предыдущий|следующий

Spatial uncertainty in multi-year mean phenology based on remote sensing data

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China

    National Earth System Science Data Center, National Science & Technology Infrastructure of China, Beijing 100101, China

  • Email：jiaxinking@hhu.edu.cn
  • Introduction：金佳鑫，研究方向为生态遥感。E-mail： jiaxinking@hhu.edu.cn
JIN Jiaxin12,  
  • Affiliation：

    College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China

JI Yingying1,  
  • Affiliation：

    PowerChina Zhongnan Engineering Corporation Limited, Changsha 410014, China

GUO Fengsheng3,  
  • Affiliation：

    College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China

YU Han1,  
  • Affiliation：

    College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China

XIAO Yuanyuan1

реферат

Multi-year mean phenology reflects the average state of vegetation growth and development rhythm and is one of the key parameters for predicting vegetation phenology. As an important source of spatial multi-year mean phenology, remote sensing is widely used for phenology detection. Different methods of multi-year mean phenology calculation are based on remote sensing. One is determining the phenological point of the annual time series curve first and then calculating the average (referred as the average method), and another is gaining the multi-year mean time series curve first and then determining the phenological point (referred as the reference curve method). The results of the above methods may be different. However, the uncertainty and its impacts need further elucidation. Hence, this study used the remote sensing vegetation index from 2001 to 2016 to extract the multi-year mean dates of the start of the growing season (SOS¯) using two methods in forests in China and detected the differences between the SOS¯ derived from the two methods (△SOS¯) and the spatial pattern. Furthermore, a commonly used indicator in phenological research, that is, the temperature (Preseason Duration (PD)) based on SOS¯, was used to explore the potential impact of the SOS¯ derived from different methods on the phenology–climate relationship. Results show that (1) the SOS¯ derived from different methods was significant different. The SOS¯ of the average method was generally smaller than that of the reference curve method (-2.6±2.2 days, accounting for 88%). The pixels with △SOS¯>7 between the dynamic average method and the reference method and that between the fixed average method and the reference method accounted for 8.0% and 6.0% of the effective pixels, respectively, which are mainly distributed in the southeastern hilly area. (2) A significant spatial heterogeneity of △SOS¯ showed a decrease with the increase of the annual average temperature (Slope=0.07 days/℃, P<0.01) and the decrease of the average annual precipitation (Slope=-0.0005 days/mm, P<0.01). (3) The PD derived from different methods was distinct. Approximately 40% of the effective pixels show a difference with PD > 5 days, and a half of them show a difference with PD>15 days, which are mainly located in the southeast hills and the southwest mountains. Overall, the achievements of this study provide a beneficial reference for the spatial parameterization of satellite-based phenology for modeling.

ключеви́че слова́

multi-year average phenology;phenological preseason duration;remote sensing surface phenology;time series;forest

