предыдущий|следующий

Recognition of corn stubble modes from SAR data without the influence of soil backscatter

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China

    Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing for Agri-Hazards, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100083, China

  • Email：lilixch@cau.edu.cn
  • Introduction：李俐，研究方向为微波遥感及其农业应用。E-mail： lilixch@cau.edu.cn
LI Li12,  
  • Affiliation：

    College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China

    Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing for Agri-Hazards, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100083, China

XIE Xiaoman12,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China

    Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing for Agri-Hazards, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100083, China

  • Email：zhudehai@cau.edu.cn
  • Introduction：朱德海，研究方向为农业信息技术及土地信息技术。E-mail： zhudehai@cau.edu.cn
ZHU Dehai12*,  
  • Affiliation：

    College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China

JIANG Chaowei1,  
  • Affiliation：

    College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China

    Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing for Agri-Hazards, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100083, China

XU Jiawei12

реферат

Crop stubble cover is an important method of conservation tillage. Obtaining the distribution of different corn stubble cover modes quickly and accurately is vital to the implementation status monitoring and effect evaluation of conservation tillage. Microwave remote sensing has characteristics of all-weather and strong penetration. Thus, it not only can ensure the acquisition of data in a short period for stubble monitoring but also can be sensitive to the information of surface roughness and crop residue structure, which provides rich information for the identification of stubble modes. Some studies consider the stubble monitoring with microwave data, but they mainly focus on the estimation of stubble coverage, and the identification of different stubble modes is rarely explored. In addition, the microwave backscattering coefficient is affected by many factors, such as soil moisture and roughness. Thus, the accuracy using microwave data simply to monitor stubble is limited.In this study, an identification method for corn stubble modes by removing soil backscatter is proposed using Sentinel-1 SAR data as the main data source. Based on the autumn field sample data in 2019 in Lishu County, Jilin Province, the backscattering model of the corn stubble is designed to separate the corn stubble scattering contribution from the soil scattering contribution and reduce the interference of soil scattering contribution on the identification of the corn stubble modes. A new Fusion Radar Index (FRI), which is produced with Sentinel-1 SAR data and Sentinel-2 optical image, is combined with traditional commonly used SAR features such as radar index and SAR textures. It is used to analyze the backscattering coefficient characteristic of field surface with different stubble modes. The best feature combination for stubble recognition is selected through the analysis of identification ability. A convolution neural network model based on 1D CNN is constructed using the optimal feature set selected to identify the corn stubble modes. The corn stubble modes are also mapped for the study area. Results show that (1) the overall accuracy of stubble identification is above 83% based on VH polarized data, FRI, and GLCM1–GLCM6 with backscattering values, which proves that the feature set obtained from Sentinel-1 radar scattering characteristics is feasible and effective for identification of the corn stubble modes. (2) The identification performance of the corn stubble modes based on data without the soil backscatter contribution improves significantly. The OA and kappa coefficients are 89.28% and 0.84, respectively. Compared with those before removing the influence of soil scattering, the recognition accuracy and kappa coefficient are improved by 5.44% and 0.09. Therefore, separating the soil scattering contribution from the total scattering contribution based on the stubble radar backscattering model can effectively reduce the influence of soil factors on the monitoring of corn stubble and improve the accuracy of the corn stubble mode recognition.This study demonstrates the great potential of Sentinel-1 SAR data and backscattering models to access the distribution map of corn stubble modes. It also provides a new idea for the wide application of Sentinel-1 SAR image in the research of corn stubble.

ключеви́че слова́

remote sensing;Sentinel-1 SAR data;corn stubble;recognition of stubble modes;backscatter model;optimal feature set

