предыдущий|следующий

Forest aboveground biomass estimation combining ICESat-2 and GEDI spaceborne LiDAR data

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Aerospace Information Research Insititute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

  • Email：mengge@aircas.ac.cn
  • Introduction：孟鸽，研究方向为植被生态遥感。E-mail： mengge@aircas.ac.cn
MENG Ge12,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Aerospace Information Research Insititute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

  • Email：zhaodan@aircas.ac.cn
  • Introduction：赵旦，研究方向为森林生态系统遥感。E-mail： zhaodan@aircas.ac.cn
ZHAO Dan12*,  
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Aerospace Information Research Insititute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

XU Cong12,  
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Aerospace Information Research Insititute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

CHEN Junhua12,  
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Aerospace Information Research Insititute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

LI Xiuwen12,  
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Aerospace Information Research Insititute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

ZHENG Zhaoju1,  
  • Affiliation：

    Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Aerospace Information Research Insititute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

ZENG Yuan12

реферат

Forest Aboveground Biomass (AGB) plays an important role in the study of carbon cycle and global change. Spaceborne LiDAR can provide information about forest vertical structures that is advantageous in AGB estimation, among which ICESat-2 and GEDI are the latest available spaceborne data. In this study, we investigated the applicability of ICESat-2 and GEDI for forest AGB estimation at regional scale, and analyzed the effect of data fusion of ICESat-2 and GEDI to find an optimal method to map the spatial distribution of forest AGB accurately in Zhejiang Province.First, we built footprint-level forest AGB estimation models by stepwise regression in the typical study area of Gutian Mountain based on ICEsat-2 and GEDI spaceborne LiDAR data, respectively. Then, combined with MODIS data and ASTER GDEM terrain information, forest AGB estimation models with spatial continuity at 250m pixel scale for different forest types were constructed by Random Forest algorithm throughout Zhejiang Province. Estimation results were validated using 40 forest AGB field plots. Finally, by comparing validation results of AGB estimation based on ICESat-2 or GEDI solely and the combination of the two spaceborne LiDAR data, the optimal method of forest AGB scaling was selected and the spatial distribution of forest AGB of the year 2020 was mapped in Zhejiang Province.The accuracy of segment-level forest AGB estimation based on ICESat-2 (R2=0.7057, RMSE=0.3571 ln(t/ha)) outmatches footprint-level forest AGB estimation based on GEDI (R2=0.5186, RMSE=0.2805 ln(t/ha)) in the typical study area of Gutian Mountain. Validation accuracy of forest AGB estimation result based on ICEsat-2 (R2=0.59, RMSE=31.2525 t/ha) is superior to GEDI (R2=0.4113, RMSE=39.2652 t/ha) in Zhejiang Province. The difference of forest AGB estimation performance between ICESat-2 and GEDI is mainly related to elevation, validation accuracy based on GEDI is higher when filtering footprints that are acquired in high elevation areas with an elevation threshold of 600m (R2=0.5387, RMSE=25.4017 t/ha). Combining ICESat-2 and GEDI data (elevation ≤ 600 m) to build scaling model is the optimal method to estimate forest AGB in Zhejiang Province (R2=0.678, RMSE=27.3592 t/ha).We have obtained a reliable estimation of forest AGB in Zhejiang Province based on ICESat-2 and GEDI data, which is a significant practice of regional scale forest AGB estimation. Our study can provide an effective method for forest carbon dynamic and sequestration potential monitoring using spaceborne LiDAR data.

ключеви́че слова́

remote sensing;forest aboveground biomass;ICESat-2;GEDI;stepwise regression;Random Forest;scaling extrapolation;Zhejiang Province

