Anterior|Siguiente

Progress of measurement technology and application of general-angle Volume Scattering Function of water

  • role： First author第一作者
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Tropical Oceanography, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China

    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

  • Email：xuconghui16@mails.ucas.edu.cn
  • Introduction：徐聪辉，1993年生，男，硕士研究生，研究方向为海洋光学技术。E-mail：xuconghui16@mails.ucas.edu.cn
XU Conghui12,  
  • role： Corresponding author通信作者
  • Affiliation：

    State Key Laboratory of Tropical Oceanography, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China

  • Email：liclaire@scsio.ac.cn
  • Introduction：李彩，1977年生，女，研究员，研究方向为海洋光学及海洋环境监测技术。E-mail：liclaire@scsio.ac.cn
LI Cai1*

resumen

In ocean optics, a Volume Scattering Function (VSF) is a fundamental inherent optical property parameter that describes the angular distribution of light scattered from an incident beam, and has considerable significance in studying ocean color remote sensing, underwater light radiation transmission, water environment monitoring and protection, air–sea interaction, and submarine target tracking. Despite its fundamental nature, the variability of the VSF is rarely reported, especially from 0° to 180° (i.e., general angle). This condition is mainly due to the extreme difficulty of performing direct measurements of general-angle VSF. With more than 50 years of development, the measurement technique of general-angle VSF remains in its infancy and is still being explored and improved. This study summarizes the research progress of measurement technology and application of the general-angle VSF of water and discusses the development status quo and the tendency of measurement technology and its application of general-angle VSF of water. On the basis of the measuring principle, the measurement technology of VSF can be divided into " mechanical rotating measurement by a single detector,” " synchronous measurement by array detectors,” and " photographic measurement by a plane array Charge-coupled Device.” The first instruments dedicated to measuring the general-angle VSF of water samples were developed in 1950—1960 and were still used up to this day. The principle of these instruments was principally based on either a light detector or a light source rotating around the sample volume. The angular distribution of scattered light can be measured with the rotation of a single detector or light source (or prism replacing the detector). The angular resolution of these instruments can reach 0.3°, regardless of measurement speed and data synchronization, and these instruments cannot be used in situ. Since the early 1990 s, the second-generation general-angle VSF instruments were built because of the significant advances in the fields of oceanic, optical, and electronics technology. This type of general-angle VSF instruments (referred to as " in situ concept” instruments) uses an array of several detectors that are located in the same plane with a monochromatic light source, which completes a rapid full measurement of VSF within 10 ms, and the angular resolution of these instruments can reach 10°. Some researchers have proposed a new optical approach to measuring the general-angle VSF through image detection. This type of instruments (operates in a laboratory environment) uses a combination of two reflectors and a CCD camera without changing the detector sensitivity and without moving any optical part, thereby allowing the simultaneous measurement of VSF at various angles with a few seconds. The application of direct measurement technology and instrument of general-angle VSF has gradually expanded to the bio-optical model, bubble trace, remote sensing of ocean color, radiative transfer, and upper-ocean heat balance. In the future, the direct measurement technology of general-angle VSF will play an important role in applying oceanic optics and its related field with the increase in application requirements and progress of measurement technology and theoretical methods.

palabra clave

general-angle;Volume Scattering Function(VSF);measurement technique;ocean color remote sensing;water environment monitoring

