Research progress of spaceborne passive remote sensing detection payload of greenhouse gases

  • role: First author第一作者
  • Affiliation:

    Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China

    Scinece Island Branch, Graduate School of USTC, Hefei 230026, China

    Key Laboratory of Optical Calibration and Characterization of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China

  • Email:wqs977@mail.ustc.edu.cn
  • Introduction:E-mail wqs977@mail.ustc.edu.cn
WANG Qiansheng123,  
  • role: Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation:

    Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China

    Scinece Island Branch, Graduate School of USTC, Hefei 230026, China

    Key Laboratory of Optical Calibration and Characterization of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China

  • Email:luohaiyan@aiofm.ac.cn
  • Introduction:E-mail luohaiyan@aiofm.ac.cn
LUO Haiyan123*,  
  • Affiliation:

    Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China

    Key Laboratory of Optical Calibration and Characterization of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China

LI Zhiwei13,  
  • Affiliation:

    Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China

    Scinece Island Branch, Graduate School of USTC, Hefei 230026, China

    Key Laboratory of Optical Calibration and Characterization of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China

SHI Hailiang123,  
  • Affiliation:

    Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China

    Scinece Island Branch, Graduate School of USTC, Hefei 230026, China

    Key Laboratory of Optical Calibration and Characterization of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China

DING Yi123,  
  • Affiliation:

    Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China

    Scinece Island Branch, Graduate School of USTC, Hefei 230026, China

    Key Laboratory of Optical Calibration and Characterization of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China

XIONG Wei123

реферат

A global consensus has been made to promote carbon emission reduction in response to global warming caused by the increase of greenhouse gases, such as CO2 and CH4. Spaceborne observation has the characteristics of large observation space and continuous observation time, which are among the main means of observing greenhouse gases at present. The establishment of a sound carbon monitoring system and spaceborne passive remote sensing of major greenhouse gases in the atmosphere will help to evaluate the impact of the greenhouse effect and guide human greenhouse gas emission activities, which is of great significance to human society.Active satellite-borne remote sensing of greenhouse gases become successful through proper planning. Among the spaceborne passive remote sensing payloads of greenhouse gases successfully applied in orbit, three technical systems are mainly included: Michelson interference spectroscopy represented by GOSAT (Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite) and GAS (Greenhouse gases Absorption Spectrometer); grating spectroscopy represented by OCO (Orbiting Carbon Observatory) and ACGS; and spatial heterodyne interference spectroscopy represented by GMI (Greenhouse gases Monitoring Instrument). This study focuses on the analysis of these three typical technology systems and compares the advantages and disadvantages of different detection technologies. At the same time, comprehensive satellite payloads for the detection of greenhouse gases include IMG (Interferometric Monitor for Greenhouse gases), SCIAMACHY (SCanning Imaging Absorption SpectroMeter CHartographY), AIRS (Atmospheric Infrared Sounder), ACE-FTS (Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer), IASI (Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Instrument), and CrIS (Cross-track Infrared Sounder). Moreover, projects for the spaceborne passive remote sensing of greenhouse gases that include GeoCarb (Geostationary Carbon Observatory) and Copernicus CO2 Monitoring Mission are introduced.To meet the needs of the next generation of spaceborne remote sensing of greenhouse gases, combined with the in-orbit performance of the GMI on GF-5 and the research progress of the new spatial heterodyne interference imaging spectroscopy technology, the feasibility of further achieving high spatial resolution on the basis of hyperspectral resolution and high signal-to-noise ratio is analyzed. This study proposes a payload technology scheme with high timeliness and regional carbon monitoring capability of different subdivisions, which will provide a technical basis for the development of the next generation of detection payload for greenhouse gases.Reviewing the development process of technologies for the spaceborne detection of greenhouse gases, six development trends of spaceborne passive remote sensing payloads of greenhouse gases are summarized: (1) specialization of detection load; (2) improvement of detection sensitivity; (3) wide width and high spatial resolution; (4) integration of multiple observation modes; (5) systematization of high/medium/ow orbit monitoring; (6) miniaturization of detection load.

