Study on water information extraction using domestic GF-3 image

  • role: First author第一作者
  • Affiliation:

    21st Century Space Technology Application Co., Ltd., Beijing 100096, China

  • Email:guxz@21at.com.cn
  • Introduction:谷鑫志,1990年生,男,工程师,研究方向为合成孔径雷达图像处理与应用。E-mail:guxz@21at.com.cn
Xinzhi GU1,  
  • Affiliation:

    21st Century Space Technology Application Co., Ltd., Beijing 100096, China

Qingwei ZENG1,  
  • role: Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation:

    21st Century Space Technology Application Co., Ltd., Beijing 100096, China

  • Email:shenhua@21at.com.cn
  • Introduction:谌华,1979年生,男,高级工程师,研究方向为干涉SAR、微波遥感器定标及SAR图像处理。E-mail:shenhua@21at.com.cn
Hua SHEN1*,  
  • Affiliation:

    Institute of Resource Information, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China

Erxue CHEN2,  
  • Affiliation:

    Institute of Resource Information, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China

LEI ZHAO2,  
  • Affiliation:

    21st Century Space Technology Application Co., Ltd., Beijing 100096, China

Fei YU1,  
  • Affiliation:

    21st Century Space Technology Application Co., Ltd., Beijing 100096, China

Kuan TU1

реферат

The Chinese Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellite GF-3 has acquired a large volume of multi-polarization and full-polarization SAR data. Moreover, researchers at home and abroad have conducted in-depth studies on the extraction of inland water body images and proposed rapid response mechanisms against flood disasters. However, optical remote sensing images and foreign space SAR images remain widely used because of their long development history and reliable image quality. Applying domestic GF-3 images to environmental protection and water resources management is an urgent matter. This study analyzed the differing backscattering characteristics of water bodies and other targets to explain the rationality of the threshold segmentation method; integrated the image binarization method based on threshold segmentation and Markov random field (MRF); and developed a method with advantages of high accuracy and high automation for water body information extraction by using GF-3 images. The method first analyzed the backscattering intensity differences of water and nowater distribution under different imaging modes and different polarization modes based on histogram statistics. The best segmentation threshold was determined by using visual interpretation. The effects of the Otsu and KI binarization methods on the water-nowater classification were compared on the basis of the research results of threshold segmentation. The threshold segmentation result of the KI method was better than that of the Otsu method. Given that the radar beam cannot illuminate the large mountain slope facing away from the SAR sensor (i.e., a phenomenon that has led to missing monitoring information), the current SAR orthorectification is applied to compensate the missing data by using the interpolation method, but this approach may result in inaccuracies in feature monitoring. Scholars at home and abroad typically use the method of removing shadow areas from water distribution maps. However, the pixel value obtained by the interpolation cannot represent true backscattering intensity information, which can then affect the distribution characterization of the image and reduce the accuracy of automatic threshold estimation. In response to this problem, this study generated a mask file, also calledMask, of the radiation distortion region by combining DEM and GF-3 orbital parameters. In this manner, the radiation distortion region is masked in the SAR logarithmic intensity map, and the influence on the probability distribution of the image can be eliminated to a great extent. The initial water distribution map can be obtained by KI threshold segmentation, which has good accuracy. Fisher transform is a data dimension reduction algorithm that converts multidimensional data into one-dimensional data, and this approach is beneficial to image classification. In this study, the multipolar logarithmic intensity image is converted into a single variable by the Fisher transform under the guidance of the initial water-nowater distribution map derived by the KI method. Although traditional methods, such as multi-look and filtering, can greatly reduce the noise level of SAR images, these methods also tend to lose useful image information. MRF can determine the class attribute of a pixel by using the maximum posterior probability criterion and by fusing spatial context information with pixel gray information (i.e., an approach with good inhibitory effect on speckle noise). Moreover, the posterior probabilities of the pixels in the water and nowater classes in this study are calculated iteratively. With Fisher transform and MRF based on Gaussian distribution. When the number of iterations has been satisfied or the posterior probability has become stable, the final water distribution map is generated on the basis of the maximum posteriori probability criterion. Experiments were performed by using multi-polarization GF-3 images under different imaging modes. The images represent the northeast part of Hunan Province where many rivers and lakes abound. Floods in the rainy season are very severe in Hunan Province. Thus, real-time monitoring of water body distribution is necessary. A random point was selected to evaluate the accuracy of using optical images in this study and by setting close imaging times with GF-3. The true detection accuracy, which denotes the proportion of correctly classified pixels in the total pixels, was used to quantitatively evaluate the accuracy of water distribution. The experimental results show that the KI method has stronger advantages than the Otsu method in terms of water extraction application by using GF-3. AfterMask was used to remove the radiation distortion area of the image, the auto-determined threshold yielded a value that was close to the visual interpretation threshold, and the difference was only 0.4 dB. However, the accuracy was low due to the existence of the nowater class within the water class. By optimizing the Fisher transform and the MRF model, the continuous extraction of water information was achieved, and the boundary of the river and the lake became smoother than that of the KI method. The extraction accuracy of the water targets exceeded 85%, which is superior to that of the water index method that use optical images. Extracting water information with the threshold segmentation method from SAR images is a reasonable method. The capability of cross-polarization (HV, VH) to distinguish water and nowater classes is stronger than that with the same polarization (HH, VV). Radiation distortion areas have certain influences on the probability density distributions of intensity images. Thus, deriving the exact segmentation threshold by removing the radiation distortion areas is imperative. The Fisher transform and the GD-MRF model can be used to fuse multipolar information and spatial context information, and they can effectively suppress the influence of speckle noise. The method requires minimal artificial experience, and it offers the advantage of strong automation and high reliability.

