предыдущий|следующий

Evapotranspiration estimation and validation at 16 m resolution based on ETMonitor model driven by GF-1 satellite remote sensing datasets

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

  • Email：zhengcl@aircas.ac.cn
  • Introduction：郑超磊，研究方向为蒸散发遥感理论和应用。E-mail： zhengcl@aircas.ac.cn
ZHENG Chaolei,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

JIA Li,  
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

HU Guangcheng

реферат

Evapotranspiration (ET) is one of the core variables for studying the surface water cycle and management of the field-scale water resources. Satellite remote sensing are widely adopted to obtain the variation of evapotranspiration at large spatial scale, but the resolution of existing ET products is mainly limited at low or medium resolution (1—25 km), which cannot satisfy the field-scale water management application. The Chinese GF-1 Wide Field of View (WFV) camera has the characteristics of high spatial and temporal resolution, with a spatial resolution of 16m, and it can support to generate ET products with high spatial and temporal resolution, which has not yet been well presented. The objective of this study is to present the capacity of using the remote sensing data from the GF-1 satellite as the driving force to produce high resolution (16 m) ET. The ETMonitor model was adopted to estimate ET at 16 m resolution in this study. ETMonitor is a combined model with multi-process parameterizations, and it has been proven to be able to generate accurate regional and global ET estimation at relative coarse resolution (e.g., 1 km) mainly using the biophysical and hydrological parameters/variables retrieved from satellite observations. During the ET estimation procedure, the adopted GF-1 remote sensing datasets include the Leaf Area Index (LAI), Fraction of Vegetation Cover (FVC), Albedo, and NDVI datasets, which are retrieved from previous studies. Ground observation data from 16 sites in China was collected to validate the estimated ET, including 6 grassland sites, 4 cropland sites, 1 mixed forest site, 2 shrubland sites, and 3 desert or Gobi sites. The validation results show that the overall Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of estimated daily evapotranspiration based on GF-1 satellite remote sensing datasets is 0.85 mm d-1, the correlation coefficient (R) is 0.79, and the Bias is 0.16 mm d-1, which can demonstrate the high accuracy of estimated ET. The GF-1 based ET at 16 m resolution also presented better performance in terms of spatial variation of ET comparing with the low-resolution (e.g., 1 km) ET, especially in the regions with high surface heterogeneity. These highlight the ability of Chinese GF-1 satellite remote sensing dataset could produce accurate ET at high spatial variation, and it has potential to meet the application of field-scale agricultural water resources management, irrigation management, ecological environment monitoring and government decision-making in China. However, due to the impact of the revisit cycle of the GF-1 satellite and the impact of clouds, there are some gaps or missing values in GF-1 based LAI, FVC or Albedo, and these further cause gaps in the GF-1 ET data. In order to improve the availability of high-resolution ET products, it is necessary to produce spatially and temporally continuous high-resolution ET products, which will be the focus of follow-up research.

ключеви́че слова́

evapotranspiration;ETMonitor;remote sensing;GF-1;validation;16 m resolution;China

