предыдущий|следующий

Ocean surface wind speed retrieve from co-polarized SAR using composite surface bragg scattering model

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    Zhejiang Climate Centre, Hangzhou 310051, China

    State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou 310012, China

  • Email：fanghe_doc@163.com
  • Introduction：方贺，研究方向为海洋微波遥感技术。E-mail： fanghe_doc@163.com
FANG He12,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou 310012, China

YANG Jingsong2,  
  • Affiliation：

    Zhejiang Climate Centre, Hangzhou 310051, China

FAN Gaofeng1,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    Jiangsu Meteorological Observatory, Nanjing 210008, China

  • Email：44183130@qq.com
  • Introduction：李超，研究方向为海洋遥感和海气相互作用。E-mail： 44183130@qq.com
LI Chao3*,  
  • Affiliation：

    Lianyungang Meteorological Observatory, Lianyungang 222002, China

SHI Dawei4,  
  • Affiliation：

    Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Dartmouth NS B2Y 4A2, Canada

WILLIAM Perrie5

реферат

Composite Surface Bragg Scattering (CSBS) model is a classical ocean microwave scattering model, which can describe the Normalized Radar Cross Section (NRCS) of microwave backscattering from a rough ocean surface. The CSBS model includes a Bragg model and a geometric optics model and can be used to retrieve ocean surface wind speed from spaceborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR). Compared with Geophysical Model Function (GMF) developed by methods of empirical statistics, the CSBS model works well at all microwave frequencies. Reports showed that geometric optics model is most suitable for small local incidence angles, whereas Bragg model tends to be best for moderate incidence angles. In other words, for local radar incidence angles that are smaller than a given angle setting, the two-scale backscattering mechanism of the sea surface is replaced by a geometric optic solution for specular reflection. However, determining the threshold for small and moderate local incidence angles is still an open question. The local incidence angle search algorithm is proposed and developed to find the optimal radar incidence angle at co-polarized (VV-and HH-polarized) channel. The modeling data for the local incidence angle search algorithm include wind speed data retrieved from 142 Canada RADARSAT-2 fine-beam quad-polarized SAR images in the east coast of America, the west coast of America, and the East China Sea. Ocean surface wind speed measured from the National Data Buoy Center (NDBC), the Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) and the China State Oceanic (SOA) are considered reference wind speed. The conclusion shows that the optimal setting of 14 and 16 degrees is the optimal radar incidence angle for ocean surface wind speeds retrieve from CSBS model at VV-and HH-polarized RADARSAT-2 SAR images. Based on the optimal incidence angle setting, ocean buoy-measured wind speed data are considered references, and ocean surface wind speed is retrieved from VV-and HH-polarized RADARSAT-2 SAR data using CSBS model at 0—15 m/s wind condition. Results show that the ocean surface wind speeds retrieved from RADARSAT-2 fine-beam quad-polarized SAR data using CSBS model at VV- and HH-polarized channel are in good agreement with in situ ocean buoy wind speed. The root mean square error (RMSE) of SAR-retrieved wind speed and buoy-measured wind speed are 2.15 m/s (VV-polarized channel) and 2.32 m/s (HH-polarized channel), and the correlation coefficients are 0.79 (VV-polarized channel) and 0.75 (HH-polarized channel), which are statistically significant at 99.9 significance level. The conclusion of this article indicated that the optimized incidence angle setting of the CSBS model found in our study has good applicability and reliability under low-to-moderate ocean surface wind speed (no higher than 15 m/s). From case comparisons of the CBS model with RADARSAT-2 SAR images, the optimized small incidence angle setting of 14 and 16 degrees of the CBS model is suitable for the microwave frequency of the C-band with co-polarization. More studies on the optimized small incidence angle setting of the CBS model and its application in other microwave frequencies, cross polarizations, or high sea states will be considered in future investigations.