ключеви́че слова́

GF-3;water extraction;KI;Markov random field;automation;maximum posterior probability

References

  1. 1.
    An C J, Niu Z D, Li Z J and Chen Z P. 2010. Otsu threshold comparison and SAR Water segmentation result analysis. Journal of Electronics and Information Technology, 32(9): 2215–2219 (
  2. 2.
    Chen L Y, Liu Z and Zhang H. 2014. SAR image water extraction based on scattering characteristics. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 29(6): 963–969 (
  3. 3.
    Deng Y, Zhang H, Wang C and Liu M. 2016. An object-oriented water extraction method based on texture and polarimetric decomposition feature. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 31(4): 714–723 (
  4. 4.
    Guo Q D, Pu R L, Li J L and Cheng J. 2017. A weighted normalized difference water index for water extraction using Landsat imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 38(19): 5430–5445
  5. 5.
    Hahmann T, Martinis S, Twele A, Roth A and Buchroithner M. 2008. Extraction of water and flood areas from SAR data//Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar. Friedrichshafen, Germany: IEEE: 1–4
  6. 6.
    Hong S, Jang H, Kim N and Sohn H. 2015. Water area extraction using RADARSAT SAR imagery combined with landsat imagery and terrain information. Sensors, 15(3): 6652–6667
  7. 7.
    Huang W L, DeVries B, Huang Chengquan, Lang Megan, Jones J W, Creed I F and Carroll M L. 2018. Automated extraction of surface water extent from sentinel-1 data. Remote Sensing, 10(5): 797
  8. 8.
    Li Z H, Chen X W, Luo P, Xu Y B and Li Y. 2013. A hybrid thresholding method for water extraction in Envisat image. Remote Sensing Information, 28(2): 62–65, 69 (
  9. 9.
    Lyu W T, Yu Q Z and Yu W X. 2010. Water extraction in SAR images using GLCM and support vector machine//IEEE 10th International Conference on Signal Processing Proceedings. Beijing, China: IEEE: 740–743 [DOI: 10.1109/ICOSP.2010.5655766]
  10. 10.
    Mason D C, Giustarini L, Garcia-Pintado J and Cloke H L. 2014. Detection of flooded urban areas in high resolution synthetic aperture radar images using double scattering. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 28: 150–159
  11. 11.
    Musa Z N, Popescu I and Mynett A. 2015. A review of applications of satellite SAR, optical, altimetry and DEM data for surface water modelling, mapping and parameter estimation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19(9): 3755–3769
  12. 12.
    Pang K C, Chen L F and Wang S Y. 2016. Water extraction method combining DEM for hillshade removal. Electronic Science and Technology, 29(4): 76–78 (
  13. 13.
    Shen Z F, Xia L G, Li J L, Luo J C and Hu X D. 2013. Automatic and high-precision extraction of rivers from remotely sensed images with Gaussion normalized water index. Journal of Image and Graphics, 18(4): 421–428 (
  14. 14.
    Sohn H G, Song Y S and Kim G H. 2005. Detecting water area during flood event from SAR image//International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer: 771–780 [DOI: 10.1007/11424826-82]
  15. 15.
    Sun W W, Du B and Xiong S L. 2017. Quantifying sub-pixel surface water coverage in urban environments using low-albedo fraction from landsat imagery. Remote Sensing, 9(5): 428
  16. 16.
    Sun Y Y, Li X T, Yang F and Huang S F. 2014. Study on the mountain water extraction method of the space-borne SAR Image. Journal of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, 12(3): 258–263 (
  17. 17.
    Wang M, Zhou S D, Bai H, Ma N and Ye S. 2010. SAR water image segmentation based on GLCM and wavelet textures//Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Wireless Communications Networking and Mobile Computing. Chengdu, China: IEEE: 1–4 [DOI: 10.1109/WICOM.2010.5600690]
  18. 18.
    Wang X B, Xie S P and Du J K. 2018. Water index formulation and its effectiveness research on the complicated surface water surroundings. Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(2): 360–372 (
  19. 19.
    Xiao Q, Yang K and Hong L. 2018. Remote sensing monitoring and temporal-spatial analysis of surface water body area changes of lakes on the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau over the past 30 years. Journal of Lake Sciences, 30(4): 1083–1096 (
  20. 20.
    Xie L, Zhang H, Wang C and Chen F L. 2016. Water-body types identification in urban areas from radarsat-2 fully polarimetric SAR data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 50: 10–25
  21. 21.
    Yang C J, Wei Y M, Wang S Y, Zhang Z X and Huang S F. 2001. Extracting the flood extent from satellite SAR image with the support of topographic data//Proceedings of 2001 International Conferences on Info-Tech and Info-Net. Beijing, China: IEEE, 1: 87–92
  22. 22.
    Yang G P, Yu X C, Chen W and Liu W. 2008. Hyperspectral remote sensing image classification based on kernel fisher discriminant analysis. Journal of Remote Sensing, 12(4): 579–585 (
  23. 23.
    Zhang B. 2013. Research on the SAR image Classification and Change Detection Based on the Markov Random Field. Wuhan: Wuhan University

Читать полностью

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website