References

  1. 1.
    Allen R G, Morton C, Kamble B, Kilic A, Huntington J, Thau D, Gorelick N, Erickson T, Moore R, Trezza R, Ratcliffe I and Clarence R. 2015. EEFlux: a landsat-based evapotranspiration mapping tool on the Google earth engine//Proceedings of 2015 ASABE/IA Irrigation Symposium: Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Irrigation-A Tribute to the Career of Terry Howell, Sr. Conference Proceedings. St. Joseph: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineer
  2. 2.
    Bastiaanssen W G M, Menenti M, Feddes R A and Holtslag A A M. 1998. A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL). 1. Formulation. Journal of Hydrology, 212-213: 198-212
  3. 3.
    Bennour A, Jia L, Menenti M, Zheng C L, Zeng Y L, Barnieh B A and Jiang M. 2022. Calibration and validation of SWAT model by using hydrological remote sensing observables in the Lake Chad Basin. Remote Sensing, 14(6): 1511
  4. 4.
    Bisht G, Venturini V, Islam S and Jiang L. 2005. Estimation of the net radiation using MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) data for clear sky days. Remote Sensing of Environment, 97(1): 52-67
  5. 5.
    Chen J M and Liu J. 2020. Evolution of evapotranspiration models using thermal and shortwave remote sensing data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 237: 111594
  6. 6.
    Chen Q T, Jia L, Menenti M, Hutjes R, Hu G C, Zheng C L and Wang K. 2019. A numerical analysis of aggregation error in evapotranspiration estimates due to heterogeneity of soil moisture and leaf area index. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 269-270: 335-350
  7. 7.
    Chen X L, Su Z B, Ma Y M, Trigo I and Gentine P. 2021. Remote sensing of global daily evapotranspiration based on a surface energy balance method and reanalysis data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126(16): e2020JD032873
  8. 8.
    Du D D, Zheng C L, Jia L, Chen Q T, Jiang M, Hu G C and Lu J. 2022. Estimation of global cropland gross primary production from satellite observations by integrating water availability variable in light-use-efficiency model. Remote Sensing, 14(7): 1722
  9. 9.
    Famiglietti C A, Fisher J B, Halverson G and Borbas E E. 2018. Global validation of MODIS near-surface air and dew point temperatures. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(15): 7772-7780
  10. 10.
    Fisher J B, Melton F, Middleton E, Hain C, Anderson M, Allen R, McCabe M F, Hook S, Baldocchi D, Townsend P A, Kilic A, Tu K, Miralles D D, Perret J, Lagouarde J P, Waliser D, Purdy A J, French A, Schimel D, Famiglietti J S, Stephens G and Wood E F. 2017. The future of evapotranspiration: global requirements for ecosystem functioning, carbon and climate feedbacks, agricultural management, and water resources. Water Resources Research, 53(4): 2618-2626
  11. 11.
    Guzinski R, Nieto H, Sandholt I and Karamitilios G. 2020. Modelling high-resolution actual evapotranspiration through sentinel-2 and sentinel-3 data fusion. Remote Sensing, 12(9): 1433
  12. 12.
    Hou A Y, Kakar R K, Neeck S, Azarbarzin A A, Kummerow C D, Kojima M, Oki R, Nakamura K and Iguchi T. 2014. The global precipitation measurement mission. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 95(5): 701-722
  13. 13.
    Hu G C and Jia L. 2015. Monitoring of evapotranspiration in a semi-arid inland river basin by combining microwave and optical remote sensing observations. Remote Sensing, 7(3): 3056-3087
  14. 14.
    Jarvis P G. 1976. The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273(927): 593-610
  15. 15.
    Jia L. 2004. Modeling Heat Exchanges at the Land-Atmosphere Interface Using Multi-Angular Thermal Infrared Measurements. Wageningen: Wageningen University: 49-68
  16. 16.
    Jia L, Xi G, Liu S, Huang C, Yan Y and Liu G. 2009. Regional estimation of daily to annual regional evapotranspiration with MODIS data in the Yellow River Delta wetland. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13(10): 1775-1787