References

  1. 1.
    Adams J R, Berg A A, McNairn H and Merzouki A. 2013. Sensitivity of C-band SAR polarimetric variables to unvegetated agricultural fields. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(1): 1-16
  2. 2.
    Bouvet A, Mermoz S, Le Toan T, Villard L, Mathieu R, Naidoo L and Asner G P. 2018. An above-ground biomass map of African savannahs and woodlands at 25m resolution derived from ALOS PALSAR. Remote Sensing of Environment, 206: 156-173
  3. 3.
    Cai W T, Zhao S H, Wang Y M, Peng F C, Heo J and Duan Z. 2019. Estimation of winter wheat residue coverage using optical and SAR remote sensing images. Remote Sensing, 11(10): 1163
  4. 4.
    Daughtry C S T, Hunt E R Jr and McMurtrey III J E. 2004. Assessing crop residue cover using shortwave infrared reflectance. Remote Sensing of Environment, 90(1): 126-134
  5. 5.
    Ding Y L, Zhang H Y, Wang Z Q, Xie Q Y, Wang Y Q, Liu L and Hall C C. 2020. A comparison of estimating crop residue cover from sentinel-2 data using empirical regressions and machine learning methods. Remote Sensing, 12(9): 1470
  6. 6.
    Gelder B K, Kaleita A L and Cruse R M. 2009. Estimating mean field residue cover on Midwestern soils using satellite imagery. Agronomy Journal, 101(3): 635-643
  7. 7.
    Huang J Y, Liu Z, Wan W, Liu Z Y, Wang J Y and Wang S. 2020. Remote sensing retrieval of maize residue cover on soil heterogeneous background. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 31(2): 474-482
  8. 8.
    Jin X L, Ma J H, Wen Z D and Song K S. 2015. Estimation of maize residue cover using Landsat-8 OLI image spectral information and textural features. Remote Sensing, 7(11): 14559-14575
  9. 9.
    Kim Y H, Oh J H and Kim Y I I. 2015. Development of a fusion vegetation index using full-PolSAR and multispectral data. Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography, 33(6): 547-555
  10. 10.
    Kong Q L, Li L, Xu K H and Zhu D H. 2017. Monitoring crop residue area in northeast of China based on Sentinel-1A data. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 48(S1): 284-289
  11. 11.
    Li L, Wang D, Wang P X, Huang J X and Zhu D H. 2015. Soil surface roughness measurement based on color operation and chaotic particle swarm filtering. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 46(3): 158-165
  12. 12.
    Li S L, Li H P, Lin Y, Xiao B and Wang G P. 2019. Effects of tillage methods on wind erosion in farmland of northeastern china. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 33(4): 110-118, 220
  13. 13.
    Liu Z Y, Liu Z, Wan W, Huang J Y, Wang J Y and Zheng M D. 2021. Estimation of maize residue cover on the basis of SAR and optical remote sensing image. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 25(6): 1308-1323
  14. 14.
    McNairn H, Duguay C, Brisco B and Pultz T. 2002. The effect of soil and crop residue characteristics on polarimetric radar response. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80(2): 308-320
  15. 15.
    McNairn H, Wood D, Gwyn Q H J, Brown R J and Charbonneau F. 1998. Mapping tillage and crop residue management practices with RADARSAT. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(1): 28-35
  16. 16.
    Quemada M and Daughtry C S T. 2016. Spectral indices to improve crop residue cover estimation under varying moisture conditions. Remote Sensing, 8(8): 660
  17. 17.
    Quemada M, Hively W D, Daughtry C S T, Lamb B T and Shermeyer J. 2018. Improved crop residue cover estimates obtained by coupling spectral indices for residue and moisture. Remote Sensing of Environment, 206: 33-44
  18. 18.
    Saatchi S S and Moghaddam M. 2000. Estimation of crown and stem water content and biomass of boreal forest using polarimetric SAR imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38(2): 697-709
  19. 19.
    Serbin G, Hunt E R, Daughtry C S T, McCarty G W and Doraiswamy P C. 2009. An improved ASTER index for remote sensing of crop residue. Remote Sensing, 1(4): 971-991
  20. 20.
    Smith A M and Major D J. 1996. Radar backscatter and crop residues. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(3): 243-247
  21. 21.
    Tao L L, Wang G J, Chen W J, Chen X, Li J and Cai Q K. 2019. Soil moisture retrieval from SAR and optical data using a combined model. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 12(2): 637-647
  22. 22.
    Van Deventer A P, Ward A D, Gowda P H and Lyon J G. 1997. Using thematic mapper data to identify contrasting soil plains and tillage practices. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 63(1): 87-93
  23. 23.
    Van Niel T G, McVicar T R and Datt B. 2005. On the relationship between training sample size and data dimensionality: Monte Carlo analysis of broadband multi-temporal classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, 98(4): 468-480
  24. 24.
    Wang C J, Zhao Q Z, Ma Y J and Ren Y Y. 2019. Crop identification of drone remote sensing based on convolutional neural network. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 50(11): 161-168
  25. 25.
    Wang L H, Jin H H, Wang C C and Sun R X. 2019. Backscattering characteristics and texture information analysis of typical crops based on synthetic aperture radar: a case study of Nong’an County, Jilin Province. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 27(9): 1385-1393
  26. 26.
    Wu T D, Chen K S, Shi J C and Fung A K. 2001. A transition model for the reflection coefficient in surface scattering. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39(9): 2040-2050
  27. 27.
    Yue J B and Tian Q J. 2020. Estimating fractional cover of crop, crop residue, and soil in cropland using broadband remote sensing data and machine learning. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 89: 102089
  28. 28.
    Zhang M, Li Q Z, Meng J H and Wu B F. 2011. Review of crop residue fractional cover monitoring with remote sensing. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 31(12): 3200-3205
  29. 29.
    Zhang M, Meng J H, Dong T F, Wu B F and Sun H J. 2012. Spectral responses analysis of soybean residues. Journal of Remote Sensing, 16(6): 1115-1129
  30. 30.
    Zhang W C, Liu H B, Wu W, Zhan L Q and Wei J. 2020. Mapping rice paddy based on machine learning with Sentinel-2 multi-temporal data: model comparison and transferability. Remote Sensing, 12(10): 1620
  31. 31.
    Zheng B J, Campbell J B, Serbin G and Galbraith J M. 2014. Remote sensing of crop residue and tillage practices: present capabilities and future prospects. Soil and Tillage Research, 138: 26-34

Читать полностью

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website