R, Lopez J, Bergstrom R, Warnock A, Follette-Cook M, Fromm M and Iraci L T. 2010. A multi-decadal history of biomass burning plume heights identified using aerosol index measurements. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10(14): 6461–6469
  14. 14.
    Hänel G. 1968. The real part of the mean complex refractive index and the mean density of samples of atmospheric aerosol particles. Tellus, 20(3): 371–379
  15. 15.
    Hänel G. 1972. Computation of the extinction of visible radiation by atmospheric aerosol particles as a function of the relative humidity, based upon measured properties. Journal of Aerosol Science, 3(5): 377–386
  16. 16.
    Herman J R, Bhartia P K, Torres O, Hsu C, Seftor C and Celarier E. 1997. Global distribution of UV-absorbing aerosols from nimbus 7/TOMS data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102(D14): 16911–16922
  17. 17.
    Hsu N C, Herman J R, Bhartia P K, Seftor C J, Torres O, Thompson A M, Gleason J F, Eck T F and Holben B N. 1996. Detection of biomass burning smoke from TOMS measurements. Geophysical Research Letters, 23(7): 745–748
  18. 18.
    Levelt P F. 2002. OMI Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document, Volume I. ATBD-OMI-01. OMI
  19. 19.
    Li-Jones X, Maring H B and Prospero J M. 1998. Effect of relative humidity on light scattering by mineral dust aerosol as measured in the marine boundary layer over the tropical Atlantic ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103(D23): 31113–31121
  20. 20.
    Liu L, Zheng X D, Chen S, Wang W H and She Y. 2015. Validation study of FY-3A-TOU total ozone using ground-based data. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 35(6): 696–706
  21. 21.
    Malm W C and Day D E. 2001. Estimates of aerosol species scattering characteristics as a function of relative humidity. Atmospheric Environment, 35(16): 2845–2860
  22. 22.
    Malm W C, Sisler J F, Huffman D, Eldred R A and Cahill T A. 1994. Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the United States. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99(D1): 1347–1370
  23. 23.
    Mikhailov E F, Vlasenko S S, Podgorny I A, Ramanathan V and Corrigan C E. 2006. Optical properties of soot–water drop agglomerates: an experimental study. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111(D7): D07209
  24. 24.
    Noël S, Bovensmann H, Wuttke M W, Burrows J P, Gottwald M, Krieg E, Goede A P H and Muller C. 2002. Nadir, limb, and occultation measurements with SCIAMACHY. Advances in Space Research, 29(11): 1819–1824
  25. 25.
    Schnaiter M, Linke C, Möhler O, Naumann K H, Saathoff H, Wagner R, Schurath U and Wehner B. 2005. Absorption amplification of black carbon internally mixed with secondary organic aerosol. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110(D19): D19204
  26. 26.
    Shettle E P and Fenn R W. 1979. Models for the aerosols of the lower atmosphere and the effects of humidity variations on their optical properties. AFGL-TR-79-0214, 94pp. [Available from AFCRL, Hanscom Field, Bedford, MA01731.]
  27. 27.
    Torres O, Bhartia P K, Herman J R, Ahmad Z and Gleason J. 1998. Derivation of aerosol properties from satellite measurements of backscattered ultraviolet radiation: theoretical basis. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103(D14): 17099–17110
  28. 28.
    Twitty J T and Weinman J A. 1971. Radiative properties of carbonaceous aerosols. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 10(4): 725–731
  29. 29.
    Wang H J, and Chen H P. 2016. Understanding the recent trend of haze pollution in eastern China: roles of climate change. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 16(6): 4205–4211
  30. 30.
    Wang P, Knap W H and Stammes P. 2011. Cloudy sky shortwave radiative closure for a baseline surface radiation network site. Journal of Geophysical Research, 116(D8): D08202
  31. 31.
    Wang W H, Flynn L, Zhang X Y, Wang Y M, Wang Y J, Jiang F, Zhang Y, Huang F X, Li X J, Liu R X, Zheng Z J, Wei Y and Liu G Y. 2012. Cross-calibration of the total ozone unit (TOU) with the ozone monitoring instrument (OMI) and SBUV/2 for environmental applications. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(12): 4943–4955
  32. 32.
    Wang W H, Zhang X Y, An X Q, Zhang Y, Huang F X, Wang Y M, Wang Y J, Zhang Z M, Lü J G, Fu L P, Jiang F and Liu G Y. 2010. Analysis for retrieval and validation results of FY-3 Total Ozone Unit (TOU). Chinese Science Bulletin, 55(17): 1726–1733
  33. 33.
    Wang W H, Zhang X Y, Wang Y M, Wang Y J, Zhang Z M, Fu L P, Jiang F and Liu G Y. 2011. Introduction to the FY-3A total ozone unit: instrument, performance and results. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 32(17): 4749–4758
  34. 34.
    Wang Y M, Wang Y J, Wang W H, Zhang Z M, Lü J G, Fu L P, Jiang F, Chen J, Wang J H, Guan F J, Huang F X and Zhang X Y. 2010. FY-3 satellite ultraviolet total ozone unit. Chinese Science Bulletin, 55(1): 84–89
  35. 35.
    Wellemeyer C G, Taylor S L, Seftor C J, McPeters R D and Bhartia P K. 1997. A correction for total ozone mapping spectrometer profile shape errors at high latitude. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102(D7): 9029–9038
  36. 36.
    Wu Y F, Zhang R J, Tian P, Tao J, Hsu S C, Yan P, Wang Q Y, Cao J J, Zhang X L and Xia X G. 2016. Effect of ambient humidity on the light absorption amplification of black carbon in Beijing during January 2013. Atmospheric Environment, 124: 217–223
  37. 37.
    Xue H X, Khalizov A F, Wang L, Zheng J and Zhang R Y. 2009. Effects of dicarboxylic acid coating on the optical properties of soot. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 11(36): 7869–7875
  38. 38.
    Zhang N, Qin Y and Xie S D. 2013. Spatial distribution of black carbon emissions in China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 58(31): 3830–3839
  39. 39.
    Zhang X Y, Wang L, Wang W H, Cao D J, Wang X and Ye D X. 2015. Long-term trend and spatiotemporal variations of haze over China by satellite observations from 1979 to 2013. Atmospheric Environment, 119: 362–373
  40. 40.
    Zhao F Q, Wang W H, Deng X B, Yang Y and Peng Y J. 2017. Relationship between absorbing aerosol index and total column ozone. Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(4): 500–508
  41. 41.
    Zheng J, Hu M, Peng J F, Wu Z J, Kumar P, Li M R, Wang Y J and Guo S. 2016. Spatial distributions and chemical properties of PM2. 5 based on 21 field campaigns at 17 sites in China. Chemosphere, 159: 480–487
  42. 42.
    Zieger P, Fierz-Schmidhauser R, Weingartner E and Baltensperger U. 2013. Effects of relative humidity on aerosol light scattering: results from different European sites. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 13(21): 10609–10631

Читать полностью

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website