ключеви́че слова́

remote sensing;electromagnetic model;synthetic aperture radar;sea surface wind speed;geophysical model functions

References

  1. 1.
    Ai W H, Chen G Y, Ge S R, Yuan L F and Zhao X B. 2019. Method for ocean surface wind field retrieval from a common reflector dual-frequency SAR. Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(3): 408-417
  2. 2.
    Barrick D E. 1968. Rough surface scattering based on the specular point theory. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 16(4): 449-454
  3. 3.
    Bentamy A, Mouche A, Grouazel A, Moujane A and Mohamed A A. 2019. Using sentinel-1A SAR wind retrievals for enhancing scatterometer and radiometer regional wind analyses. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 40(3/4): 1120-1147
  4. 4.
    Cox C and Munk W. 1954. Measurement of the roughness of the sea surface from photographs of the sun’s glitter. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 44(11): 838-850
  5. 5.
    Donelan M A and Pierson W J. 1987. Radar scattering and equilibrium ranges in wind-generated waves with application to scatterometry. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 92(C5): 4971-5029
  6. 6.
    Du P J. 2002. Research on filtering of RADARSAT images. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, 31(2): 132-137
  7. 7.
    Fang H, Xie T, Perrie W, Zhang G S, Yang J S and He Y J. 2018. Comparison of C-band quad-polarization synthetic aperture radar wind retrieval models. Remote Sensing, 10(9): 1448
  8. 8.
    Fang H, Xie T, Zhou Y F, Yang J S, Zhao L, He Y J and Perrie W. 2018. Evaluation of SAR wind speed retrieved based on C-2PO model and CMOD5. N geophysical model functions. Haiyang Xuebao, 40(9): 103-112
  9. 9.
    Hersbach H. 2010. Comparison of C-band scatterometer CMOD5. N equivalent neutral winds with ECMWF. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 27(4): 721-736
  10. 10.
    Hwang P A, Zhang B, Toporkov J V and Perrie W. 2010. Comparison of composite Bragg theory and quad-polarization radar backscatter from RADARSAT-2: with applications to wave breaking and high wind retrieval. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 115(C8): C08019
  11. 11.
    La T V, Khenchaf A, Comblet F and Nahum C. 2018. Assessment of wind speed estimation from C-band sentinel-1 images using empirical and electromagnetic models. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(7): 4075-4087
  12. 12.
    Meissner T and Wentz F J. 2004. The complex dielectric constant of pure and sea water from microwave satellite observations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(9): 1836-1849
  13. 13.
    Plant W J. 1986. A two-scale model of short wind-generated waves and scatterometry. Journal of Geophysical Research, 91(C9): 10735-10749
  14. 14.
    Plant W J. 2002. A stochastic, multiscale model of microwave backscatter from the ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 107(C9): 3120
  15. 15.
    Ren L, Yang J S, Mouche A A, Wang H, Zheng G, Wang J, Zhang H G, Lou X L and Chen P. 2019. Assessments of ocean wind retrieval schemes used for Chinese gaofen-3 synthetic aperture radar Co-polarized data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(9): 7075-7085
  16. 16.
    Shao W Z, Sheng Y X and Sun J. 2017. Preliminary assessment of wind and wave retrieval from Chinese Gaofen-3 SAR imagery. Sensors, 17(8): 1705
  17. 17.
    Thompson D R, Horstmann J, Mouche A, Winstead N S, Sterner R and Monaldo F M. 2012. Comparison of high-resolution wind fields extracted from TerraSAR-X SAR imagery with predictions from the WRF mesoscale model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 117(C2): C02035
  18. 18.
    Valenzuela G R. 1967. Depolarization of EM waves by slightly rough surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 15(4): 552-557
  19. 19.
    Valenzuela G R. 1978. Theories for the interaction of electromagnetic and oceanic waves-A review. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 13(1): 61-85
  20. 20.
    Xu F and Jia F. 1996. An algorithm of sea surface radar scatter applicable to wide frequency band. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 11(3): 26-30
  21. 21.
    Yang J S, Huang W G, Zhou C B, Fu B, Shi A Q and Li D L. 2001. Coastal ocean surface wind retrieval from SAR imagery. Journal of Remote Sensing, 5(1): 13-16
  22. 22.
    Ye X M, Lin M S, Song Q T, Liao F, Liang C and Zhou X. 2019. Comparisons of composite radar backscattering model and sea surface radar backscatter from synthetic aperture radar, scatterometer and altimeter. Haiyang Xuebao, 41(7): 123-135
  23. 23.
    Zhang B, Perrie W and He Y J. 2011. Wind speed retrieval from RADARSAT-2 quad-polarization images using a new polarization ratio model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 116(C8): C08008
  24. 24.
    Zhang G S, Li X F, Perrie W, Hwang P A, Zhang B and Yang X F. 2017. A hurricane wind speed retrieval model for C-band RADARSAT-2 cross-polarization ScanSAR images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(8): 4766-4774

Читать полностью

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website