References

  1. 1.
    Alrutz M, Gómez-Diaz J A, Schneidewind U, Krömer T and Kreft H. 2021. Forest structural parameters and aboveground biomass in old-growth and secondary forests along an elevational gradient in Mexico. Botanical Sciences, 100(1): 67-85
  2. 2.
    Campbell M J, Dennison P E, Kerr K L, Brewer S C and Anderegg W R L. 2021. Scaled biomass estimation in woodland ecosystems: testing the individual and combined capacities of satellite multispectral and lidar data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 262: 112511
  3. 3.
    Chen Z J and Pu X A. 2016. Comparison of multiple linear regression analysis and stepwise regression analysis. Journal of Mudanjiang College of Education, (5): 131-133
  4. 4.
    Dorado-Roda I, Pascual A, Godinho S, Silva C A, Botequim B, Rodríguez-Gonzálvez P, González-Ferreiro E and Guerra-Hernández J. 2021. Assessing the accuracy of GEDI data for canopy height and aboveground biomass estimates in Mediterranean forests. Remote Sensing, 13(12): 2279
  5. 5.
    Du Z L, Su T, Ge J M and Wang X. 2021. Towards the carbon neutrality: the role of carbon sink and its spatial spillover effects. Economic Research Journal, 56(12): 187-202
  6. 6.
    Dubayah R, Blair J B, Goetz S, Fatoyinbo L, Hansen M, Healey S, Hofton M, Hurtt G, Kellner J, Luthcke S, Armston J, Tang H, Duncanson L, Hancock S, Jantz P, Marselis S, Patterson P L, Qi W L and Silva C. 2020. The global ecosystem dynamics investigation: high-resolution laser ranging of the Earth's forests and topography. Science of Remote Sensing, 1: 100002
  7. 7.
    Duduman G, Barnoaiea I, Avăcăriței D, Barbu C O, Coșofreț V C, Dănilă I C, Duduman M L, Măciucă A and Drăgoi M. 2021. Aboveground biomass of living trees depends on topographic conditions and tree diversity in temperate Montane forests from the Slătioara-Rarău Area (Romania). Forests, 12(11): 1507
  8. 8.
    Editorial Committee of the Land Cover Atlas of the People's Republic of China. 2017. Land Cover Atlas of the People’s Republic of China (1: 1,000,000). Beijing: China Map Publishing House
  9. 9.
    Fang K N, Wu J B, Zhu J P and Xie B C. 2011. A review of technologies on Random Forests. Statistics and Information Forum, 26(3): 32-38
  10. 10.
    Fu T and Huang Q F. 2010. Development of forest biomass estimations using airborne laser scanner data. Forest Investigation Design, (4): 86-89
  11. 11.
    Fu W J, Fu Z J, Ge H L, Ji B Y, Jiang P K, Li Y F, Wu J S and Zhao K L. 2015. Spatial variation of biomass carbon density in a subtropical region of southeastern China. Forests, 6(6): 1966-1981
  12. 12.
    Huang J P. 2021. Study on canopy height estimation based on ICESat-2/ATLAS photon counting LiDAR data. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University
  13. 13.
    Lang N, Kalischek N, Armston J, Schindler K, Dubayah R and Wegner J D. 2022. Global canopy height regression and uncertainty estimation from GEDI LiDAR waveforms with deep ensembles. Remote Sensing of Environment, 268: 112760
  14. 14.
    Li M, Lu Y Y, Lu T F, Xu H and Ou G L. 2022. Forest aboveground biomass estimation and saturation point analysis using optical remote sensing in Nujiang River Basin of Yunnan Province. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 42(3): 116-127
  15. 15.
    Li W, Niu Z, Wang C, Gao S, Feng Q and Chen H Y. 2015. Forest above-ground biomass estimation at plot and tree levels using airborne LiDAR data. Journal of Remote Sensing (in Chinese), 19(4): 669-679
  16. 16.
    Liu Q, Yang L, Liu Q H and Li J. 2015. Review of forest above ground biomass inversion methods based on remote sensing technology. Journal of Remote Sensing (in Chinese), 19(1): 62-74
  17. 17.
    Luthcke S B, Thomas T C, Pennington T A, Rebold T W, Nicholas J B, Rowlands D D, Gardner A S and Bae S. 2021. ICESat-2 pointing calibration and geolocation performance. Earth and Space Science, 8(3): e2020EA001494
  18. 18.
    Magruder L, Brunt K, Neumann T, Klotz B and Alonzo M. 2021. Passive ground-based optical techniques for monitoring the on-orbit ICESat-2 altimeter geolocation and footprint diameter. Earth and Space Science, 8(10): e2020EA001414
  19. 19.
    Markus T, Neumann T, Martino A, Abdalati W, Brunt K, Csatho B, Farrell S, Fricker H, Gardner A, Harding D, Jasinski M, Kwok R, Magruder L, Lubin D, Luthcke S, Morison J, Nelson R, Neuenschwander A, Palm S, Popescu S, Shum C K, Schutz B E, Smith B, Yang Y K and Zwally J. 2017. The Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2): science requirements, concept, and implementation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 190: 260-273
  20. 20.