References

  1. 1.
    Cao P Y, Zhang L M, Li S G and Zhang J H. 2016. Review on vegetation phenology observation and phenological index extraction. Advances in Earth Science, 31(4): 365-376
  2. 2.
    Cao R Y, Shen M G, Zhou J and Chen J. 2018. Modeling vegetation green-up dates across the Tibetan Plateau by including both seasonal and daily temperature and precipitation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 249: 176-186
  3. 3.
    Chuine I. 2000. A unified model for budburst of trees. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 207(3): 337-347
  4. 4.
    Dai J H, Wang H J and Ge Q S. 2013a. The decreasing spring frost risks during the flowering period for woody plants in temperate area of eastern China over past 50 years. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 23(4): 641-652
  5. 5.
    Dai J H, Wang H J and Ge Q S. 2013b. Multiple phenological responses to climate change among 42 plant species in Xi’an, China. International Journal of Biometeorology, 57(5): 749-758
  6. 6.
    Dai J H, Xu Y J, Wang H J, Alatalo J, Tao Z X and Ge Q S. 2019. Variations in the temperature sensitivity of spring leaf phenology from 1978 to 2014 in Mudanjiang, China. International Journal of Biometeorology, 63(5): 569-577
  7. 7.
    Deng G R, Zhang H Y, Yang L B, Zhao J J, Guo X Y, Hong Y, Wu R H and Dan G. 2020. Estimating frost during growing season and its impact on the velocity of vegetation greenup and withering in northeast China. Remote Sensing, 12(9): 1355
  8. 8.
    Ding M J, Zhang Y L, Sun X M, Liu L S, Wang Z F and Bai W Q. 2013. Spatiotemporal variation in alpine grassland phenology in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau from 1999 to 2009. Chinese Science Bulletin, 58(3): 396-405
  9. 9.
    Fu Y H, Zhao H F, Piao S L, Peaucelle M, Peng S S, Zhou G Y, Ciais P, Huang M T, Menzel A, Peñuelas J, Song Y, Vitasse Y, Zeng Z Z and Janssens I A. 2015. Declining global warming effects on the phenology of spring leaf unfolding. Nature, 526(7571): 104-107
  10. 10.
    Garonna I, De Jong R, De Wit A J W, Mücher C A, Schmid B and Schaepman M E. 2014. Strong contribution of autumn phenology to changes in satellite-derived growing season length estimates across Europe (1982—2011). Global Change Biology, 20(11): 3457-3470
  11. 11.
    Ge Q S, Wang H J, Rutishauser T and Dai J H. 2015. Phenological response to climate change in China: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 21(1): 265-274
  12. 12.
    Geng L Y and Ma M G. 2014. Advance in method comparison of reconstructing remote sensing time series data sets. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 29(2): 362-368
  13. 13.
    He J, Yang K, Tang W J, Lu H, Qin J, Chen Y Y and Li X. 2020. The first high-resolution meteorological forcing dataset for land process studies over China. Scientific Data, 7(1): 25
  14. 14.
    Huang W L, Zhang Q, Kong D D, Gu X H, Sun P and Hu P. 2019. Response of vegetation phenology to drought in Inner Mongolia from 1982 to 2013. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(13): 4953-4965
  15. 15.
    Huang Y, Jiang N, Shen M G and Guo L. 2020. Effect of preseason diurnal temperature range on the start of vegetation growing season in the Northern Hemisphere. Ecological Indicators, 112: 106161
  16. 16.
    Jeong S J, Ho C H, Gim H J and Brown M E. 2011. Phenology shifts at start vs. end of growing season in temperate vegetation over the Northern Hemisphere for the period 1982—2008. Global Change Biology, 17(7): 2385-2399
  17. 17.
    Jin J, Jiang H, Peng C, Zhang X, Wang Y, and Wang J. 2014. Climate change contribution to forest growth in eastern China over past two decades. Terrestrial Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 25(1): 49-60 [DOI: )]
  18. 18.
    Keenan T F, Gray J, Friedl M A, Toomey M, Bohrer G, Hollinger D Y, Munger J W, O’Keefe J, Schmid H P, Wing I S, Yang B and Richardson A D. 2014. Net carbon uptake has increased through warming-induced changes in temperate forest phenology. Nature Climate Change, 4(7): 598-604
  19. 19.
    Lawrence D M, Oleson K W, Flanner M G, Thornton P E, Swenson S C, Lawrence P J, Zeng X B, Yang Z L, Levis S, Sakaguchi K, Bonan G B and Slater A G. 2011. Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in version 4 of the community land model. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 3(3): M03001
  20. 20.
    Li W, MacBean N, Ciais P, Defourny, P, Lamarche C, Bontemps S, Houghton R A and Peng S. 2018. Gross and net land cover changes in the main plant functional types derived from the annual ESA CCI land cover maps (1992—2015). Earth System Science Data, 10, 219-234
  21. 21.
    Liu H L, Ge Q S, Zhou Y, Dai J H, Hao Z X and Yan J H. 2021. Peony-appreciating dates recorded in historical documents around Kaifeng in Henan Province and their indications to climate variations during 981—1040 A.D.[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 41(3): 864-876