References

  1. 1.
    Aas E. 1996. Refractive index of phytoplankton derived from its metabolite composition. Journal of Plankton Research, 18(12): 2223–2249
  2. 2.
    Agrawal Y C. 2005. The optical volume scattering function: temporal and vertical variability in the water column off the New Jersey coast. Limnology and Oceanography, 50(6): 1787–1794
  3. 3.
    Babin M, Stramski D, Reynolds R A, Wright V M and Leymarie E. 2012. Determination of the volume scattering function of aqueous particle suspensions with a laboratory multi-angle light scattering instrument. Applied Optics, 51(17): 3853–3873
  4. 4.
    Balch W M, Drapeau D T, Cucci T L, Vaillancourt R D, Kilpatrick K A and Fritz J J. 1999. Optical backscattering by calcifying algae: separating the contribution of particulate inorganic and organic carbon fractions. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104(C1): 1541–1558
  5. 5.
    Bohren C F and Huffman D R. 1983. Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles. New York: Wiley: 328
  6. 6.
    Boss E and Pegau W S. 2001. Relationship of light scattering at an angle in the backward direction to the backscattering coefficient. Applied Optics, 40(30): 5503–5507
  7. 7.
    Brice B A, Halwer M and Speiser R. 1950. Photoelectric light-scattering photometer for determining high molecular weights. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 40(11): 768–778
  8. 8.
    Chami M, Marken E, Stamnes J J, Khomenko G and Korotaev G. 2006a. Variability of the relationship between the particulate backscattering coefficient and the volume scattering function measured at fixed angles. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111(C5): C05013
  9. 9.
    Chami M, McKee D, Leymarie E and Khomenko G. 2006b. Influence of the angular shape of the volume-scattering function and multiple scattering on remote sensing reflectance. Applied Optics, 45(36): 9210–9220
  10. 10.
    Chami M, Shybanov E B, Churilova T Y, Khomenko G A, Lee M E G, Martynov O V, Berseneva G A and Korotaev G K. 2005. Optical properties of the particles in the Crimea coastal waters (Black Sea). Journal of Geophysical Research, 110(C11): C11020
  11. 11.
    Chami M, Thirouard A and Harmel T. 2014. POLVSM (Polarized Volume Scattering Meter) instrument: an innovative device to measure the directional and polarized scattering properties of hydrosols. Optics Express, 22(21): 26403–26428
  12. 12.
    Czerski H, Twardowski M, Zhang X and Vagle S. 2011. Resolving size distributions of bubbles with radii less than 30 μm with optical and acoustical methods. Journal of Geophysical Research, 116(C7): C00H11
  13. 13.
    Dana D R and Maffione R A. 2000. HydroBeta: a new instrument for measuring in-situ profiles of the volume scattering function from 10 to 170 degrees. Ocean Optics XV.
  14. 14.
    Dawson L H and Hulburt E O. 1941. Angular distribution of light scattered in liquids. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 31(8): 554–558
  15. 15.
    Duntley S Q. 1963. Light in the sea. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 53(2): 214–233
  16. 16.
    Effler S W, Peng F, O'Donnell D M and Strait C. 2013. The backscattering coefficient and its components in the Great Lakes: a review and synthesis. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 39(S1): 108–122
  17. 17.
    Gibbs R J. 1978. Light scattering from particles of different shapes. Journal of Geophysical Research, 83(C1): 501–502
  18. 18.
    Glazman R E. 1983. Effects of adsorbed films on gas bubble radial oscillations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 74(3): 980–986
  19. 19.
    Harmel T, Hieronymi M, Slade W, Röttgers R, Roullier F and Chami M. 2016. Laboratory experiments for inter-comparison of three volume scattering meters to measure angular scattering properties of hydrosols. Optics Express, 24(2): A234–A256
  20. 20.
    Hodkinson J. R 1962. Light scattering and extinction by irregular particles larger than the wavelength. Ices Electromagnetic Scattering. Postdam: Milton Kerer: 87–100
  21. 21.
    Hojerslev N. 1975. A spectral light absorption meter for measurements in the sea. Limnology and Oceanography, 20(6): 1024–1034
  22. 22.
    Huang C C, Li Y M, Sun D Y, Le C F and Jin X. 2011. Research of scattering spectrum characteristic and formative mechanism of Taihu lake waters. Acta Optica Sinica, 31(5): 0501003
  23. 23.
    Hubert L, Lubac B, Dessailly D, Duforet-Gaurier L and Vantrepotte V. 2010. Effect of inherent optical properties variability on the chlorophyll retrieval from ocean color remote sensing: an in situ approach. Optics Express, 18(20): 20949–20959
  24. 24.