ключеви́че слова́

greenhouse gases;Passive remote sensing;Carbon Monitoring;satellite payload;interference imaging spectroscopy

References

  1. 1.
    Aumann H H, Chahine M T, Gautier C, Goldberg M D, Kalnay E, McMillin L M, Revercomb H, Rosenkranz P W, Smith W L, Staelin D H, Strow L L and Susskind J. 2003. AIRS/AMSU/HSB on the aqua mission: Design, science objectives, data products, and processing systems. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(2): 253-264
  2. 2.
    Basilio R R, Bennett M W, Eldering A, Lawson P R and Rosenberg R A. 2019. Orbiting Carbon Observatory-3 (OCO-3), remote sensing from the International Space Station (ISS)//Proceedings of SPIE 11151, Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XXIII. Strasbourg: SPIE: 1115109
  3. 3.
    Blumstein D, Chalon G, Carlier T, Buil C, Hebert P, Maciaszek T, Ponce G, Phulpin T, Tournier B, Simeoni D, Astruc P, Clauss A, Kayal G and Jegou R. 2004. IASI instrument: technical overview and measured performances//Proceedings of SPIE 5543, Infrared Spaceborne Remote Sensing XII. Denver: SPIE: 196-207
  4. 4.
    Boone C D and Bernath P F. 2003. SciSat-1 mission overview and status//Proceedings of SPIE 5151, Earth Observing Systems VIII. San Diego: SPIE: 133-142
  5. 5.
    Bovensmann H, Burrows J P, Buchwitz M, Frerick J, Noël S, Rozanov V V, Chance K V and Goede A P H. 1999. SCIAMACHY: mission objectives and measurement modes. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 56(2): 127-150
  6. 6.
    Bréon F M and Ciais P. 2010. Spaceborne remote sensing of greenhouse gas concentrations. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 342(4/5): 412-424
  7. 7.
    Bril A, Maksyutov S, Belikov D, Oshchepkov S, Yoshida Y, Deutscher N M, Griffith D, Hase F, Kivi R, Morino I, Notholt J, Pollard D F, Sussmann R, Velazco V A and Warneke T. 2017. EOF-based regression algorithm for the fast retrieval of atmospheric CO2 total column amount from the GOSAT observations. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 189: 258-266
  8. 8.
    Bruhwiler L, Basu S, Butler J H, Chatterjee A, Dlugokencky E, Kenney M A, McComiskey A, Montzka S A and Stanitski D. 2021. Observations of greenhouse gases as climate indicators. Climatic Change, 165(1): 12
  9. 9.
    Butz A, Guerlet S, Hasekamp O, Schepers D, Galli A, Aben I, Frankenberg C, Hartmann J M, Tran H, Kuze A, Keppel-Aleks G, Toon G, Wunch D, Wennberg P, Deutscher N, Griffith D, Macatangay R, Messerschmidt J, Notholt J and Warneke T. 2011. Toward accurate CO2 and CH4 observations from GOSAT. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(14): L14812
  10. 10.
    Châteauneuf F, Soucy M A and Buijs H. 2006. ACE-FTS instrument: extending mission lifetime//Proceedings of SPIE 6297, Infrared Spaceborne Remote Sensing XIV. San Diego: SPIE: 62970E
  11. 11.
    Cheng L X, Tao J H, Yu C, Zhang Y, Fan M, Wang Y P, Chen Y L, Zhu L L, Gu J B and Chen L F. 2021. Tropospheric NO2 column density retrieval from the GF-5 EMI data. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 25(11): 2313-2325
  12. 12.
    Chen L F, Shang H Z, Fan M, Tao J H, Husi L T, Zhang Y, Wang H M, Cheng L X, Zhang X X, Wei L S, Li M Y, Zou M M and Liu D D. 2021. Mission overview of the GF-5 satellite for atmospheric parameter monitoring. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 25(9): 1917-1931
  13. 13.
    Chesnokova T Y, Chentsov A V, Rokotyan N V and Zakharov V I. 2015. Retrieval of content of greenhouse gases from atmospheric spectra of solar radiation with the use of different spectroscopic data on absorption lines. Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics, 28(5): 469-475
  14. 14.
    Climate Change Center, China Meteorological Administration. 2018. China Greenhouse Gas Bulletin of 2017. Beijing: China Meteorological Administration
  15. 15.
    Climate Change Center, China Meteorological Administration. 2019. Blue Paper of Climate Change 2019 in China. Beijing: China Meteorological Administration
  16. 16.