  22. 22.
    Liu H Q and Huete A. 1995. A feedback based modification of the NDVI to minimize canopy background and atmospheric noise. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 33(2): 457-465
  23. 23.
    Matsumoto K, Ohta T, Irasawa M and Nakamura T. 2003. Climate change and extension of the Ginkgo biloba L. growing season in Japan. Global Change Biology, 9(11): 1634-1642
  24. 24.
    Menzel A. 2002. Phenology: its importance to the global change community. Climatic Change, 54(4): 379-385
  25. 25.
    Menzel A, Sparks T H, Estrella N, Koch E, Aasa A, Ahas R, Alm-Kübler K, Bissolli P, Braslavská O, Briede A, Chmielewski F M, Crepinsek Z, Curnel Y, Dahl Å, Defila C, Donnelly A, Filella Y, Jatczak K, Måge F, Mestre A, Nordli Ø, Peñuelas J, Pirinen P, Remišová V, Scheifinger H, Striz M, Susnik A, Van Vliet A J H, Wielgolaski F E, Zach S and Zust A. 2006. European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Global Change Biology, 12(10): 1969-1976
  26. 26.
    Nowosad J, Stepinski T F and Netzel P. 2019. Global assessment and mapping of changes in mesoscale landscapes: 1992-2015. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 78: 332-340
  27. 27.
    Piao S L, Fang J Y, Zhou L M, Ciais P and Zhu B. 2006. Variations in satellite-derived phenology in China’s temperate vegetation. Global Change Biology, 12(4): 672-685
  28. 28.
    Piao S L, Tan J G, Chen A P, Fu Y H, Ciais P, Liu Q, Janssens I A, Vicca S, Zeng Z Z, Jeong S J, Li Y, Myneni R B, Peng S S, Shen M G and Peñuelas J. 2015. Leaf onset in the northern hemisphere triggered by daytime temperature. Nature Communications, 6: 6911
  29. 29.
    Richardson A D, Black T A, Ciais P, Delbart N, Friedl M A, Gobron N, Hollinger D Y, Kutsch W L, Longdoz B, Luyssaert S, Migliavacca M, Montagnani L, Munger J W, Moors E, Piao S L, Rebmann C, Reichstein M, Saigusa N, Tomelleri E, Vargas R and Varlagin A. 2010. Influence of spring and autumn phenological transitions on forest ecosystem productivity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1555): 3227-3246
  30. 30.
    Richardson A D, Hufkens K, Milliman T, Aubrecht D M, Furze M E, Seyednasrollah B, Krassovski M B, Latimer J M, Nettles W R, Heiderman R R, Warren J M and Hanson P J. 2018. Ecosystem warming extends vegetation activity but heightens vulnerability to cold temperatures. Nature, 560(7718): 368-371
  31. 31.
    Schwartz M D. 1998. Green wave phenology. Nature, 394(6696): 839-840
  32. 32.
    Shen M G, Piao S L, Cong N, Zhang G X and Jassens I A. 2015. Precipitation impacts on vegetation spring phenology on the Tibetan Plateau. Global Change Biology, 21(10): 3647-3656
  33. 33.
    van Vliet A J H, de Groot R S, Bellens Y, Braun P, Bruegger R, Bruns E, Clevers J, Estreguil C, Flechsig M, Jeanneret F, Maggi M, Martens P, Menne B, Menzel A and Sparks T. 2003. The European phenology network. International Journal of Biometeorology, 47(4): 202-212
  34. 34.
    Wang H J, Dai J H, Zheng J Y and Ge Q S. 2015. Temperature sensitivity of plant phenology in temperate and subtropical regions of China from 1850 to 2009. International Journal of Climatology, 35(6): 913-922
  35. 35.
    Wang M Y, Luo Y, Zhang Z Y, Xie Q Y, Wu X D and Ma X L. 2022. Recent advances in remote sensing of vegetation phenology: Retrieval algorithm and validation strategy. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 26(3): 431-455
  36. 36.
    Wang Z X, Liu C and Huete A. 2003. From AVHRR-NDVI to MODIS-EVI: advances in vegetation index research. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 23(5): 979-987
  37. 37.
    White M A, Thornton P E and Running S W. 1997. A continental phenology model for monitoring vegetation responses to interannual climatic variability. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 11(2): 217-234
  38. 38.
    Wu Y F, Li M S and Song J Q. 2008. Advance in vegetation phenology monitoring based on remote sensing. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 24(3): 51-58
  39. 39.
    Xia C F, Li J and Liu Q H. 2013. Review of advances in vegetation phenology monitoring by remote sensing. Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(1): 1-16
  40. 40.
    Xiao X M, Boles S, Liu J Y, Zhuang D F and Liu M L. 2002. Characterization of forest types in Northeastern China, using multi-temporal SPOT-4 VEGETATION sensor data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 82(2/3): 335-348
  41. 41.
    Zhang X X, Ge Q S and Zheng J Y. 2004. Relationships between climate change and vegetation in Beijing using remote sensed data and phenological data. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 28(4): 499-506
  42. 42.
    Zhu K Z. 1973. A preliminary study on the climatic fluctuations during the last 5,000 years in China. Scientia Sinica, 16(2): 226-256

Читать полностью

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website