    Hulburt E O. 1945. Optics of distilled and natural water. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 35(11): 698–705
  25. 25.
    Jerlov N G. 1961. Optical measurements in the eastern North Atlantic. (" Discovery II” expedition of August and September 1959). Meddelanden från Oceanografiska Institutet i Göteborg. 30. 22-32.
  26. 26.
    Kalenak D, Boss E and Effler S W. 2013. Inherent optical properties of suspended particulates in four temperate lakes: application of in situ spectroscopy. Hydrobiologia, 713(1): 127–148
  27. 27.
    Kullenberg G. 1968. Scattering of light by Sargasso Sea water. Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts, 15(4): 423–432
  28. 28.
    Kullenberg G. 1978a. light-scattering observations in frontal zones. Journal of Geophysical Research, 83(C9): 4683–4690
  29. 29.
    Kullenberg G. 1978b. Light scattering observations in the northwest African upwelling region. Deep Sea Research, 25(6): 525–542
  30. 30.
    Kullenberg G. 1984. Observations of light scattering functions in two oceanic areas. Deep Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers, 31(3): 295–316
  31. 31.
    Lee Z P, Carder K L and Arnone R A. 2002. Deriving inherent optical properties from water color: a multiband quasi-analytical algorithm for optically deep waters. Applied Optics, 41(27): 5755–5772
  32. 32.
    Li C, Cao W X and Yang Y Z. 2012a. Optical scattering property: spatial and angle variability in Daya Bay. Chinese Optics Letters, 10(S2): S20101
  33. 33.
    Li C, Cao W X, Yang Y Z and Xu Z T. 2015. The optical scattering property: spatial and angle variability in Northern South China Sea//Proceedings of SPIE 9449, The International Conference on Photonics and Optical Engineering. Xi'an, China: SPIE
  34. 34.
    Li C, Cao W X, Yu J, Ke T C, Lu G X, Yang Y Z and Guo C Y. 2012b. An instrument for In situ measuring the volume scattering function of water: design, calibration and primary experiments. Sensors, 12(4): 4514–4533
  35. 35.
    Li C, Ke T C, Cao W X, Lu G X, Yang Y Z and Guo C Y. 2004. An instrument for measuring in-situ profiles of the Volume Scattering Function of seawater//Proceedings of 2004 National Symposium on Optics and Photoelectronics, 2005 National Symposium on Optics and Photoelectronics, and the Collection of Papers at the 20th Anniversary of the Establishment of Guangxi Optical Society. Yantai: China ordnance Society, Optics Committee of China Military Engineering Society, Guangxi Society of Optics, Optical Technology Magazine
  36. 36.
    McLeroy-Etheridge S L and Roesler C S. 1998. Are the inherent optical properties of phytoplankton responsible for the distinct ocean colors observed during harmful algal blooms?. Ocean Optics: 14
  37. 37.
    Mobley C D, Sundman L K and Boss E. 2002. Phase function effects on oceanic light fields. Applied Optics, 41(6): 1035–1050
  38. 38.
    Morel A. 1991. Light and marine photosynthesis: a spectral model with geochemical and climatological implications. Progress in Oceanography, 26(3): 263–306
  39. 39.
    Oishi T. 1990. Significant relationship between the backward scattering coefficient of sea water and the scatterance at 120°. Applied Optics, 29(31): 4658–4665
  40. 40.
    Pak H, Ronald J, Zaneveld V and Beardsley Jr G F. 1971. Mie scattering by suspended clay particles. Journal of Geophysical Research, 76(21): 5065–5069
  41. 41.
    Park Y J and Ruddick K. 2005. Model of remote-sensing reflectance including bidirectional effects for case 1 and case 2 waters. Applied Optics, 44(7): 1236–1249
  42. 42.
    Petzold T J. 1972. Volume Scattering Functions for Selected Ocean Waters. San Diego: Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 1-30.
  43. 43.
    Rehm E and McCormick N J. 2011. Inherent optical property estimation in deep waters. Optics Express, 19(25): 24986–25005
  44. 44.
    Reuter R. 1980. Characterization of marine particle suspensions by light scattering II. Experimental results. Oceanologica Acta, 3(3): 325–332
  45. 45.
    Reynolds R A, Stramski D and Wright V M. 2006. Measurement of the volume scattering function using a multi-instrument approach. Applied Optics, 36: 6057–6067
  46. 46.
    Ronald J, Zaneveld V, Twardowski M S, Shifrin K S, Pegau W S, Boss E and Zolotov I. 2002. Inversion of light scattering measurements to obtain biogeochemical parameters. Ocean Optics XVI, 1-19
  47. 47.
    Slade W H, Agrawal Y C and Mikkelsen O A. 2013. Comparison of measured and theoretical scattering and polarization properties of narrow size range irregular sediment particles//Proceedings of 2013 Oceans - San Diego. San Diego, USA: IEEE
  48. 48.