  17. 17.
    Jia L, Zheng C, Hu G C and Menenti M. 2018. 4.03-Evapotranspiration. Comprehensive Remote Sensing, 4: 25-50
  18. 18.
    Jia L, Hu G C, Chen Q T and Zheng C L. 2021. Crop water productivity assessment of a representative irrigation district in Morocco//Guo H D, ed. Big Earth Data in Support of the Sustainable Development Goals. Beijing: Science Press
  19. 19.
    Jiang C Y, Guan K Y, Pan M, Ryu Y, Peng B and Wang S B. 2020. BESS-STAIR: a framework to estimate daily, 30 m, and all-weather crop evapotranspiration using multi-source satellite data for the US Corn Belt. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 24(3): 1251-1273
  20. 20.
    Jung M, Koirala S, Weber U, Ichii K, Gans F, Camps-Valls G, Papale D, Schwalm C, Tramontana G and Reichstein M. 2019. The FLUXCOM ensemble of global land-atmosphere energy fluxes. Scientific Data, 6(1): 74
  21. 21.
    King M D, Menzel W P, Kaufman Y J, Tanre D, Gao B C, Platnick S, Ackerman S A, Remer L A, Pincus R and Hubanks P A. 2003. Cloud and aerosol properties, precipitable water, and profiles of temperature and water vapor from MODIS. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(2): 442-458
  22. 22.
    Kljun N, Calanca P, Rotach M W and Schmid H P. 2015. A simple two-dimensional parameterisation for flux footprint prediction (FFP). Geoscientific Model Development, 8(11): 3695-3713
  23. 23.
    Koppa A, Rains D, Hulsman P, Poyatos R and Miralles D G. 2022. A deep learning-based hybrid model of global terrestrial evaporation. Nature Communications, 13(1): 1912
  24. 24.
    Letu H, Shi J C, Li M, Wang T X, Shang H Z, Lei Y H, Ji D B, Wen J G, Yang K and Chen L F. 2020. A review of the estimation of downward surface shortwave radiation based on satellite data: methods, progress and problems. Science China Earth Sciences, 63(6): 774-789
  25. 25.
    Li Z L, Tang B H, Wu H, Ren H Z, Yan G J, Wan Z M, Trigo I F, Sobrino J A. 2013. Satellite-derived land surface temperature: current status and perspectives Remote Sensing of Environment, 131: 14-37
  26. 26.
    Liu Q H, Wen J G, Zhou X, Zhao J, Li Z Y, Li X, Ma M G, Wang W Z, Liao X H, Liu S M, Fan W J, Xiao Q, Zhong B, Li J, Xin X Z, Li L, Jia L, Gao Z H, Jin J D, Liang S, Xin J, Liao C J and Wu Y R. 2023. Technique system of remote sensing product generation and validation of GF common products. National Remote Sensing Bulletin， 27(3): 544-562
  27. 27.
    Liu S M, Xu Z W, Wang W Z, Jia Z Z, Zhu M J, Bai J and Wang J M. 2011. A comparison of eddy-covariance and large aperture scintillometer measurements with respect to the energy balance closure problem. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(4): 1291-1306
  28. 28.
    Liu S M, Li X, Xu Z W, Che T, Xiao Q, Ma M G, Liu Q H, Jin R, Guo J W, Wang L X, Wang W Z, Qi Y, Li H Y, Xu T R, Ran Y H, Hu X L, Shi S J, Zhu Z L, Tan J L, Zhang Y and Ren Z G. 2018. The Heihe integrated observatory network: a basin-scale land surface processes observatory in China. Vadose Zone Journal, 17(1): 1-21
  29. 29.
    Ma Y F, Liu S M, Song L S, Xu Z W, Liu Y L, Xu T R and Zhu Z L. 2018. Estimation of daily evapotranspiration and irrigation water efficiency at a Landsat-like scale for an arid irrigation area using multi-source remote sensing data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 216: 715-734
  30. 30.
    Miralles D G, Holmes T R H, De Jeu R A M, Gash J H, Meesters A G C A and Dolman A J. 2011. Global land-surface evaporation estimated from satellite-based observations. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(2): 453-469
  31. 31.
    Mo X G, Liu S X, Lin Z H and Zhao W M. 2004. Simulating temporal and spatial variation of evapotranspiration over the Lushi basin. Journal of Hydrology, 285(1/4): 125-142
  32. 32.
    Mu Q Z, Zhao M S and Running S W. 2011. Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(8): 1781-1800
  33. 33.