    Nandy S, Srinet R and Padalia H. 2021. Mapping forest height and aboveground biomass by integrating ICESat-2, Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data using random forest algorithm in northwest himalayan foothills of India. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(14): e2021GL093799
  21. 21.
    Narine L L, Popescu S C and Malambo L. 2020. Using ICESat-2 to estimate and map forest aboveground biomass: a first example. Remote Sensing, 12(11): 1824
  22. 22.
    Neuenschwander A L and Magruder L A. 2019. Canopy and terrain height retrievals with ICESat-2: a first look. Remote Sensing, 11(14): 1721
  23. 23.
    Neumann T A, Martino A J, Markus T, Bae S, Bock M R, Brenner A C, Brunt K M, Cavanaugh J, Fernandes S T, Hancock D W, Harbeck K, Lee J, Kurtz N T, Luers P J, Luthcke S B, Magruder L, Pennington T A, Ramos-Izquierdo L, Rebold T, Skoog J and Thomas T C. 2019. The Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 mission: a global geolocated photon product derived from the Advanced Topographic Laser Altimeter System. Remote Sensing of Environment, 233: 111325
  24. 24.
    Pang Y, Li Z Y, Chen B W and Liang X J. 2019. Status and development of spaceborne Lidar applications in forestry. Aerospace Shanghai, 36(3): 20-27
  25. 25.
    Pang Y, Meng S L and Li Z Y. 2017. Temperate Forest aboveground biomass estimation using Fourier-based textural ordination (FOTO) indices from high resolution aerial optical image. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 53(3): 94-104
  26. 26.
    Qi W L, Saarela S, Armston J, Ståhl G and Dubayah R. 2019. Forest biomass estimation over three distinct forest types using TanDEM-X InSAR data and simulated GEDI lidar data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 232: 111283
  27. 27.
    Qin G W and Tian M H. 2022. The development opportunities and implementation path of forestry carbon sequestration under the target of carbon peak and carbon neutrality. Administration Reform, 1(1): 45-54
  28. 28.
    Queinnec M, White J C and Coops N C. 2021. Comparing airborne and spaceborne photon-counting lidar canopy structural estimates across different boreal forest types. Remote Sensing of Environment, 262: 112510
  29. 29.
    Rosenfield M F and Souza A F F. 2014. Forest biomass variation in Southernmost Brazil: the impact of Araucaria trees. Revista de Biología Tropical, 62(1): 359-372
  30. 30.
    Shen A H, Wu C F, Jiang B, Deng J S, Yuan W G, Wang K, He S, Zhu E Y, Lin Y and Wu C P. 2018. Spatiotemporal variations of aboveground biomass under different terrain conditions. Forests, 9(12): 778
  31. 31.
    Silva C A, Duncanson L, Hancock S, Neuenschwander A, Thomas N, Hofton M, Fatoyinbo L, Simard M, Marshak C Z, Armston J, Lutchke S and Dubayah R. 2021. Fusing simulated GEDI, ICESat-2 and NISAR data for regional aboveground biomass mapping. Remote Sensing of Environment, 253: 112234
  32. 32.
    Wu B F, Zeng Y and Zhao D. 2019. Remote Sensing Methods of China’s Ecological Parameters and Changing Patterns. Beijing: Science Press
  33. 33.
    Wu C F. 2016. Regional Biomass Estimation and Application Based on Remote Sensing. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University
  34. 34.
    Xiong J. 2019. Forest Tree Species Classification and Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Airborne LiDAR and Hyperspectral Data. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  35. 35.
    Yan Y J, Fan S H and Guan F Y. 2018. Research progress in TLS technology in forest investigation. World Forestry Research, 31(4): 42-47
  36. 36.
    Yi H Y, Zeng Y, Zhao Y J, Zheng Z J, Xiong J and Zhao D. 2020. Forest species diversity mapping based on clustering algorithm. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 44(6): 598-615
  37. 37.
    Yu M J, Hu Z H, Yu J P, Ding B Y and Fang T. 2001. Forest vegetation types in Gutianshan Natural Reserve in Zhejiang. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 27(4): 375-380
  38. 38.
    Yue C Y, Zheng Y C, Xing Y Q, Pang Y, Li S M, Cai L T and He H Y. 2020. Technical and application development study of space-borne LiDAR in forestry remote sensing. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 49(11): 20200235
  39. 39.
    Zhang Z P. 1993. Preference of linear regression models and log-linear regression models: the use of several simple tests. Statistical Research, (1): 57-59
  40. 40.
    Zheng Z J. 2017. Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using LiDAR and Scaling Model in the Three Gorges Region of China. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
  41. 41.
    Zhou G Y, Yin G C, Tang X L, Wen D Z, Liu C P, Kuang Y W and Wang W T. 2018. Forest Ecosystem Carbon Stocks in China: Biomass Equation. Beijing: (Science Press

Читать полностью

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website