    Smith R C and Baker K S. 1982. Oceanic chlorophyll concentrations as determined by satellite (nimbus-7 coastal zone color scanner). Marine Biology, 66(3): 269–279
  49. 49.
    Spilhaus Jr A F. 1968. Observations of light scattering in seawater. Limnology and Oceanography, 13(3): 418–422
  50. 50.
    Stramski D, Bricaud A and Morel A. 2001. Modeling the inherent optical properties of the ocean based on the detailed composition of the planktonic community. Applied Optics, 40(18): 2929–2945
  51. 51.
    Sugihara S and Tsuda R. 1979. Light scattering and size distribution of particles in the surface waters of the North Pacific Ocean. Journal of the Oceanographical Society of Japan, 35(2): 82–90
  52. 52.
    Sullivan J M and Twardowski M S. 2009. Angular shape of the oceanic particulate volume scattering function in the backward direction. Applied Optics, 48(35): 6811–6819
  53. 53.
    Sun D Y, Li Y M, Wang Q, Le C F, Huang C C and Wu L. 2008. The scattering characteristics of Lake Taihu waters. Journal of Lake Sciences, 20(3): 389–395
  54. 54.
    Tan H, Doerffer R, Oishi T and Tanaka A. 2013. A new approach to measure the volume scattering function. Optics Express, 21(16): 18697–18711
  55. 55.
    Tan H, Oishi T, Tanaka A and Doerffer R. 2015. Accurate estimation of the backscattering coefficient by light scattering at two backward angles. Applied Optics, 54(25): 7718–7733
  56. 56.
    Turquois T and Gloria H. 2000. Determination of the absolute molecular weight averages and molecular weight distributions of alginates used as ice cream stabilizers by using multiangle laser light scattering measurements. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 48(11): 5455–5458
  57. 57.
    Twardowski M, Zhang X D, Vagle S, Sullivan J, Freeman S, Czerski H, You Y, Bi L and Kattawar G. 2012. The optical volume scattering function in a surf zone inverted to derive sediment and bubble particle subpopulations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 117(C7): C00H17
  58. 58.
    Twardowski M S, Boss E, Macdonald J B, Pegau W S, Barnard A H, and Zaneveld J R V. 2001. A model for estimating bulk refractive index from the optical backscattering ratio and the implications for understanding particle composition in case I and case II waters. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106(C7): 14129–14142
  59. 59.
    Tyler J E. 1961a. Measurement of the scattering properties of hydrosols. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 51(11): 1289–1293
  60. 60.
    Tyler J E. 1961b. Scattering properties of distilled and natural waters. Limnology and Oceanography, 6(4): 451–456
  61. 61.
    Tyler J E and Austin R W. 1964. Scattering meter for deep water. Applied Optics, 3(5): 613–620
  62. 62.
    Tyler J E and Richardson W H. 1958. Nephelometer for the measurement of volume scattering function In situ. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 48(5): 354–357
  63. 63.
    Volten H, de Haan J F, Hovenier J W, Schreurs R, Vassen W, Dekker A G, Hoogenboom H J, Charlton F and Wouts R. 1998. Laboratory measurements of angular distributions of light scattered by phytoplankton and silt. Limnology and Oceanography, 43(6): 1180–1197
  64. 64.
    Whitlock C H, Poole L R, Usry J W, Houghton W M, Witte W G, Morris W D and Gurganus E A. 1981. Comparison of reflectance with backscatter and absorption parameters for turbid waters. Applied Optics, 20(3): 517–522
  65. 65.
    Wyatt P J. 1993. Light scattering and the absolute characterization of macromolecules. Analytica Chimica Acta, 272(1): 1–40
  66. 66.
    Wyatt P J. 1997. Multiangle light scattering: the basic tool for macromolecular characterization. Instrumentation Science and Technology, 25(1): 1–18
  67. 67.
    Wyatt P J. 1998. Submicrometer particle sizing by multiangle light scattering following fractionation. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 197(1): 9–20
  68. 68.
    Zhang X D, Lewis M, Lee M, Johnson B and Korotaev G. 2002. The volume scattering function of natural bubble populations. Limnology and Oceanography, 47(5): 1273–1282
  69. 69.
    Zhang X D, Twardowski M and Lewis M. 2011. Retrieving composition and sizes of oceanic particle subpopulations from the volume scattering function. Applied Optics, 50(9): 1240–1259
  70. 70.
    Zhou W, Wang G F, Sun Z H, Cao W X, Xu Z T, Hu S B and Zhao J. 2012. Variations in the optical scattering properties of phytoplankton cultures. Optics Express, 20(10): 11189–11206

Leer el texto completo

The above content is generated by Large Model Translation. The translated content is for reference only. We do not assume any commercial or legal responsibilty for any consequences arising from the use of our website