    Crisp D, Pollock H R, Rosenberg R, Chapsky L, Lee R A M, Oyafuso F A, Frankenberg C, O'Dell C W, Bruegge C J, Doran G B, Eldering A, Fisher B M, Fu D J, Gunson M R, Mandrake L, Osterman G B, Schwandner F M, Sun K, Taylor T E, Wennberg P O and Wunch D. 2017. The on-orbit performance of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) instrument and its radiometrically calibrated products. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 10(1): 59-81
  17. 17.
    Eldering A, Boland S, Solish B, Crisp D, Kahn P and Gunson M. 2012. High precision atmospheric CO2 measurements from space: the design and implementation of OCO-2//2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Big Sky: IEEE: 1-10
  18. 18.
    Eldering A, Taylor T E, O'Dell C W and Pavlick R. 2019. The OCO-3 mission: measurement objectives and expected performance based on 1 year of simulated data. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 12(4): 2341-2370
  19. 19.
    Foucher P Y, Chédin A, Armante R, Boone C, Crevoisier C and Bernath P. 2011. Carbon dioxide atmospheric vertical profiles retrieved from space observation using ACE-FTS solar occultation instrument. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11(6): 2455-2470
  20. 20.
    Gautam Y K, Sharma K, Tyagi S, Ambedkar A K, Chaudhary M and Singh B P. 2021. Nanostructured metal oxide semiconductor-based sensors for greenhouse gas detection: progress and challenges. Royal Society Open Science, 8(3): 201324
  21. 21.
    Han M L and Li B C. 2017. Embarked on a journey to global greenhouse gases emission observation: China’s first Fourier-transform spectrometer for GHG observation remote sensor. Space International, (12): 16-17
  22. 22.
    IPCC. 2018. Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Geneva: IPCC
  23. 23.
    Issa H, Marpu P, Jallad A H and Al Marar A. 2020. Data processing workflow for the greenhouse gases monitoring CubeSat mission-MeznSat//2020 Mediterranean and Middle-East Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (M2GARSS). Tunis: IEEE: 192-195
  24. 24.
    Kobayashi H, Ogawa T, Shimoda H, Shimota A, Kondo K, Kadokura S, Yoshigahara C, Uehara Y and Yoshida I. 1998. IMG: precursor of the high-resolution FTIR on the satellite//Proceedings of SPIE 3501, Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Clouds. Beijing: SPIE: 23-33
  25. 25.
    Liang A L, Gong W, Han G and Xiang C Z. 2017. Comparison of satellite-observed XCO2 from GOSAT, OCO-2, and ground-based TCCON. Remote Sensing, 9(10): 1033
  26. 26.
    Luo H Y, Li Z W, Wu Y, Qiu Z W, Shi H L, Wang Q S and Xiong W. 2023. Greenhouse Gases Monitoring Instrument on GaoFen-5 Satellite-II: Optical Design and Evaluation. Remote Sensing, 15(4):1105
  27. 27.
    Luo H Y, Xiong W, Shi H L and Li Z W. 2017. Study for signal-to-noise ratio of spatial heterodyne spectrometer. Acta Optica Sinica, 37(6): 0612001
  28. 28.
    Mager R, Fricke W, Burrows J P, Frerick J and Bovensmann H. 1997. SCIAMACHY: a new generation of hyperspectral remote sensing instrument//Proceedings of SPIE 3106, Spectroscopic Atmospheric Monitoring Techniques. Munich: SPIE: 84-94
  29. 29.
    Morse P G, Bates J C, Miller C R, Chahine M T, O'Callaghan F, Aumann H H and Karnik A R. 1999. Development and test of the atmospheric infrared sounder (AIRS) for the NASA earth observing system (EOS)//Proceedings of SPIE 3870, Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites III. Florence: SPIE: 281-292
  30. 30.
    Nakajima M, Suto H, Yotsumoto K, Shiomi K and Hirabayashi T. 2017. Fourier transform spectrometer on GOSAT and GOSAT-2//Proceedings of SPIE 10563, International Conference on Space Optics — ICSO 2014. Tenerife: SPIE: 105634O
  31. 31.
    Noël S, Bramstedt K, Hilker M, Liebing P, Plieninger J, Reuter M, Rozanov A, Sioris C E, Bovensmann H and Burrows J P. 2016. Stratospheric CH4 and CO2 profiles derived from SCIAMACHY solar occultation measurements. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 9(4): 1485-1503
  32. 32.
    Olsen K S, Strong K, Walker K A, Boone C D, Raspollini P, Plieninger J, Bader W, Conway S, Grutter M, Hannigan J W, Hase F, Jones N, De Mazière M, Notholt J, Schneider M, Smale D, Sussmann R and Saitoh N. 2017. Comparison of the GOSAT TANSO-FTS TIR CH4 volume mixing ratio vertical profiles with those measured by ACE-FTS, ESA MIPAS, IMK-IAA MIPAS, and 16 NDACC stations. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 10(10): 3697-3718