    Shuttleworth W J and Wallace J S. 1985. Evaporation from sparse crops‐an energy combination theory. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 111(469): 839-855
  34. 34.
    Stewart J B. 1988. Modelling surface conductance of pine forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 43(1): 19-35
  35. 35.
    Su Z. 2002. The Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 6(1): 85-99
  36. 36.
    Susskind J, Barnet C D and Blaisdell J M. 2003. Retrieval of atmospheric and surface parameters from AIRS/AMSU/HSB data in the presence of clouds. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(2): 390-409
  37. 37.
    Tang R L, Li Z L and Tang B H. 2010. An application of the Ts-VI triangle method with enhanced edges determination for evapotranspiration estimation from MODIS data in arid and semi-arid regions: implementation and validation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(3): 540-551
  38. 38.
    Wen J G, Xiao Q, Zhong S Y, Tang Y, Chen X, Wei Q F, Wu X D, Lin X W, Ouyang X Y, You D Q and Liu Q H. 2023. Technology system for product validation and algorithm test of GF common products and an application example. Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(3): 780-789
  39. 39.
    Xu Z W, Liu S M, Gong L J, Wang J M and Li X W. 2008. A study on the data processing and quality assessment of the eddy covariance system. Advances in Earth Science, 23(4): 357-370
  40. 40.
    You D Q, Wen J G, Tang Y, Liu Q, Zhong S Y, Han Y, Gong B C, Zhong B, Wu S L and Liu Q H. 2023. The GaoFen land surface albedo product based on the high-spatial-and-temporal-resolution BRDF priori-knowledge and its preliminary validation. Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(3): 738-747
  41. 41.
    Zhang H, Li J, Zhang Z X, Wu S L, Zhong B and Liu Q H. 2022. A dataset of 16m/10-day leaf area indices of MuSyQ GF-series (2018-2020, China, Version 01). China Scientific Data, 7(1): 211-220
  42. 42.
    Zhang X, Liu L Y, Chen X D, Gao Y, Xie S and Mi J. 2021. GLC_FCS30: global land-cover product with fine classification system at 30 m using time-series Landsat imagery. Earth System Science Data, 13(6): 2753-2776
  43. 43.
    Zhang Y Q, Kong D D, Gan R, Chiew F H S, McVicar T R, Zhang Q and Yang Y T. 2019. Coupled estimation of 500 m and 8-day resolution global evapotranspiration and gross primary production in 2002-2017. Remote Sensing of Environment, 222: 165-182
  44. 44.
    Zhao J, Li J, Zhang Z X, Wu S L, Zhong B and Liu Q H. 2022. A dataset of 16 m/10-day fractional vegetation cover of MuSyQ GF-series (2018-2020, China, Version 01). China Scientific Data, 7(1): 1-10
  45. 45.
    Zhao T J, Shi J C, Xu H X, Sun Y L, Chen D Q, Cui Q, Jia L, Huang S, Niu S D, Li X W, Yan G J, Chen L F, Liu Q H, Zhao K, Zheng X M, Zhao L M, Zheng C L, Ji D B, Xiong C, Wang T X, Li R, Pan J M, Wen J G, Mu X H, Yu C, Zheng Y M, Jiang L M, Chai L N, Lu H, Yao P P, Ma J W, Lyu H S, Wu J J, Zhao W, Yang N, Guo P, Li Y X, Hu L, Geng D Y, Zhang Z Q, Hu J F and Du A P. 2021. Comprehensive remote sensing experiment of water cycle and energy balance in the Shandian river basin. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 25(4): 871-887
  46. 46.
    Zheng C L, Jia L, Hu G C and Lu J. 2019. Earth observations-based evapotranspiration in northeastern Thailand. Remote Sensing, 11(2): 138
  47. 47.
    Zheng C L, and Jia L. 2020. Global canopy rainfall interception loss derived from satellite earth observations. Ecohydrology, 13(2): e2186
  48. 48.
    Zheng C L, Hu G C, Chen Q T and Jia L. 2021. Impact of remote sensing soil moisture on the evapotranspiration estimation. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 25(4): 990-999
  49. 49.
    Zheng C L, Jia L and Hu G C. 2022. Global land surface evapotranspiration monitoring by ETMonitor model driven by multi-source satellite earth observations. Journal of Hydrology, 613: 128444

Читать полностью

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website