  33. 33.
    Palmer P I. 2008. Quantifying sources and sinks of trace gases using space-borne measurements: current and future science. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1885): 4509-4528
  34. 34.
    Polonsky I N, O'Brien D M, Kumer J B, O'Dell C W and The geoCARB Team. 2014. Performance of a geostationary mission, geoCARB, to measure CO2, CH4 and CO column-averaged concentrations. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 7(4): 959-981
  35. 35.
    Shi H L, Li Z W, Ye H H, Luo H Y, Xiong W and Wang X H. 2021. First level 1 product results of the greenhouse gas monitoring instrument on the gaofen-5 satellite. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 59(2): 899-914
  36. 36.
    Shi H L, Xiong W, Li Z W and Luo H Y. 2019. Quality analysis of on-orbit observation data of greenhouse gases monitoring instrument. Aerospace Shanghai, 36(S2): 161-166
  37. 37.
    Shi H L, Xiong W, Luo H Y, Li Z W and Wu J. 2013. Novel hyper-spectral technology for atmospheric carbon dioxide detection. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 40(8): 36-41
  38. 38.
    Shimoda H and Ogawa T. 1997. Interferometric monitor for greenhouse gases (IMG)//Proceedings of SPIE 3221, Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites. London: SPIE: 110-120
  39. 39.
    Simeoni D, Astruc P, Miras D, Alis C, Andreis O, Scheidel D, Degrelle C, Nicol P, Bailly B, Guiard P, Clauss A, Blumstein D, Maciaszek T, Chalon G, Carlier T and Kayal G. 2004. Design and development of IASI instrument//Proceedings of SPIE 5543, Infrared Spaceborne Remote Sensing XII. Denver: SPIE: 208-219
  40. 40.
    Stumpf K D and Overbeck J A. 2002. CrIS optical system design//Proceedings of SPIE 4486, Infrared Spaceborne Remote Sensing IX. San Diego: SPIE: 437-444
  41. 41.
    Tsuno K, Kameda Y, Kondoh K and Hirai S. 1991. Interferometric monitor for greenhouse gasses for ADEOS//Proceedings of SPIE 1490, Future European and Japanese Remote-Sensing Sensors and Programs. Orlando: SPIE: 222-232
  42. 42.
    World Meteorological Organization. 2020. WMO Greenhouse Gas Bulletin: the State of Greenhouse Gases in the Atmosphere Based on Global Observations Through 2019. WMO
  43. 43.
    Wang Y P, Tao J H, Cheng L X, Yu C, Fan M, Zhang Y, Chen Y L, Zhu L L, Gu J B and Chen L F. 2021. Feasibility analysis and preliminary results of formaldehyde retrieval based on Environmental trace gases Monitoring Instrument onboard GF-5 satellite. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 25(10): 2040-2052
  44. 44.
    Xiong W. 2018. Hyperspectral greenhouse gases monitor instrument (GMI) for spaceborne payload. Spacecraft Recovery and Remote Sensing, 39(3): 14-24
  45. 45.
    Xiong W. 2019a. Greenhouse gases Monitoring Instrument (GMI) on GF-5 satellite (invited). Infrared and Laser Engineering, 48(3): 0303002
  46. 46.
    Xiong W. 2019b. Optimum design and data analysis of greenhouse gases monitoring instrument on GF-5 satellite. Aerospace Shanghai, 36(S2): 167-172
  47. 47.
    Yang Z D, Bi Y M, Wang Q, Zheng Y Q and Yin Z S. 2016. China’s first dedicated hyperspectral satellite for detecting consistency of CO2 set to get into orbit. Space International, (12): 13-17
  48. 48.
    Yoshida Y, Ota Y, Eguchi N, Kikuchi N, Nobuta K, Tran H, Morino I and Yokota T. 2011. Retrieval algorithm for CO2 and CH4 column abundances from short-wavelength infrared spectral observations by the Greenhouse gases observing satellite. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 4(4): 717-734
  49. 49.
    Zhang X Y, Meng X Y, Zhou M Q, Bai W G, Zhou L H, Hu Y M and Yu X. 2018. Review of the validation of atmospheric CO2 from satellite hyper spectral remote sensing. Climate Change Research, 14(6): 602-612
  50. 50.
    Zhang X Y, Wang F, Wang W H, Huang F X, Chen B L, Gao L, Wang S P, Yan H H, Ye H H, Si F Q, Hong J, Li X Y, Cao Q, Che H Z and Li Z Q. 2020. The development and application of satellite remote sensing for atmospheric compositions in China. Atmospheric Research, 245:105056

Читать полностью

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website